How is BTC supposed to survive when there are no miner subsidies?

[Anonymous No.16662474]

Hard mode: no trolling

[Anonymous No.16662479]

>>16662474
>what are fees
why do you keep making these threads?

[Anonymous No.16662488]

>>16662479
fees account for ~2% of current miner revenue, that isn't a feasible solution

[Anonymous No.16662489]

>>16662479
Elaborate on "what are fees". If nobody is mining, who pays that fee?

[Anonymous No.16662494]

>>16662488
>>16662489
who is paying you to say this on christmas day lmao i do hope youre getting paid.......

[Anonymous No.16662495]

Btw, just sold all of my BTC. These threads made me realize this is literally a ponzi.

[Anonymous No.16662516]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNSlIiKyZJM

[Anonymous No.16662519]

>>16662488
At the current block size, you're correct. Technology may be a lot more advanced by the time block subsidies go to near zero. If internet connection and hard drive space gets 10-100x better by around 2060 I think btc miners could probably survive off tx fees given there are people filling up the mempool with tx

[Anonymous No.16662550]

Fees will $1k

[Anonymous No.16662565]

>>16662474
>>16662474
It's not, and it's not trolling. It's just not going to work.
It's at least three halvings before it becomes obvious, so everyone just ignores it today, planning to dump before that (on whom, though?).