$1k eoy

[Anonymous No.16709714]

[Anonymous No.16709735]

And people call ME the shill for spamming link threads with ATOM

[Anonymous No.16709740]

>>16709714
yay

[Anonymous No.16709761]

>>16709714

With Coinbase and Google hype now well behind us, is there anything happening in 2020 that would pump the price?

Obviously, there's zero use, but at least some news to help run another P&D.

[Anonymous No.16709780]

>>16709761
>Obviously, there's zero use

[Anonymous No.16709785]

>>16709761
if anything, the fact that Chainlink is KYC is just more reason for it to bleed more. Everybody keeps ignoring the KYC part. its not actually decentralized. most major banks are already doing a centralized transaction with things like Cosmos and Ripple, so if the banks are already doing centralized stuff, its most likely they will be using centralized oracles.

But Chainlink is not centralized enough to be valuable to banks, but too centralized to be valueable to independent institutions. it just fails in both worlds

[Anonymous No.16709784]

>>16709780

Yes, zero commercial use.

LINK is not generating any revenue. Are you disputing this?

[Anonymous No.16709794]

>>16709714
t-t-there's still a few hours left.

[Anonymous No.16709797]

>>16709784
Have sex

[Anonymous No.16709803]

>>16709797

Very compelling defense.

So you know nothing about this shitcoin and bought it just because of frog pictures?

[Anonymous No.16709815]

>>16709803
nice spacing reddit nigger

[Anonymous No.16709829]

How the fuck are you niggers still on this scam

[Anonymous No.16709847]

>>16709815
he's right you idiot. You got shilled into investing thousands of $s into a shitcoin that tried to meme a bull run. The OG biz guys must have been total faggots

[Anonymous No.16709849]

reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

on a personal note, sorry guys but you chose the wrong horse. you even probably fudded a project that should have taken link's place. this is nobody's fault but your own and that fat walrus sirgay. it'll never happen, fr, fr this time.

[Anonymous No.16709858]

>>16709714

THERE ARE PEOPLE
*SKHHH*
ON THIS FUCKING BOARD
*PFFFFTPHHH*
WHO
*WHEEZE*
BOUGHT CHAINLINK OVER 4 DOLLARS
*AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*

[Anonymous No.16709869]

honestly
what the fuck happened?

[Anonymous No.16709882]

>>16709858
>December 31 2020
>THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO BOUGHT CHAINLINK OVER 780 DOLLARS

[Anonymous No.16709913]

>>16709784
nodes get paid for serving data, SNX stakers get yields for minting, those are examples on both sides of generating revenue

>>16709785
>KYC centralization with dozens of independent oracle nodes is anywhere close to the centralization of a closed source, single node oracle owned by the oracle developer
no

[Anonymous No.16709935]

Remind me when I didn't sell DERO at 4$.

[Anonymous No.16709943]

>>16709869
sirgay is a faggot, that's what happened

[Anonymous No.16710014]

>>16709943
i bought at $3 because of you assholes

[Anonymous No.16710015]

>>16709847
Have sex

[Anonymous No.16710035]

remember there's now nu-scum-stinker queers trying to claim its NOW 1k eo2020. dont let these nuscumstinks try to move the goalposts. call them out whenever you see a nuscumstink going no no its 1k eo2020! fucking pathetic faggots

[Anonymous No.16710914]

>>16709784
Bitcoin has zero commercial use.

[Anonymous No.16710939]

>>16710035

It has always been eoy 2020, don’t let this fudder fool you

[Anonymous No.16710946]

>>16709913
This is total bullshit, nobody is making an income from chain link, only server and his dad when you buy his pre mined shit tokens

[Anonymous No.16710963]

>derivatives end of year
Much worse than 1000eoy bc it actually came out of scammer sergs mouth

[Anonymous No.16711006]

>>16710014
>Bought 300$ worth at 2.78

At least I don't have much to invest to begin with so I don't lose as much I guess. Not selling tho

[Anonymous No.16711077]

>>16709849
>>16709849
You have to go back

[Anonymous No.16711243]

Two straight years of failure. Congratulations on this, seriously

[Anonymous No.16711253]

>>16711243
So excited for these kids right now.

[Anonymous No.16711284]

>>16709913
>nodes get paid for serving data

That's Chainlink distributing it's pre-mined IOU tokens that came out of thin air.

And those came from the dev premine, so what you're saying is that Chainlink is quietly DILUTING the tokens outstanding and keeping the price suppressed.

Lmao, this is great. So the more Chainlink is used, the more value token holders lose!

AYYYYYYY

[Anonymous No.16711294]

>>16709714
what year tho?

[Anonymous No.16711316]

>>16711284
This is exactly whats happening.

[Anonymous No.16711317]

>>16710946
Premined shitoken
>glybto gurency
Faggot kys

[Anonymous No.16711332]

>>16709714
ya i'm going all in btc...

[Anonymous No.16711824]

>>16709803
Poo poo pee pee

[Anonymous No.16712037]

I'm out. Fuck you all
Bush did 9/11 and I'll only be back once we hit 12.5 euros per link

[Anonymous No.16712044]

>>16711316

Do we know the rate of emissions?

It would be cool to calculate how quickly the HODLers are going to lose their investments.

[Anonymous No.16712056]

I'M SO EXCITED FOR YOU GUYS!

[Anonymous No.16712524]

>>16709714
Last year this moment it was 0.25.......good times

[Anonymous No.16712560]

Everyone on this board has a higher probability of smacking this ass than seeing link ever hit $1k

[Anonymous No.16713795]

just gonna leave this here lmao

[Anonymous No.16713812]

>>16712044
its about 2$ per request and last I saw there was about 5,000 requests a day

[Anonymous No.16713819]

I’m thinking we don’t pump again until staking. Unless Swift finally gets their shit together. Either way though, it could be a while.

[Anonymous No.16713945]

>>16709882
You said that in 2018 also.

[Anonymous No.16713960]

>>16709780
It's still a $1shitcoin for a reason

[Anonymous No.16714297]

1000 suicides were committed
Lmao

[Anonymous No.16714556]

>>16709714
>mfw I was new to crypto and was retarded enough to believe this meme

[Anonymous No.16714600]

>>16710939
this it was always $1k EOY 2020 and 10k link was always the /makeit/ stack

[Anonymous No.16714609]

>>16709714
good ol clownlink delivering the laughs

[Anonymous No.16714628]

>>16709714
How can it reach 1k? How?

[Anonymous No.16714644]

>>16714628
be patient, only 12 months to 1k

[Anonymous No.16714669]

>>16711332
>imaging going all in btc during the second miner hash war and few months before the next block reward halvening
Even a crypto illiterate who never invested a cent in it, double digit iq timmy like me knows btc is about to tank hard, how clueless can you really be?

[Anonymous No.16714673]

>>16714669
Based mtg player

[Anonymous No.16714717]

>>16711006
Be patient my friend, we have all seen major losses in crypto. Only the strong survive.

[Anonymous No.16714747]

1k EOY
k

E
O
Y

We are gonna be so fucking rich bros.

[Anonymous No.16714759]

Can somebody PLEASE tell me how to short chain link? This is a sure thing, thanks in advance.

[Anonymous No.16714773]

>>16713812
Including eth fees?

[Anonymous No.16714830]

>>16711006
I’m right there with you man, it was $400 I got from cashing savings bonds my mother got me when I was a baby.

[Anonymous No.16715118]

>>16714673
how'd you know?
It's financeanon btw (but you alrdy know this if you post on /tg/)

[Anonymous No.16716167]

>>16709714
Don't even know what to say.

[Anonymous No.16716186]

>>16709761
Q2/Q3 is what I'm looking at. As jokey as those Oracle startups were, by then other industries will be able to tell if they're doing anything innovative with the tech that's helping their business in any way financially. If they are, this is where you will start to see real world adaptations being announced, likely to follow after a decent bit more time.

[Anonymous No.16716209]

>>16709714
thanks for keeping us in check

[Anonymous No.16716220]

>>16714644

>700 million tokens still not in circulation


If LINK were to reach one 1K, that means the market cap would have to be equal or close to 1 TRILLION DOLLARS.

That's $1,000,000,000,000.00.

That's greater than ALL of the biggest companies listed on the US S&P500 index save for Apple and Amazon. And these care companies with ACTUAL PRODUCTS, and REAL INCOMES.

Amazon made 70 billion dollars last year.

Link has not earned a single dollar in revenue, except for selling it's own pre-printed shit tokens.

In short, Link HODLers are little babby-brained toddlers.

[Anonymous No.16716238]

>>16716186
>As jokey as those Oracle startups were, by then other industries will be able to tell if they're doing anything innovative with the tech that's helping their business in any way financially.

Did you not get that those "startups" were fraudulent veneers erected just to feign activity?

They're not actually real businesses with real people...

Jesus Christ.

[Anonymous No.16716249]

LINK is ride or die until the 2023-25 range, no earlier. I don’t know why the majority of you cunts don’t understand this.

>t.2017 OG Marine

[Anonymous No.16716269]

>>16716249

What changes in 2025?

Gravelcoin is no longer a scam but a Brazilian global corporate success story?

So you're going to sit there losing money while stock markets all around you pump, and then hope for some magical P&D event?

It doesn't sound like an investment, sounds like you are a member of some sort of religious cult.

The absolute state.

[Anonymous No.16716293]

>>16716238
> Crowdz doesn't actually exist
You're a fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.16716330]

>>16716269
> Since you bought a stack and hodl you don't invest in the stock market
Again, you're fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.16716426]

>>16716293

Literally who

[Anonymous No.16716723]

>>16716293
>>16716330

Cope.

[Anonymous No.16717751]

>>16716220
Imagine not understanding that the value of LINK comes in staking as collateral for when multi million/billion dollar contracts are being traded through the network.