A list of companies that LINK must be larger than

[Anonymous No.17228357]

... in order to reach $1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.17228373]

>>17228357
peanuts

[Anonymous No.17228375]

>>17228357
All these companies are shitcompanies dude, they can't stand up to a real LINK DUDE, THEY AIN'T SHIT DUDE

[Anonymous No.17228391]

>>17228357
Only about half of them are integrating Chainlink sofar, how do we get the other half?

[Anonymous No.17228476]

>>17228391
The other half are integrating, we just don't know about it yet

[Anonymous No.17228489]

>>17228357
>larger than
kek, chainlink IS the value faggot. this whole list will be measuring these companies worth in LINK instead of USD when the singularity arrives.

[Anonymous No.17228499]

>>17228357
DR;NS

[Anonymous No.17228512]

>>17228357
Good thing all of those companies will use chainlink networks.

[Anonymous No.17228525]

>>17228489
kek

[Anonymous No.17228645]

>>17228373
>>17228375
>>17228391
>>17228476
>>17228489
>>17228499
>>17228512
>>17228525
And now for some more perspective straight out of MS Paint.

[Anonymous No.17228999]

>>17228645
Am I the only one salivating at this little fact?

[Anonymous No.17229233]

>>17228999
I can smell the interior of my brand new civic that I will buy with my gainz.

[Anonymous No.17229264]

>>17228357
This much effort to fud LINK...

[Anonymous No.17229271]

>>17229264
It's not even FUD.

[Anonymous No.17229276]

>>17228357
Applejes and orangutans.. If chainlink reach 1k$, then it would have a marketcap around twice what XRP had during the last bullrun.

[Anonymous No.17229289]

>>17228645
And bitcoin is a shitcoin that does nothing meanwhile link will power the 4thIR ITS OVER IM NEVER SELLING SHLOMO

[Anonymous No.17229349]

>>17229276
Or about the same as Bitcoin did.

[Anonymous No.17229386]

>>17228357
Chainlink isn't a company. This is what people don't get. Crypto isn't a collection of companies, it is a currently speculative space of digitialized, decentralized finance, in this space there are projects that receive various valuations that should (if the market was efficient, which it will become with maturity) reflect utility of these individual franchises to the entire crypto economy/space. If you believe crypto space will continue to develop into some coherent useful whole and if you believe LINK is going to be a big part of raising this utility, you should be extremely bullish on LINK.

[Anonymous No.17229457]

>>17228357
i cant wait for the seething boomers

[Anonymous No.17229458]

>>17228357
All the fags on /biz/ that shill Link are going to get their a$$e$ whooped with this shitcoin so hard that even if Sergey personally licks you there, I'll still hurt!

[Anonymous No.17229484]

Wrong.
The value of the network has to be larger than those companies.
It's entirely doable if the financial backbone of those companies integrates link and therefore requiring each token to represent a fractional amount of this undertaking.
Fuck off op, and don't post here again.
Biz is full of fucking niggers now I swear.

[Anonymous No.17229885]

>>17229386
Does chainlink have a monopoly on what it does? Or is it just a good concept that anyone can imitate. The CEO of chainlink, Jason Parser, said "Fuck niggers... and fuck jannies. Traps are gay" but people wouldn't listen to him, why should we listen to you now?

[Anonymous No.17229917]

>>17228357
how low is your IQ?

[Anonymous No.17229952]

>>17229917
It's somewhere in the 140s (σ = 15).

[Anonymous No.17230002]

>>17228357

>comparing company shares to tokens of a worldwide network that are needed for the network to function.

[Anonymous No.17230111]

>>17229952
Brainlet. Why don’t you try reading a book sometime and get up to 160 iq John Lennon woman beating levels

[Anonymous No.17230185]

>>17229885
Yeah does LINK got Buffett Moat?

[Anonymous No.17230187]

>>17230111
I don't like boasting about such things anyway and I don't mind if people think I'm stupid.

[Anonymous No.17230217]

>>17230187
Very based of you sir