It’s Happening BUY AS MUCH AS YOU CAN

[Anonymous No.17253098]

https://medium.com/offchainlabs/scalable-low-cost-computation-of-ethereum-smart-contracts-using-arbitrum-on-the-chainlink-8985c6542d4e

[Anonymous No.17253116]

>>17253098
How the whole rest of the board isn't losing their shit i dont know
i am
its happening

[Anonymous No.17253136]

>>17253098
I’m autistic what does this mean

[Anonymous No.17253137]

>>17253098
op just fucking opens /biz starts typing with his eyes closed

[Anonymous No.17253147]

>>17253116
we don't read therefore we are not selling.

[Anonymous No.17253163]

>>17253147
I don't even know my pkey, sad I barely got past a suicide stack

[Anonymous No.17253173]

>>17253136
link expand dong

[Anonymous No.17253180]

Another literal who. Who gives a fuck

[Anonymous No.17253189]

>>17253173
>+2.4cm has been added to your buduu for this post king

[Anonymous No.17253194]

>>17253098
DN;NS

[Anonymous No.17253238]

>>17253147
this. i dont read, and i don't fucking sell.
simple as.

[Anonymous No.17253247]

it means chainstink is paying shit startups with their premined link to use chainstink

[Anonymous No.17253263]

>>17253247
dr;ns

filtered

[Anonymous No.17253337]

>>17253147
Holy fucking kek

[Anonymous No.17253354]

>>17253098
Yeah it's cool but how is arbitum different from any other L2 scaling thing that has so far had negligible impact? Like Loom, or raiden, or any of the other examples

[Anonymous No.17253383]

>shitcoin partners with another shitcoin
W O W
O
W

[Anonymous No.17253395]

>>17253354
THEY ARE LITERALLY ONBOARDING CORPORATE PROJECTS RIGHT NOW
THE SHIT WORKS AND IS MADE TO THE SPECS OF THE PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO MAKE BILLIONS OFF THIS NETWORK

[Anonymous No.17253441]

Imagine trying to slide this news with flags threads. Link volume is $400m what possible effect could you hope to have.

[Anonymous No.17253461]

>>17253395
What, you mean the Oracle announcement? I don't think that implies they'll use arbitum + chainlink, and that is also planned for q3. Anything could happen>>17253395

[Anonymous No.17253499]

All FUDERS are PAJEET VIRGIN FAGGOTS! IM A CHAD LINKHOLDER I WILL LITERALLY BUY ANOTHER 1000 AT ATH DO NOT TEMPT ME

[Anonymous No.17253575]

>>17253147
Incredibly based

[Anonymous No.17253588]

>>17253147
didn't read but based

[Anonymous No.17253598]

>Not dumping all your Chainlink tokens to buy Witnet
You guys are never going to make it

[Anonymous No.17253604]

>>17253098
>arbitrum
so it's customizable scalable off chain computation that has high security guarantees, you only need one honest node for correct contract execution, that makes no fucking sense can someone explain?

[Anonymous No.17253645]

>>17253604
A challenge based proof system where you put up stake and provide a proof of your claim. Someone else can then counter with a claim and more stake. It basically reverse engineers the merkle tree based on the proofs

[Anonymous No.17253668]

I am never buying your shit glorified JSON parser fuck off

[Anonymous No.17253687]

>>17253645
I fail to see the resemblance to a merkle tree

[Anonymous No.17253745]

>>17253645
i get the first part, i don't see how it's related to a merkle tree though, isn't a merkle tree a tool to reduce data storage requirements by storing a hash of a bunch of subhashes?

[Anonymous No.17253758]

>The Chainlink integration will also help existing Arbitrum users. For example, if a project launches an Arbitrum rollup chain, but doesn’t have access to jreputable nodes, they can outsource validation to Chainlink nodes. Chainlink already has one of the largest collections of security-reviewed, Sybil-resistant, and fully independent node operators, which can serve as the validators for any Arbitrum computation, and scale to secure increasingly greater value over time.
We're all gonna make it.

[Anonymous No.17253761]

>>17253745
“How Arbitrum Rollup works” by Ed Felten https://link.medium.com/xdNdH7BA53

[Anonymous No.17253765]

>>17253098
>medium sharticle
>BUY NOW SIRS
Shoo shoo Rajesh.

[Anonymous No.17253785]

>>17253761
thx bru

[Anonymous No.17253787]

>>17253745
I think it's because the chainlink nodes submit their proofs to an on chain validator. This has same structure like a parent node taking a hash of its leaf node's hashes

[Anonymous No.17253792]

Based!

[Anonymous No.17253841]

>>17253098
am i the only one who no longer understands any of this new chainlink shit but still holds on for dear life anyway? I was totally down with the decentralized oracles and all that shit but this article made my brain melt and eyes glaze over

[Anonymous No.17253863]

>>17253841
basically they're using chainlink nodes are going to run smart contracts offchain because its faster and cheaper
somehow magically this wont break

[Anonymous No.17253885]

Not clicking, not reading and definitely not selling
Kys

[Anonymous No.17253910]

>>17253863
Me no understand. So node operators are running the smartcontract and not just providing data?

[Anonymous No.17253925]

>>17253761
>>17253787
ok i get it a little better, they cut the code in half, compute a hash of the contract state after that half executes, and if the challenger thinks the hash is wrong, the cutting in half continues until there is literally only one step of code to be hashed, and at that point the asserter provides a "one step proof" (whatever the fuck that is LOL) of the correctness of the hash or doesn't, the loser between challenger and asserter gives half their stake to the winner and the other half is burned, that is actually really cool wtf

[Anonymous No.17253931]

>>17253910
yeah basically

[Anonymous No.17253963]

>>17253841
I haven't touched crypto in like 2 years but all I know is I have a LINK stack and I'm not fucking selling.

[Anonymous No.17253976]

>>17253910
arbitrum is using chainlink for two reasons: 1) because chainlink nodes are already security audited an sybil resistant so they're a set of trustworthy nodes to use for arbitrum's protocol and 2) the usual reasons: chainlink can use its decentralized oracle network to push data on/off chain for arbitrum with minimal trust required

[Anonymous No.17253990]

>>17253499
>lad Id
>dubs
The absolute madman don’t make this lad do it

[Anonymous No.17253991]

>>17253841
Basically, ethereum network is not ready to scale but Sergey is trying to pump these smart contracts. So, some shit will be handled off chain until ETH 2.0

[Anonymous No.17254126]

>>17253147
This. Never selling.

[Anonymous No.17254166]

Do you guys think /biz/ will be studied in the distant future like some ancient scripts. If so fuck niggers and kikes. We are all going to make it

[Anonymous No.17254200]

>>17254166
She wants 500$ a month in rent and I have 10,000 LINK and negative 220$ in my checking account. I showed the dumb bitch where Link's price is right now and she knew where it was before. She's at her wits end with me and I told her to just give it 3 more months, but she isnt having it. She took away my XBOX too and I'm in South Dakota where there is nothing else to do but play Halo 3. Shes telling me to go work in an oil field but I dont want to be killed when we are so close to the singularity. Any South Dakota LinkMarines I can stay with for the summer? I'll give you 50 link a month. Or should I just hit the fat bitch over the head with a frying pan

[Anonymous No.17254206]

>>17254166
Checked. What will they think of our gods zyzz and kek?

[Anonymous No.17254214]

>>17253761
This is big, however:

>At this point you might be worried that the tree of possibilities can get very large and branch-y. That’s not likely to happen in practice, because it would require multiple parties to stake on outcomes that are mutually inconsistent.

I hope they're not ignoring the fact that this may happen, because I think it definitely does and can greatly increase the complexity & runtime characteristics of a system like this.

[Anonymous No.17254246]

>>17254166
>numbers
Yes, based.

[Anonymous No.17254273]

>>17254166
oop oop eep eep

[Anonymous No.17254287]

>>17253136
read the article and you will

[Anonymous No.17254397]

>>17254206
My way of thinking has changed after browsing and buying link. I now really believe in animism and spirituality. Whenever i see frog figures i always pet them and send them a message in my head. Just this Wednesday I bought my first first frog figure. I've been browsing biz early summer 2019 but never bought link. When i went to vacation in PV i thought the turtle was a cool souvenir. The art form is calle huichol and they all have their own symbol. The lady told me that the symbol of the peyote was the symbol for health and success. That inclined me to purchase it. I believe i subconsciously chose it at the time because of the link symbolship. Kek is real and digists hold truth

[Anonymous No.17254419]

>>17253991
Even when ETH scales, it will never be a computation engine. It will be settlement layer and court system if you will as a last resort arbitrator, which is still quite valuable and is synchronistic with Chainlink being the off chain power house

[Anonymous No.17254554]

>>17253598
kek I ‘member

[Anonymous No.17254696]

>>17254397
You are a MANIAC!

[Anonymous No.17254741]

>>17253098
>Co-founder, Offchain Labs. Kahn Professor of Computer Science and Public Affairs at Princeton. Former Deputy U.S. CTO at White House.
Literal who

[Anonymous No.17254751]

10kEOY

[Anonymous No.17254762]

>>17253098
Will LINK ever be sub$4 again? I wanna buy 1000 more but I don't wanna get fucked on a small dip.

[Anonymous No.17254811]

>>17253147
Jesus loves you, you based anon you

[Anonymous No.17254822]

>>17253098
Fresh meme!

[Anonymous No.17255033]

>>17254696
(((they))) do not want you to access your powerful mind

[Anonymous No.17255120]

>>17253841
Basically by this time next year you and your kin will never have to work ever again. I’m so excited for you.

[Anonymous No.17255167]

>>17253116
its 90% pajeets, 5% chainlink holders, and the other 5% are just retards(reddit)

[Anonymous No.17256318]

>>17253147
How can one anon achieve such basedness?

[Anonymous No.17256339]

>>17253098
I refuse to believe that there are people not holding link on this board, holy shit they are stupid if not.

[Anonymous No.17256343]

>>17253098
Arbi-who? Sounds like hopium tbqh

[Anonymous No.17256352]

I'm getting fed up to my neck with the do gooders thinking that they're doing good by spoon feeding the nubs. Quit it let them fend for themselves

[Anonymous No.17256386]

How is it different from the threshold signatures Coventry Is doing

[Anonymous No.17256470]

>>17253098
>-using-arbitrum-on-the-chainlink
what is arbitrum?
I don't open links on here sorry op

[Anonymous No.17256500]

>>17256386
Very complimentary

[Anonymous No.17256549]

>>17253147
Based APE

[Anonymous No.17256552]

>>17256500
Seems more redundant than complimentary besides the fact that arbitrum just beat them to launch and could also be implemented by competitors, can you spoon feed more

[Anonymous No.17256749]

>>17253147
based post of the week

>>17253098
Already crawling my way up to the next 1k LINK stack since the beginning of the bullrun. And always remember lads: Only invest as much as you can afford to lose. It's crucial for staying in the game.

[Anonymous No.17256795]

Cheap decentralization mixed with cheap offchain computation... you just win. T sigs is for data, arbitrum is for computation. Nice try

[Anonymous No.17257387]

Someone give me the lowdown on how important this is? The team looks impressive but I can't decipher if this is another lame partnership that means nothing or another critical piece for the CL ecosystem.

Too many jews for me lads.

[Anonymous No.17257395]

>>17257387
Forget about the fundamentals. It's a cult, you dip.

[Anonymous No.17257436]

>>17253098
I have 20k LINK on coinbase. If chainlink hits $1000 on coinbase will the withdrawal limits or fees cause a problem?

[Anonymous No.17257450]

>>17257395
Can confirm.

[Anonymous No.17257476]

>>17257436
Why bother with coinbase when there's Kraken?

[Anonymous No.17257946]

>>17253147
Based

[Anonymous No.17258140]

>>17253147
based, I confirm
holding since pre-SIBOS and not reading since SIBOS

[Anonymous No.17258209]

>>17257476
Does kraken not have withdrawal limits?

[Anonymous No.17258275]

>>17253098
literally dumping

[Anonymous No.17258300]

>>17253098
literally who

[Anonymous No.17258743]

>>17254397
What if we are all part of God, living all lives in this existence as well as being all things in this existence. You experience this when you dream, in that dream existence everything there comes from you.

[Anonymous No.17259172]

is this shit done? any idea when it is going to be released and we will have scalling on eth?

[Anonymous No.17259839]

>>17254166
Remember that Kek worshipping and fighting the Merchant began literally thousands of years ago.
The eternal struggle