Wen steaking?

[Anonymous No.17207595]

Seriously, what the fuck is taking so long? I can fully understand not allowing NEET nodes yet, but staking should be feasible. Is it not in the benefit of the KYC'd nodes to have more collateral available for jobs?

[Anonymous No.17207671]

presumably staking is being developed for viability on a private testnet that will be grafted into the wider network once the parties involved are comfortable with its operation

[Anonymous No.17207699]

>>17207671
he...he gave a straight answer. s-sergey?

[Anonymous No.17207710]

>>17207595
Staking is useless if there aren't NEET nodes, you brainlet
If all the nodes are trusted, verified, KYC'd providers, there is no need to staking/reputation/penalty, because it is assumed that they will all behave appropriately

[Anonymous No.17207844]

>>17207595
Its cringey af when you faggots say steaking
>WEN STEAKING
>HUUURRDURRRRRHURDURRRRR
>DO YU GIYZ GIT IT STEAKING
its STAKING dumbass

[Anonymous No.17207867]

>>17207595
Unironically probably 2-3 years.

[Anonymous No.17207873]

>>17207671
DELETE THIS NOW. WTF ARE YOU DOING! DELETE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.17207891]

>>17207595
Lol LINK DOESNT HAVE STAKING YET?
RLC HAS HAD IT FOREVER

[Anonymous No.17207972]

>>17207595
1-2 years. They even said its not a priority atm.

[Anonymous No.17207997]

>>17207671
Sergey please delete this

-Rory

[Anonymous No.17208029]

>>17207972
Link will be double digits at this point, this will bring nice rewards
Clever anons will become stupidly rich, between staking a part of their Link, and swinging a few dozen at a time when the price routinely drops a dollar, then $10+ dollars
Good god I'm excited for you guys

[Anonymous No.17208039]

>>17207671
This is way too articulate of a response...something is going on, a spy among us!

[Anonymous No.17208105]

>>17207710
>Calling me a brainlet without even understanding fundamental token usage.
I'll be kind to you, even though you were rude.

Each node needs X amount of LINK for collateral, X being dependent on the jobs they're taking on & the value of those jobs & therefore collateral required. A node needs LINK whether it's KYC'd or not, trusted or not. Therefore, at a certain point, every node will presumably want more LINK so they can take on more and/or larger jobs. There is no downside to having additional LINK on your node, only upside. Most KYC'd nodes will ultimately allow staking, hence why LinkPool already has all their tech set up to do so (as do several other KYC'd nodes). Hence why Coinbase will eventually operate a node with exclusively staked from CB users LINK (no personal risk).

I hope you understand this now, but if you don't, just don't reply, because anything you say will be stupid.

[Anonymous No.17208113]

>>17207891
>V4 vaporware garbage no one uses and can't make money off staking

[Anonymous No.17208169]

>>17207595
What's the point of implementing staking if there are no customers because public blockchains aren't secure and private enough yet you doofus, they're unproven, and so many other reasons, can't scale, regulatory obstacles, too expensive, legacy systems too slow to transition etc. Do you think adoption will magically appear out of thin air because you staked some made up internet tokens in some Jason Parser node lol. Right now enterprises are only using centralized dlt like Corda and they don't need oracles.

[Anonymous No.17208209]

it's never happening. ever. coins that already have staking will pass you by. you'll watch throughout 2020 and 2021 as this same thread is posted over and over

[Anonymous No.17208225]

There isn't any demand from smart contracts for data from Chainlink though. What's the point of opening staking if people would just get about 0.1% roi a year, if even that.

How many calls happen every day? How much LINK per call? It's probably under $100k and the nodes making a piece of that money have no reason to get extra links from the public(aka staking) if the links aren't even needed in the first place. For staking to makes sense, we would need more demand from smart contracts and also competition between the nodes where one node will offer the same data, but will back it up with some linkies staked(meaning if the node gives wrong data, it loses it's linkies). Currently there isn't much demand for even basic 0.1 LINK off-chain data calls or whatever the price was.

[Anonymous No.17208235]

>>17207844

fagget ID

[Anonymous No.17208264]

>>17207671
Oh.. okay thanks!

[Anonymous No.17208284]

When stay king

[Anonymous No.17208323]

>>17207671
Thanks sergey, keep up the hard work

[Anonymous No.17208327]

>>17207595
Staking will come years from now. First they need to setup all these price feeds to prove things work. Then they need a proof of concept (the flight insurance from last week). Then they need to get the infrastructure companies involved (this year), then they need to bring companies on as customers privately (next two years), then they go big. I'm thinking Q3 2023 we'll see staking.

[Anonymous No.17208340]

>>17208209
Because you posted this I’m going to fuck up your discord tranny FUD. Everyone this is why chainlink has pumped and why they want your cheap linkies

[Anonymous No.17208404]

>>17208340
Ironic lol a discord tranny calling someone else a discord tranny. fuck off with your shitty larp pic.

[Anonymous No.17208466]

>>17208404
nufag

[Anonymous No.17208502]

If you stake and don't sell the rewards it should be called stacking.

[Anonymous No.17208503]

>>17208404
Get out here tranny you won’t shake biznessmen out of their linkies on my watch. You’ve fucked yourself by calling this a larp it will only make people research more.

[Anonymous No.17208517]

>>17208466
Smd

[Anonymous No.17208544]

>>17207671
Are you fundamentally thrilled about it though?

[Anonymous No.17208620]

>>17208340
So what? A SmartCon in May, with some potential announcement. Buy the rumor pump, sell like every other conference day dump?

[Anonymous No.17208623]

>>17207595
they're finalizing their release package of slashing criteria

[Anonymous No.17208679]

>>17207671
You're not supposed to actually answer questions about Link...

[Anonymous No.17209102]

>>17207595
This network is going to handle a quantity of value most cant even comprehend. If even one little thing goes wrong, even while beta testing, it could spell the end as it would demonstrate the network is not secure enough to handle the load it is intending to lift. This needs to be executed FLAWLESSLY, or it will fail. This is why the team doesnt hype the project, this is why there are only KYC nodes operating for now, and this is why it took so long to get to mainnet. It will continue to take a long time, and continue to make consistent gains over BTC for every milestone it hits.

[Anonymous No.17209133]

You guys realize staking is a meme right

[Anonymous No.17209232]

>>17208517
Whip that needle dick out and I'll suck it dry you stupid faggot

[Anonymous No.17209287]

>>17209133
Look at how tezos is doing right now because it's the only viable pos platform right now

[Anonymous No.17209306]

>>17209287
Tezos is all hype. good tech but in the end its about the network. Ethereum has the largest network. Tezos, no one is using it. They are extremely far behind.

[The Devil !!y9pM1O7kKh0 No.17209317]

>>17207671
You all need to hurry the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.17209341]

>>17209133
STAKINGU STAKINGU
NAGAI NO IYA DA

[Anonymous No.17209386]

>>17207844
You’re retarded. It is steaking

[Anonymous No.17209422]

>>17207671
I-i-is it true???!
L-l-lads?!!!!

[Anonymous No.17209449]

>>17208327
I would argue that they will unroll staking much sooner, but the catch is that all initial use cases of the LINK network will be low stakes. The reason why I think this is because the best way to test and debug the network is to simply use it as it was intended to be used, you cannot fully debug a test network, or beta network as opposed to a live network.

[Anonymous No.17209453]

>>17207671
This is The Hodge. Sergey writes with punctuation. It is known.

[Anonymous No.17209535]

>>17209317
yes, hurry up wagie and make me rich

[Anonymous No.17209612]

>>17209317
you also need to hurry up and end your life :)

[Anonymous No.17209688]

>>17207671
He didn't ask how staking is done he was asking why they're going so slowly, which they are.

[Anonymous No.17209762]

>>17208620
The conference is a literal larp. In the initial thread the supposed sound clip didn't exist, it was deleted apparently before the thread went up. A site for the conference was also linked which had events in january and february that never happened. Its pure autistic tranny work.

[Anonymous No.17209844]

>>17209762
We in alt season. Rumor pumps the price. By the time staking is released, I be dead from ramen noodle over dose. Doesn't hurt to pump the price a bit before actual progress.

[Anonymous No.17209889]

>>17209844
But the larps focused here aren't designed to pump the price. They're literally trannies who hate 4chan and want to demoralize and waste our time/ have substantial autism and nothing better to do.

The same people making these things up are also the fud spammers and probably the porn spammers.

[Anonymous No.17209918]

>>17207671
S-sergey?

[Anonymous No.17209926]

>>17209612
Kys, S*rgey and his team of soibois have held this project back immensely. Staking, mixiles, threshold Sig's, reputation etc all should have released at mainnet not v0.6.0 which has done nothing besides be a useless price fetcher for the past 9 months

[Anonymous No.17210686]

Is there any better? I made a promise not to wash until staking. I seeded myself with psilocybin spores and now have growths all over me. They've burrowed into my blood. Into my brain. I'm in a constant state of extreme agony and glorious clairvoyance. The mycelium chews at my flesh and rewards with visions more real than the air you breathe. Chainlink has already reached $1000, it has always reached it. Time is just sinking round and round to that inevitable point and you are scrambling at the sides trying to climb out, but my mushrooms will have you in time.

[Anonymous No.17210705]

>>17207595
>he thinks there’s jobs that are paying link and it’s not just sergey propping up the kyc’d nodes to make it look like there is interest in using chainlink
cute

[Anonymous No.17210738]

Staking available now on the Tezos network, come and join us on Coinbase and a host of other exchanges, or join a community staking roll yourself!

[Anonymous No.17210770]

>>17207671
get me in the screencap boys

[Anonymous No.17210797]

>>17207844
have you even fucking read the whitepaper? It’s like how tezos calls their staking “baking”.
The link whitepaper calls it steaking

[Anonymous No.17210816]

>>17207891
Are they on v69 yet? Hows muh digital oil going rajbinder?

[Anonymous No.17210825]

>>17207671
Michael Hastings blew up in his 2013 Mercedes, at the age of 33, in Los Angeles, near the 33rd parallel.

[Anonymous No.17211053]

>>17207710
>there is no need to hire cops and create the need for a whole criminal justice industry because it is assumed that everyone will behave appropriately

[Anonymous No.17211265]

there needs to be demand for staking before they create it, I reckon it's probably 2 years out. It'll be two years using KYC'd nodes before Chainlink is toted as the only way to do oracles and we get staking.

[Anonymous No.17211923]

>>17211265
kek there's already countless projects using oracles in production, Maker, Augur, etc....

None of them use Chainlink, and never will, it's vaporware.

That's why there's no staking, BECAUSE NO ONE IS USING IT. Staking would only expose that the network has zero real usage, hence why they'll never release it.

[Anonymous No.17211940]

>>17209889
It was no larp, fren. But you already knew that, didn’t you.

[Anonymous No.17211984]

>>17209762
It's not a larp. Its called smart contract summit. Being announced this week. Cool speakers. But you didn't hear this from me.

[Anonymous No.17211983]

>>17211940
what video?

[Anonymous No.17212433]

>>17211984

[Anonymous No.17212449]

>>17207595
probably fucking never desu, this is the Achilles heel of the whole thing

[Anonymous No.17212487]

>>17207710
So once they are trusted and verified someone reputation is never scrutinized again? It's not just about if a node is ethical, they can run into technical issues, poor internet connection, etc. YOu can't assume a node will "behave" the same way forever.

[Anonymous No.17212494]

>>17207595
Don't know, don't care. But I can tell you that STEAKING is what ill be doing tonight. As in celebrate being COMFY as FUCK by eating a nice rare to medium-rare 84 day dry aged ribeye

[Anonymous No.17212518]

>>17207699
>>17207699
>>17207699
>>17207699
Megasa squize meee !

[Anonymous No.17212576]

Staking was promised before derisking occurred and you are still holding.

[Anonymous No.17212625]

>>17210686
Chainlinkers are
-beta
-homosexuals
-drug addicts
-NEETS
-schizophrenics
-incels

[Anonymous No.17213605]

>>17207710
Staking also useless if there's no application using the network...
Plz show me one
*crickets*

[Anonymous No.17213620]

>>17212625
>tfw you are all of the above

[Anonymous No.17213659]

>>17212625
Link sellers are
-race traitors
-cucks
-poor

[Anonymous No.17213715]

>>17211940
what is this

[Anonymous No.17213827]

>>17207671
We love you, sirgay!

[The Devil !!y9pM1O7kKh0 No.17213897]

>>17209612
Ahahahahahahaheheheheheheheh rent free nigga!!!

[Anonymous No.17214241]

>>17209688
>once the parties involved are comfortable with its operation
Mongrel