Where my pinkies at

[Anonymous No.16986440]

[Anonymous No.16986453]

Here. Feeling comfy.

[Anonymous No.16986458]

>>16986440
pinkie marine reporting in
this gem will make us so fucking rich

[Anonymous No.16986461]

Yep

[Anonymous No.16986470]

Usecase seems niche but they have shit going on for them and shills so I'm betting to increase my money on this. Just purely memetic energy right here.

[Anonymous No.16986477]

>>16986440
180k PNK marine reporting for duty, sir!

[Anonymous No.16986494]

>>16986440
3.7m PNK Sergeant Major reporting

[Anonymous No.16986560]

The absolute state of PNK buyers and rumours

[Anonymous No.16986587]

>>16986440
1M here, and I will go for 5M before takeoff. If I don’t get there, whatever.

[Anonymous No.16986592]

2

[Anonymous No.16986593]

>>16986560
Ranjeeshed

[Anonymous No.16986596]

>>16986560
Which biztard is this lol

[Anonymous No.16986600]

>>16986440
Imagine selling your linkies for pinkies. Absolute state of /biz/.

[Anonymous No.16986602]

20m pinky here

[Anonymous No.16986603]

>>16986596
Probably one of the fud monkeys. Manpreet is in there too kek

[Anonymous No.16986612]

>>16986603
corona chan can't visit india too soon

[Anonymous No.16986617]

>>16986600
5 million Kleros Chad here.

Sold my whole LNK stack for PNK

[Anonymous No.16986628]

>>16986602
>20m
thats a lie

[Anonymous No.16986719]

60K
trying to reach 100k by the time this is all over

[Anonymous No.16986746]

Nobody in this thread holds any of these and if they do I don’t even feel bad for them. More than enough people have called this out for what it is - “developer” cash grab.

>”Our tokens are worthless so uhhhh please give us your ETH in exchange for our tokens. Heh, maybe they’ll even have value one day haha haha. We don’t know because we won’t be around to find out. Thanks for your ETH and supporting our yach..err... project, anon!”

Refute this.

[Anonymous No.16986809]

>>16986746
It’s called a token sale, knob-head.

[Anonymous No.16986892]

>>16986719
I hope PNK can help me out of these financial constraints and away from the nasty people in my life. :(

[Anonymous No.16986897]

bros whats the point of buying these shitcoins when the big cap coins give you better returns?

[Anonymous No.16986908]

>>16986897
Small caps can become top 50 coins. Especially when they have so much support from major players and autism behind them like Kleros does.

[Anonymous No.16986984]

>>16986470
Look I love link as much as the next deluded beholder, but there are a lot of cases where external data would be useful to trigger smart contract clauses but a perfectly reliable/decentralized data source doesnt exist. Use the auto collision insurance example... there will probably be a few data sources to work with including GPS info of each car, on-board computer for steering/acceleration/braking data, and possibly a dashcam or two. It's not trivial to see how chainlink oracles can perfectly determine fault and payouts in such a situation where context gets fuzzy such as variation of traffic laws by state/locality, malfunction or tampering of the on-board computers or applicable sensors, and eyewitness accounts that add info that the sensors failed to adequately capture. Kleros adjudication or arbitration would seem to fit a lot better in this case by leveraging the human ability to make informed judgments in imperfect situations, while maintaining a lot of similar benefits as chainlink such as decentralization of the decision-making mechanism, cryptoeconomic security, and flexibility to be applied to any situation where the counterparties to a contract deem it appropriate. Chainlink is still absolutely amazing for any use cases with reliable/well-understood data sources and well-defined computational needs.

[Anonymous No.16987060]

>>16986984
>token sale quietly accelerates

[Anonymous No.16987068]

>>16986440
430K pinky here. Should I get 670K more to complete a sui stack????

>>16986470
>Usecase seems niche
You do realize they have a decentralized oracle that Vitalik is favoring over LINK as the official oracle layer?

[Anonymous No.16987188]

>>16986984
High IQ take.
>>16987068
>Vitalik is favoring over LINK as the official oracle layer
Low IQ baseless claims.
People like this make it look like an organized shill campaign, or deluded brainlets desperate to validate their decisions. Ethereum will not have an "official oracle layer".

[Anonymous No.16987214]

>>16987068
1M is the make it stack for yacht / citadel entry and I suggest you get there.

>>16986984
Nice

[Anonymous No.16987224]

Is there anywhere for us citizens to sell if we buy in?

[Anonymous No.16987233]

>>16986746
The tokens represent a claim on ETH not more PNK like other staking systems it also requires you to do something in its current state, no free lunch.

[Anonymous No.16987249]

>>16986600
Double checked

[Anonymous No.16987260]

>>16986440
PNKS NOT DEAD?

[Anonymous No.16987266]

>>16987224
It will be listed on CB one day just like LINK was, except PNK will be the official decentralized oracle solution of Ethereum. LINK is old news.

[Anonymous No.16987270]

>>16987260
It's still in ICO , you absolute mong. Lmao.

[Anonymous No.16987276]

>>16987266
>the official decentralized oracle solution of Ethereum
Notice how this phrase is being used in every kleros post. Desperately repeating it to try and make it true, without a single bit of evidence. Think carefully anons.

[Anonymous No.16987280]

>>16987224
Should learn about Uniswap anon. Most PNK volume has historically been there. Also just don't KYC on a VPN'd IDEX

[Anonymous No.16987284]

>>16987270
>ICO
2020

[Anonymous No.16987296]

>>16987188
Yes just like how Maker isn't the official stablecoin of ETH, even it Kleros 200xs to a market cap still below LINKs, it likely won't be official

[Anonymous No.16987309]

>>16987270
Its IICO - Interactive initial coin offering.

[Anonymous No.16987310]

>>16987284
Literally getting 2017 vibes from this desu look into the buys that would have pumped this a minimum of 60x a MINIMUM.

[Anonymous No.16987312]

>>16987276
A single retard made his baseless claim twice
>It's DESPERATELY being stated in EVERY kleros post!!
Care to debate my take here?
>>16986984

[Anonymous No.16987317]

>>16987296
de facto standard != official

[Anonymous No.16987324]

Went all in on this and I’ve never been more confident in a project. I feel so safe and happy knowing that I’m a millionaire. Thank you for revealing this goldmine to me.

[Anonymous No.16987329]

>>16987312
Can you post this in a thread tomorrow? I'm a bit busy enjoying my coffee right now and I have a policy not to frustrate myself trying to elevate anons to a new financial stratum on Sundays.

[Anonymous No.16987334]

>>16987317
Okay. Fair enough. I redact the word "official." I will take "de facto standard that flips LINK on CoinMarketCap." No skin off my pretty white nose.

>>16987310
I am getting full blown 2015 ETH vibes.

[Anonymous No.16987364]

>>16987312
Why? I already said it is a high IQ take. LINK and PNK cover two different but overlapping/similar use cases. Neither will be the official oracle layer. LINK will be the standard for automated oracles, and PNK for anything requiring human judgement.

[Anonymous No.16987371]

>>16987334
Even 10% of LINKs market cap is nearly a 30x. Just sit back and think about that for a second.

[Anonymous No.16987391]

>>16987364
Stinky Pinky n Linky together in perfect harmony :)

[Anonymous No.16987401]

>>16987364
Sorry I didnt check post ID. Read your comment as an attempt to discredit kleros based on straw argument of shills existing, but now see you're just calling out bullshitters.

[Anonymous No.16987408]

>>16986809
Their reason for the token sale knob head is to raise capital. Why not just sell their tokens on the open market? Why do they need to put on some big show? It’s on plenty of exchanges. The problem is it is worthless and nobody will buy them.

Refute this.

[Anonymous No.16987422]

>>16987408

>provide smart contract with good liquidity and no exchange fees
>"lol they are stupid for not market selling on idex"

Please neck yourself

[Anonymous No.16987453]

>>16987224
Uniswap

[Anonymous No.16987456]

>>16987408
Liquidity

[Anonymous No.16987713]

Why do people put valuable ETH tokens into useless Kleros tokens?

Imagine hating on HEX for that reason but buying Kleros...

[Anonymous No.16987995]

Retard here, what does this even mean?

[Anonymous No.16988010]

>>16987995

Just use the advanced window for the set price and then click yes a few times on metamask. It just asks you to adjust your gas limit to a certain level, then provide gas price after that which determines the cost of your transaction.

Gas limit = how much gas you wanna use
Gas price = how much you wanna pay for it

[Anonymous No.16988024]

>>16988010
What the fuck is gas?

[Anonymous No.16988105]

>>16986746
Mhmmm

[Anonymous No.16988213]

>>16986560
>thinks this is fud
All you have to do is check the etherscan to see. But you won’t, because you don’t know how to.

[Anonymous No.16988229]

based on this fud, i am going to buy more pnk. haven’t seen this since the old link times.

[Anonymous No.16988232]

>>16987713
Kleros is completely different to Hex. Hex is a money grab by a known scam artist..

[Anonymous No.16988237]

>>16987713

[Anonymous No.16988262]

>>16986600
>imagine being a poorfag and not making it off link yet even though it has already topped
Meanwhile, real link whales are trading 10’s of thousands of link for pnk.

[Anonymous No.16988296]

Is it worth grabbing some PNK if I know it's going to be a pain the fucking ass to cash out since I'm Canadian?

[Anonymous No.16988362]

>>16988296
No

[Anonymous No.16988399]

>>16986984
Ive bought LINK and never knew what it does until this post. Thanks buying some PNK

[Anonymous No.16988681]

From the whitepaper:

>Jurors rule disputes in order to collect arbitration fees. They are incentivized to rule honestly
because, after a dispute is over, jurors whose vote is not coherent with the group will not receive their arbitration fees and furthermore they lose will some tokens. Then both the arbitration fees they would have received if coherent and their lost stakes of tokens are given to coherent jurors.

Which means, if there is a somewhat ambiguous case, in which jurors rule down the middle, say 4-5, you could LOSE MONEY by ruling on the "objectively correct side" due to other jurors being fucking retarded. Yes, your money is dependent on the other jurors not being fucking retarded. Which as we all know, is a huge risk when it comes to other humans.

A problem I could see is that people will only volunteer to be jurors if it is "worth their time". If a particular juror, who actually is smart and studies the cases closely, gets burned multiple times by the retarded majority, he won't be coming back. It's not worth his time. The same goes if the reward in general is not big enough. Think if there is a complicated case that requires close attention and study, you might be spending hours on this case, days possibly, for a small token reward. It is unclear if this represents an efficient use of time to the individual.

There's a small concept in real courts called DELIBERATION, in which the jurors meet PRIVATELY to reach a CONSENSUS, and DEBATE THE FACTS/CASE. Kleros doesn't offer this at all. It relies completely on the "Schelling point" as its golden rule. Which means everyone is reviewing the facts/case privately, with all implicit biases and misunderstandings intact. If they misunderstand a portion of the case, there is no deliberation session in which to ask or be corrected on this point, it is all done alone/without the input of other jurors.

Just a few problems I can think of with this system.

[Anonymous No.16988718]

>>16987713
go away richard

[Anonymous No.16988818]

>you could LOSE MONEY by ruling on the "objectively correct side" due to other jurors being fucking retarded.
Cases can be appealed by anyone if the outcome is "wrong". If the decision is flipped in the next round you double your ETH.

>in which the jurors meet PRIVATELY to reach a CONSENSUS, and DEBATE THE FACTS/CASE. Kleros doesn't offer this at all.
Maybe not by Kleros, but @klerosjuror tg group most jurors chat here all the time so that cases are clear.

[Anonymous No.16988843]

>>16986984
Trust me. You wasted everyone's time by typing that out anon.

[Anonymous No.16988855]

>>16988681
These are really good points. You should go on their telegram and bring this up. They love discussing shit like that on there and it might make them think of solutions to the issues you bring up.

[Anonymous No.16988878]

>>16987276
>Ignorantly claims no evidence of oracles

https://kleros.io/en/oracle/

[Anonymous No.16989859]

>>16988878
Absolutely fucking btfo lmao. Can't believe the level of ignorance on biz.

[Anonymous No.16989939]

>>16989859
The dumber the FUDders, the better the project. PNK and VIDT are similar in that respect. They get massive amounts of unfounded low IQ FUD. It's absolutely bullish.

[Anonymous No.16990328]

I'm up to 780K

[Anonymous No.16990549]

Almost at my 1,000,000 PNK goal

[Anonymous No.16990627]

>>16990549
hidey-ho neighborino! i'm within 5 ranks of you :]

[Anonymous No.16990685]

>>16988024
Based newbie, gas is the price it costs to send eth and things on eth

[Anonymous No.16991045]

>>16987260
SMINEM literally blessed this coin

[Anonymous No.16991157]

i'll throw 2 eth at this shit show just because of all the static

[Anonymous No.16991644]

>>16991157
yeah fuck it why not I also did this

[Anonymous No.16991652]

>>16991157
You've just been pajeeted

[Anonymous No.16992301]

>>16987364
Absolutely this.

Can't wait for the inevitable partnership.

Imagine.

[Anonymous No.16992337]

>>16991652
that's ok i'll just keep studying the art of the blade

[Anonymous No.16992818]

>>16992337
I unironically have a small collection of family heirloom swords. Swords from dead soldiers my family may or may not have killed in the past. Most prized is a WW2 Japanese officers' sword with definite battle marks on the edge. Plan on using my PNK gains on getting myself some more shit like that. Old Spanish shipwreck silver knives, shit like that.

[Anonymous No.16993051]

>>16986440
Comfy as fuck

[Anonymous No.16993063]

>>16986628
Not in one wallet

[Anonymous No.16993075]

>>16992337

[Anonymous No.16993126]

>>16986440
Kleros threads are always based.

[Anonymous No.16993394]

>>16988878
the key word was "official" you absolute brainlet. there will be no "official" oracle to ETH no matter how much you pajeets repeat it out loud.

that being said, I like the system. it adds a capitalistic take on arbitration and will likely result in the free market reducing the cost of arbitration substantially, which will attract the attention of big business and potential jurors alike.

[Anonymous No.16993409]

You can tell the coin is the next x100 by the length of it's threads, Link threads were like this back in 2018, with more memes of course.

[Anonymous No.16993649]

>>16993394
Official stable coin effectively DAI
Official Oracle for everything not price feed, Kleros.

[Anonymous No.16993676]

Feeling comfy , PNK marines

[Anonymous No.16993974]

>>16993649
>Official Oracle for everything not price feed, Kleros.
i get you missed the boat on LINK but automating brainlet work that doesn't require a human touch is what will drive the price of LINK ie contractual transactions (including p2p), derivatives, IoE sensor data oracles, etc.

Kleros basically groups together an unrelated unit of people to make a gray-area decision. And maybe that has value. The end game is probably 3rd world nations with an internet connection volunteering (and colluding) to resolve a case that will give them enough pennies to buy food for the week. Because what this will do to arbitration, if successful, is drive the price of arbitration down to the bare minimum that 'jurors' are willing to work for.

if you're planning on making it on Kleros then I hope you have a shitload of it.

[Anonymous No.16994173]

>>16993974
So you're judging LINK value off the technology being imperative for work flow and cost cutting. Do you not realize just how big and expensive dispute revolution is? We're talking hundreds of millions of cases dealt with annually by giant e-commerce sites alone. Team's papers claim 3-5% of all transactions end in dispute. It's not sustainable nor cheap to deal with these cases in usual centralized, and slow manner. Rather than buying our outsourcing all that dispute resolution, you literally just let an already existing network to do it for your clients for minimal cost. In this case, it'd clearly become an imperative just like Chainlink for all businesses.

[Anonymous No.16994182]

>>16994173
dispute resolution*

[Anonymous No.16994206]

196K Reporiting in.

Comfy. I will finally make it.

[Anonymous No.16994279]

>>16994173
This is based

>>16992818
This too

[Anonymous No.16994301]

>>16994173
I'm not saying Kleros can't be valuable. If it's adopted, it will be an excellent source of low-stakes dispute resolution, and I say low-stakes because businesses who adopt the network will bombard it with the low value slack that's too expensive for them to deal with in house; and as I mentioned prior, they will try to drive the cost of arbitration down as low as possible which will lead to diminishing returns for jurors in the network. The high-stakes arbitration will probably stay in-house because they probably want a favorable agreement that they will refuse to leave up to the judgement of a party of unknowns. Which brings up another point: giants like Amazon and Ebay want a favorable ruling for the house. The potential savings of using the Kleros network can be completely undone if rulings are constantly against them. A completely fair system will likely drive them away from utilizing the network beyond a pilot. Which leaves p2p disputes as the primary driver of network use, and how many people are going to be needing that?

[Anonymous No.16994371]

>>16994301
eBay doesn’t represent the house. It’s between buyer and seller. They are only a 3rd party negotiator/arbitrator. If anything, they favor with the buyer 95% of the time. You would think most sellers would leave but they don’t.

t. eBay seller $100k gross

[Anonymous No.16994417]

>>16994371
Then it's probably the case with Amazon as well. I think Amazon stocks it's own shelves though with some in house offerings though. So in that case Ebay could potentially package in the Kleros arbitration system and pocket the difference from the outsourcing.

[Anonymous No.16994470]

>>16994301
>betting on a world entrenched in blockchain usage via Chainlink
>but no one's going to use p2p marketplaces

Come on now. All valid points and I definitely see what you're getting at, but I see it unfolding a bit differently. In the video below, the Reuters guy explains just how big this space is getting, and how existing models for online dispute resolution will become increasingly difficult to apply with the advent of purely global marketplaces due to factors like jurisdiction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz6hNwJ2bNo

[Anonymous No.16994493]

>>16994417
Yeah I think anything buyer to seller would be a good fit. But amazon sales from companies and their warehouse might be a different story.

[Anonymous No.16994513]

>>16992818
extremely based

[Anonymous No.16994544]

>>16988878
LINKS are seething

[Anonymous No.16994567]

>>16994519
any shills want to respond to this obvious problem?

[Anonymous No.16994795]

>>16994567
Shh. We don't talk about that here

[Anonymous No.16994858]

>>16994567
Biz isn’t capable of outsmarting a team like kleros. If you’ve thought of it, so have they.

[Anonymous No.16994865]

>>16988878
Obviously you are low-intelligence so I will explain it very clearly.
I said that Kleros would not be the "official decentralized oracle solution of Ethereum".
I did not say that Kleros did not have an oracle solution. If you had a better ability to understand written English you would recognize these are two different statements.
>>16989859
Speak for yourself. The retard you are replying to can only make up straw men, and can't actually argue what I wrote.
>>16993394
Glad there are some smart anons here.
>>16994544
LINK is not the "official" oracle solution either, dumb fuck. You shills are so desperate.
>>16994567
None of them will be able to respond. Look at the IQ of the ones I am replying to... like they would even be able to understand what a Sybil attack is.

[Anonymous No.16994868]

>>16994858
Except they just did youass

[Anonymous No.16994914]

>>16994567
I answered it in the other thread. Either party to the contract can file an appeal, and the appellate board will not include the original jurors. Whale scammers who rigged the original decision lose their stakes and the contract resolves properly. Unless you're assuming that a whale consortium controls such an overwhelming proportion of the network that both the original and appellate boards can be reliably compromised via sybil attack, in which case you're just flailing wildly against the premise of cryproeconomics in general and have found no unique fault of the kleros protocol.

[Anonymous No.16994938]

There are literally more replies ITT than there are PNK transactions on THE ENTIRE ETHEREUM NETWORK in the last 24 hours

kys if you entertain buying this trash

[Anonymous No.16994942]

>>16994868
No they didn’t you brainlet. Jfc

[Anonymous No.16994950]

>>16994938
>he doesn’t know link whale traded 800 eth of link for pnk in the last week
Ngmi

[Anonymous No.16994957]

>>16994914
>I answered it in the other thread.
No you didn't. Just said it would be unlikely, without realizing there is nothing to stop this attack from happening.
> in which case you're just flailing wildly against the premise of cryproeconomics in general and have found no unique fault of the kleros protocol.
Correct. The Sybil Attack is not unique to Kleros. But Kleros needs to protect against it if it is to have any chance of success.
How do you think they will combat the Sybil Attack? KYC requirements for jurors, or something else? "we hope it won't happen" is not a valid protection.

[Anonymous No.16994985]

>>16994957
I fud to get a lower price too. It’s dead hours for biz rn. Don’t need to try so hard. Save it for the morning.

[Anonymous No.16995046]

>>16994957
Being readied.

Now we wait.

[Anonymous No.16995047]

>>16994957
Even in lieu of something like KYC or reputation which could be extremely easily implemented, cryptoeconomics allow us to rationalize about the level of security provided by a network, which in a staking-based system is directly proportional to the overall value of the network. We'll be extremely generous and assume that a 51% attack will work (which is far from guaranteed since it provides only a slight edge and requires taking a massive gamble on losing such a large stake), then you can easily calculate how much money the whale consortia would need to spend/risk to acquire and stake 51% of the total staking pool (we can use 51% of the applicable total token value as a safe lower bound, although the real amount is higher due to price slippage in buying such a large share). Then you only utilize the network for contracts worth less than the cost of performing that attack (minus some additional margin for safety). So your fud is now limited to "the network can only secure contracts worth less than some X% of the total network value. Amazing, really compelling stuff anon.

[Sage No.16995053]

>>16986440
No coiner because this is a pnd scam

[Anonymous No.16995073]

>>16995053
>pnd scam
Everyone is getting the same price. This fud is extremely bullish.

[Anonymous No.16995102]

>>16995047
nice
there are responses here that are bending toward the right-hand side of the iq curve
breddy gud for a shill thread

[Anonymous No.16995129]

>>16994985
>I fud to get a lower price too.
That accusation would make more sense if Kleros wasn't an ICO.
Grow up anon, not everyone highlighting negative aspects of a token is fudding. The sybil attack is a real issue for kleros - they either need to propose a solution for it, or accept that the outcomes will be controlled by whales.
LINK went through the same thought process, and uses KYC'd nodes as a solution. Kleros will probably have to do the same thing.
>>16995047
Higher IQ than most anons, good that you acknowledge that reputation or KYC will be required to solve this.
> So your fud is now limited to "the network can only secure contracts worth less than some X% of the total network value. Amazing, really compelling stuff anon.
IQ dropped off towards the end. A valid criticism against a project's current design is not necessarily fud, but an acknowledgement that improvements need to be made.

[Anonymous No.16995161]

>>16995047
The problem is that said whale would not need 51% of the network to rig a dispute; they would only need 51% of the jurors applying to take the dispute. Unless 100% of the network is applying for every single dispute, then it costs much less to spam one case and obtain 51% of the jury.

also I need to sleep. goodnight.

[Anonymous No.16995167]

>>16995129
> The sybil attack is a real issue for kleros - they either need to propose a solution for it, or accept that the outcomes will be controlled by whales.

THEY HAVE THE SOLUTION TO THE SYBIL ATTACK. READ THE FUCKIN BLOG!

Why Does Kleros Need its Own Token?
First and foremost, PNK is a protection against Sybil attacks. In order for an attacker to flood the juror pool, they need to buy enough PNK so that they are selected enough times to be a juror for the same case in order to change the outcome. Generally, this means that the attacks needs 51% of the total (staked) tokens.

> https://medium.com/kleros/why-kleros-needs-a-native-token-5c6c6e39cdfe

[Anonymous No.16995172]

>>16995129
The question is lies. Are you going to get a bag of pnk

[Anonymous No.16995177]

>>16995129
You're right, you do seem to be taking a more balanced approach to the discussion, so it's not fair to call it fud. But the issue is also obviated to the extent that you simply operate within the margin of safety provided by the staking economics. Adding sybil resistance layers such as KYC or reputation just increase the costs of performing an attack and so expand the value range of contracts that can be serviced.

[Anonymous No.16995176]

>>16995172
Still* not is

[Anonymous No.16995194]

>>16995053
>didn't even go up yet

yes. stay out!

[Anonymous No.16995207]

>>16995129
Each Juror would have to be staking a certain amount of Kleros to be able to be a juror. Also if the Majority of the jurors disagree with the attackers vote then the attacker pays a portion of their stake to keep honesty.

[Anonymous No.16995213]

>>16995161
Fair point but that's why I said applicable total token value (meaning value of tokens being staked into that particular court). The same logic holds for how to calculate the level of security provided by the network's game theory, you just scale down the numbers to deal with what's applicable for the case/court in question. Also worth noting (unless I'm retarded) that staking 51% of the court's tokens does not guarantee you 51% of the votes, since I believe it's a weighted lottery and not direct allocation. So you would stand to lose 51% of the total applicable token pool, but maybe still not even control a majority of the votes.

[Anonymous No.16995228]

>>16986440
SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG SATSGANG GANG

[Anonymous No.16995230]

Um...g-guys?
>>16995222

[Anonymous No.16996149]

>>16995161
That's why Kleros has a forking mechanism. If a large whale controls 51% of the court, the court can fork making the attackers PNK worthless and thus, the attack both expensive and pointless.

[Anonymous No.16996580]

I'm thinking this is the new LINK.

[Anonymous No.16997304]

When is this getting listed on major exchanges?

[Anonymous No.16997350]

>>16997304

Who the fuck could know? It's not the team's priority #1 to get it on some chink token washcoin central.

[Anonymous No.16997417]

>>16997350
>Who the fuck could know?
True. Do you think something like CB could be in the cards? I mean, they listed LINK after all. I am just wondering what will be the pump catalyst for this going forward. It has never pumped before, so it is only a matter of time. I'm thinking the release of their oracle could see a nice pump.

Also, the exchanges its listed on does kind of matter. It's not something to be brushed off. Where can burgers cash out when the time comes?

[Anonymous No.16997785]

>>16997350
Yeah they stated several times they are looking for worthy real exchanges. Probably has something to do with the government backing. I think Coinbase is in the cards.

[Anonymous No.16998439]

>>16997785
>Probably has something to do with the government backing.
They are doing everything by the book it seems. I like seeing teams that actually plan several steps ahead in terms of regulatory requirements.

[Anonymous No.16998603]

>>16998439
Yeah this is literally it

Seems like everything they have done is strategic