He can end all this with a single message

[Anonymous No.16812250]

How can we pressure him into signing a message as Satoshi so Craig Wright goes away forever and BSV dies overnight?

Serious question. We all know hes satoshi so what gives? Every day he doesn't do this is another day that noobs get scammed into buying a fake bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.16812256]

It's bad for Bitcoin if Satoshi signs

[Anonymous No.16812263]

>>16812250

no need for him to sign for a lightweight like craig

[Anonymous No.16812308]

>>16812256
Why?explain.

[Anonymous No.16812317]

>>16812250
who’s that wigger?

[Anonymous No.16812351]

>>16812317
Nick Szabo you lazy fuck!

[Anonymous No.16812372]

>>16812256

Fake bitcoin is worse.

>>16812263

Yes, there is. People are going to lose a tonn of money on this BS and it will be his fault.

[Anonymous No.16812380]

>>16812372
No it isn't. Fake Bitcoin confuses everyone and throws doubt on the claim that Szabo is Satoshi or whoever else
Are you forgetting Satoshi clearly doesn't want to be known? Lmao

[Anonymous No.16812417]

>>16812380
>throws doubt on the claim that Szabo is Satoshi or whoever else

That is a bad thing.

>Are you forgetting Satoshi clearly doesn't want to be known?

If he wanted to be unknown he shouldn't have become a public figure with public blog posts and many people who admire him and follow his work and can see that he's obviously Satoshi

[Anonymous No.16812423]

>>16812417
Ok retard

[Anonymous No.16812674]

>>16812423

So what are we supposed to do? Just pretend we don't already know? lmao

The cat is out of the bag

[Anonymous No.16813428]

Bump

[Anonymous No.16813478]

>>16812308
It means Satoshi could dump his coins any moment.

[Anonymous No.16813488]

>>16812250
>We all know he’s satoshi, kek
I can’t go sleep, finished my popcorn, your desperate posts are too good, all the seething, yes yeeeas, we’ve waited for this more than two years. Cheers woke anons, cope op

[Anonymous No.16813734]

>>16813488

And your point is??

[Anonymous No.16813802]

>>16812250
It's Ari Jules.
>Short list of people who have been planning blockchain concepts since the 90s
>Is heavily into the occult and twisted enough to play a long game
>SmartContract.com was registered days before Bitcoin's whitepaper, him being one of few who knew what a smart contract was at this point
>Co-wrote the Chainlink Whitepaper, which will be a fulfillment of Szabo's godprotocol concept
>Gave ownership of SC.com to his frontman Sergey

[Anonymous No.16813818]

>>16812250
has anyone shown a connection between this nigger and ari juels?

[Anonymous No.16813841]

>>16813802
Chain link is a garbage pump and dump scheme. Slow bleed to ICO price. Cope

[Anonymous No.16813887]

>>16813802

Assuming he is, the same point still applies. Except more people know that Nick Szabo is Satoshi and not Ari Juels

[Anonymous No.16813903]

I knew satoshi and he died a few years ago

[Anonymous No.16813906]

this is how false flagging should be done

[Anonymous No.16813912]

>>16813887
If you were playing at that level of mindfuckery why would you get rid of Faketoshi? The clown would keep people distracted while giving more cover for yourself.

[Anonymous No.16813914]

>>16813912

But many people are losing millions of dollars to his blatant scam.

[Anonymous No.16813919]

>>16813914
that's going to happen regardless; it's a free market

[Anonymous No.16813927]

>>16813914
Ari is a Demiurge cultist trying to create a new era, why would he care about an annoying ponzi scheme? Especially given a transfer from the Genesis wallet would reignite people's curiosity.

[Anonymous No.16813928]

Why do you fags think some random nigger is satoshi just on his word?

[Anonymous No.16813936]

>>16813919

Nobody will ever buy real bitcoin again if they all got scammed buying forks.

>>16813928

https://nakamotoinstitute.org/bit-gold/

Nuff said

[Anonymous No.16813944]

>>16813914
Satoshi isn't obligated to protect idiots

[Anonymous No.16813945]

>>16813936
>implying the people who get scammed have the power to make or break bitcoin. you misunderstand something about the nature of competition

[Anonymous No.16813946]

>>16813802
This guy is a fucking nobody you dumb linkoid. Don't shoehorn your Ethereum token in a cryptocurrency thread.
>Co-wrote the Chainlink Whitepaper
You mean that thing that made no mention of how a decentralized oracle network would even come about that was written up AFTER the ICO?
>planning blockchain concepts since the 90s
Objectively false. All this guy did was be a typical kike, see something that was created by 2 researchers, a chick and another smarter kike (Proof of Work), then literally, just give it a name. He made zero technical contributions to PoW, he just slapped a name on it in a paper that he piggy-backed on in the early 00's.

You linktards don't know anything about tech and you can't even do some basic research on your charlatan ICO devs.

[Anonymous No.16813959]

>>16813944

Not obligated, obviously. But realistically, many people know it's him. He surrendered that kind of privacy long ago, and it will only get worse as more people start to find this out.

[Anonymous No.16813969]

>>16813959
>it will only get worse
Unless of course there was a useful idiot distracting everyone claiming to be Satoshi.

[Anonymous No.16813972]

>>16813969

Yeah... that still not a good look by any means.

[Anonymous No.16813978]

>>16813936
kys

the next 24 hours are critical to linkies

[Anonymous No.16814119]

>>16813978

No u

[Anonymous No.16814446]

Only BTC segwit coin is fake coin here.

[Anonymous No.16814456]

>>16812250
>"I've never heard that before"
not satoshi
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXUOSCGfuJA

[Anonymous No.16814554]

>>16812250
good try glownigger

[Anonymous No.16814783]

[Anonymous No.16815722]

>>16812250
I think we'd all rather watch Craig drive himself into insanity followed by a mass BSVjeet suicide

[Anonymous No.16815787]

>>16814446
Fake news, segwit was a soft fork, both bcash forks are full of hard ones. BTC is, by lack of hard changes and higher hash, the legit Bitcoin. Tell that to your overlords at coingeek and nchain, ranjesh

[Anonymous No.16816460]

>>16815787
So you're saying segwit coin isn't safe. Miners can not accept segwit softfork and all coins will be lost.
Good update.

[Anonymous No.16816513]

>>16812250
Daily reminder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1020&v=LdvQTwjVmrE

[Anonymous No.16816593]

Nick can't sign because he destroyed his keys, on purpose.

Early on he realized that being a central authority figure would be a net detrimental to Bitcoin, so he burned his harddrives, resigning to the Genesis key and the 1M or so Satoshi coins which are linked to the Satoshi identity.

This happened way before the 1M coins had any significant value, so that he wouldn't be tempted to keep being the "boss of Bitcoin".