[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 79 KB, 1686x560, tcevxji5bdc41.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16949862 No.16949862 [Reply] [Original]

Prepare for takeoff.

We're gonna make it.

>> No.16949892

>>16949862
ETH?

>> No.16949959

>>16949892
Yes, I think it is.

>> No.16949980

>>16949892
doesn't even matter which

>> No.16950003
File: 53 KB, 534x800, tophat-pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16950003

>>16949892
Literally every altcoin

>> No.16950013

>>16949862
Jesus Christ... You cannot despute that ta...

>> No.16950394

>>16950013
this.... huge confirmation wow

>> No.16950408

>>16950013
IT'S LITERALLY INFALLIBLE

THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY THIS COULD HAVE ANOTHER OUTCOME

WE ARE THE NEW ELITE

>> No.16950450

>>16950013
OH WOW. OH WOW. OH WOW.

>> No.16950468

>>16949862
Tick tock

>> No.16950504

mETHheads are starting to get annoying. Seen a variation of this chart 50 times already.

>> No.16951165

>>16949892
ETH.

>> No.16951218

>>16949862
Juiciest chart in crypto. Basically free money.

>> No.16951239
File: 135 KB, 1079x1150, 1575319478221.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16951239

>>16949862
>this TA

>> No.16951264

>>16950504
yup. They are delusional. The chart looks like its headed sub $100.

>> No.16951271

>>16950013
HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>> No.16951275

>>16949862
Here's the ETH blackpill;
ETH will never pump to new high in satoshis

Because if it did it would flip BTC marketcap because of higher inflation

Literally impossible to pump more than 7x from here, why bother with such low gains when you could buy something with lower marketcap?

>> No.16951357

>>16949862
imagine hodling this highly risky shitcoin through an entire bull/bear cycle and at the end of it all you should have just been holding BTC because it retraced ~99% of it's satoshi value.

>> No.16951415

>>16949980
Rising tide?