Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Maintenance is complete! We got more disk space.
Become a Patron!

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.17078591
File: 199 KB, 800x670, 1prysr4o8tnx.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
17078591

>>17078575
>2 results

>> No.17078604

>>17078575
>sites
much rather read anon's paranoid conspiracy theories than some forbes contributer blog trash

>> No.17078610

whoa the 80th forbes article
like I get this is good because boomers and basedmen in important positions read this rag and the name recognition is good
but it's ALL SO FUCKING TIRESOME

>> No.17078660
File: 131 KB, 1080x1020, 1580207162233.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
17078660

>>17078604
>>17078610
t.

>> No.17078702

>>17078575
>contributor
get the fuck out of here

>> No.17078714

>>17078660
I've been holding longer than you kid, and I'm fucking bored.

>> No.17078749
File: 181 KB, 820x838, 1575472222664.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
17078749

>>17078702
>>17078714
>NOOOOO FORBES STOP TALKING ABOUT CHAINLINK STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP

>> No.17078770

>>17078749
Don't stop, but contributor articles are literally totally unrelated to Forbes. They don't mean anything.
This isn't Forbes. It's a blogpost that happens to be on their website. Get a grip.

>> No.17078782

>>17078660
>>17078749
Check the URL you brainlet. It's not an official Forbes article.

>> No.17078783
File: 127 KB, 782x758, 1570986327335.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
17078783

>>17078770
>FORBES CONTRIBUTORS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH FORBES RRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>> No.17078800
File: 48 KB, 456x740, 1574472980438.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
17078800

>>17078782
>SO WHAT IF IT SAYS "FORBES.COM", I SAY IT'S NOT OFFICIAL SO YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE ME

>> No.17078803

>>17078660
>>17078749
>>17078783
Serious question: are you 12 years old?

>> No.17078809
File: 59 KB, 424x693, FAB3C9F9-4BFB-419D-9858-36DA694E2B37.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
17078809

>>17078782
>Check the URL you brainlet. It's not an official Forbes article.
>forbes.com

>> No.17078812

>>17078803
good one anon

>> No.17078815

This has nothing to do with chainlink

>> No.17078882
File: 582 KB, 1536x2048, 1519153388233.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
17078882

>>17078575
>https://www.forbes.com/sites/biserdimitrov/2020/02/03/how-is-strong-enterprise-interest-in-2020-pushing-blockchain-technology-further/#5929077f139d
>ctrl+f
>chainlink
>only talks about ERP systems
>ERP
>Erotic Role Play
I warned you chainlink being named after a gay sex position would be bad for press...

>> No.17079474

>>17078575

Unibright & Chainlink The two standards that are spear heading Blockchain adoption.

You have to be a fullblown idiot to not see LINK and UBT are the only worthwhile investments.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
reCAPTCHA
Action