/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.17236830]

THE PRESENTATION PICS WERE REAL
https://events.rainfocus.com/widget/oracle/owlonglobal2020/cataloglondonow20?search=LHT1056-

[Anonymous No.17236847]

>>17236830
fake

[Anonymous No.17236853]

>>17236830
Oracle and their favela fatass can fuck right off.

[Anonymous No.17236854]

yes yes old news & priced in

[Anonymous No.17236873]

>>17236854
>old news
This is absolute brand-spanking new you retard.

Yesterday we had pics snapped by a literal who startup, today we have actual confirmation.

[Anonymous No.17236884]

>>17236853
>the second-largest software company in the world by revenue and market cap can fuck right off

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

FUCKING COPE YOU TRANNY

[Anonymous No.17236901]

>>17236873
you see that price dump? priced in you tranny

[Anonymous No.17236905]

>>17236901
>people sold the rumor
>this is a bad thing

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.17236938]

priced in

[Anonymous No.17236953]

>>17236830
Post the real picture shill fag

[Anonymous No.17236958]

>3.94$

[Anonymous No.17236987]

>>17236953
you got me bro

[Anonymous No.17237032]

>>17236953
haha GOTEM, stinkshitpisscunts will NEVER, NEVER EVER. and i mean this /biz/, they will NEVER FUCKING RECOVER EVER AGAIN. fucking CHAINLINK IS A SCAM. FAT FUCKING FRAUD sirGaylord

[Anonymous No.17237044]

>>17237032
HAHAHA fucking this HAHAHAH eat shit fucking stinkers incessant insect shitcunts BTFO

[Anonymous No.17237056]

So is this new news? What is happening? I'm retarded and confused but I have 25k linkies should I be excited

[Anonymous No.17237067]

>>17237056
>So is this new news?
yes

>What is happening?
Yesterday a literal who startup posted pics of a presentation at an Oracle conference saying "Chainlink integration".
People were openly skeptical since there was no reliable source.

Now there is, the link in OP.
So it has been confirmed that Oracle is integrating Chainlink into its backend.

This isn't oracle4startups, this isn't Fernando, this is Oracle itself.

[Anonymous No.17237076]

>>17237067
Chainlink is a scam $0 end of week

[Anonymous No.17237079]

>>17237067
Neat. When did these pics come online?

[Anonymous No.17237089]

>>17237067

And nobody is still using your Stinkcoin. Nobody will ever use your STINK to anything. Not now, not ever.

[Anonymous No.17237097]

>>17237079
Under a day ago.

And I think the link with the actual presentation was posted possibly less than an hour ago or something.
Oracle was having a conference the past two days called "OOWLON", and the link in OP was a presentation by the EMEA Blockchain Domain Leader at Oracle.

[Anonymous No.17237121]

>>17237097
Found it. It's 9am in London now, so I would assume this was just posted an hour or so ago too. This is bigger than Google and kaleido

[Anonymous No.17237131]

>>17237121
Best part is Link dipped after the literal who startup posted those pics, so in a way people were selling the rumor lmao

[Anonymous No.17237133]

>>17237097
I literally wouldn't be surprised if we pumped to $10 based off this news alone. Wow

[Anonymous No.17237138]

Joost volker
Do your homework

[Anonymous No.17237172]

>>17237067
The nando thing has been such a blunder, honestly terribly managed PR and marketing strategy. Adie really dropped the ball here. There should have been a clear press release to pump our bags instead of this cluster fuck of vague Twitter and conference announcements. Now everyone thinks the stupid startups is the same as direct platform integration and its already priced in and ignored/misunderstood despite it being an actually huge development. Fuck the Brazilian

[Anonymous No.17237196]

>>17237133
All time high in sats going to break for sure, quite likely in dollar, too.

[Anonymous No.17237203]

>>17237172
>The nando thing has been such a blunder
No.
The first batch had projects like Quant and Crowdz (who are literally backed by Barclays and doing very interesting stuff).
Not to mention Fernando got promoted right after.
The Fernando thing was neat as fuck, you drank too much of the kool-aid fud.

However, the integration into Oracle proper is absolutely massive.
There's no comparing to the oracle for startups thing.

[Anonymous No.17237210]

>>17237133
It's not gonna pump because they're not marketing it, it's already priced in and crypto normies don't know Oracle, doesn't matter if it's the second biggest enterprise software company, it's a backend company, crypto is a clown world morons market and would rather pump on Nike or Mercedes partnerships. Also the Oracle company/chainlink being blockchain oracle word association is incredibly confusing and doesn't help, no one understands what this shit means besides us.

[Anonymous No.17237233]

>>17237210
>it's already priced in
lmao, that's what they said about Google.
Remember that Google Cloud testnet node that everyone could see weeks before the announcement?
"It doesn't mean anything", "it's priced in", etc. until the actual announcement came.

[Anonymous No.17237244]

>>17237210
We don't need 70 iq normies on coinbase for this to pump we need 110 iq Reddit midwits who at least understand what Oracle is different from a blockchain Oracle. Regardless, if it hits $10 I am still not selling.

[Anonymous No.17237246]

>>17237203
If you remember correctly the price dumped when he did the announcement because the shitty expo had been hyping it for months and afterwards he behaved like a clueless boomer attention whore on Twitter not realizing he was being manipulated by traders, it was textbook sell the news manipulation and the way he behaved was the complete opposite of how a professional team should have been handling it. Most of the QNT staff has resigned btw, it's a phantom project and token scam.

[Anonymous No.17237256]

>>17237233
checked. Gonna make it

[Anonymous No.17237264]

>>17237210
The rare 100 IQ LINK holder

[Anonymous No.17237266]

>>17237210
It's the curse. It makes so much sense that it makes no sense to anyone.

[Anonymous No.17237282]

>>17237246
>If you remember correctly the price dumped when he did the announcement because the shitty expo
No.
The price fluctuated between 2.15 and 2.03 USD on the day of that conference (June 26), then pumped above 2.20 the day after that.
And then the next day after that Link started boosting above 4 USD.

Not that any of what you said changes anything.
The Fernando thing was great.

[Anonymous No.17237340]

>>17237282
What is coinbase
There was a huge red dildo the moment he got on stage

[Anonymous No.17237360]

>>17237340
>What is coinbase
Yes, Coinbase triggered the boost two days after Fernando's conference.
But Link didn't dump on the day of that conference, and pumped from ~2.10 to ~2.25 the day after.

[Anonymous No.17237363]

>>17237340
Ok big guy. What does this Fernando bullshit even have to do with anything now? In fact I think if you're right it's even more bullish. If you're right then we pumped to $4 despite Fernando being retarded, basically just because Oracle mentioned link. So imagine what we can reach now.

[Anonymous No.17237434]

>>17237133
but why is it not happening?

[Anonymous No.17237443]

>>17237434
nobody knows about it

[Anonymous No.17237455]

>>17237363
It pumped because of coinbase, the point is the oracle startup thing had zero positive impact on the price. And it's relevant now because it was all over crypto Twitter and the oracle association, any future oracle association even x100 more important, became equally priced in as a result. You only get the speculative effect of an announcement once, and chainlink first oracle announcement was wasted on a minor, and poorly strategized, collaboration. Regrettable when compared to the Google announcement for example which was perfectly executed marketing.

Crypto is not a rational market that follows logic. This is very good news for chainlink long term but its not gonna be create a short term pump. Maybe in q3 they'll release an official announcement once integration is done and you'll see a pump, but the real value there is the implied adoption over the long term.

[Anonymous No.17237467]

>>17237455
The oracle for startups thing was great.
And it did absolutely not price in being integrated by Oracle proper.
One of the common fud themes at the time was "it's just oracleforstartups, it's not oracle itself".

You're cute when you're trying and seething though.

[Anonymous No.17237512]

>>17237455
>the point is the oracle startup thing had zero positive impact on the price.
it pumped up to the start ups being announced

[Anonymous No.17237571]

>>17237455
it pumped like a crazy when fernando started tweeting about it and hit above 3, then coinbase happened and we seen 4. google announcement timing was horribly wrong, if only they could wait coinbase listing, we would see double digits easily yet they rushed and wasted the opportunity.

>>17237203
lol fernando didn’t get promotion what are you talking about? he literally became call center. he used to be manager of his own department.

[Anonymous No.17237604]

>>17237467
Do I really need to keep spoon feeding you, I'm talking about marketing strategy, speculative dynamics, market psychology, short term pumps vs long term value, etc all you can reply with is 'hurrr seething lol'. It's great news, I'm excited, but the market isn't going to react to this, not today. It's not gonna pump to 10 dollars today on this.

[Anonymous No.17237605]

>>17237571
>lol fernando didn’t get promotion what are you talking about?

He's now "Innovation Customer Solutions Strategist Principal" at Oracle itself, no longer just oracle for startups.
https://linkedin.com/in/fribeiro1/

[Anonymous No.17237621]

>>17237605
i dunno about this Brazilian cunt
didn't his brother run fucking gravelcoin or something

[Anonymous No.17237659]

>>17237605
yes looks like he got promoted but this one belongs to last december. i’m
not sure if they are the same job or he got another promotion

[Anonymous No.17237705]

>>17237659
It says he got promoted on December 2rd 2019.
So he got promoted after the whole Chainlink thing.

[Anonymous No.17237820]

It’s not gonna pump because of this but it gave me an extreme boner

[Anonymous No.17237825]

>>17237659
Just because the job title changed it doesn’t mean its a promotion

[Anonymous No.17237831]

>>17237825
He went from being a top guy at "oracle for startups" to being a head guy at "Oracle" itself.

[Anonymous No.17237849]

>>17237820
>It’s not gonna pump
t. sold at 3.8

[Anonymous No.17237876]

>>17237849
>someone has a different opinion than me so they must be a degenerate swinglinker
Jesus man, why are you so attached to expecting this to pump immediately? It’s fucking huge but it’s also a tiny blip of a slide of a presentation that already happened

[Anonymous No.17237884]

>>17236847
Shuttup tranny

[Anonymous No.17237887]

>>17237876
We're talking about direct integration into the backend of Oracle, the second-largest software company in the world.
This isn't a matter of opinion, this is industry adoption.

[Anonymous No.17237958]

>>17237887
You’re so proud of yourself for recognizing how significant the integration is for Chainlink. Good for you. You overestimate what the average person even knows about Chainlink/tech/crypto and general. For example, you started this thread as “the pics were real,” assuming that /biz/ is a hive mind that just autistically reads every thread and knows every Chainlink update in real time like you do. That might be true for some posters but not all. Now imagine the average person who doesn’t lurk /biz/ at all, they know even less than that. They might not even know how big Oracle is because it’s not a name like Apple or Google. It’s just background noise and it also shares the same name as the purpose of Chainlink so the average person isn’t gonna pump this token unless Oracle explicitly comes out and makes an announcement soon

[Anonymous No.17237973]

>>17237958
Oracle:
>integrates Chainlink

Anon:
>yes but blablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablablabla

[Anonymous No.17237992]

>>17237958
>the average person isn’t gonna pump this token unless Oracle explicitly comes out and makes an announcement soon
Anybody arguing with that is retarded.

[Anonymous No.17238003]

>>17237958
triple digit iq response

>>17237973
room temperature iq response

[Anonymous No.17238012]

>>17237992
>>17238003
>this isn't going to pump link until it does

[Anonymous No.17238021]

I’d love to be wrong but also you’re a fucking smug prick so I kinda hope you have to despair over the integration doing nothing for the price

[Anonymous No.17238027]

>>17238021
If the integration of Chainlink by the 2nd-biggest software company in the world does nothing for the price of Chainlink, then whatever is going wrong isn't on my end lmao.

[Anonymous No.17238029]

>>17238021
Who cares lmao we already made it

[Anonymous No.17238031]

>>17238012
the pumpability of this news is good for a couple of days at most. fireside chat will overshadow it and it will be downgraded to a shill line.

[Anonymous No.17238035]

>>17238031
We're talking about the integration of Chainlink by the 2nd-biggest software company in the world.
Whatever headcanon you have going on doesn't apply here.

[Anonymous No.17238045]

>>17238035
I am talking about that integration from a very short term price perspective.

[Anonymous No.17238047]

>>17238021
You have some good points but hopefully you are being a bit too pessimistic. The market is seemingly almost full bull. Also if chain link or Oracle come out and say it directly I think there are enough twittercels to get enough hype going to get a strong pump going.

[Anonymous No.17238053]

>>17238045
Anything can happen short-term.
Markets are women on their period x1,000.

What matters is what's actually going on: and that is Chainlink integration by the 2nd-biggest software company in the world.

[Anonymous No.17238055]

The startup thing was what made the integration with oracle viable. You are being a brainlet thinking they should do it in a "proper way" just to pump your bags, shilling and marketing was never the point, but network usage. This is another confirmation in the giant pile of breadcrumbs that link will be the backbone of the fourth industrial revolution. Im glad you retarded redditors will sell too early, actually even selling at all.

[Anonymous No.17238063]

Just want to clarify something on the behalf of all LINK holder on this board:

1. We have already won and there is nothing anyone can say or do to change that.

2. 95% of FUD is coming from us so you if you're one of the 5% then you have a major malfunction.

3. DR;NS

[Anonymous No.17238072]

>>17238027
>whatever is going wrong isn’t on my end
Yes, then you can blame the stupidity of everyone else. But if you’re so smart then you’ll recognize how fucking stupid everyone else is and expect them to act accordingly. Since you’re not, that makes you barely one step above the retarded normie masses. I’m done now, have a good one faggot

>>17238029
Yeah my thoughts exactly.

[Anonymous No.17238082]

>>17237467
>The oracle for startups thing was great.
It looked good on paper but when the list came out it was the scamiest shit I ever read and I'm all in chainlink. QNT and Crowdz are the only legit names. GravelCoin was the nail on the coffin of that initiative.

[Anonymous No.17238086]

>>17238072
>Yes, then you can blame the stupidity of everyone else. But if you’re so smart then you’ll recognize how fucking stupid everyone else is and expect them to act accordingly. Since you’re not, that makes you barely one step above the retarded normie masses. I’m done now, have a good one faggot
What the fuck is even your point?
That markets are fickle and don't always respond appropriately?

That's short-term and changes nothing about what's actually going on: industry adoption of Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.17238104]

>>17238047
chainlink marketing team must do its trick. if they can make an announcement of this golden opportunity what are they good for?

[Anonymous No.17238106]

>>17238082
>QNT and Crowdz are the only legit names
There were more.
You're just repeating the two names you were already spoonfed in the past hours.

>GravelCoin was the nail on the coffin of that initiative.
Gravelcoin is a supply chain coin.
This is a very basic and popular use case for blockchain and oracles.

Also they were always going to be "startups", which are literally whos by definition.
You drank way too much fud kool-aid.

[Anonymous No.17238123]

>>17237067
Well you want to tell someone because the price isn’t at $10. I think this is why the recent small pump happened tho MAYBE it’s hard to tell anymore I’m just tired of caring so much I’m just holding and going to neet node it until 1000 eoy

[Anonymous No.17238124]

>>17237884
delete

[Anonymous No.17238133]

>>17238123
When the initial rumor leaked yesterday, Link instantly dumped.
People are obviously playing mindgames.
Focus on what's actually happening: industry adoption.

[Anonymous No.17238146]

>>17238123
Also remember that right now is absolute dead hour across the globe.
Europe is working the morning shift, the US is sleeping, and Australia is sweeping up koala ashes.

[Anonymous No.17238148]

>>17238106
a healthy dose of fud kool aid prevents one from becoming a bagholder

[Anonymous No.17238163]

>>17238086
If you weren’t fucking retarded you would have understood my point from my first post: it’s not gonna pump immediately, which I stated multiple times. Yes that’s short term, which was my point you dipshit. Yet you’re regurgitating the same thing again about industry adoption. I already know Chainlink is the backbone of the 4th industrial revolution which is why I don’t give a flying fuck if it pumps right now at all because one day data providers and corporations are gonna be sucking my cock left and right and handing me buckets of money for the privilege of accessing the link network using my tokens. Enjoy your low IQ circle jerk with your fellow sensationalist retards

[Anonymous No.17238166]

>>17238148
It's just as delusional as being a moonboi.

[Anonymous No.17238176]

>>17238163
>it’s not gonna pump immediately
It could, who the fuck knows in advance how markets respond initially.

If you think you have initial market responses on lock, you're delusional.

[Anonymous No.17238198]

>>17238166
I consider bagholding believers at the same level of delusion

[Anonymous No.17238208]

>>17238106
There are start ups and there are outright scams.

[Anonymous No.17238211]

>>17236953
Every time I get excited it turns out to be a shop... thanks for posting this..

Real funny op... you got me... gonna go have a drink and think about things...

[Anonymous No.17238219]

>>17238198
Oracle just integrated Chainlink.
Sounds like the "bagholding believers" were right.

>>17238208
So prove any of them were "outright scams".
(btw major industry players get fooled by scams all the time, so even if you did find any it still wouldn't mean shit)

[Anonymous No.17238226]

>>17238211
can't tell if seriously this dumb or literally being the joker.

[Anonymous No.17238234]

>>17238176
>things that I don’t understand are too complex for other people to understand
This needs to be shilled by Chainlink or Oracle to take full effect. Or like >>17238047
anon said the twitter army might get the news out or at least provoke a response from either company. For the record yeah I’m pessimistic but also I’m thinking of Chainlink on a timespan of 5-10 years from now. It’s not even a finished product yet and I can’t wait to see how it evolves but I know once the vision is complete I’m gonna be a fucking billionaire

[Anonymous No.17238249]

>>17238226
Up your autismo meds

[Anonymous No.17238265]

>>17238249
if my blanket gets any heavier I'll die

[Anonymous No.17238292]

>>17236830
yet ur still incels
>>17237244
reddit midwits wont get ur precious 1000eoy. only normies

[Anonymous No.17238324]

>>17238219
>Oracle just integrated Chainlink.
No they didn't, it's planned Q3 AND BEYOND and that slide doesn't guarentee anything, read everything.
>>>17238208
>(btw major industry players get fooled by scams all the time, so even if you did find any it still wouldn't mean shit)
>major industry players
>fooled by scams
We're talking about GravelCoin and startups that don't even have website, or last update was 3 years ago. Stop defending the undefendable, even Google admitted that Google+ was a failure.

[Anonymous No.17238416]

>>17238146
>Australia is sweeping up koala ashes
Nah the floods washed em away

[Anonymous No.17238498]

>>17238234
>This needs to be shilled by Chainlink or Oracle to take full effect.
Who the fuck cares how or when exactly this takes "full effect"?
I'll tell you who: weak-handed shrimp who think short-term.

[Anonymous No.17238522]

>>17238324
>No they didn't, it's planned Q3 AND BEYOND and that slide doesn't guarentee anything, read everything.

M A X I M U M ~ O V E R C O P E

[Anonymous No.17238607]

>>17238522
It is cope, but I noticed the same thing which just means its probably more like 9-12 months away which is honestly fine

[Anonymous No.17238625]

>>17238607
>which is honestly fine
You think? Are you sure?

[Anonymous No.17238790]

>>17238063
Thanks Ranjeesh very cool

[Anonymous No.17238810]

>>17236830
>ctrl-F chainlink
>0 results

[Anonymous No.17238912]

>>17238810
>ctrl+f "OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"
>1,000 results eoy

[Anonymous No.17238987]

I don't think it matters if Reddit midwits or retail sub 70iq normies see and understand this.

The fact is if the big boys want to take enterprise blockchain seriously they'll need to ChainLink to play.

[Anonymous No.17239270]

>>17238987
looks like market-chan is slowly awaking from its slumber

[Anonymous No.17239300]

>oracle blockchain
sure, like everyone have their own internets, fucking retards

[Anonymous No.17239310]

>>17239300
HAHAHAHAHAHA YOU LOST

[Anonymous No.17239346]

>>17239300
are you somehow trying to imply that every company on earth DOESN'T have an intranet with specific policies and standards that meet their business and security requirements?
pic related is you. by far the stupidest person ive (You)'d all month

[Anonymous No.17239348]

>>17239310
enjoy while it lasts

[Anonymous No.17239394]

>>17239346
We were talking about everyone having their own internet. I don't know what retardation you have if you don't get it. Internet is a protocol, and there will be one blockchain protocol and the one that scales will be the winner. Act correctly, you are getting precious information.

[Anonymous No.17239417]

>>17238045
Only trannies and niggers care about shorterm price

[Anonymous No.17239424]

>>17239417
Figures that this kind of retardation should come from one of """them""".

[Anonymous No.17239435]

>>17236830
>enterprise unit of one of the largest global companies literally integrates chainlink
>+10%
What the fuck is this market? Long term this shit just got a guarantee of $100+ but nobody will pay more than $4.20 for it?

[Anonymous No.17239452]

>>17238498
>I’d rather get rich in 10 years than be rich right now, loser!

[Anonymous No.17239453]

>>17239394
lets be clear about two things here
1. blockchain is a glorified database, with additional capabilities and advantages that make it superior
2. different businesses have different business requirements

blockchain is in no way comparable to how the internet is a single global protocol.
different companies, industries, countries, etc. can and most likely WILL use different blockchains depending on business and security requirements.

to compare something like a database, that has different utility based on its configuration and management, to the fucking internet.... is not only unbelievably incorrect, it proves just how little you understand technology

[Anonymous No.17239480]

>>17239435
>>17239452
You can't let the whale games get to you, you just can't.

[Anonymous No.17239493]

>>17239453
You’re underestimating smart contracts though. Those are in no way capable with a traditional database.

[Anonymous No.17239499]

>>17239453
You don't seem to understand how blockchain is going to be adopted. Well, have fun while it lasts, it will end soon enough.

[Anonymous No.17239504]

>>17239394
BSVtard detected
Figures that this kind of retardation should come from one of """them""".

[Anonymous No.17239530]

>>17237203
quant is a scam and chainlink makes it redundant

[Anonymous No.17239544]

>>17239493
im super bullish on blockchain in general. i get that smart contracts are game changing for most industries.
my point is moreso that there will absolutely not be one single blockchain platform that consooms all the others. there will be at least a handful of very successful blockchains in a decade, or there will be none. but it absolutely wont be a single blockchain that dominates 99.99% of the market

>>17239499
read above low iq summer poster

[Anonymous No.17239558]

We’re literally making it this year

[Anonymous No.17239648]

>>17239558
This Oracle integration just put Chainlink in the top 4, right above BCH.
It's just a matter of time now.

[Anonymous No.17239725]

>>17239544
>there will be at least a handful of very successful blockchains in a decade, or there will be none. but it absolutely wont be a single blockchain that dominates 99.99% of the market
Based on what? Do you think if there is one blockchain that is superior to others, that the others will still be used? Give me a fucking break.

[Anonymous No.17239766]

>>17239725
If one blockchain does end up ruling them all, it won't be the one where people have to use trusts and bonded couriers and physically give people pieces of paper with partial keys instead of using a fucking smart contract.

[Anonymous No.17239801]

>>17239725
Different chains for different purposes?

What comes to link, I think if cryptomarket in its totality survives, chainlkink will survive and prosper. One won't exist without another.

So, in the end, it'll be a couple of chains + LINK.

[Anonymous No.17239812]

>>17239725
listen here you illiterate fucking nigger. ive been nice. but let me copy and paste the answer to your question for the 5th fucking time.

"2. different businesses have different business requirements"
some businesses will want private platforms
some businesses will want public platforms
some businesses are going to want a more centralized platform, some businesses will be okay with a completely decentralized platform

some businesses will want platforms with opt-in privacy
some businesses will want platforms without any privacy whatsoever
some entities will just incorporate blockchains that are already conveniently in the pipeline for their region (see: ICON)

there are tons of reasons that not a single blockchain will dominate the entire industry. try thinking first before you ask such stupid questions.

[Anonymous No.17239900]

>>17238063
This. Let them seethe.

[Anonymous No.17239917]

>>17236830
Is 30k enough to make it? I need $1M.

[Anonymous No.17239965]

>>17239812
>"2. different businesses have different business requirements"
>some businesses will want private platforms
>some businesses will want public platforms
>some businesses are going to want a more centralized platform, some businesses will be okay with a completely decentralized platform
>some businesses will want platforms with opt-in privacy
>some businesses will want platforms without any privacy whatsoever
>some entities will just incorporate blockchains that are already conveniently in the pipeline for their region (see: ICON)
Or there will be a one blockchain, where you can do everything mentioned and much more, and all the data in the world will be trustworthy, because it's stored in the blockchain.

[Anonymous No.17240043]

>>17239965
>there will be a single blockchain that is both centralized and decentralized
>there will be a single blockchain that is both completely private and completely public
>there will be a single blockchain that both hard-forks and has consensus based rolling upgrades

fuck you for making me waste my time arguing with scum like yourself.
you clearly have no idea what any of these words mean.
dont bother responding, youre a fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.17240613]

>>17237210
It's up 30% since you posted this. HAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.17241234]

>>17240043
It’s true tho. Ethereum- public chain, building privacy features on top. Centralized vs decentralized? Well, a centralized blockchain is a fancy database. It is an intranet to permissionless blockchain’s Internet. A good base layer must be highly secure and allow the desired parameters of your particular system to be built out on top. Your smugness makes you sound like an absolute brainlet

[Anonymous No.17241535]

>>17241234
>It’s true tho. Ethereum- public chain, building privacy features on top.
The guy you're quoting was talking about "a single blockchain that is both completely private and completely public".

So not "a public chain with privacy features".

[Anonymous No.17241563]

>>17239917
That's 30 million in 2 years.

[Anonymous No.17241630]

>>17241563
Actually one
In 5 years its 300,000,000

[Anonymous No.17241795]

>>17241234
what this guy said >>17241535

there is a massive difference between a public chain with privacy features (AKA "opt-in" privacy, as i mentioned in my earlier post) and a default private chain with no opt-in or opt-out

[Anonymous No.17241948]

TRANSLATION
>we got paid by sergey millions of dollars to put the name of his scamcoin on the slide and we really dont wanna get sued once it becomes clear that we are actually not integrating his scamcoin

[Anonymous No.17241978]

>>17236830
photoshop

[Anonymous No.17242054]

>>17241948
>>17241978
These tears, so salty yet so sweet to me.

[Anonymous No.17242438]

>>17242054
Go to bed Sergey, you've shilled more than enough for today.

[Anonymous No.17242935]

>>17242438
bump