No Linkers check in

[Anonymous No.17259029]

Proud no-linker. Anyone else out there not following the crowd?

[Anonymous No.17259038]

>look at me, I’m a retard

[Anonymous No.17259047]

yea honestly I couldn't care less about chainlink

[Anonymous No.17259049]

wew they will call me a faggot, if I share why I am not all in, even if i knew about it from it's inception

[Anonymous No.17259053]

>>17259029
Nah. I was like you for years, a proud retard. Then I swallowed my pride and bought a fat stacklet at $2.80 like a week or two ago. I am up a shitton.

[Anonymous No.17259054]

>>17259029
What is there to be proud about

[Anonymous No.17259070]

>>17259053
Were the guy buying 1200 link at time?

[Anonymous No.17259075]

>>17259038
this desu

[Anonymous No.17259086]

>>17259070
Maybe. I was on kraken

[Anonymous No.17259087]

>>17259029
>Proud no-linker

lawl. dont you no linkers have like the precious metals general thread you can play with your judas silver coins in


seriously if you are constantly on this board and dont have at least 100 link by this stage just for the memes then something is very wrong with you

[Anonymous No.17259088]

>>17259029
No linker here. I'm investing in Cardano and feeling very comfy atm

[Anonymous No.17259091]

>>17259029
Yes. Chainlink has no adoption and a tenuous use-case. I've got my money in XRP, which has actual, demonstrable adoption.

[Anonymous No.17259094]

>>17259029
I missed the ico because it was going on as the entire market was crashing and i thought no way i'd be putting money into this ponzi scheme again. Subsequently cashed out the gains i made.
I think now its too late to make it with link, sure it may have a x3 or x5 in it but making it to me is a x100. I had my chance witu unibright last month and i missed.
Not gonna miss PNK tho

[Anonymous No.17259111]

>>17259029
No linker here. I like staying poor so am all in XRP and Unibright rn. We're all based ITT, amirite guise?

[Anonymous No.17259129]

>>17259087
ICX and ALGO are going to hit $2 sooner than LINK hits $20 so why I would hold LINK? I'm in for the money not memes.

[Anonymous No.17259145]

Going to be glorious when this shit tanks for good

[Anonymous No.17259148]

>>17259029
what coins are you in then? this is the #1 gainer of the past 2 years

[Anonymous No.17259152]

>>17259129
Chainstink? Not a hope in hell. All in bsv. Don’t like it? STIFF

[Anonymous No.17259154]

>>17259129
This person will stay poor. The next Antshares is Antshares

[Anonymous No.17259156]

Sold the ICO too early and never bought back in. I sitll think that the valuation is only so high due to the lack of proper competition and that the market of decentralized oracles will be quite saturated in the long term. I also don't see why the token can't be abstracted out and being replaced by the native token of the blockchain the oracle is serving.
That being said, it's doing an impressive run and the team indeed seems to be very well connected, and in the end it will benefit the entire ecosystem when they are successful.

[Anonymous No.17259159]

>>17259152
This guy gets it.

[Anonymous No.17259166]

I sold at $4.50 and doubled my stack in the last 6 months.

Just sold half, again.

If It goes to $50, great. If not, I'll be 50x'ing my compounded gains off UND soon anyway.

[Anonymous No.17259170]

>>17259029
Poor fag thread.

[Anonymous No.17259177]

>>17259029
am broke with no coins, how do I rapidly gain capital to take advantage?
should I sell drugs or something?

[Anonymous No.17259184]

>>17259170
yeeee

[Anonymous No.17259192]

>>17259029
You're following the 99.999% of the world population that are no-linkers.

[Anonymous No.17259208]

>>17259177
Sell your Apple products.

[Anonymous No.17259302]

Is band realistic competition or just a poor copy?

[Anonymous No.17259333]

>>17259087
Not owning physical metals and link.
>ngtmi

[Anonymous No.17259349]

>>17259029
as per >>17255503

chainlink is le scam

[Anonymous No.17259374]

>>17259208
all I have is a 2010 MBP that doesn't boot lol

[Anonymous No.17259384]

>>17259038
fpbp

[Anonymous No.17259415]

You faggots are retarded.

If you think Chainlink is not a scam and current price/market cap matters.

Verge was once close to being a top 10 coin. Let that sink in.

Link will be 0.50 next year.

[Anonymous No.17259578]

>>17259415
Link is not a scam. That being said the market is volatile and everything is possible so you might as well be right

[Anonymous No.17259607]

>>17259029
please write a weekly blogpost

[Anonymous No.17259619]

>>17259029
No linker reporting. Feel pretty sick these days not going to lie

[Anonymous No.17259622]

>>17259156
>I also don't see why the token can't be abstracted out and being replaced by the native token of the blockchain the oracle is serving.
It’s the year 2020 and people are still repeating this

[Anonymous No.17259683]

Kinda funny how it goes up right after they introduce leveraged trading.

[Anonymous No.17259691]

>>17259029
The real crowd has never heard of it

[Anonymous No.17259709]

>>17259088
Poor soul... trade whatever you can for ETH and LINK. Don't trust Hoskinson.

[Anonymous No.17259718]

I'm a PNKer.

[Anonymous No.17259720]

>>17259192
If the return from staking is so great, why doesn't chainlink just hodl all the link themselves and act as a network provider like Visa or Mastercard?

[Anonymous No.17259785]

>>17259720
>if a company is profitable why would it go public and not keep all the profit for themselves????

[Anonymous No.17259820]

>>17259029
Yup im here. Never buying this shitty project scam token lmfao

[Anonymous No.17259846]

>>17259156
Massive cope

[Anonymous No.17259861]

>>17259415
>comparing a Dogecoin fork to the network Sergey and co have built

lmao at ur life kid

[Anonymous No.17259866]

>>17259820
Stay poor kiddo

[Anonymous No.17259878]

>>17259720
You should be sterilized

[Anonymous No.17260529]

Most people don’t own link, you ARE following the crowd you fucking dumplings.

[Anonymous No.17260674]

no because I like money

[Anonymous No.17260851]

>>17259038
lmao

[Anonymous No.17260890]

>>17259029
I don't but I don't take pride in the fact. If you bought at 1.70 and sold at 4.50 you would have made a tidy profit. many did. what other token consistently performs like this? I dunno about 1000 EOY but I'm picking some up when it dips again.

[Anonymous No.17260891]

>>17259029
You are delusional

[Anonymous No.17261213]

>>17259087
This. Especially since, as ludicrous as it may sound, a hundred LINK could be a make it stack.
I think those people are larping, nobody is both on 4chan and impaired in the memetic department.

Ah well maybe they're redditors trying to be special by being contrarians

[Anonymous No.17261279]

>>17259029
Following the crowd is literally not buying link, idiot.

[Anonymous No.17261734]

>>17259029
>i hate making money
suit yourself

[Anonymous No.17261771]

>>17259038
fpbp

[Anonymous No.17261779]

>>17259029
>heh, glad I didn't fall for that scam

[Anonymous No.17261849]

>>17259091
IDGAF about LINK but fuck your faschcoin.

[Anonymous No.17261873]

>>17259177
Get a job

[Anonymous No.17261903]

>>17259029
Linklet checking in. I regret not buying but I put all of my 500k brokerage account into ishares IT index. Did 42% last year with an expense ratio of 0.05. shits insane.


Although I am proud of you link Marines. 24/7 pajeet sponsored FUD and you held through it all. Takes grit.

[Anonymous No.17261990]

>>17259029
Been on /biz/ since '17 I'm a proud nolinker. This coin is appears to be scam to the initiated.
Linkies will argue, but hey, scams make money, till they don't.

[Anonymous No.17262004]

>>17259177
get some kneepads

[Anonymous No.17262457]

>>17259029
Me. Haha jk I love money and made over $80k on LINK in the past month. Keep sticking it to the man tho OP.

[Anonymous No.17262462]

>>17259861
>Sergey and co
Cringe. Sergey is a Russian nobody.

[Anonymous No.17262491]

>>17259091
Do you get on your knees and smile when they print massive amounts of XRP from thin air and dump it on your face? Kek imagine being proud of holding a centralized Jew coin.

[Anonymous No.17262739]

>>17259029
it's the same scam as xrp or iota, absolutely worthless token propelled by marketing.
Don't worry about it though. Next to zero link holders are going to make money for the same reason iota and xrp holders won't, they are waiting for non-speculative money from future adoption, not realizing the token design makes that impossible. Possibly they are even still buying more.

[Anonymous No.17263497]

>>17259029
>No linker
>Not the crowd
Pick one

[Anonymous No.17263516]

>>17259029
> 99.999% of the population are nolinkers
> not following the crowd
kek

[Anonymous No.17263597]

>>17259156
This is a classic example of a person who hasn't done proper research.

One of the guiding principles of Ethereum is a "no features" approach: https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/design-rationale

As for competition: they are so far ahead at this point that at the very least they will be dominant in the market for the foreseeable future.

[Anonymous No.17263759]

>>17263597
What market? The oracle market is not worth anything. Everyone is just going to choose the cheapest data provider, driving prices to the ground.
The single most used oracle is the makerdao oracle, all chainlink has is partial use by synthetix.

[Anonymous No.17263855]

>>17263759
Well sure because it's being built out. They're building a network of oracles.
All oracles/data providers are going to join it because there is no reason for them not to. Chainlink does not compete with them.

https://twitter.com/nanexcool/status/1181510086042079249

[Anonymous No.17263911]

>>17259029
>proud of being retarded: the thread

[Anonymous No.17263945]

>>17263855
Ok? Literally the only thing chainlink does is force the use of their token for payments. Which means the exact same service is going to be more expensive than elsewhere.

[Anonymous No.17263961]

>>17259156
>I sold the token but....
>lists all the reasons why you shouldn't have

fucking state

[Anonymous No.17263969]

>>17259091
Now imagine when companies admit they are using chain link. Don’t be fooled by the “no use case” meme

[Anonymous No.17263974]

>>17259029
why do you hate money? serious question

[Anonymous No.17263976]

No linker checking in, fuck this pyramid scheme
Tokenomics don’t work. Obviously whale manipulation. Going to be funny as hell when this tower comes tumbling down

[Anonymous No.17264223]

Can we please get some clean up from the jannies the link tards are shitting everywhere .

[Anonymous No.17264225]

>>17263945
Why is it going to be more expensive than through in-house oracles? It's going to be cheaper as most data will be provided to multiple parties.
Furthermore, clearly contract architects are going to prefer a network that has a far greater degree of decentralisation and has layers of security.
>what is a network

[Anonymous No.17264265]

>>17259029
Well well, guess this thread has aged poorly.

[Anonymous No.17264297]

>>17263976
>Going to be funny as hell when this tower comes tumbling down
Given how durable xrp is I wouldn't count on it happening any day soon.
Sergey cloned Ripple's token model. Xrp locked for nostro accounts = link locked by nodes. It's not a source of value in both cases, but it was a smart move - as Ripple proved many people think it is.

Also why is tsla so fucking overvalued?
It's going to take years before things make sense anymore.
>>17264225
Because nobody has link in the first place, they have either eth or some stablecoin, and you have to exchange that to link in the request transaction, incurring a 0.3% fee.
>a far greater degree of decentralisation
it doesn't have any. You can either trust chainlink and choose their kyced nodes (full centralization) or choose nodes manually. If you choose nodes manually, what's the added value of chainlink? You can as well choose nodes elsewhere if they are cheaper.

[Anonymous No.17264448]

>>17264297
I think you really just need to zoom out and look at the big picture. Most of the future market isn't going to have ETH, DAI or LINK. They're going to buy with USD.
As for KYCed nodes being centralised - do you really believe that? Many of the entities providing this data are validators across multiple networks, providing incorrect data would imperil their entire business.
Chainlink is ultimately a security question and they have essentially reframed the decentralisation paradigm: how much decentralisation do you need? Who do you need it from?

[Anonymous No.17264488]

>>17264448
ultimately a security company*
Lastly, Chainlink are moving away from the certification. Third party Certification and Reputation systems have been and are being built currently. These will be "layered" to provide additional surety for contract creators.

[Anonymous No.17264553]

>>17264448
>They're going to buy with USD
usd stablecoins.
>Many of the entities providing this data are validators across multiple networks, providing incorrect data would imperil their entire business.
That's equivalent to manual selection - no advantage from chainlink.

[Anonymous No.17264831]

>>17264553
Other than the ability to scale through the network and the additional layers of security that are being built out.

[Anonymous No.17265184]

>>17259720
>Why does any company sell any stocks ever? They can just hodl and...

[Anonymous No.17265204]

>>17259029

[Anonymous No.17265935]

Bump

[Anonymous No.17266648]

*AHEM*

>ROI: 2,774,14% (In less than 3 years)
>Market rank: #14 (Was talked to death here since before it even was in the top 100)
>ATH just broken
>We're going FUNDAMENTALLY VERTICAL

No amount of cope will make you forget what you've missed.

You missed BTC
You missed LTC
You missed ETH
You are about to miss LINK.

[Anonymous No.17266661]

>>17259038
fpbp, fucking kek

[Anonymous No.17266995]

>>17259029
No-linker here
Have never understood the hype for this useless shitcoin. There is not even any money to be made anymore with the massively over-inflated valuation

[Anonymous No.17267000]

Han last di

[Anonymous No.17267060]

If I’d is k79YrDgI then link to 1k and pink to 100 dollars

[Anonymous No.17267076]

>>17261990
>>17262739
This, who the fuck is going to buy your bags of shit? Maybe 10% of holders will get out in time and the rest will hold the bags to zero

[Anonymous No.17267075]

>>17267060
Disregard

[Anonymous No.17267100]

If ID is kIFy3Pyd link to 1k and pnk to 100 dollars

[Anonymous No.17267112]

[Anonymous No.17267113]

>>17259029
So brave, OP. We need more people like you in the world.

[Anon No.17267133]

link is garbage

[Anonymous No.17267198]

>>17259029
Proud nulinker

[Anonymous No.17267206]

>>17267100
How is that possible sir

[Anonymous No.17267223]

>>17259029
i had 10k chainlink, sold most at $1

now i have 1k chainlink

i consider myself a no linkfer

i feel pretty bad for not having a bigger position in LINK

[Anonymous No.17267247]

chainlink is a scam

[Anon No.17267276]

Link is worthless, let me explain; link is supposed to support cross chain oracles. yet not a single implementation allows from cross chain entropy. Even more so, the implementation of smart contracts on 99% of chains is a joke and does not pass security standards. Zero auditing. Now sure truffle this blah blah, but truffle is built on ETH and may move to tezos but in the immediate time frame not happening. Most smart contracts with be hacked screen cap this

[Anonymous No.17267304]

>>17259029
reminder that incels subhumans do not belong on tha yacht.

[Anonymous No.17267365]

>>17267223
jfc

[Anonymous No.17267576]

>>17259192
*checks numbers*
69121 wallets with 1 or more link
7.8B people.

Yup, checks out alright.
We're so early.

[Anonymous No.17268226]

>>17259029
>proud for being retarded

[Anonymous No.17268244]

I sold but only with the intention of buying back in later. Filthy swing linker I may be but I still know LINK will be the best performing crypto asset at least for the net 3 years if not more