/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.17194031]

Holy fuck. How will Linkies ever recover?

[Anonymous No.17194203]

Blown the fuck out

[Anonymous No.17194250]

>>17194031
just sold

[Anonymous No.17194297]

>>17194031
Dump that trash while you still can. People are starting to notice it’s a huge scam.

[Anonymous No.17194307]

>>17194031
OOOOOOO NOOO NOOOOO so this is just the exit pump generated by that tweet.
SELL SELL SELL

[Anonymous No.17194315]

>>17194031
USD Price at time of initial tweet: 2.78
USD Price now: ligma

[Anonymous No.17194514]

>Get desperate
>Load early 2019 fud

[Anonymous No.17194780]

>>17194514
Ahhhhh

[Anonymous No.17194803]

Is link out of the question for makerdao?

[Anonymous No.17194807]

>>17194031
>erc20
uh huh. carry on.

[Anonymous No.17194809]

>>17194031
Literally who talking about how something is true because a literally who said so

[Anonymous No.17194835]

>>17194809
it's not even correct, if you dig up shit from Maker's subreddit you can see them considering chainlink. i dont give too much of a fuck to actually give a source though so whatever. i just remember it because i recall Rune being adamant against using chainlink before, that their solution is sufficient for them, but then i see them "considering" using chainlink. dunno what spurred the change of mind but yeah

[Anonymous No.17194922]

>>17194031
"people" like him have self admittedly not scratched the surface and un-ironically don't know what is coming despite their in-depth knowledge of their own domain

[Anonymous No.17194953]

>>17194835
They always bend the knee in the end

[Anonymous No.17194966]

>>17194953
ORACLE STANDARD

[Anonymous No.17194993]

>>17194966
There is no such thing. Nobody is paying Sergey’s nodes.

[Anonymous No.17195069]

while I do find it absurd that the price is over $4 with almost no usage..
If I'm a wall street fag who is going to pump Billions of dollars into automatic payments based on smart contract inputs... am I not willing to pay a few cents per contract to validate inputs and make them immutable?
In the other case, lets say you use one central database source to assemble a high payout contract. A hacker cracks into that single server, changes the value, and awards himself $1 million of your money, since he can't target the distributed ETH network. with LINK, that same infrastructure is used to securely grab inputs from as many sources as your use case requires security for. Hackerman now has the problem of trying to crack 12 servers with various architectures and security policies.
While arguably they need LINK, MakerDao's risk per transaction is lower, and link is not a battle hardened system. no one has attacked it so who knows if it even works?

[Anonymous No.17195112]

>>17195069
lay off the coke pal
youre not making any sense

[Anonymous No.17195137]

>>17195069
retard.

[Anonymous No.17195217]

>>17195069
>with almost no usage.
you are stupid

[Anonymous No.17195285]

>>17195217
can someone link the network usage graph over time, i havent been able to find it

[Anonymous No.17195304]

makerdao is using chainlink

https://wyre-talks.simplecast.com/episodes/fc4e10f3-fc4e10f3

[Anonymous No.17195342]

>>17195304
at what minute?

[Anonymous No.17195362]

>>17194031
He's a paid shill

[Anonymous No.17195384]

>>17194031
by buying link at 0.19 and dabbing on you when i look at the chart today

[Anonymous No.17195402]

>>17195285
https://twitter.com/CryptoSpong3/status/1225921107426975746/photo/4
you mean the 1000 LINK per week across all nodes combined for BTC/USD calls? (transactions chart count includes all tx, not just contracts )

[Anonymous No.17195415]

>>17195069
what do you mean dude its the future

you can go right on their website, and see how it would be used

[Anonymous No.17195433]

>>17194835
Meta Oracles is why.

[Anonymous No.17195509]

Dude is FUDding just like we were. Still packing bags, obviously. He’s crazy bullish on Eth. Eth needs link.

[Anonymous No.17195511]

>>17195402
thanks fren