Decentralized Networks Summit - IPFS & Friends

[Anonymous No.17228517]

RLC TIME
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WG0dBSoDB1A

[Anonymous No.17228600]

>>17228517
future is LUBE

[Anonymous No.17228616]

>>17228600
IM FUCKIN LUBED UP HERE HOLY SHIT HADRIEN IS A GENIUS IEXEC IS THE FUTURE

[Anonymous No.17228714]

>>17228517
WE WON ITS OVER RLC TO 100,000$ EOY

[Anonymous No.17228947]

It will take 1-2 more years. Meanwhile accumulate ideally between 20-40c. But take off can be anytime. You had 3 years to accumulate in that range. If it dips dont be retards and buy as much as you can.

[Anonymous No.17228952]

hon'ble sir i need more videos and i aspect that u will satisfies me i will wait ur next video...

[Anonymous No.17229026]

>>17228947
if it dips to 20c i will literally beg my entire family for as much money as possible and go all in

[Anonymous No.17229083]

link is the better buy right now

[Anonymous No.17229151]

>>17229083
No it isn't

[Anonymous No.17229215]

>>17228517
for what do you need it? can't find anything gamebreaking /yawn

[Anonymous No.17229240]

>>17229215
Everything. The blockchain needs iExec s lube to work at it's highest potential.

[Anonymous No.17229471]

>>17229240
sounds reasonable, ALL IN

[Anonymous No.17229686]

>>17229026
I will literally sell my whole family and buy rlc.

[Anonymous No.17229724]

>>17229471
good choice! your anus will get the best lubing money can buy, iexecs trannies are waiting for you

[Anonymous No.17229832]

DIGITAL SNAKE OIL

[Anonymous No.17230023]

>>17229686
I just told my mom we could be billionaires if we got $100k and all inned RLC, lets see how it goes
>>17229832
its digital lube oil cunt

[Anonymous No.17230051]

Also did anyone see how excited the announcer guy was when he was announcing iExec?
Holy shit dude I am going to make it

[Anonymous No.17230088]

Will I make it with 35k?

[Anonymous No.17230119]

>>17230088
Of course. 35k is a lot when RLC is worth 400$

[Anonymous No.17230146]

>>17230119

[Anonymous No.17230162]

>>17230146
wtf it didnt take my text
*400$ next year*

[Anonymous No.17230213]

>>17230162
not this year

[Anonymous No.17230219]

Now answer me this fags
I own both rlc and chainlink but
Will rlc suprass chainlink or not

It seems to me after their partnership chainlink is the alpha in that relationship, am I wrong?

[Anonymous No.17230271]

>>17230213
Probably not but if it goes to like 30$ you're still a millionaire, but who the fuck wants only 1M
>>17230219
Potentially? But I wouldn't want to even think about that because I think in the future most of the "good" cryptos will be worth 100s of billions anyways so we will all make it.
The partnership clearly shows that LINK needs iExec for computing power(computing the data is hard or impossible for LINK) and iExec needs LINK for oracles to grab the data(even though iExec has oracles too they used LINK because its the best oracle right now). It's basically a 50/50 relationship.

LINK has much more to lose partnering with iExec than iExec does so it's a big win for them.

[Anonymous No.17230371]

can we pump now? please?

[Anonymous No.17230384]

>>17230371
As much as I want it to moon too Im happy I can keep buying some. In fact Im gonna throw another 500 into it right now since no one is buying.

[Anonymous No.17230397]

>>17230219
>I own RLC
>Surprass
Yep

[Anonymous No.17230431]

>>17230397
Fun fact, most white people cannot spell.
Also thank the based whales for suppressing.

[Anonymous No.17230464]

>>17230271
Alright i see what you mean
Now Staying on topic with you I do believe as well that cryptos will be worth gazillions one day now i only fear the jew and the triggered recession which would fuck up btc link rlc and everything else for that matter
Now hopefully that recession won’t happen soon (although it should), otherwise it would be wise to get out before that happens and after the impact buy back in

[Anonymous No.17230489]

>>17230464
I think BTC is recession proof but I could be wrong of course.
If it proves to be recession proof then all coins will moon

[Anonymous No.17230492]

>>17230431
Fun fact, there is no such word as surprass so OP must have overrided the spellcheck on his device to force his idiocy on the world. That is the kind of aggressive stupidity I would associate with buying RLC.

[Anonymous No.17230515]

>>17230431
>implying that’s a spelling mistake rather than a typo

[Anonymous No.17230535]

>>17230492
>>17230515
Kek whatever it is. Suppress is a weird word.

[Anonymous No.17230557]

>>17230489
People will need money since getting laid off work sucks and they need to eat and pay rent. I’d say you pulled that thought out of your ass but I hope you can succesfully counterargument me for the sake of both our money and our frens money who are lurking this shitty board.
Otherwise maybe selling with the next pump may be a good idea

[Anonymous No.17230573]

>>17230535
Jesus christ i mistyped rlc surpassing chainlink not suppressing

[Anonymous No.17230600]

>>17230557
Most wagies arent investing into anything as it is anyways it's mostly people with actual money and real jobs that arent really affected by much.
BTC has kinda already shown resistance to the stock market crash anyways
>>17230573
Makes sense. Your typing is very white as far as I can tell

[Anonymous No.17230608]

>>17228947
hahaha, another 7 versions guys, just hold

[Anonymous No.17230629]

>>17230608
Kek I think hes wrong. When the scheduler becomes decentralized in the very near future is when it will take off

[Anonymous No.17230645]

>>17230573
You didn't mistype anything it would get autocorrected to an actual. At some point in the past you INSISTED to your keyboard that THAT was the word you wanted.
Admit it
ADMIT IT
Admit your hubris and repent and sell that awful fucking shitcoin and return to 100% all-in LINK like you are going to do in the end anyway

[Anonymous No.17230646]

>>17230271
LINK only integrates with RLC in certain instances. Even the current Defi stack doesn't use RLC but uses LINK.

RLC is good. but not needed in all enterprise builds. LINK however will be needed in every stack. Anyone that needs to connect data to the blockchain...which means everyone that wants to use the smartcontracts.

[Anonymous No.17230660]

>>17230646

Eth - Smartcontracts
LINK - Data (connectivity through APIs)
UBT - Integration (connectivity through ERPs and SAPs)

all you really need.

[Anonymous No.17230676]

>>17230645
>autocorrected
Not everyone is a phonefag or cares about red lines faggot
>>17230646
What you say makes no sense because RLC also has oracles, and also deals with datasets. iExec is literally meant for enterprise use initially, so...wtf are you talking about lol

[Anonymous No.17230699]

>>17230676
>or cares about red lines
Your unwillingness to pay attention to detail is why you end up holding bags of fucking garbage

[Anonymous No.17230712]

>>17230629
>pretending like we didnt hear this at v2, v3, v4

[Anonymous No.17230722]

im suprise lube tranny anon is not yet here kek

[Anonymous No.17230723]

>>17230699
My friend, I have a pretty good grasp on English as it's my first language and I am whiter than snow, but I also understand mistakes happen. He showed he was able to type like an Englishman soon after.
Not many pajeets hold RLC, but some do, just like any other crypto.

[Anonymous No.17230732]

Can’t stop accumulating RLC. It’s like an addiction

[Anonymous No.17230743]

>>17230712
The scheduler was never scheduled to be done in these versions.
Just buy a small 1k bag. It won't kill you.

[Anonymous No.17230754]

>>17230676
obviously you have no clue what your talking about. RLC has oracles but they are using them newfag. They are using Chainlink.

Get a clue and work on your DD

[Anonymous No.17230760]

>>17230712
Also how can you look at this and not think someone important or intelligent is accumulating RLC?
There was a huge buy order on RLC that got 35% filled too.
Someone or something is accumulating.

[Anonymous No.17230773]

>>17230723
You just said you don't care about "red lines" ie. correct spelling. This indicates a lack of intellectual acuity - - the hallmark of an RLC bagholder

[Anonymous No.17230776]

>>17230754

Edit
*They are NOT using them

Nobody trusts RLCs doracles. Your behind. You keep making enough bad decisions and you'll stay poor.

[Anonymous No.17230781]

>>17230754
I'm saying if LINKs oracles cannot or dont need to be used that RLC has "fallback oracles".
That's why I own both LINK and RLC.

[Anonymous No.17230793]

>>17230676

RLC bent the knee. why don't you know this.

[Anonymous No.17230817]

>>17230793
Both coins are using eachother, please read my previous comment about it.

[Anonymous No.17230823]

>>17230781

ummm, no thats not how decentralization works dude. get a clue.

Theres a reason why they ARE NOT USING RLC doracles. and most likely they will NEVER use them. why? cause its not up to RLC dummy. Its about the smartcontract users wanting the best security. they decide. The network decides. The enterprises decides. do you even know what your talking about.

[Anonymous No.17230893]

>>17230823
>Theres a reason why they ARE NOT USING RLC doracles
I'll tell you why.
1) RLC's oracles do not have enough nodes set up.
2) The chainlink partnership enables both teams to focus on progression where it counts. Oracles are completed for RLC, but there isn't a reason to use them(kinda like why no one uses LINKs either).
3) Zero demand = Zero use

The main reason is definitely #2 though. Having your team focus where it counts is smart. RLC's oracles don't have anything wrong with them, in fact they are similar to LINK's with staking and rewards.
>do you even know what your talking about.
Do you even know what you're talking about?

[Anonymous No.17230895]

>>17230817

But yes, I agree, both work together. And both are critical in certain stacks.

My point was that RLC is not always needed. If you like RLC good for you. decent invetment. Im here to make money and im going with the standard.

EThereum
Chainlink
Unibright.

[Anonymous No.17230919]

>>17230895
RLC is always going to be needed for off-chain computation and data processing/monetization.

ETH
LINK
RLC
Best combo right now.

[Anonymous No.17230924]

>>17230893
wow, your really way behind.

LINK is the #2 gas user on ETH network just behind tether. meaning its near the number one useed network right now. Hello.. you have not studied your investments enough.

and Right now LINK is powering all of Defi. and just started powering DeInsurance.

Read, learn, make the right choice or stay poor.

[Anonymous No.17230955]

>>17230924
>LINK is the #2 gas user on ETH network just behind tether.
Yet no one is actually using it for anything. Show me a single thing that its being used for other than an ETH price grabber. Also, one current downfall of LINK(why I hedge with RLC) is that the oracles are expensive with gas. RLC is not.

[Anonymous No.17230968]

>>17230924
>Read, learn, make the right choice or stay poor.
Dude you are arguing with me about LINK when 40% of my portfolio is LINK. Stop being a faggot. Don't buy RLC and stay poor.

[Anonymous No.17230969]

>>17230600
>Makes sense. Your typing is very white as far as I can tell
Thanks, I always wanted to type like J.R.R Tolkien
>>17230645
I admit that you're a loveable faggot.
Now turn around and bend over

[Anonymous No.17230998]

>>17230969
>Thanks, I always wanted to type like J.R.R Tolkien
Kek, based. Love me some Tolkien

[Anonymous No.17231003]

>>17230760
>something
Cthulhu

[Anonymous No.17231026]

>>17230955

1. Threshold signatures. It makes gas 15000x cheaper. Way cheaper than anything doracles could do. Your behind

2. Defi is about price dude. whats your beef with defi?

3. They are setting up Deins and will be aggregating weather data.

dude, the network is being built right before your eyes and your missing out the greatest opportunity right now.

Im done with you. Again. feel good about your RLC and stop being so insecure about it.

[Anonymous No.17231047]

>>17230955

And by the way. The only reason we are having this debate is because you needed to be corrected when you thought that RLC having its own doracles meant something.

Good day.

[Anonymous No.17231056]

>>17231026
>Threshold signatures.
I know about them, but they aren't here yet now are they? That's why "muh gas is so high" "hurr durr #1 usage". It's fake dude.

>2. Defi is about price dude. whats your beef with defi?
See, you have no other use right now for the oracle. I'm not saying there never will be but I am right on this.

>3. They are setting up Deins and will be aggregating weather data.
>will be
You don't get it.

[Anonymous No.17231074]

>>17231047
Yes, it means in case the LINK use cases fall short that RLC has something to fall back on. Don't kid yourself.

[Anonymous No.17231076]

>>17230955

also, if you are not understanding why the simplist things need to be decentralized like "price" for smartcontracts then you have no idea why your really in the space and what decentralization means and its needs.

[Anonymous No.17231085]

>>17231074
oh oh sure. thats right doracles are here to save you. So many are llined up to use them.

Your failing here and you don't even know it.

[Anonymous No.17231095]

>>17231076
You are wrong about RLC. That is all. Goodbye pleb.

[Anonymous No.17231101]

>>17231095

ok, like i said. be happy with your RLC investment. but stop spreading misinformation.

[Anonymous No.17231106]

>>17231085
I never said that. Having a plan B is always a good thing. Hedging oracles is smart as fuck pajeet. Byebye.

[Anonymous No.17231119]

This is great, I'm genuinely eating popcorn and reading your posts, I guess it's just us 3 in this thread

[Anonymous No.17231131]

>>17231101
You are the one spreading misinformation faggot.

[Anonymous No.17231158]

>>17231119
Yeah he doesn't realize the importance of the LINKRLC partnership as well as the benefit for RLC having their own oracles to fall back on.

It's one of the best hedges in crypto right now.
1b+ crypto oracle hedging with 50m multiuse tech coin with oracles

[Anonymous No.17231169]

>>17231119
I will lurk with you

[Anonymous No.17231208]

>>17231158
Yeah bro don't mind him just scoop up some more barrels and we'll make it
>>17231169
Hey fren, hope you have a fine time this evening

[Anonymous No.17231241]

>>17231208
Yeah, believe me or not I am not that bad off. I made a lot of money thanks to LINK but I have come to realize the importance of RLC through tons of research.

[Anonymous No.17231274]

>>17231241
Congratulations you have IQ over 90

[Anonymous No.17231305]

>>17231274
It's actually over 120, but thanks.

[Anonymous No.17231326]

>>17228517
LUBE the knee

[Anonymous No.17231341]

>>17231326
BEND THE LUBE

[Anonymous No.17231354]

>>17231241
remove your buy wall you fucking traitor

[Anonymous No.17231358]

>>17231241
How many barrels did you get fren?
I've got 38k

[Anonymous No.17231372]

>>17231305
Well well I myself have 138. Was forced to take IQ test before mandatory conscription. That number feels like meme dont feel like some big head or something.

[Anonymous No.17231407]

>>17231354
It's not mine.
I've been accumulating for a while now I never put a wall like that. I think it's a big player though.
>>17231358
A lot... lol. More than that. 38k is a very "nice" bag to have though.
I plan on being almost a billionaire.
If you didn't know, the rate at which billionaires are made is going to exponentially increase during the next decade.

[Anonymous No.17231421]

>>17231372
IQ is fluid, so some days I'll be over or below. It doesn't mean shit if you dont do anything with it though

[Anonymous No.17231460]

>>17231407
I hope to one day be like you with a huge bag of rlc (hopefully over 150k)
I want to borrow money and put it into rlc
I just don't know how much and how long i have...

[Anonymous No.17231494]

>>17231460
>I want to borrow money and put it into rlc
I did this with LINK. That's why I am where I am now. Very thankful.
Honestly you might not have very long.
Big players are starting to move in.
You will make it with 30k though.

[Anonymous No.17231589]

>>17231494
>I did this with LINK. That's why I am where I am now. Very thankful.
Nice
Well thanks for the words of encouragement

[Anonymous No.17231676]

>>17231589
When the time comes, good luck.
Selling is a very tricky thing.
Do you sell at 10$ for a nice profit?
Or do you wait to see what happens?
That is the dilemma, again, good luck.

[Anonymous No.17231824]

>>17231676
Yeah I figured that's the issue, I'll figure it out
Same as with LINK, hold or sell
Cheers

[Anonymous No.17231840]

>>17231824
Yep. With LINK I had to de-risk. Still enjoying gains though

[Anonymous No.17231894]

>>17231824
I'm so fucking curious about the your stack numbers for link and rlc
Share if you want, no pressure... I'm not envious if you pull a huge number out, just want to imagine what it's like

I'm gonna take a loan for 6 months and split it between link and rlc.. hope 6 months is enough

[Anonymous No.17231971]

>>17231894
meant to quote >>17231840

[Anonymous No.17232019]

>>17231894
>>17231971
I can't say :)
Just know I'm already a millionaire so it doesn't matter kek.

[Anonymous No.17232040]

>>17232019
Okay np bro