"Filming an interesting announcement in Zurich, Switzerland"

[Anonymous No.17265968]

What did Jimmy mean by this?

[Anonymous No.17265988]

https://coingeekconference.com/agenda/

[Anonymous No.17265992]

>>17265968
sony integration

[Anonymous No.17266104]

>>17265968
wasn't that last year?

[Anonymous No.17266139]

>>17266104
Yes in October.
They're bringing former IMF director Thomas Moser (works at Swiss central bank) to speak. Related?

[Anonymous No.17266142]

[Anonymous No.17266168]

>>17266142
not sure what you thinking but im thinking based

[Anonymous No.17266194]

>>17265968
all they do is announce announcements and every single brainlet falls for it

[Anonymous No.17266256]

"We are proud to announce that the Swiss National Bank will be utilizing the platform Bitcoin SV provides for their central bank digital currency infrastructure and financial systems."

BOOM!!!!!!
$2200 IN MARCH

[Anonymous No.17266715]

>>17266194
this, back to sleep, it's nothing

[Anonymous No.17266758]

>>17266256
"Sorry Jimmy, we can't have anything to do with a coin run by offshore gambling drunk that hides in the islands...."
"...by the way do you have the payment for my speaking fee ready?"

[Anonymous No.17266830]

Jimmy Wales btfos all the BSV shysters

[Anonymous No.17266922]

>>17266830
https://coingeek.com/updated-statement-about-jimmy-wales-appearance-at-coingeek-london-2020/

>Therefore, Wales would like to clarify the following: “Last week, I published tweets which referenced Bitcoin SV as having no value or use to Wikipedia. Those social media posts reflect my opinion about cryptocurrencies and blockchains generally not having value to Wikipedia, and is not an opinion I hold uniquely about BSV.”

[Anonymous No.17266943]

>>17266922
>wikipedo doesnt want a transparent immutuable database
wew

[Anonymous No.17266961]

>>17266943
kek, didn't even think it from that perspective, jimmy is a retard

[Anonymous No.17267349]

>>17266943
it's more like he has zero faith in that a blockchain full of unverifiable garbage like sv brings any sort of value to the table.

[Anonymous No.17267382]

>>17266961
did you? i mean just think about how wikipedia works... do you think their biggest issue is disappearing records of modifications or abuse?

[Anonymous No.17267402]

>>17267382
yes

[Anonymous No.17267432]

>>17267402
well it's not. i have actually used the site records of modifications don't disappear. doesn't mean it's not full of unverifiable garbage and biased censorship. just because you track these they are not going away.