ARPA

[Anonymous No.16812978]

It's right in front of you.

>Mid 1900s ARPA creates inter webs
>1950s, Morris Worm nearly ends it while trying to plot / map it
2013 ARPA (now DARPA) announces MEMEX
>plan to plit internet, comprehensive map
>deep and surface web
>impossible with all fringe sites, constant fluctuation
>Snowden tells how volatile security is and how invasive the gov is
>NSA can view all cloud saves / shares
>Celeb leaks from 4chan
>gaming bs
>misinformation
>FCC shutting down net neutrality
>cut down the fringe sites
>silence opposite
>BITCOIN
>map and police the web
>this is all (D)ARPA
>this is military taking back control
>we CAN fight this
>MUSK
>ARPAchain
* YOU ARE HERE ****
>China overthrows internet privacy, unironically. World goes ham.
>Andrew Polestra
>Mimble Wimble Whitepaper writer
>ARPA = Fully Homomorphic Encryption
>Ben Gorlik, Liquid sidechain writer
>Gorlick, ARPA advisor
>World goes disillusioned after Chinese internet takeover
>Andrew Polestra becomes new Fluffy
>Entire crypto space donates $50M into new global currency running sidechain data feeds on ARPA.

'hello'

[Anonymous No.16813023]

>>16812978
You do realize that ARPA Chain is in no way, shape, or form affiliated with DARPA right?

[Anonymous No.16813030]

>>16813023
The Adaptive Execution Office (AEO) is one of two new DARPA offices created in 2009 by the DARPA Director, Regina Dugan. The office's four project areas include technology transition, assessment, rapid productivity and adaptive systems. AEO provides the agency with robust connections to the warfighter community and assists the agency with the planning and execution of technology demonstrations and field trials to promote adoption by the warfighter, accelerating the transition of new technologies into DoD capabilities.
The Defense Sciences Office (DSO) vigorously pursues the most promising technologies within a broad spectrum of the science and engineering research communities and develops those technologies into important, radically new military capabilities.[28] DSO identifies and pursues high-risk, high-payoff fundamental research initiatives across a broad spectrum of science and engineering disciplines – sometimes reshaping existing fields or creating entirely new disciplines – and transforms these initiatives into radically new, game-changing technologies for U.S. national security.

[Anonymous No.16813035]

>>16812978
>* YOU ARE HERE ****
>* IN INDIA ****

[Anonymous No.16813039]

>>16812978
'hello'

- BASED
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/internet-got-started-simple-hello

[Anonymous No.16813046]

>>16813035
kek. this thread reeks of curry

[Anonymous No.16813105]

>>16813030
I don't see how that's related to ARPA chain. No partnership or collaboration was announced

[Anonymous No.16813146]

>>16813046
Indians don't post like this. Hyper autism ITT. Bullish for ARPA. Got some with buys down to 0.008.

Huobi ties alone will make this a gainer from nu-China FOMO (it'll happen), and all I'm after are early staking coins under ICO for the next run up. I'm picking a few stakers because compound gains, no matter what, are very real brought out to a 5 year timeline, and let's face it, you never know what will be a huge first bubble run.

[Anonymous No.16813158]

>>16812978
Imagine falling for this scam

[Anonymous No.16813182]

>>16813158
I'm bullish.

Bullets from yesterday: https://www.coinspeaker.com/cypherpunk-ux-multi-party-computation/

"“Ultimately, using sMPC, we can realize the separation in data of the right to use and the right of use, and directly calculate results on multi-source and heterogeneous ciphertext data,”

At a high level, sMPC empowers users to compute something over a large set of data without revealing their individual inputs, furnishing enhanced privacy, and a means to produce a specific outcome. Consequently, sMPC affords advantages over two existing modes of key management: multi-sig and hardware storage."

“We have implemented an agreement to support the participation of any party, and as long as there is an honest node in it, it can ensure the security of the data,” says Xu. “Either of these two points is a breakthrough, and as far as we know, the vast majority of projects can only support the involvement of two parties.”

“Imagine multi-party joint credit information, data leasing, secure data analysis, other scenarios in the financial industry, multi-source data joint risk control in the insurance industry with sMPC,” says Xu. “In the future, applications will exist for corporate finance, marketing, medical applications, and even artificial intelligence.”

ArpaChain achieves this dynamic balance using an off-chain, layer two structure making ARPA compatible with any public blockchain.

“The ARPA secure computing network can be used as a second layer to provide privacy computing capabilities for any public blockchain, enabling developers to build efficient, secure computing networks on ARPA computing networks, while also protecting the data privacy of business applications,” says Xu.

“Enterprise and personal data can be safely analyzed or utilized on ARPA computing networks without worrying about exposing data to any third party,” he continues.

A confluence of security, privacy, and better UX – a compelling proposition.

[Anonymous No.16813207]

>>16813182
None of that shit means anything, imbecile.

[Anonymous No.16813213]

>>16813182
nice. the real kicker is if they'll be able to get China on board in an official manner. they're one of them, which will help. ANT partners with the IEEE thing.

https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/1212950895618613248

Also, the exchange solvency issue. Doubt they'll be a top mover, but another notch : https://medium.com/arpa/how-arpa-can-address-the-growing-problem-of-exchange-solvency-9c198847711f

Solid crumbs to follow all around.

[Anonymous No.16813215]

>>16813207
how do you figure with an unreasonable statement like this? literally new infrastructure building.

[Anonymous No.16813275]

>>16813207
Brainlet. Another crumb.

"Could ARPA gain mass adoption on a Chinese network? One could find it laughable, until Xi's 4D chess comes to fruition and he finally says "Okay, Cryptocurrency, not just Blockchain." If they gain any traction on credit / anti-fraud (a big problem in Asia in general), enterprise-level secure data sharing, it could mean a domino effect. banks can perform searches on encrypted blacklist, or run analysis on encrypted prop data across the whole bank alliance. During the process, neither the secret input (borrower’s name) nor the raw data from any bank is disclosed. This is just one of a multitude of catalysts."

[Anonymous No.16813339]

>>16813213
Kraken's image of popo got me interested in stuff like this. It's a big "if", helping solvency, but DEX's too.

I'm anti global police. Resource constraints are the kicker IMO. This team is chad.

"… most Internet vulnerabilities at the protocol and standards layers have been there since day one. Because they were quite deliberately built in from day zero.

It was almost certainly not done maliciously but to “solve problems within resource constraints” that no longer apply.

The thing is nobody wants to spend money to solve these problems, usually portrayed with the excuse of “don’t break legacy systems” as it’s the almost perfect “get out clause”. As well as the biggest source [sic] of not just technical debt but building in security vulnerabilities across the board."

If this doesn't get you bullish you don't understand it, or you don't understand crypto.

[Anonymous No.16813509]

I'm bullish under 1 cent. Pre-sale was 2 cents. Doubt we'll see 0.007 again.

[Anonymous No.16813551]

Na its TROY turn

[Anonymous No.16813662]

>>16812978
Woah back at it again from yesterday? 113 sats and going lower, tick tock

[Anonymous No.16813824]

>>16813662
The lower it dumps, the more I buy, and the better DCA until proper main net. That's the thing about DCA'ing down on something you know will moon. It's a chance to catch true bottom, and get rid of the higher averages along the way if you truly wish.

[Anonymous No.16813955]

>>16813824
this

[Anonymous No.16813996]

AUTISM IS BULLISH.

In September 1995, as the demand for Internet registration became largely commercial (97 percent) and grew by orders of magnitude, the NSF authorized NSI to charge a fee for domain name registration. Previously, NSF had subsidized the cost of registering all domain names. At that time, there were 120,000 registered domain names. In September 1998, when NSF’s agreement with NSI expired, the number of registered domain names had passed 2 million.

""""""The year 1998 marked the end of NSF’s direct role in the Internet."""""

>READ
>BETWEEN
>THE
>LINES.

[Anonymous No.16814032]

>>16813824
>something you know will moon

Shill harder pajeet.

[Anonymous No.16814040]

>>16813551
What the fuck is this. I'm literally buying more ARPA because you said this.

[Anonymous No.16814051]

Is ARPA the true SAGE?

"The first computer network was an air defense system called SAGE (Semi-Automatic Ground Environment) that was initiated by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) with financial support from the U.S. Air Force. I began helping design it in 1956 and it became a technological marvel that included six levels of packetized data communications networks that were more tightly connected than the later ARPAnet and Internet. I was assigned to design the guidance and control functions of missiles and manned interceptors based on my earlier experience, having graduated from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in 1953 and spent 3.5 years as an aviation electronics officer in the U.S. Navy, mostly doing simulations of flight control systems for aircraft using rudimentary digital computers.

By the early 1960s, SAGE networks spanned the U.S. and Canada, connecting twenty-three main computer sites. While it was a technological marvel it was also a gigantic fraud as an air defense system in that it had fatal flaws at multiple levels. However its flaws were kept secret from the public so as to enable the contractors to make enormous profits over a twenty-five year period, during which time SAGE evidently became the biggest military-industrial-political fraud of the 20th Century. President Ronald Reagan's later Strategic Defense Initiative was a close competitor for foolish wastefulness."

Proof that packet switching could work came out of a 1962 MIT PhD dissertation by Leonard Kleinrock and was then implemented by an academic coalition led by Dr. Larry Roberts, also from MIT, using contractor Bolt, Baranek and Newman (BBN), which also had close ties to MIT. After several years of development using a four site testbed it became operational in 1971."

[Anonymous No.16814061]

Western Electric, IBM, Burroughs and other contractors benefited greatly from their involvement in SAGE, both from direct financial payments and from learning about advanced technologies.

Western Electric learned from MIT how to build data links using modems, though when newer packet switching technology was introduced later as part of ARPAnet they opposed it along with their owners and partners, AT&T and Bell Telephone Laboratories, who claimed that it was inferior to their long-established circuit-switching systems. While Bell Labs clearly innovated in a number of areas, such as their invention of the transistor, they showed remarkable ignorance in the advancement of communications technology, which was supposed to be their specialty.

IBM received $30 million ($230 million in 2011 dollars) for each of the 56 computers they provided and more for their maintenance over many years, though their vacuum tube technology became obsolete about the time SAGE was first deployed. IBM also benefited by learning from MIT how to make magnetic core memories and promptly applied that technology to their main line of computers, though for some reason the IBM memories were only about half as fast as those designed by MIT. IBM also took the rudimentary timesharing scheme used by SAGE and used it to create the first online airline reservation system, called SABRE.

Given that each SAGE computer used about 58,000 vacuum tubes, a lot of replacement tubes had to be purchased during their 25 years of operation. Ironically, as SAGE aged and transistors replaced vacuum tubes in most new electronic equipment, U.S. manufacturers stopped making tubes whereas that transition happened later in the Soviet Union. As a result Soviet tubes ended up being imported to keep SAGE running.

[Anonymous No.16814071]

>>16814051
>>16814061
based conspiracy anon.

[Anonymous No.16814075]

>>16813182
>>16813339
>>16814051
Nice spacing vpn faggot

[Anonymous No.16814086]

>>16814075
spacing is good for the brain.

[Anonymous No.16814123]

All governments are connected to Google, and all governments can shift their search engines so only what they want you to see comes up. ARPA fixes this.

[Anonymous No.16814202]

>>16814075
Nice

But

No

>>16814123
Bullish on MPC in general might actually be huge

[Anonymous No.16814219]

ARPA is a secret moon. The fun begins at 5 cents.

[Anonymous No.16814280]

>>16814219
gibbe plz, would be great for staking long term. not gonna say this is the new NEO, but, ant ant ant IEE swoosh.

[Anonymous No.16814982]

>>16814219
Words out anon. I reckon we've got a week or two max before it's obvious.

[Anonymous No.16815335]

>>16814202
> MPC

They don't even know. Biz isn't intelligent enough for how huge this will be.

[Anonymous No.16815446]

https://youtu.be/OdTSSZSv2PM
Is Blockchain Brad actually Illuminati?
I hate the way he looks

[Anonymous No.16815534]

>>16813023
oh god .... ...... I'm finna COOOOOOOOOOOM

[Anonymous No.16815539]

>>16814982
Is word out on Reddit?

[Anonymous No.16815601]

I signed up for binance.us only to find out all the fun coins are on binance.com. Kill me, Pete.

[Anonymous No.16815806]

>>16815539
no. wait until 5 cents.

[Anonymous No.16816749]

300 sats EOM.