LOOOL

[Anonymous No.16616139]

BSV is about to hardfork again. That makes it what, the 4th time? haha. a fork of a fork of a fork. I don't think celvin and creg has the steam to survive this time. Looks like they are having big issues with unconfirmed chain transactions that are stuck too

[Anonymous No.16616152]

The absolute state of 3rd world bitcoin

[Anonymous No.16616224]

>>16616139
This “hardfork” is an upgrade, and the final one at that. Once genesis is complete the protocol is locked in. It’s done.

I can’t name one other viable coin that is done, scales, has a notable app dev presence, and a notable amount of transactions taking place daily.

[Anonymous No.16616236]

>>16616224
Until craig blows his fiat, sells his BSV, and hard forks the chain from a block back when his wallet was full. He pulled this shit with BCH and will do it ad infinitum until people stop believing in him.

[Anonymous No.16616240]

>>16616224
nano

[Anonymous No.16616250]

>>16616240
nano is the unit size that people care about nano

[Anonymous No.16616687]

>>16616240

Nobody is building apps on nano

[Anonymous No.16616716]

>>16616224
This

[Anonymous No.16616835]

this fork makes BSV incompatible with multiple exchanges lol

[Anonymous No.16616843]

>>16616835
Is that the only measurement of what amkes a coin successful?

[Anonymous No.16616847]

you cant propagate blocks that big without a major syncing issue. this shit is doomed, its literally only a matter of time

[Anonymous No.16616880]

>>16616224
>if you you only knew

[Anonymous No.16617040]

>>16616139
>posters like this reassure me that BTC will never update and increase blocksize

I'm SO excited for you guys.

[Anonymous No.16617041]

>>16616224
>scales
no it doesn’t
imagine the shit show when blocks keep getting orphaned 100 times in a row

[Anonymous No.16617058]

>>16616139
BSV is shit but I'm glad it's upgrading.
Fucking retarded BTCers think upgrades are bad because of some bullshit technical reason that you need a background in computer science to even understand.
And once you do understand it, it's revealed as incompetent garbage excuses from shitty devs.

[Anonymous No.16617076]

miners are giving up, it will become the most centralized shitcoin on earth

[Anonymous No.16617088]

>>16617041
I can't wait to watch the cope once gigabyte blocks are rolling out regularly.

[Anonymous No.16617105]

>>16617088
Take your schizo pills while you wait 2020 for the biggest nothingburger ever
Imagine the rope when it’s 2021 and faketoshi still keeps delaying the bullshitrust

[Anonymous No.16617123]

>gigabyte blocks
>trust

Those two are mutually exclusive. Also enjoy getting dumped on when CSW gets his trust lmao

[Anonymous No.16617130]

>>16616835
Removing P2SH does not make it "incompatible". P2SH addresses will still be able to create spend outputs, but miners will block P2SH addresses from receiving. There are many better methods for multisig than P2SH.

>>16617041
>>16616847
Seemingly, the 100mb+ blocks that have been mined on chain didn't cause orphaning issues. Let alone, Orphans/Reorgs are a part of Nakamoto Consensus, take your boogeyman talking points elsewhere. With secure 0-conf this doesn't matter, once your transaction is in the mempool, oh no a reorg, now your transaction is back in the mempool. Where will you move your goal post next once you see that big blocks work?

>>16617076
>miners are giving up
no, miners about to have control, as intended

[Anonymous No.16617138]

>>16616139
How long until CSW's pajeests for his new project complain about "BitCoin Cash SV Corecucks"

[Anonymous No.16617143]

>>16617123
>Also enjoy getting dumped on when CSW gets his trust lmao
BSV moonboys confirmed for low IQ

[Anonymous No.16617153]

>>16616224

cope

Kek

[Anonymous No.16617169]

>>16616224
There will still be some updates after Genesis. To name one, removing EDA

[Anonymous No.16617186]

>>16617169
>removing EDA
I wouldn't imagine that happening until SV has at least +50% hashpower.

[Anonymous No.16617194]

>>16616139

If you try to FUD, at least do it Wright.
STIFF

[Anonymous No.16617203]

>>16617186
Correct, in the meantime it is a necessary safety measure. We will see the likely hood around the time of the halvening, post halvening

[Anonymous No.16617216]

>>16616880
how bad you're bagholding? yeah we know

[Anonymous No.16617228]

>>16617203
You think BSV will have that much hash by then? Pretty optimistic. I think we still have a ways to go, but I suppose we'll see.

[Anonymous No.16617283]

>>16617228
BTC miners will still have a fair amount of profitability but its going to dwindle down to Mining Ops in 3rd world countries. Most people in the US won't survive, most Europeans are already out, China will survive because their rainy season (April-june iirc) will allow for lower electricity cost, but after that they will face 3-4 cents per kwhr. Only with the latest mining tech will companies survive, but capex is through the roof with mining.

The only way BSV survives is if they get some serious transaction volume. nChain is being unironic when they say their competition is Visa/MC/etc, the current level of transactions across all blockchain platforms is a drop in the bucket globally

[Anonymous No.16617375]

>>16617283
Well I do think we can offset the block subsidy by the time we reach the halvening, but it's going to take some large transaction volume to get there. Doable, but hard. We need Genesis to get there and companies like UNISOT to start taking off and stacking serious volume onchain. I'll agree that BTC is absolutely fucked if the price continues to trend downward.

[Anonymous No.16617398]

>>16617375
Unisot is a vaporware scam to drain money from Calvin

[Anonymous No.16617412]

>>16617398
lol I thought calvin was the scammer?

[Anonymous No.16617459]

>>16617398
That's some pretty hardcore cope, anon. ERP systems are ripe for Bitcoin integration and it's Bitcoin solutions like this that will bring mass adoption. Not digital hodl.

[Anonymous No.16617470]

>>16617130
>Orphans/Reorgs are a part of Nakamoto Consensus
literally what

[Anonymous No.16617479]

>>16617459
ERP systems don't need a vaporware coin run by a fraud, brainlet-kun.

[Anonymous No.16617494]

>>16617470
O O F

>>16617479
If it saves them money and is more secure than contemporary methods they will. Aside from that your opinion is meaningless.

[Anonymous No.16617501]

>>16617470
"the longest valid chain is the official one"

refer to tweet

[Anonymous No.16617717]

>>16617470
Hasn't even read the Whitepaper.

[Anonymous No.16617777]

>>16616139
i fucking hate BSV and their third world larp shills with the passion of a thousand suns but this is a gay post

[Anonymous No.16617786]

>>16617777
no u r gay

[Anonymous No.16617800]

>>16616139
>That makes it what, the 4th time?
bsv is shit but what's with this retarded corecuck meme? hard forks are not a negative and ethereum proved there are zero problems due to regular hard forks.
well in the bsv case this one is a negative, as they are retarded and are removing p2sh. but in general

[Anonymous No.16617904]

How long until Craig finds an excuse to fork himself all of Satoshi's coins on SV?

This trash coin is such a joke

Go back to Twatter you dunce rejects

[Anonymous No.16617905]

>>16616835
good. Less normies can buy
>>16617105
OR he doesn't and shocks the world and faggots like you neck yourselves or FOMO in late

[Anonymous No.16617914]

>>16617777
my friend I very offended by your post! My indian ancestors spoke to me and told me to buy many BSV . They said I will be very rich with many rupees! I can buy my own village and clean up my shitty river!

[Anonymous No.16618008]

>>16617041

Orphans are how the network scales and operates. That's what other projects like BCH ETH etc don't get. It's competitive. You don't care if every node survives, the weak ones die and the ones that can keep up continue to grow. Proof of work ensures this constant competition continues.

[Anonymous No.16618020]

>>16616139
Why do they keep doing this??

[Anonymous No.16618146]

>>16618008
>Orphans are how the network scales and operates.
> That's what other projects like BCH ETH etc don't get
>ETH
eth even has reduced block rewards for orphans, what a uninformed post

[Anonymous No.16618151]

>>16618008
unironically based and redpilled.
how can craig not be satoshi if he is right about everything bitcoin related, and the most based and redpilled avatar of the whole cryptosphere

[Anonymous No.16618178]

>>16616843
financially yes

[Anonymous No.16618202]

>>16618146
>rewarding miners for uselsss work
Lmao get back to me when ETH works and scales

[Anonymous No.16618212]

>>16618202
it's not useless work, orphans still confirm their parents, if parents are in the valid chain

[Anonymous No.16618548]

>>16617800
>ethereum proved there are zero problems due to regular hard forks
Using ETH as an example as using HFs in a positive way is an insult to HFs.

>they are retarded and are removing p2sh
I think you mean big brained af.

[Anonymous No.16618559]

>>16618146
jfc eth is such a shitcoin

[Anonymous No.16618608]

lmao fake bitcoin

[Anonymous No.16618644]

>>16618608
btw reminder

https://pastebin.com/xMWEEf84

[Anonymous No.16618674]

>>16618644
BTW

[Anonymous No.16618687]

>>16618674
didn't even have an idea about that subreddit. i just use my logic.

[Anonymous No.16618828]

>>16616139
Fucking dip shit Genesis is coming and will ass blast you

[Anonymous No.16618838]

>>16618674
who cares? creg has deserves all the ridicule he gets and more at this point.

[Anonymous No.16618916]

>>16618146

no, see this actually shows they don't get it. You don't put in things like preconsensus, different rewards for orphans or any of that. That all assumes you want to try to avoid orphans. The truth is, orphans are needed to punish incompetent miners and to keep the system competitive and robust.

[Anonymous No.16618930]

Honest question. I've been accumulating for a while. But I've been wondering do you think BSV will crash before it rises due to BTC eventually dying? Or will the transition be gradual that now is a good time to buy? Been considering selling to buy in lower if it's a flash crash type of situation

[Anonymous No.16618939]

>>16618930
just dca in if u feel that way. no one knows 2bh

[Anonymous No.16618999]

>>16618930

I wouldn't risk it, you can't time anything short term. It could go down some more but it could go to $1k next month. If you believe in BSV you believe in the long term. Just hold onto it

[Anonymous No.16619019]

>>16618999
checked.

[Anonymous No.16619052]

>>16616224
Hey guyse don't mind the 4th fork. This time it really is the real bitcoin. Protocol set in stone sirs

[Anonymous No.16619546]

>>16619052
>literal retard

They are removing a bunch of garbage and restoring OP_codes Core removed. The protocol is complete and it'll scale as intended. There won't be need for anymore upgrades or forks after Genesis outside bug fixes. If BTC EVER hopes to scale even a little bit they are going to have to fork. Thank fucking god the people in charge don't want that and the people who buy BTC are fucking idiots so no upgrade will ever occur.

[Anonymous No.16619826]

>>16617905
>good. Less normies can buy
that kinda makes price discovery harder
so it's easier for BSV to wash trade if there are less exchanges

what Calvin should do is create an exchange and only allow BSV to be sold there
he would completely take control of the price

[Anonymous No.16619899]

>>16619826
>so it's easier for BSV to wash trade if there are less exchanges

How so? It definitely needs more fiat onramp type exchanges though. Especially in the US.

[Anonymous No.16620001]

>>16619899
the less exchanges the easier the price manipulation

[Anonymous No.16620078]

>>16620001
I kinda figured. The only thing though is it would much more obvious I would think.