[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 229 KB, 828x848, 1D5EC753-0FF7-4FDB-8933-D8F985422F4A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16988801 No.16988801 [Reply] [Original]

What would you prefer to have: 210 bsv or 10,000 chainlink?

>> No.16988811

I'm sure this thread won't be autistic at all

>> No.16988815

>>16988811
Checked

>> No.16988831

210 of the real bitcoin or a pre-mined shitcoin. really fucking makes you think.

>> No.16988835

BSV

>> No.16988841

>>16988801
link has huge bull flag forming, easy profits medium-long term

>> No.16988853

>>16988835
Why?

>> No.16988866

>>16988841
Namaste

>> No.16988868

>>16988801
Would you prefer 210 BTC or 10,000 Digibyte? That's pretty similar to what you are asking here. So definitely BSV.

>> No.16988907

>>16988853
Old fags and high-IQ anons are all deep in BSV. You don't have to dig that deep to understand that craig is satoshi and BSV is bitcoin. Start with reading a bit of the Ira case, and watch some of craig's talk.
DYOR
>DYOR
DYOR
>DYOR
DYOR
>DYOR

I'm babysitting newfags yet again. What can you do I'm just a nice anon.

>> No.16988910

>>16988801
Of course chainlink

>> No.16988913

>>16988801
10k LINK

>> No.16988921

>>16988913
Also I'm a burger and BSV is only available on chink scam exchanges

>> No.16988935

>>16988913
Why link?

>> No.16988956

>>16988935
Sergey is a model CEO while Craig is just a fucking weirdo. Why would I invest in something where the executive tries to alienate himself at every turn

>> No.16988996

>>16988956
Yes you! Explain this!
>>16988907

>> No.16988999

>>16988801
I’d prefer 1 link over 1000 bsv

>> No.16989024

Bsv's success hinges on whether or not Craig is who he claims to be. That in of itself is retarded.
You are betting on the success of a court case on the coins performance.

>> No.16989028
File: 649 KB, 1776x1181, 5F2BEEEA-4B47-48B2-A65E-34E0125D93F2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16989028

>>16988999

>> No.16989045

>>16988801
whatever is worth more, then I convert it to XRP.

>> No.16989046

>>16989024
You didn’t watch the last interwiew CSW had and what he said

>> No.16989051

>>16988907

> Old fags and high-IQ anons are all deep in BSV

As if. BSV is a scam. A good one. But also a short legged one.

>> No.16989065

>>16988801
A shitty fork of a shitty fork or an original idea hmmmm I wonder

>> No.16989069

>>16989045
According to having DMOR, I’d say XRP is shit and yahawa ve ashera zona

>> No.16989098

>>16988831 <*
Explain this ^*


>>16989051
The tulip trust is a trust and it doesn’t need keys
>>16989051

>> No.16989116
File: 32 KB, 1200x800, 1569087565548.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16989116

>>16988996
>Yes you! Explain this!

>> No.16989121

>>16989065
anon, I implore you to undertand the smartmoney/dumb money dynamic in crypto. Let's look at ETH.... it did well during 16/early 17 when basically nonthing else was mooning because people with brains and vision were buying it up. It pumped during late 2017, but nowhere near shit like tron or verge......

if we take this assumption to be true, link will probably pump again this, and again during the next speculative fomo, but nowhere near to the same extent that shit that's digestible to retards will. After link's next leg up I'd encourage you to take profit and reinvest into absolute shitcoins that appeal to retarded top buyers, because those early linkies that get an additional 100x will be the ones that truly make it and get to 6 figure link stacks during the next bear phase.

>> No.16989195
File: 221 KB, 740x1132, judge satoshi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16989195

oh this thread again, let me tell you one thing, this pasta is not a meme:

sad that the only anons left holding chainlink are deluded schizo fucks and their dumb followers who wants to believe they are somehow part of something mystical to give a purpose to their wasteful lives.
meanwhile, all the OGs are slowly transfering their gains into bsv and the slightly above average anons are starting to catch on. The smartest one did long ago.
Truth is, token unironically not needed and everything chainlink does could've been done on the original bitcoin blockchain. The blog post was unironically just a blogpost too. Linkies all thought those memes were marines being ironic, making good shitposts and such, but it was even better than that, it was unironic fud.
as always, no amount of anon posts should lead your investements. DYOR or be left weak-handed and broke

>> No.16989209

>>16989116
The asshole on Pajeets flag is scratch and sniff.

>> No.16989351

>>16989195
ok pajeet. have a terrible day in new delhi

>> No.16989358

>>16989098

So? If you are referring to my pirate song, it still applies. And your hero Craig doesn't hold shit btw, he is a manipulator. A scammer. A disgustingly talented one. And you fall for it.

>> No.16989363

>>16989209
Imagine the smell

>> No.16989367

>>16988801
bsv for sure, chatillon is so 2019, 2020 is the year of bsv

>> No.16989389

>>16988801
I already sold all my LINK for BSV before it pumped. Feels good desu

>> No.16989403

>>16989351
didn't you read it? the smartest sold already, the pajeets are only left holding chainlink, that's why it's ironic you call us pajeets.

>> No.16989411

>>16988801

BSV; real Bitcoin vs laughable shitcoin, how is that a choice?

>> No.16989464

>>16989358
STIFF

>> No.16989488

>>16988921
theres a reason it was delisted from binance (scam)

>> No.16989500

>>16989411
bsv is not bitcoin. btc is bitcoin, just so you know.

>> No.16989514

>>16988907
Remember the Craig talk where he says there were particle swarm optimization algs running on bitcoin that died because of fees? What did he mean by that?

>> No.16989517
File: 43 KB, 400x167, Screenshot_22.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16989517

>>16988801

Its happening soon.

https://decrypt.co/17652/chainlink-has-three-big-reasons-to-feel-good-about-2020

>> No.16989544

>>16989517
Thanks senpai

>> No.16989547

>>16988999
Thx kek

>> No.16989569

>>16988999
But why?

>> No.16989813
File: 8 KB, 218x250, 50438215-8361-4F4E-9E58-92CA34F19C9B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16989813

>hello? HELLLLOOO??? BUT CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY? CANT YOU EXPLAIN THIS TO ME? LIKE, CAN YOU HOLD MY HAND? SPOON-FEED ME PLEASE? I CANNOT THINK FOR MYSELF, SOMEBODY PLEASE TELL ME. IM BEGGING YOU!

>> No.16989823

>>16989813
Well, this, minus shitty wojakposting.
Valuable information is rarely given for free.

>> No.16989858

>>16989823
Chainlin; chainlin
I made a hundred reks off a chainlins
Chainlink, I stink sirs
I bought three million toilets with a chainblink ;)

>> No.16989916
File: 75 KB, 1285x774, chainlin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16989916

>>16989858

>> No.16990176

>>16989916
Im not stiff enough and I miss 500 stinkies to get to 10K

>> No.16990262

You would have to be severely dumb to think anyone but an American invented bitcoin. No sheep fucker would ever one up us on technological innovation.

>> No.16990284

>>16990262
Multiculturalism is a scam. America is an emerit pos

>> No.16990340

>>16988868
Could anyone else admit and agree with this?!
What will happen to chainlink if bsv is like bitcoin and chainlink like digibyte

>> No.16990353

>>16990340
Yes, try to understand, bsv makes link and every other project useless, and that's a hard cold fact.

>> No.16990391

bsv is a scam run by this guy, https://github.com/vbuterin/cult-of-craig (that's vitalik's github page, vitalik is not exactly the most aggressive voice in crypto so you know craig is a real piece of shit if vitalik is outspoken about his bullshit).
for whatever reason the BSV crowd pay third world losers to shill their shitcoin on here, don't ever let them convince you that BSV is anything but a giant pile of lies and faggotry.

>> No.16990416

>>16990391
Cringe

>> No.16991338

>>16988801
HAHAHA THIS CANT BE A REAL QUESTION

>> No.16991387

Fucking LINK FUD thread i'm buying

>> No.16991397

>>16990353
how does bsv address the oracle problem?