[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 247 KB, 508x400, nick szabo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16895217 No.16895217 [Reply] [Original]

I'm sick of the imposters and shills for other coins. This is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. His name is Nick Szabo.

The guy created BitGold which is literally just Bitcoin with puzzles instead of blocks, except he began this idea in 1998.

He lets slip that he created Bitcoin. In the below video he was speaking in context of why he created 2 layers within Bitcoin not BitGold yet he has to refer back to BitGold because thats all he is techinically known for.
https://youtu.be/3FA3UjA0igY?t=5717 [Embed]

His knowledge of Blockchain tech, smart contracts and economics in general were top notch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpSeOU1VVj4 [Embed]

Look into it further if you don't believe me. But don't sit there and scream "C raig is Satoj" because he's not.

>> No.16895810
File: 952 KB, 1546x1052, 1578067391113.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16895810

Satoshi dont know Bitcoin is turing complete?

>> No.16895834
File: 5 KB, 218x232, bobodab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16895834

>>16895810
Bitcoin is not turing complete, and CSW plagiarized the article.

>> No.16895872

>>16895810
>he thinks bitcoin is turing complete
its not

>> No.16895876

>>16895217
Playing this and cregs childish tantrum side by side. I definitely know who seems more like the Satoshi poster of old

>> No.16895895

>>16895217

Yes, Nick is unironically Satoshi

>> No.16895920

>>16895217
imagine creating a revolutionary tech, not taking any credit for the greater good, and letting billions of dollars sit untouched forever
what a chad

>> No.16895949
File: 230 KB, 592x781, 1545332282957.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16895949

>>16895217
DELET

>> No.16896003

>>16895217
Nah it's Adam Back. I know it's disappointing but what did you expect.

>> No.16896048

unironically if nick szabo isn't satoshi then he knows who satoshi is

>> No.16896066

>>16895810
Took me a while to find the video but this guy explains really well why bitcoin isnt turing complete
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=um9_sXhY014

>> No.16896136
File: 147 KB, 2618x1506, turing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16896136

>>16896066
https://overpool.network/#/?id=_6-turing-complete-bitcoin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ1DTeexpvA

>> No.16896285
File: 1.18 MB, 1546x1052, 1577907485362.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16896285

>> No.16896384

>>16895217
We know you idiot.

>> No.16896560

well he does look like someone anime loving enough to name himself a japanese meme on the internet

>> No.16896577

>>16896003
i talked with adam irl and can tell you there's absolutely no way he's satoshi.

>> No.16896594

>>16895217
I too think Nick Szabo is a strong possibility. In my mind it's either him or some secret government project by the NSA or something.

>> No.16896618

>>16896560
In that light it could be Ari Jules.

>> No.16896629

>>16896577
I told you it would be disappointing, but it's really him.
>British (satoshi's posting times corresponded strongly to the UK)
>CS PhD
>boomer C++ programmer
>referenced twice in the whitepaper
>developed hashcash, which had basically 90% of bitcoin's initial features
>was talking about electronic currencies on cryptography mailing lists since the 90s
the only reason he didn't use his real name is he was working for a company under a no-compete/NDA contract which would have made him hand over all his creations to the company

>> No.16896657

>>16896629
all of those points are irrelevant. i talked with him over 2 hours. i know his personality. he is not satoshi. he would never create bitcoin. and he would definitely never ever write that white paper. the non-technical part of it for sure.

>> No.16896684

>>16896657
the whitepaper has college freshman level math and CS. people learn Poisson distribution in high school. it is hardly technical.

Adam Back has a PhD in CS. He is very technical, even if he comes across as a dull moron.

>> No.16896690

>>16896684
sorry but you lack reading comprehension.

>> No.16896716

Szabo move his coins :D?
https://blockchair.com/search?q=182PsFUgcwUro2HX7LF4nU59jaQ18WHAzu

>> No.16896728

>>16896690
>implying you didn't imply he was non-technical
>he would definitely never ever write that white paper. the non-technical part of it for sure

>> No.16896777

>>16896684
>>16896657
Could Ari Jules and Adam Back have worked together as Satoshi?
>Adam Back and Ari Jules collaborated to develop Proof of work together
>Smartcontract.com bought days before BTC's whitepaper
>SC.com now owned by Sergey Nasarov
>Sergey and Ari (with Steve Ellis) wrote Chainlink's whitepaper

>> No.16896879

>>16896728
>implying you didn't imply he was non-technical

>he would definitely never write the bitcoin whitepaper.
>well maybe he would write the technical part, but he would never ever write the non-technical part of it, for sure.

>> No.16897841

>>16896136
>external API
lol
a rock is turing complete by your shitstandard

>> No.16897981

>>16896285
Did anybody ask him what the fuck he thought he was talking about? What were those pso's supposed to be computing?

>> No.16898010

Check BTCdude.com for more info on who might be the person/s behind the Bitcoin project. The latest post gets very close to the core team.

>> No.16898060

>>16896048
yes. it's himself

>> No.16898067

>>16896594
no. its nick szabo ft. hal finney and wei dai

>> No.16898077

CIA is satoshi you dumbasses

>> No.16898090

>>16896629
Referrenced twice on the WP where exactly?

>> No.16898100

>>16895217
Someone remind me what's the connection between szabo and sergers again? Last time I checked the theory was that sergers almost certainly was responsible for the bitcointalk posts as satoshi and probably co-wrote the whitepaper because of writing style analysis. What do we have linking sergers and szabo from 10 years ago?

>> No.16898103

>>16898077
no. it's nick szabo

t. been on bitcointalk since 2012

>> No.16898110

>>16898100
no you deluded cretin. all sergey did was buy a domain name.

>> No.16898113

>>16895217
Yes, but delet this

>> No.16898154

>>16898110
Yea just any old domain name. sergersburgers.net . Nothing to do with crypto at all. Forget what

>>16896777 pointed out.

>> No.16898159

>>16895217
It is a group. But yes, szabó Nick is probably the one. The group involved were , Nick, Vitalik, Craig and probably some others but almost sure that Nick is the real Satoshi

>> No.16898170

>>16898159
>creg

>> No.16898257

>>16898159
no. the group involved were Nick szabo (N.S -> S.N) hal finney and wei dai. its literally written on the white paper

>> No.16898258
File: 264 KB, 640x713, 01363E55-AD42-4C1C-B602-677104FE7650.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16898258

>>16896777
Jesus fucking Christ look at you cringey bagholding fucks just coming into any thread trying to shoehorn your shitcoin into totally different discussions. Ari Juels is a fucking nobody. Ari Juels did not invent proof of work, proof of work was made by 2 researchers in the earlt 90s and all Ari did was piggyback on some other dude’s research paper and give it a marketing name. That’s literally all he fucking did. If you’re a brave and real man, go read the the Wikipedia entry for proof of work and get back to me. Ari Juels doesn’t even have a fucking hyperlink in this article, despite the even bigger nobody Markus having one. That’s how big of an absolute nobody kike Ari Juels is. Pic related.

Smart contract is a generic as fuck term and was probably first registered by some boomer law agency before being much later sold. Everyone can see how utterly desperate you bagholders are to garner any attention whatsoever to your bags. Nobody in Chainshit’s team has ever done anything useful before. Sergey Nazarov is a serial failure with 3 prior DOA projects that he just waddled away from when hype cooled down while showing the same enthusiasm as he does with his current DOA project. He will again, simply waddle away and step into his Lambo and race his dad into the horizon when the hype train runs out of fuel. There’s only so much that you can milk stage appearances and price fetches for. He will suffer zero consequences from walking away, just like before because none of you are investors technically speaking and he owes nobody anything. Now fuck off back to rebbit because that’s the only place you’ll be safe to circlejerk over your ERC token.

>> No.16898284

>>16898258
this

>> No.16898294

>>16896629
THIS
Szabo was working for DigiCash, a Dutch company, on a solution called eCash.
Szabo has an extensive knowledge about money history and the technical skills to pull out Bitcoin, simply because his main full time job was literally 90% overlapping.
Also, it’s so fucking easy to understand he is Satoshi, he had 2 blogs talking about cryptocurrencies, and one his most famous blog post on unenumerated was edited and date was changed from 2005 to Dec 2008, after the release of the BTC white paper, just to be less suspicious
>>16896657
lol, I work for a big tech Corp, yet I’m working with gov agencies and smoke weed everyday. If you ask colleagues or my parents they obviously don’t know shit, even if I talk hours with them
Everyone has a daemon inside, that project that doesn’t let you sleep at night because you see in it the fucking purpose of your life

>> No.16898318

>>16898294
yes. nick szabo is satoshi

>> No.16898989

>>16898258
>Instead of bothering to debunk a single claim you insult them all
Some 'DetectiveAnon' you are.

>> No.16899049

>>16895217
Hes dimbo

>> No.16899155

>>16895217
I'm pretty sure Paul Le Roux is Satoshi.

>> No.16899404
File: 46 KB, 727x727, kek.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16899404

>>16895217
False, he's the real Satoshi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFuSGzLkw90

>> No.16899430

>>16898067
this is the most likely answer.

>> No.16899705

>ctrl+f hal finney
>only 2 results
what the fuck, you guys are fucking ignorant as fuck

>> No.16899760

>be satoshi
>don't even understand the wp

Yeah no. Craig is Satoshi

>> No.16899767

>>16895217
szabo is a gen X asperger addicted to knowledge and with an obsession for freedom and privacy

he created bitgold which is the prototype/theory under why bitcoin could actually be sold 20k starting from 0

he's not satoshi, but what he did is more important than satoshi

I think satoshi is either adam back or kleiman

>> No.16899771
File: 20 KB, 695x515, 95.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16899771

>>16899404

>> No.16899772

>>16895810
It's "doesn't know", Akshit.

>> No.16899837

>>16899705
Read the back and forth emails between Finney and Satoshi

Satoshi and Finney are clearly two different persons

>> No.16899845

Lol faketoshi just scours papers looking for juicy technobabble quotes to put on powerpoint slides huh. The absolute state.

>> No.16899849
File: 105 KB, 714x395, Nsazbs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16899849

Szabo appears when Satoshi disappears and vice versa.

>> No.16899880

>>16899849
There's also no emails between Satoshi and Kleiman despite Kleiman being a long-time member and contributor on the same mailing list where Satoshi announced the original bitcoin white paper

>> No.16899883

fun fact: in hungarian names the surname comes first, like in japanese

>> No.16899953

>>16899883
kurva anyád köcsög

>> No.16900061

Satoshi is a black man

>> No.16900098

>>16900061
Das ryte......

>> No.16900138
File: 2.08 MB, 1176x1764, 1574177575044.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16900138

>>16895217
Take the Cowellpill anon.

>> No.16900325

>>16899705
Hal finney audited the code with Dillinger, brainlet
why would he audit his own code lmfao

>> No.16900878

>>16896594
>Satoshi nakamoto
Samsung toshiba nakamichi motorola

>> No.16901159

>>16900061
WE