[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 228 KB, 1037x1071, mascot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16595965 No.16595965 [Reply] [Original]

This is your daily reminder Dragonchain is a scam and Joe Roets should be in prison.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hj2zbcITmc6nVubHcT9l8e72AaCOuNeNizRr0nSIoLA/mobilebasic
https://freetexthost.net/kgOXoVR

>> No.16596012

2017 called

>> No.16596024
File: 190 KB, 1920x1080, micky-dragon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16596024

>>16595965

How the fuck do you not spend like 5 minutes googling and find out that this guy is a scammer before you buy the token?


https://youtu.be/BA2_pg_odX4?t=173

>> No.16596352

>>16596024

That interview is absolute gold!

>> No.16596367

>>16595965
This thread will drive at lest 5 people to sudoku

>> No.16596857

>>16596367

What exactly does driving people to sudoku imply? Solving puzzles isn't the most horrible thing...

>> No.16596884

WTF man? Seriously?

>> No.16596913

>>16595965
DRGN is "America's Blockchain" that isn't listed on a single USA approved exchange lel.

>> No.16596928

>>16595965
kek what an absolute shocker

>> No.16597428
File: 59 KB, 758x686, qnt.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16597428

>>16596024

Notice the fact that the scammer also mentions that he's on the W3C Blockchain Committee listing his credentials on some on some pointless blockchain committee just like Gilbert Verdian of Quant does with his involvement in the ISO Blockchain Standard

>> No.16597487

>>16596857
This better be bait. If not go back.

>> No.16598150

>>16597487
Serious, what's wrong with sudoku puzzles?

>> No.16598835

Hilarious that this is a US based crypto and is avoided like the plague from 98% of the exchanges out there.

>> No.16598905

People still think it's not a scam when their "rebranding" included a Pepe?

>> No.16599990

>>16598905
I don't recall that?