>>17091788
Who knows, one thing about the virus is it's more or less been proven that china is lying about the virus numbers (numbers of sick, numbers of deaths) per day
Whether that means they're overstating it, understating it, or are so inept as to not be able to reliably generate any numbers, who knows
>proof?
I didn't have the graph but the tl;dr is some statistician took the reports back from the beginning, did maths, and determined an exact curve that then let him accurately predict china's next virus report