[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 890 KB, 1200x676, csw.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16828339 No.16828339 [Reply] [Original]

CSW is legit, if he was really a conman he would be much more convincing.

>> No.16828420

Nick Szabo and Hal Finney were Satoshi.

/thread

>> No.16828432

>>16828420
>Nick Szabo
LOL isn't that the guy who said to Craig, live on stage, that Bitcoin is not turing complete and that he should write a paper on it if he was stupid enough to think so? Then a year later Craig published a peer reviewed academic paper proving that Bitcoin is turing complete. Haha you can't make that shit up. What a loser

>> No.16828440

>>16828432
Yikes. Do you know what any of those terms mean?

>> No.16828442

>>16828432

That never happened lmao

>> No.16828444

>>16828339
Yes, Craig is merely pretending to be retarded

>> No.16828480
File: 230 KB, 1024x1177, 1 6VheV4lvgpYZOvI-Qa8-hg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16828480

>>16828432
You don't know the meaning of that term. btw, CSW failed his computations course, very bad, m8

>> No.16828506

>>16828339
The way scams work is by having it really unconvincing, so only the stupidest people fall for it. The scammer's intend is never to convince everyone, even 1% of the population is enough to profit greatly. Another example is those bad Nigerian prince emails, and people do fall for them.

>> No.16828517
File: 50 KB, 300x383, 1576297469570.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16828517

>>16828444
Aren't we all?

>> No.16828535
File: 62 KB, 640x469, 0F4D5CD6-94A4-43D7-8FFC-8BDA43FEC92A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16828535

Thank you sirs
Very informative post

>> No.16828739

>>16828420
>>16828442
https://youtu.be/hXUOSCGfuJA?t=329

It happened. Also you should watch it from the beggining, as this video is a pure gold.

>> No.16828846
File: 152 KB, 1178x1769, 1578771156729.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16828846

>>16828442
no YOU never happened

>> No.16828887

>>16828739
Nick's right though, even the BSV subreddit admitted that bitcoin script isn't turing-complete. It was Craig's blunder that drags on out of sheer servility.

>> No.16828916

>>16828739

No thanks

>> No.16829924

>>16828432
>a year later Craig published a peer reviewed academic paper proving that Bitcoin is turing complete

He plagiarized that paper.

>> No.16830036

>>16829924
>He plagiarized that paper.
thats unfair - he added a few bits
>errors, mostly

>> No.16830109

>>16828432
>>16828739
Watch this and learn what Turing complete means first before making that claim

https://youtu.be/RPQD7-AOjMI