demonic

[Anonymous No.16730898]

Remember what he meant about donating his wealth to charity, he gave control of his MS stock to his own foundation. That way he can sell his shares that he got for free and never pay a penny in taxes.

All his private jet trips? Paid for by his foundation

His clothes? Litterally paid for the foundation.

His cars? Paid for by the foundation, kids getting 6 figure jobs at the foundation as consultants.

I'd love to see if he supported the ending of tax write offs for charities and ban them from holding stock.

[Anonymous No.16730903]

>>16730898
Chainlink is a scam

[Anonymous No.16730927]

>>16730898
Berkshire Hathaway control his actions. They are all the greediest people alive while playing the innocent boomer card.

[Anonymous No.16730947]

Pretty smart

[Anonymous No.16730948]

>>16730898
I don't know how people who think guys that managed to gain net worths in the billions would ever give money away. Don't they realize people never reach such wealth without being cutthroat and obsessed with money? Bill's good nerdy guy image hasn't worked for many years.

[Anonymous No.16731075]

Managed to keep msft the dominate OS for 30 plus years? Why do ppl dislike him?

[Anonymous No.16731088]

>>16731075
Windows backend sucks. MacOS really is a smoother operating system. Windows only feature is gaymes

[Anonymous No.16731181]

>>16731088
2 of the Top 5 companies in the world right now ,market cap wise, having any rivalry what-so-ever that isn’t mutually beneficial. I thought Tim Cook was going to kill apple but the brand loyalty is too strong. I suppose the same could be said for Billy gold watch.

[Anonymous No.16731184]

He was friends with Epstein after it was known he was a convicted pedophile. He has fucked children to say the least

[Anonymous No.16731311]

>>16730898
I think the American healthcare system should try to move toward single-payer if it's somewhat comparable to what people would otherwise be paying, on average, for insurance premiums and copayments. But I don't buy sentiment about changes in taxation from people like Gates or Buffett. As this anon mentions >>16730948. People don't get to places of power by playing nice, and all this "tax the rich, meanwhile I'm about keel over and die, or I've already organized distributions to myself through different entities" just comes off as having ulterior motives or trying to promote some image. Buffett does this, especially.

[Anonymous No.16731823]

>>16730903
in case anyone was unsure of jewish anti shill chainlink bots

[Anonymous No.16731834]

>>16731184
lucky him

[Anonymous No.16731840]

>>16730947
Honestly I'm mirin'. I wish I was cleaver.

[Anonymous No.16731847]

>>16731088
This, Windows is pajeetware bullshit which is just bloat running on top of Windows 95.

[Anonymous No.16731848]

>>16731088
>Mac

Just end it, senpai.

[Anonymous No.16731852]

>>16731184
Doubt the children part but God will judge him

[Anonymous No.16731857]

>>16730898
insanely rich, still will die. Remember frens, this is the decade demonic farts like buffet will breathe the last breath and we will be dabbing on the old fart when his wealth is worth fuck all for him

[Anonymous No.16731883]

>>16731857
>insanely rich, still will die.
Not if they cryogenically freeze themselves and wait until there is a cute for aging. This is legit what rich people are doing after death for their brains and organs.

[Anonymous No.16731942]

>>16731883
He's probably already been transplanted into a new body and that's just his public cyborg clone.

[Anonymous No.16732064]

>>16731847
Linux is just pajeetware bullshit, which is just bloat running on Unix.

[Anonymous No.16733039]

>>16731184
Oh boy, here we go with the conspiracy theories.

[Anonymous No.16733048]

>>16731942
I never saved anything for the swim back.

[Anonymous No.16733050]

>>16733039
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/business/jeffrey-epstein-bill-gates.html

[Anonymous No.16733076]

>>16731088
>windows backend sucks
>entirety of macos is better
if you were comparing backends, do it equally and just say *BSD/UNIX is better than the windows backend, which is actually pretty nice if you ignore the backdoors. if you consider macos to be good, you're either already in the ecosystem and buying a new device every year or just like the frontend look, in either case you're an idiot.

[Anonymous No.16733105]

Plan is very simple for FAGates
>increase taxes
>destroy smaller competition
>profit

I hate how media potrays these rich fags as some good guys when they say they want to tax the rich

[Anonymous No.16733106]

>>16731883
Sounds good to me.

[Anonymous No.16733111]

>>16731857
You dab alone.

[Anonymous No.16733139]

>>16730898
All these guys have the ability to write a check to the treasury, but they’re not doing it. So whenever rich dudes say “tax the rich” I can only hear “tax the other rich guys”

[Anonymous No.16733146]

That's just how the game is played. Monetizing poverty is the only way to make charity worthwhile, if Bill gates were to give away even just 1% of his wealth to charity no strings attached right now then considering his rate of return right now that is closer to 3-6% drawdown in his total wealth in 10 years. That means by giving those poor people 1 billion in charity now he is costing the impoverished in the future 5 billion he could of given them instead. This is why the rich often say tax rates should be higher while doing the opposite, if everyone was required to pay 10% more in tax then bill gates giving billions to the government would be a level playing field and not just financial suicide. it has a lot to do with the laws surrounding corporations as well, corporations are legally obligated to do everything to generate returns for the shareholders, one of the easiest and most cost efficient forms of that when you have hundreds of billions of dollars and "market cap" actually becomes a limiting factor in your investments, is lobbying the government for tax reforms.

So I don't think it's hypocritical at all actually for him to say that. We can debate all day if corporations would actually pay the tax or would skirt it and hide the money, or if the government would actually spend the money prudently, but if the floor isn't higher on taxes it is a moot point argue wether or not they would actually get paid, since you can't bring criminal cases for a hypothetical scenario.

With that being said there is absolutely an argument to be made for passing better laws, closing loopholes, and starting initiatives in regards to making sure corporations and the wealthy are actually paying the fair amount of taxes currently required by law before we raise them more, especially after the Panama papers, but I think there is a clear reason you never hear politicians or the rich talk about that and instead argue over the current tax rates ad infinum.

[Anonymous No.16733174]

>>16733146
Loopholes for all!

[Anonymous No.16733192]

>>16730898
Bill Gates should give every American a share of his company.

[Anonymous No.16733235]

>>16730927
Boomers didn't do nothing, bucko. Pay the damn rent

[Anonymous No.16733244]

>>16733039
Shut it down

[Anonymous No.16733303]

>>16730898
foundation and charites founded by rich people are never for their intended purpose, just one more loophole to exploit

[Anonymous No.16733306]

>>16733192
if you pirate windows and office he does

[Anonymous No.16733332]

Hasn't he given a bunch of money to charities? He's fine in my books.

[Anonymous No.16733352]

>>16731883
>cure for aging
>after aging
retard.