ETHUSD < 130

[Anonymous No.16710957]

what went wrong?

[Anonymous No.16710964]

>>16710957
Its a scam

[Anonymous No.16710999]

>>16710957
The volume really makes you think tho

[Anonymous No.16711213]

>>16710999
accumulation :)

[Anonymous No.16711215]

Vitalik.

[Anonymous No.16711238]

>>16711213
Gen2.0 bag holders

[Anonymous No.16711245]

>>16711238
ID moon confirmed

[Anonymous No.16711263]

>>16710999
CMC volume is FAKE

[Anonymous No.16711334]

>>16710957
It's what we call 'spaghetti code'. It can 100% NEVER scale. When I say that, I mean that ETH can NEVER implement a scaling solution without having to implement another one in the future. Nothing on ETH will ever be 'set in stone'. You can attempt to roll the scaling with a fork every 2 years, like they are supposedly doing with 'ETH 2.0', but then the devs who are attempting to build apps/products on ETH see their projects eventually become laggard if ETH keeps making changes every couple years for ETH 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 etc.. So, anyone with half a brain can see that ETH is not worth building on because the future is 100% unpredictable since ETH is nothing but spaghetti code. It doesn't matter what type of app or product you are trying to build, it only matters that there is a stable protocol that has limitless scaling set in stone. The devs who created ETH are not as intelligent as you might think.

[Anonymous No.16711526]

>>16711334
sure anon, you know better than thousands of devs :)

[Anonymous No.16711549]

>>16710957
Pumped and dumped like 99% of every crypto to ever come

[Anonymous No.16711755]

>>16711334

is this what happened to btc core as well?

[Anonymous No.16712016]

>>16711526
for one, ETH doesn't have 'thousands' of devs, two they would have to agree with him that scaling is an unsolved problem. and three, the problem is unrelated to quality of code or the number of devs. It's about how many transactions/contracts can execute and how much information is being stored on each node while retaining security guarantees. Even a 'perfect' design will have trouble scaling.
We were told sharding & POS were going to be implemented a year ago. They

[Anonymous No.16712562]

>>16711334
>>16712016
Just when I was thinking about increasing my bag. I'll just wait another week and by then I'll forget this fud.

[Anonymous No.16712567]

>>16710957
the devs sell it to pay their rent

[Anonymous No.16712572]

It will only moon after I get a bag of at least 1000 eth. You were warned

[Anonymous No.16712595]

>>16711755
no not at all bitcoin core is and will always be backwards compatible
>>16711526
>1000s of devs agree
lol this is the reason why ETH kids are communist, so gullible

[Anonymous No.16712622]

>>16712016
Four if a software project does have thousands of devs with no management you get spaghetti code.

[Anonymous No.16712671]

>>16710957
developers are selling their ICO stacks in masses and getting out of doge
the community is getting restless while new money dried up
this EIP being denied broke the camel's back
the ETH community was no longer buying them sports cars, private jets, and exotic vacations

[Anonymous No.16712684]

oops posted the photo
this is an EIP for 140k more ETH on top of the 72 million ETH they premined
old and wealthy devs are done and there's no new money for new devs
the codebase is a fucking mess and their only option is 2.0 and rebuilding the whole thing

come on guys, ETH is a fucking shitcoin

[Anonymous No.16712707]

>>16710957

>>16712618