[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 115 KB, 1400x733, 1*2KtYER-M6SFphw8baAbsZw.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16935210 No.16935210 [Reply] [Original]

AWWW SHIIIIIIIIET HERE WE GO LADS

https://medium.com/@betprotocol/betprotocol-connects-with-chainlink-for-esports-and-sports-betting-129e02b9f853

>> No.16935222

nobody will use it.

>> No.16935226

>>16935210
Who?

>> No.16935228

>>16935222
lol...

>> No.16935233

how is that ethereum scaling for the use of chainlink? kek

>> No.16935239

>>16935228
What? Nobody uses eth dapps for gambling.

>> No.16935240

>>16935210
Fuck off this can’t possibly be real.

>> No.16935258

>>16935210
LITERALLY

>> No.16935267
File: 21 KB, 600x315, 1571853820731.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16935267

Here come the copelets, right on cue.

>> No.16935270

>>16935210
>>16934671
This guy called it!

>> No.16935278

>>16935233
eth 2.0 should scale pretty well. i expect it'll be ready within the year

>> No.16935280

Unironically great

>> No.16935288

>>16935270
That guy probably works for Bet Protocol, whatever the fuck that literal who is

>> No.16935336

>>16935210
who the fuck...

>> No.16935443

>>16935336
That's what kids say about mommy's new boyfriend, right before the thumping and moaning starts.

>> No.16935458
File: 151 KB, 600x900, 42147897891237823.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16935458

>>16935210

>> No.16935469

>>16935210
nothing burger

>> No.16935474

>>16935210
Who?

>> No.16935491

>>16935210
>another nothing burger
fucking lmao

>> No.16935492

>>16935443
alright dude try to lay off the porn today

>> No.16935546

>>16935210
it's just a startup =/ link could partner with 1000 teams like this and it won't mean shit. Need big boys, need usage, or we get fucked.

>> No.16935564

>>16935222
All my village's Rupees disagrees with you.

>> No.16935592
File: 11 KB, 225x225, images (100).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16935592

>>16935564
your village is going to tar and feather you

>> No.16935632

literal

>> No.16935638

>>16935546
>link could partner with 1000 teams like this and it won't mean shit
>Need big boys
Imagine actually believing this about a decentralized project.

>> No.16935758

>>16935239
not that I'm shilling betprotocol which I had never heard of before this, but a couple of other gambling tokens I follow do consistent (~$50MM/event) volume. So idk what you're talking about.

>> No.16935856

>>16935638
Imagine not understanding the tokenomic value proposition offered by the chainlink network. Without a huge amount of value locked in DeFi and Collateralized in the link token, you're not going to see dramatic growth or double digits. If you disagree please explain to me based on what rationale? If you are able.

>> No.16935870
File: 124 KB, 900x444, sure its about betting.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16935870

>> No.16935883

>>16935856
>Without a huge amount of value
And lots of small participants together don't amount to a "huge amount of value"?

Then why are the "big boys" constantly shilling so desperately to individual consumers?

>> No.16935900

>>16935883
No, they don't. These small partners are mostly startups with literally no users. You should read a book, or at least some blog posts on the subject of network growth and USAGE. Or go on believing BEND THE KNEE LINK THE STANDARD memes, if that is all your brain can handle.

>> No.16935911

SHUT UP FAGGOTS TRUMP WILL ANNOUNCE AT DAVOS THE FED IS USING CHAINLINK FROM THIS MOMENT ON.

>> No.16935918

>>16935900
>startups with literally no users.
They have "no users" because they're startups.
You absolute retard.

>> No.16935954
File: 31 KB, 668x382, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16935954

>>16935918
You must be the smart guy at work

>> No.16935974

>>16935954
>hurrrr startups bad

A major part of Chainlink is that probably the majority of all crypto projects out there need external data.
That means most of the "literal whos" that came out of the ETH ico boom for instance.
That also means ETH itself.
That also means all of DeFi.
etc.

If you don't like it, maybe crypto isn't for you.

>> No.16935980

>>16935911
No one from link is going to be at DAVOS. XRP is the only crypto project that will be the AFAIK, and Steve Mnuchin(us treasury secretary) speaking on moneygram(xrp partner), at DAVOS... Retweeted by XRP ceo as well. Linkies got meme'd unbelievably by the DAVOS thing, it is going to be about xrp.

>> No.16936012

>>16935974
I most likely hold more link than you and have been here longer. Just saying, you sound like an emotional bitch right now. The layer Link would be operating from has other projects that deserve the attention of anyone with a brain(ie, not you); Kleros and Tellor. Anyone who is invested in decentralized oracle tech, who ignores every project but the one most heavily shilled to them, is an idiot.

Also, you're missing the overarching theme here, usage. Usage is not just the hurdle to overcome for link... It is the main challenge to ETH and all of DeFi.

>> No.16936059

>>16936012
>The layer Link would be operating from has other projects that deserve the attention
The fact that such a large proportion of crypto is using Chainlink is extremely bullish for a decentralized project.

Chainlink is about peer-to-peer oracles. They cut out middlemen.
They may put a lot of legacy finance institutions out of business, so you fetishizing them is pretty dumb.

>> No.16936061

>>16935443
Biljal the coomer detected

>> No.16936070

>>16936059
>they cut out the middeman
its a middleware software you fucking retard

>> No.16936082

>>16936070
Yes, much like Napster.

Chainlink allows two peers to enter into secure agreements and contracts, without necessarily needing middlemen like lawyers, banks, insurance companies, notaries, ...

>> No.16936085
File: 45 KB, 698x827, e7225a64.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16936085

I don't really understand why chainlink publishes these partnerships with literal who coins on their pages sometimes too. What the fuck are they thinking?

>> No.16936088

>>16936059
The reality is no one knows how link tokenomics will play out. Idk what you're accusing me of fetishizing, usage? You're the fucking linky cult cuck here, knowing next to nothing about your own fucking investment

>> No.16936094

>>16936088
>The reality is no one knows how link tokenomics will play out.
The more value goes through Link, the more Link tokens will be needed to colleteralize transactions.
And the more players, the more value (and the more security).

>> No.16936124

>>16936094
Linkies are pretty much depending on trillions of dollars being locked in DeFi, one way or another. There is less than one billion in DeFi today, the road to 1t mcap is 1000x, or ONE THOUSAND BILLION. This is something that will take another 5-10 years to build, unless ETH flips BTC and we see fully regulated and ADOPTED DeFi apps, not just from consumers but from institutions.

>> No.16936184

XRP shits on Chainspank

>> No.16936219

>>16936059
>The fact that such a large proportion of crypto is using Chainlink is extremely bullish
Said nobody ever. Gravelcoin and MOAB isn’t crypto. Nobody is using this shit.

>Chainlink is about peer-to-peer oracles
>peer-to-peer oracle
That’s not even a fucking term. You’re trying real hard to sound technical aren’t you? Fucking retarded linkoids LMAO. Your technobabble doesn’t fly on this site kid, you might be able to impress your parents with this nonsense though.
>PEER-TO-PEER ORACLES

>> No.16936256

>>16936124
>Linkies are pretty much depending on trillions of dollars being locked in DeFi, one way or another.
And if/when smart contracts replace conventional financial products, that's exactly what will happen.

>> No.16936305

>>16936256
I think they could hope to achieve as much exposure to the traditional market as say, DocuSign has... That is to say, not a trillion dollars worth. SC's won't be adopted to a significant degree within the next five years, like 10+ years for that shift to even become evident or mandated by law which is what linkers would have you believe

>> No.16936314

>>16936305
>I think they could hope to achieve as much exposure to the traditional market as say, DocuSign has... That is to say, not a trillion dollars worth.
wow, you think THAT??

>> No.16936329

>>16936305
wrong
>open banking
>swift gpi
>new api standards and protocols
>etc etc...
good try though buddy! maybe next time!

>> No.16936333

>>16936314
It is a pretty fair prediction to make especially considering docusign's involvement don't you fucking think?

>> No.16936350

>>16936333
>It is a pretty fair prediction to make especially considering docusign's involvement
Why?
Swift is involved too. And Google Cloud.

>> No.16936353

>>16936329
oh yeah, the long list of white labeled NDA's that will save you from the realization of your own emotional attachment

>> No.16936374

>>16936350
>SWIFT gpiLink
>PlaidLink
>UpLink
show me the network activity? tell me why they would need to collateralize in chainlink?

>> No.16936385

>>16935443
based

>> No.16936398

>>16936374
>show me the network activity?
Chainlink is just getting started.

>tell me why they would need to collateralize in chainlink?
Because collateral adds security.

>> No.16936401

W H O
H
O

>> No.16936432

>>16936398
Lot's of security with binance 75x leverage and sergey 700k dumps, eh?

>> No.16936436

>>16936432
Yes.

>> No.16936528

>>16936436
makes sense :^)

>> No.16936605

>>16936082
That's smart contracts in general. Chainlink is just a network that delivers data to and from smartcontracts.

>> No.16936613

>>16936528
14 posts in a Chainlink thread to fud Chainlink.

Imagine your time being this worthless, just imagine.

>>16936605
>That's smart contracts in general.
And any smart contract beyond creating and moving tokens around needs external data.

>> No.16936705

New. Industry. Standard.

>> No.16936708

>>16936613
>And any smart contract beyond creating and moving tokens around needs external data.

Yes, hence what I said here:

>>16936605
> Chainlink is just a network that delivers data to and from smartcontracts.

I'm not knocking Chainlink, but I'd assigning credit to where credit is due. Ethereum is the powerhouse here with their smartcontracts. Problem is that they're a computer without access to the internet. That's where Chainlink comes in.

>>16936124
>unless ETH flips BTC and we see fully regulated and ADOPTED DeFi apps, not just from consumers but from institutions

How much Link do you own again? How long have you been here? Link got attention BECAUSE of their institutional backing.

>> No.16936741

>>16936708
>Ethereum is the powerhouse here with their smartcontracts.
There are many other projects that offer protocol-level smart contracts, ETH was the first of its kind.

The real difficulty lies in making non-deterministic data available within a deterministic network.

>> No.16937061

>>16936085
They try to get usage up by any means necessary. Usage begets usage to get the network effect going.

>> No.16937568

>>16935233
You mean using chainLINK and loopring to allow 2500tps?
Or ETH 2.0

>> No.16937595

>>16935443
oh god it’s all coming back to me fuck youuuuu!

>> No.16937602

>>16936219
Who are you that does not know the partnership history of chainLINK?

>> No.16937925

>>16935564
Smeminim is that you?

>> No.16937969

>>16936219
JUDT FUCK OFF ALREADY PATHETIC TRIPFAGGOT

>> No.16938219

>>16936305
This. We are a decade away from the place where marines think they will be by eoy 2021