>>16625062
shut the fuck up you literal brainlet
>the risk free rate of the fed
you mean the federal funds rate
>dictates fcf and lending, which affects dividends
sure, it can affect dividends, but this has nothing to do with what we were discussing, which was your statement here >>16624410
>doesn't know there's a thing literally called the "risk free rate"
that was a response to OP here >>16624094 when he said that you make the following assumption:
>2) That you just can "live off dividends" as if there's no risk involved
in conclusion, your statement makes no fucking sense, because the funds rate has nothing to do with dividends being risk-free, because they fucking aren't
>The risk-free interest rate is the rate of return of a hypothetical investment with no risk of financial loss, over a given period of time.
Exactly, it is the THEORETICAL return of a HYPOTHETICAL investment. It does not exist in reality, and the closest proxy used in practice would be the 1 month t-bill, which sure as fuck is not enough to live off
>I'm not even going to tell you two fucktards how to cash out properly, nice try with cunninghams tho do some fucking work
There is literally only one way to cash out, and no matter what you will owe CGT on the gain. Fuck off
>t. all of finance and accounting an economics
nice try retard, you have never opened a finance book in your life
t. actual finance major