Craig ultimate fud

[Anonymous No.16974459]

Why doesn't he just log into his old satoshi account that was last active in 2010 and just post a comment proving that is his account :)?

[Anonymous No.16974497]

because he's a sociopathic liar that understands the value of fooling the most gullible speculative community in the world

[Anonymous No.16974512]

>>16974459
fuck off imbecile satoshi account was compromised in 2011 this is a well known fact by the people that were around. many retards larped as satoshi over the years with his accounts it proves nothing.

[Anonymous No.16974521]

also the real craig pill:
imagine putting billions of manhours to squirm around signing which only takes a minute...

[Anonymous No.16974526]

>>16974512
why hasnt the bitch just made his "trustee" move his btc :)? That's another easy thing to do, retard

[Anonymous No.16974540]

>>16974526
rofl the simplest explanation is the most likely: there is no trust craig never mined any bitcoins he is a gox baby also a narcissistic sociopath and a compulsive liar.

[Anonymous No.16974542]

>>16974512
also, would like to see proof of the compromise in 2011. The most ive read are alleged stories. Not actual proof

[Anonymous No.16974572]

>>16974512
He could still log into it with a camera filming him just to prove he could access it

[Anonymous No.16974647]

>>16974542
the only person who could prove that without the shadow of doubt is satoshi himself he however disappeared. his emails got leaked and sold on dark web along with his accounts with which about 3-4 people posted over the years the nour fag being the latest and the 2014 "i'm not dorian is the first larper". there was one faggot that wrote a wall of text about being disappoint which i can't find right now.

[Anonymous No.16974654]

>>16974572
like i said it would prove nothing the account ws up for sale several times. not to mention an admin could reset the password for a bribe or blackmail. it would only be a matter of money and calvin has it. no! craig could actually log into satoshi account but he could never ever sign as satoshi because he is not fucking satoshi.

stop moving the goalpost to something a scammer could actually easily accomplish! fucktards...

[Anonymous No.16974700]

>>16974654
I'm not defending Craig, I think he's a con-artist. I'm saying that he's not even doing that much.

It's obvious that he's bullshitting about everything, real Satoshi wouldn't need to go back and re-edit his own blog posts from the past to try and prove his identity, nor would he claim that he doesn't care if someone doesn't believe him while getting insanely butthurt anytime someone calls him out as being a liar.

He's a power hungry ego-maniac who thinks of himself as smarter than everyone else.

[Anonymous No.16974817]

>>16974700
i'm serious stop moving the goalpost to something a scammer could actually easily accomplish!
the situation is bad as it is don't give him ideas how he could try to avoid signing

[Anonymous No.16974911]

>>16974817

> Imagine being so retarded to think whoever signs is actually Satoshi

Signing just proves someone has the keys, not who they could be.

[Anonymous No.16974985]

>>16974911
Holy shit, you're fucking stupid.

[Anonymous No.16975006]

>>16974911
its the best bet that only satoshi would have his private keys. especially his rsa pgp keys. there is absolutely no reason to entertain any candidate that can't sign.

[Anonymous No.16975426]

>>16975006
>demands absolute proof
>best bet
>bet
>BET

Signing is not proof of anything, your own language betrays you.

[Anonymous No.16975462]

>>16974459
Yeah this has been asked before, the Satoshi/Ver/CSW saga is pure theater
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU

[Anonymous No.16975670]

>>16975426
it would be proof he at the very least had access to they keys