/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.17044721]

bend the knee
https://medium.com/iex-ec/chainlink-and-iexec-collaborate-to-address-the-complex-off-chain-needs-of-next-generation-702e55ab1ead

[Anonymous No.17044735]

>>17044721
Chainlink finally bends the knee

[Anonymous No.17044762]

kek iExec ditched its own dOracles after months of shilling, because no one used them

[Anonymous No.17044764]

>>17044735
The future is here

[Anonymous No.17044775]

>>17044762
€Imagine still crying about a chart and ignoring to industry leaders coming together to corner the market

Someones gonna stay poor

[Anonymous No.17044798]

>>17044762
Does any project on mainnet use chainlink oracles or even required their help to make their own?

All the ones I know of just built their own very early on.

[Anonymous No.17044802]

>>17044762
No one is using Chainlink oracles tho. Actually no one is using any blockchain solution

[Anonymous No.17044805]

>>17044762

I remember that shit. Also the arrogance of the Iexec team about how link is basically shit etc.

[Anonymous No.17044813]

>>17044721
literally
who

[Anonymous No.17044815]

>>17044798
All the ones that built their own will use chainlink eventually. Like literally all of them, they are dogshit in comparison. Industry standard

[Anonymous No.17044827]

>>17044721
Chainlink is a scam, it’s sad to see another great project fall victim to sergey

[Anonymous No.17044842]

>>17044735
MUH DORACLES

[Anonymous No.17044844]

>>17044721
It's over Gilles, we won't pay for your gender experiments anymore

[Anonymous No.17044851]

wait. i thought iexec had its own doracles?

BAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.17044875]

NO WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY

You know what, good on iexec.
It was only a matter of time, really.

This is as big to me as Oraclize.

[Anonymous No.17044878]

>>17044851
I bet you also thought they where working with Intel

[Anonymous No.17044879]

>>17044721
Aa lube user I spit on this

[Anonymous No.17044888]

>>17044721
From dOracles
To nOracles

[Anonymous No.17044897]

>>17044851
>doesnt realize this is a use case
>doesnt realize CL needs Iexec, not the other way around
>doesn’t see the irony in his stupidity

Not

Gonna

Make

It

[Anonymous No.17044901]

>muh DORACLES

It ain't gonna suck itself.

[Anonymous No.17044905]

>>17044897
Stop with the shitcope and be glad.
The whole doracle thing was a disaster for iexec's credibility, and now they redeemed themselves.

[Anonymous No.17044915]

They all bend the knee, and their voices come together in chorus to proclaim Sergey is Lord of the decentralized oracles.

[Anonymous No.17044916]

>>17044901
>>17044897
Only Linktards think blog posts and use cases are definitive anything

[Anonymous No.17044921]

>>17044897
Yeah okay. In no way did I mention CL doesnt need iExec, but continue being butthurt. The fact is iExec ditched its dOracle because lets be honest here, literally nobody is going to be using it. Keep coping with this mindset poorfag.

[Anonymous No.17044922]

always great to see projects working together
I actually wouldn’t even be smug if it weren’t for the arrogance of iexec

[Anonymous No.17044925]

>>17044922
Water under the bridge.

[Anonymous No.17044946]

The funny part is eventually chainlink will eat their lunch and dominate off-chain compute, the very thing iExec is trying to achieve. Data messaging and off chain compute will be done in the same layer of the stack, oracles.

[Anonymous No.17044948]

>>/biz/thread/S13924969

>4000 sats or worse by next month. The project is possibly dead in the water after this knowledge.

>Sybil attacks are possible since sybil resistance requires KYC or "trustworthy" node operators. Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous". Therefore, since most operators won't want to KYC, LINK will not be sybil resistant.

>Now why does RLC make LINK obsolete in this regard? It's simple. The PoCo algorithm is so well designed that iExec's dOracles can rely on it instead of KYC for sybil resistance.

>Boom. I sold all of my LINK at 1.40 because I knew after RLC v3 dumped, that even LINK would dump.

>I will not be buying back after learning this. I am all in RLC at the price of 0.43$, about 0.7x ICO price.

>Sorry gentlemen, I thought LINK was going to save me just like all of us did, but this is the nail in the coffin. RLC is a god tier coin.

[Anonymous No.17044954]

>>17044925
Just imagine chainlink make up a shitty chart how they are better then all the other off chain computing projects
I actually would sell

But yes looking forward how they will work together

[Anonymous No.17044957]

>>17044721
CHAINLINK REALIZING THEY NEED IEXEC FOR OFF CHAIN COMPUTE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
BEND THE KNEE LINKIES
B E N D I T

[Anonymous No.17044963]

>>17044921
They didnt ditch anything, its a use case. Nothing more. I know all the high I Q linkers bailed awhile ago, but try to at least read the article before you comment.

[Anonymous No.17044978]

>>17044957
Even if that is true i haven’t seen a single tweet from CL nor the team about how other projects are inferior to them and that their off-chain computing sideproject shits on all the competitors
So i don’t see them bending the knee but working together eye to eye with everybody who wants
Iexec on the otherhand was on a high horse about muh doracles and now they need to bend down a bit

[Anonymous No.17044990]

>>17044922
Go back

[Anonymous No.17044994]

>>17044978
Because they are professionals

[Anonymous No.17045021]

>>17044721
Who's the Bandaid now, muthafucka!?

[Anonymous No.17045051]

>>17044994
Once again, this is just showcasing IEXECs product can be used w any oracle service, giving clients complete versatility. Not sure where any “knees are bending”. If a client was already using chainlinks oracles ? Great. You can use IEXeC seamlessly. Not using chainlinks oracles ? Perfect. Iexec can provide you with one, or you can pick whichever you choose. Use your brain.

[Anonymous No.17045130]

>>17045051
I'm gay and I support this reply

[Anonymous No.17045131]

>>17044802
Factually wrong, synthetix is using them as well as other of you check the ether scans

[Anonymous No.17045138]

>>17045051
IM GOING TO BE SO FUCKING RICH HOLY SHIT
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.17045173]

>>17044978
CL doesn't give a shit about rlc's announcement because rlc is just another shitcoin 'partnered' with them at this point.
RLC niggers will keep trying to cope though.

[Anonymous No.17045175]

>Auto insurance example
Tesla recently rolled out their own car insurance offering. I'll let you guys keep digging into that.
https://www.tesla.com/support/insurance

[Anonymous No.17045185]

>>17045051
great, but no one is using it because it's an unuseable mess. That "it can be used with anything" is irrelevant if the underlying product is shit

[Anonymous No.17045209]

>>17045173
CL literally needs RLC to do certain things. CL is RLC's bitchboy that gathers things for the big boy workers to work on and report to the buyer.
Stay cucked with your 1B marketcap coin.

[Anonymous No.17045233]

CHAINLINK TWEETED IT
https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1223262116318068741?s=21
IT'S HAPPENINGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

[Anonymous No.17045244]

KNEE STATUS: BENT

[Anonymous No.17045254]

>>17044721
Chainlink is fucking savage, iexec, oraclize.

inb4 Mobious integrates chainlink.

[Anonymous No.17045256]

>>17045209
This is exactly the kind of take I'd expect from some 50 iq pajeet who tries to brigade the board with broken english RLC sales pitches and horrible quality memes before every vX dump.
As I said - you'll keep trying to cope because it's all you can do. "Digital ghee" Gilles bent the knee and RLC is clearly over the moon to be associated with a project like chainlink, hence why they rushed to announce it.
Hopefully you'll get a small pump out of this? Make sure to set your exit targets though - it never lasts with RLC.

[Anonymous No.17045258]

>>17045185
Nobody is using anything currently, its par for the crypto course.chainlink, outside of Of a worthless price feed API, isnt being used for anything either. What we are looking for is the future, and there are multiple accounts of major industry players involved with both tokens currently. Dont be naive.

[Anonymous No.17045303]

>price continues to flatline
Bill gates could buy 1 billion link and the price wouldn’t increase

[Anonymous No.17045311]

>>17044721
I knew they'd bend the knee.
Fuck your shitty doracles.

[Anonymous No.17045324]

>>17045311
>LINK literally needs RLC to do powerful tasks
>muh knee!
LINK bending the knee to most powerful RLC.

[Anonymous No.17045336]

>>17044990
Dont try so hard to fit in

[Anonymous No.17045342]

>>17044948
hopefully he was just a shill...

no one can be this stupid

[Anonymous No.17045366]

>>17044954
This

[Anonymous No.17045390]

>>17045324
Stop denying reality like a tranny and humble yourself you little shit.

[Anonymous No.17045422]

>>17045051
>>17045138
>Not sure where any “knees are bending”
Iexec said their doracles were superior to Chainlink's, and now they're working together.

Good on iexec, but you're going to have to start coping.

[Anonymous No.17045445]

>>17045422
It's okay, I'll cope with my insane gains this year. Don't worry retard!

[Anonymous No.17045457]

>>17044963
yes and the article has no mention of dOracles in it.

[Anonymous No.17045479]

>>17045422
The only thing bending is your IQ... they aren't using chainlink, they are presenting a use case for a client that already uses chainlinks oracles, and showcasing that IEXECs versatility allows it to be used with any oracle service. IEXEC still has decentralized oracles, and would provide that service, should a client require it.

[Anonymous No.17045492]

>>17045457
Because the use case is utilizing chainlinks oracles... if it was using IEXECs oracles, there would be no need for chainlink. try to keep up.

[Anonymous No.17045507]

>>17045479
>our doracles are better than Chainlink's!!
>oh btw guys here's how you can use Chainlink instead of our Doracles

now cope

[Anonymous No.17045526]

Should I sell my link & go all in rlc?

[Anonymous No.17045533]

>>17045507
>says cope 3009 times
>cant read or comprehend any actual information

Keep eating those crayons, or don’t. It makes no difference to me.

[Anonymous No.17045576]

>>17045533
iexec created and promoted their "doracles" as a Chainlink killer.
And now they're working with Chainlink, actively integrating it.

Good on iexec because they redeemed themselves.
Bad on you because of a distinct lack of cope.

[Anonymous No.17045587]

>>17045533
Liar! You love crayons.

[Anonymous No.17045682]

>>17045576
Iexec created decentralized oracles to be a complete solution, thus making it as easy as possible for client integration. What was presented today is a use case with part of the iexec solution, showcasing its versatility. Not saying it again. If you can’t seem to wrap your tiny head around that concept, I’ll just assume you are a poorfag at this point.
>inb4 “urrrr cope”

[Anonymous No.17045710]

>>17045682
>Iexec created decentralized oracles to be a complete solution
And now they're integrating Chainlink instead.

[Anonymous No.17045719]

>>17045682
Panjeets trying real hard to spin away from what it actually is... a knee bend

[Anonymous No.17045741]

>>17045719
But to WHO?
Seems like LINK and RLC are bending the knee to eachother

[Anonymous No.17045775]

>>17045741
>Seems like LINK and RLC are bending the knee to eachother
Well no, because Link never badmouthed iexec or launched a direct competitor against it.

Again, good on iexec for redeeming themselves now, but it's time for you to let go.

[Anonymous No.17045783]

>>17045775
Your lack of understanding of the game is showing. You never acknowledge a "lesser", especially a competitor. They definitely have something to gain from a partnership with iExec, but iExec moreso.

[Anonymous No.17045799]

>>17044721
"bend the knee" is a stupid meme. faggots who run their mouths on twitter about link being more valuable than fucking ETH are literal brainlets who build NOTHING, as they sit in front of their screen like chimps screaming NUMBER GO UUUP

[Anonymous No.17045822]

Chainlink saves iExec from its dumpster fire oracles (doracles)

[Anonymous No.17045876]

>>17045822
Weak ass Chainlink needs stronk iExec warlord to complete heavy tasks

[Anonymous No.17045898]

>>17045783
>You never acknowledge a "lesser", especially a competitor.
lmao, then explain this: >>17045390
which was on iexec's website when they launched their "doracles".

iexec directly badmouthed Chainlink and launched a directly competing product.
And now, many months later, they are integrating Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.17045904]

>>17045876
>ctrl+f "doracle"
>0 results
Another "Chainlink killer" once again became a part of the Chainlink ecosystem, like clockwork.

[Anonymous No.17045910]

>>17045799
You sound upset.

>>17045876
Chainlink is integrated to connect external data to iexec.
What the fuck are you talking about.

[Anonymous No.17045953]

This is how blockchain ecosystems are working together and helping each other. Speaking of the most friendly ecosystem for interoperability, Tachyon Protocol definitely deserves a mention. They are decentralized Internet Protocol which aims to bring Next-Gen VPN based on Tech Trusted by 50 Million users in the ecosystem.

[Anonymous No.17045973]

>>17045898
They did it so faggot crybabies like you continually keep RLC in your mouth. Thanks for the free advertisement sub-100 IQ retard.
>>17045910
Read the fucking article retard. RLC is using the data to power ML/AI and other crazy shit.

[Anonymous No.17045987]

>>17045051
This.
Does Android forces you to use Google Drive? No, you can use Dropbox if you want.
Linkies not realizing they are the ones bending the knee.

[Anonymous No.17045998]

>>17045973
>Thanks for the free advertisement
Says the faggot whose pet coin just partnered with Chainlink.

>Read the fucking article retard. RLC is using the data to power ML/AI and other crazy shit.
And Chainlink allows iexec's backend to access the necessary external data.

>>17045987
New levels of cope.

[Anonymous No.17046009]

>>17044802
This. And people don't understand that is perfectly okay. There won't be a use for human -> human smart contracts until the AI singularity. In which Chainstink will rise to $1000 overnight. But we don't know when that will be. There is limited demand for decentralized human ->machine or machine -> smart contracts. The profit models are currently always higher with a centralized third party solution

[Anonymous No.17046022]

I rather invest in the Apple Appstore instead of the Snapchat App, thanks for the heads up guys :)

[Anonymous No.17046023]

>>17045998
Says the faggot who's LINK twitter posted about RLC. A 1B marketcap coin posting about groundbreaking happenings with a 50m coin.

>And Chainlink allows iexec's backend to access the necessary external data.
In reality iExec doesn't need link but it's easier to just use them for now. Combine the best of both worlds for faster adoption overall. Makes sense, but you must remember, iExec has their own oracle :)

[Anonymous No.17046038]

The orchestrator is using link as oracle as he could use another oracle and that independently to iexec as computation maker

The orchestrator is using iexec as computation maker as he could use another computation maker and that independently to link as oracle.

This is a use case, that’s all. Iexec Doracle can be used later as oracle and link can be used for computation later if they get it work.

[Anonymous No.17046052]

>>17044762
You can create some sort of 'lets vote for the truth' game in many blockchains but people are only interested in practically working solutions.

[Anonymous No.17046069]

>>17046023
>In reality iExec doesn't need link but it's easier to just use them for now

so you admit that iExec is better off using LINK instead of dOracles?
i dont really get the argument here, nobody is saying that LINK will replace iExec, as they have fundamentally different use cases

we are however saying that LINK is a better oracle solution, a point which you have just agreed too.
this partnership doesnt hurt either LINK or iExec, but rather exemplifies that LINKs oracle solution is the industry standard. iExec literally chose a 3rd party over their own in-house solution.
it makes sense as the oracle problem is LINKs primary focus, but i dont understand how you can possibly act like this isnt the metaphorical nail in the coffin for dOracles

[Anonymous No.17046072]

>>17046038
>link can be used for computation later if they get it work.
Big if.
Really big if.

[Anonymous No.17046075]

>>17044802
Ampleforth, Synthetix, Aave.

[Anonymous No.17046083]

>>17046023
Yes, the DumpsterFire Oracle (Doracle).
Should've started working on that shit long before Chainlink to get first mover advantage.

[Anonymous No.17046093]

>>17046072
Wanted to be nice... hope you got the point though

[Anonymous No.17046094]

>>17046069
>so you admit that iExec is better off using LINK instead of dOracles?
For now, probably. It also helps more people become aware of iExec. Winwin for iExec.

LINK is not the "better" oracle solution by any stretch of the word. LINK is simply the most known and built on. Big difference. RLC could probably use their own dOracle if they wanted, but this is a master-mind marketing move.

[Anonymous No.17046096]

>>17044805
That arrogance had really French vibe in it.

[Anonymous No.17046127]

>>17045998
>cope
Gilles Fedak, Sergey Nazarov and Vitalik Buterin are all slavshits.
Gilles is obviously the most alpha, most senior and most big brain of them all, he even has a pet chink with a supercomputer in his head to tame China called Huawei or something.

Now let's check some breadcrumbs:

Iexec was at the Wuhan municipal comity one year ago when they put an ultimatum on the CCP: open China to iexec and adopt or be erased from the map.
The chinks accepted with reserves but they were being to slow.
So what did Gilles do? He engineered a new virus strain using the iExec decentralized cloud calculations and released it there.
The current epidemic is a warning shot and the chinese know it.

Not something that fat Sergey could do.

[Anonymous No.17046131]

>>17044762
Did the iExec team make this comparison? Cause it's straight up lies, lmao.

[Anonymous No.17046175]

>>17046094
Take it easy with the mental gymnastics.
iExec is an alright project, no one is trying to take that away from you...

...just kidding, digital curry! :D

[Anonymous No.17046205]

>>17046175
teeheeeheee =D

[Anonymous No.17046317]

>>17046175
It's okay I'm gay and I hold both LINK and RLC.(more RLC admittedly because more gain possibilities imo)

[Anonymous No.17046361]

>>17045682
Cope
Just be happy your shitcoin will finally be useful and stop being a faggot

[Anonymous No.17046394]

>>17044946
This. Iexec is finished

[Anonymous No.17046399]

>>17044721
my god it's happening
I remember biz bro in 2018 they said that only coins to hold were these 2.
You are still ahead of normies and boomers. They will come in 2025 probably
Amazon and microsoft docet

[Anonymous No.17046435]

Not to piss on your bend the knee memery but this article is laughable and embarrassing. Really highlights how iexec is a meme piece of shit, Chainlink is wasting their time even exploring collaborations like these. Car insurance, Jesus Christ. What a joke.

[Anonymous No.17046500]

>>17046435
>Car insurance, Jesus Christ. What a joke.

this.
name 1 single person on earth who buys car insurance.
im honestly not even sure that "car insurance" exists? anyone know anything else about this, seems like just buzzwords

[Anonymous No.17046632]

I lost major confidence in iexec for collaborating with an amateurish startup project like chainlink.

[Anonymous No.17046719]

>>17046023
>but you must remember, iExec has their own oracle
Tell that to iexec, who are now integrating Chainlink oracles.

Copety copety cope.

[Anonymous No.17046742]

>>17046632
This take you a long time to think up Paresh?

[Anonymous No.17046770]

I think a really important aspect here is how Sergey has let them keep face over this. It's a good sign of the leadership that he possesses.

He is ruthless but the only overt action I've seen was when triumphantly retweeting Oraclize's announcement that they had bent the knee. Remember them?

The way to read this is:

- RLC have conceded on oracles.
- LINK will outflank them on TEEs through TC.

But yeah nice table.

[Anonymous No.17046779]

>>17045492
This.

[Anonymous No.17046785]

>>17046770
RLC have not conceded on oracles. It's a power play on iExec's part to utilize chainlinks permeation in the oracle space to shine a light on their own capabilities.

Fucking loser.

[Anonymous No.17046811]

>>17045256
>digital ghee
kek

[Anonymous No.17046812]

>>17044888
nobody checked this? rage

good pun also

[Anonymous No.17046972]

>>17046785
>power play
>literally bending over and admitting chainlink is superior

Makes you think!

[Anonymous No.17046984]

>>17046785
there there sweetheart, you'll learn to cope some day

>>17044888
checked and kecked

[Anonymous No.17046994]

>>17046972
He meant "power bottom" play.

[Anonymous No.17047018]

>>17046785
Why you heff to be mad?

[Anonymous No.17047055]

>>17046785
Look guys, this looser here has some anger and insecurity issues. Because of that he harasses people on the internet.

Go fuck yourself fucking piece of chink shit.

[Anonymous No.17047135]

>>17046785
>15 posts
yep that's cope alright

[Anonymous No.17047232]

Haven't seen picrelated in a while.
Perfect occasion.

[Anonymous No.17047265]

>>17046785
>There are retards on this board that genuinely believes rlc is better than link
God have mercy on us all

[Anonymous No.17047350]

>>17046785
>>17046094
>it's not like I like being a bottom, it's just good for my needs right now! normally im an alpha top!

[Anonymous No.17047371]

>>17044735
didnt iexec claim they had oracles?

[Anonymous No.17047386]

>>17045175
You mean you want someone to do it for you

[Anonymous No.17047432]

>>17047232
I remember coping RLCjeets shitting on LINK just few months ago. Fun times.

[Anonymous No.17047647]

>>17047432
>>17047386
>>17047371
>>17047265
>>17047232
>>17047135
>>17047055
>>17047018
>>17046994
>>17046984
>>17046972
>>17046812
>>17046811
Keep fudding asshole retard sandjeets, I'll keep on buying the dips.

[Anonymous No.17047656]

>>17044721
Of all the sore knees, this one feels the best.
GET. FUCKED. IEXEC SHILLS.

[Anonymous No.17047726]

BEND THE KNEE IEXEKEKS

[Anonymous No.17047755]

>>17047647
Absolutely buttblasted

[Anonymous No.17047761]

>>17047656
actually it is chainlink that has bent the knee as they cannot get their tee to work

[Anonymous No.17047776]

>>17047656
>>17047726
>>17047755
>LINK is using RLC because they can't figure out off-chain compute
g-g-get rr-rekt iexekeks!1!!

[Anonymous No.17047812]

>>17047776
Monumentally ass burned

[Anonymous No.17047827]

>>17047776
Link never claimed to have off chain compute. Iexec based v3 on having oracles better than link

BEND
THE
FUCKING
KNEE

[Anonymous No.17047914]

>>17047827
iexec has both. what is your point?

[Anonymous No.17047915]

Some questions about link tokens because I can't find the answers through google


There's 1 billion tokens, right? Can there ever be more? Is it possible for them to inflate the token? Why not?

Is there any part of the chainlonk project that is not open source? Or is their only collateral as a company the fact they own 30% (really 65% right?) Of the link tokens?

[Anonymous No.17047938]

Why the fuck did you people attach so strongly to RLC anyway? Was it purely out of spite against us Linkies? Every RLC thread was pretty much just people screaming "WE'RE LINK, BUT BETTER!" from what I recall.

[Anonymous No.17047973]

>>17047827
See>>17047914
>>17047938
No one ever said that. We just said RLC was good and it can also do oracles as well. As you can see, link holders hate it because of that reason alone.

[Anonymous No.17047975]

>>17046094
>LINK is not the "better" oracle solution by any stretch of the word. LINK is simply the most known and built on.
>LINK is simply the most known and built on.
... Because it's the best lmao

[Anonymous No.17047984]

>>17044888
Checked

[Anonymous No.17048008]

>>17047975
any proof what it is technogically superior?

[Anonymous No.17048147]

>>17047973
We hate it because the RLC team engaged highly unprofessional behaviour by releasing their infamous "comparison table". They had no conception of the depth and breadth of LINK's work on oracles and how that game is over before its begun. It is the standard.

This is compounded by the fact that LINK OGs have read the section 6.3 of the whitepaper and fully understand the implications of the TC acquisition.

[Anonymous No.17048188]

>>17048147
Imagine being assblasted years later about a CHART that they apologized for because it wasn't correct. The absolute state of assblasted link bagholders.

>muh tc
Call me when it's implemented

[Anonymous No.17048231]

>>17048188
The point isn't even the chart was blatantly misleading. It's the fact that there was a chart in the first place.

And February 18.

[Anonymous No.17048234]

>>17047973
>>17048188
Universally dinkleberged

[Anonymous No.17048259]

>>17044721
THE TWO ALTS TO RULE THEM ALL