LET IT END

[Anonymous No.16433712]

Why WWHHYYYYY did I fall for the memes. The next eth, YEAH RIGHT! This was such a classic pump and dump.

[Anonymous No.16433735]

>>16433712
Yeah, what did you think was gonna happen?

[Anonymous No.16433739]

[Anonymous No.16433749]

>>16433712
Did you not see the news before investing? Chainlink is that pump & dump

[Anonymous No.16433813]

>>16433712
lols thanks for holding my bags.

[Anonymous No.16433879]

>>16433712
But it was a good investment, you could have bought any time under $1 and been doing great. If you bought above $2 you truly are a retard. Still, there is a lot of energy around LINK, just buy every time we dip under $1.5 and sell after a moon mission

[Anonymous No.16434389]

>>16433712
The most exciting project in this space. Actually, the only project that makes sense.

If Chainlink wins all of crypto wins. If Chainlink fails then all of crypto is pointless. How do you not go all in on a project that all of crypto is depending on?

[Anonymous No.16434434]

I'm thinking were back

[Anonymous No.16434496]

>>16434389
Pretty much this. It blows my mind retards are still loading up on their favorite smart contract bag (ETH, ADA, EOS, or whatever it is) when all suffer from the same data connectivity issue and will be reliant on LINK. Either LINK succeeds and a few smart contract protocols do as well, or LINK fails and nearly every crypto project dies.

[Anonymous No.16434521]

>>16434496
Zero adoption even in the smart contract space but nice try linkies
Total delusion

[Anonymous No.16434533]

>>16434521
The protocol is in its infancy....one single price feed and growing. Keep bagholding your coins that are reliant on oracles.

[Anonymous No.16434546]

>>16433712
You're a retard. Link is on sale right now and you are crying like a faggot.

[Anonymous No.16434625]

>>16434546
It blows my mind how many linklets talk about how they wish they had a larger stack but as soon as LINK goes on sale they panic and sell off. The absolute state of the financially illiterate

[Anonymous No.16434657]

>>16434625
Because deep down they know their bag isn't actually worth anything, the current price is literally just a meme based on what it could become in the future. It's not going to "$1k" if it succeeds since it's success is already priced in. It's current actual value is literally $0.

[Anonymous No.16434680]

>>16433739
>It pumped once so its good!

The absolute state of linkoids with their centralized shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.16434705]

>>16434657
>priced in
you guys have been saying this since link was 20c lmao. Stay poor if you want, I won't be losing any sleep over it

[Anonymous No.16434820]

>>16434496
Lmao, such a retarded post.
Blocknet solves the EXACT same problem, while being WAY more decentralized, since with LINK you need to actually be APPROVED to setup your node. What's next? KYC? Get outta here.

Blocknet is also a WAAAY cheaper solution, do your own research on their Xrouter solution, newfag

[Anonymous No.16434852]

Chainfags

[Anonymous No.16435149]

>>16434680
It went from outside the top 100 to a top 15 coin during bear market you faggot. It wasn't pumped, people invested when Mainnet was realeased, when the Google article dropped, and when Coinbase listed it. Your fud is fake and gay

[Anonymous No.16435279]

>>16435149
Youre gay and gay

[Anonymous No.16435362]

I typed half an essay here explaining the ins and outs of certain things but then I remembered.

Peepee
Poopoo

[Anonymous No.16435398]

>>16434820
Imagine believing this garbage

Back to your designated street ranjeesh

[Anonymous No.16435434]

faglink

[Anonymous No.16435442]

>>16433712
Guys, it looks bearish as fuck
Hands getting weak

[Anonymous No.16435872]

>>16434389
Nonce

[Anonymous No.16435891]

ITS OVER. All link shills have moved on to SNX

[Anonymous No.16435932]

>>16435362
Based as fuck

[Anonymous No.16435955]

>>16433712
>he fell for an ERC20 token that has no use at all in a web scraper system(which has no use at all)

[Anonymous No.16435962]

>>16435955
Imagine being still this priced out

[Anonymous No.16435972]

>>16435955
Imagine believing this is a ERC-20 token..

[Anonymous No.16435982]

Linkies have resorted to leafleting in dc lol

[Anonymous No.16435993]

>>16434680
If you bought in January 2019 you'd still be like 4x. I don't see what the issue is? All the OG Linkers said they don't expect to make it until mid 2020s anyways. The best advice I got from them was "Just buy, HODL, forget about it, and check back in a few years"

[Anonymous No.16436002]

making multiple accounts to look like they are doing something

[Anonymous No.16436028]

gotta feel bad for Sergey working so hard only for all these startups and integrationsb to never actually use his tokens

[Anonymous No.16436035]

>>16433712
So sell then, faggot. Quit muddying the water with your incessant whining and fuck off.

[Anonymous No.16436045]

>>16436028
>all these startups
You mean the shell place holder GoDaddy hosted stillborn site “partnerships” that were all used just to shuffle his money around?

Yeah, literal Pajeet startup CashPundit, fucking GravelCoin, and some blockchain thrift store will all be using LINK for their In house money laundering. Fakest startup list ever. If you went to their websites you’d know it’s just a front for Sergey to launder.

[Anonymous No.16436098]

>>16436045
This

>gravelcoin
>some pajeet cash scam
>literal who blockchain companies

What ever happened to the rest of the Oracle 50? It was so bad they couldn't even get 50 companies. THAT should be your red flag, 50 companies didn't even want "free money and marketing"

[Anonymous No.16436128]

>>16436035
kek why are you so mad? could it be cause we told you 5 months ago no one would ever use KYC oracles, and we were right?

[Anonymous No.16436132]

>>16436098
I think it’s more that there aren’t 50 smart entrepreneurs aware of LINK. 50 smart entrepreneurs to begin with is a LOT. I mean, statistically even with that 45 of them will fail. Regardless, LINK had nothing to do with Oracle’s ambition. They are focused on much bigger fish. Oracle literally begged Sergey to talk to them.

[Anonymous No.16436143]

thanks for the money

[Anonymous No.16436257]

>>16434496
It needs to go lower. $0.20-0.50 is the next bottom for LINK. It will reach these numbers by April. I will buy back in then and sell in October. I’ve extrapolated all the data to support this forecast. Screencap this and thank me later.

[Anonymous No.16436292]

>>16436132
kek no, Chainlink is vaporware centralized KYC oracles. It was featured on forbes and every news outlet imaginable. There's not a single dev in the space who doesn't know about Chainlink.

Every single one of them decides not to use KYC centralized vaporware. Your IQ is so low it's almost unbelievable.

>1+ year test net
>5 months main net
>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production
>(with proof link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan)
>Linkers: this is bullish!

[Anonymous No.16436371]

What don't you idiots get about speculative investments

Of course it's a risk that's the whole point... You don't make a million dollars off a 5k investment unless there's a high level of risk. You have to actually beat the normies in to get such a return. Or else just go buy microshit stock or something fuck.

The project is still at the very first stage. The whole point is throw some cash on crypto instead of buying dumb shit and don't sell until it's 0 or life changing money because this game is too volatile.

Anyway don't buy link if you haven't already I literally don't give a fuck about retards. I begged my friend who had legit 100k sitting in cash doing nothing to buy at 23c I said just 5 to 10k please I beg you but he didn't listen and literally bought in at 4.80 and now complains

Thats what it means to beat THE MARKET

[Anonymous No.16436375]

>>16436371

[Anonymous No.16436387]

>>16436098
Based.

It was so bad the team couldn’t even find an extra 30 startups as shit as the ones they obviously made up. Nobody wants to use this trash. It’s sad when they can’t even fill spots after 3+ years, mainstream coverage, and $32+ million.

[Anonymous No.16436457]

>>16436371
>The project is still at the very first stage
>3 years
>40 mil in dev
>already top 10 coin if you count the 65% is Sergey's wallet
>0 users
>Linkers: we are so early!
KEK

[Anonymous No.16436469]

>>16436292
>Link dumps a whole fucking dollar
>Still amazingly priced out

[Anonymous No.16436470]

>>16435982
>be me, working in Georgetown
>walking down the street during my lunch break
>suddenly hit my a noxious, smelly combination of sweat, coom and burger grease
>what is that?
>I look up from my phone and see a short, fairly overweight man sitting behind a table screaming something
>what is he saying? “1000” “big macs on the cloud” “eoy”
>as I pass his table he reaches over it and jams a leaflet in front of me.
>I can’t tel if it’s stained with grease or semen, probably both
>It reads “Blockchains,data, oracles, piss bottles” and on and on, it makes no sense
>I look at the man, he is froathing at the mouth and is furiously moving his hand up and down in his pants, he seems frustrated
>I toss him a viagra and go about my day, and sanitize my hands

[Anonymous No.16436479]

Your last chance is xtz

[Anonymous No.16436536]

>>16435149
>during bear market
Look at you kiddies parroting this meaningless shit, this is CRYPTO, its a fucking 10 year old market that had a pump ONCE. There are no market 'conditions' its all random shit. None of that means anything, your devs dumped on you and you can't refute the fact you bought a funding token.

>"the OG Linkers"
>2 years
Go the fuck back to plebbit you and your other newfag friends.

[Anonymous No.16437505]

>>16434820


Many here don't quite understand the strategy of Chainlink.

If you've every gone to a few of Sergeys talks he emphasizes one thing and he repeats himself over and over and over.

"Security"

He says the word "security" so often you start to realize that this is his #1 goal of right now. Sure, the first nodes needed to be approved because of what? "Security". launching the network isn't about decentralization..YET. It was the plan all along to decentralize as soon as they know the product is working and it is Trusted and Secure. If your smart, youd know why already. But let me break it down for the brainlets in here.

Basically as he stated himself. Chainlink has 1 shot to make this thing work. With Synthetix going to be the first Defi dapp using the oracle network and others soon following it puts Chainlink in a position where it CAN'T fail. If in some way Chainlinks oracle network is compromised the whole thing collapses. Not just Chainlink but yes, you guessed it. Every other project in crypto will be years behind. THEY ARE ALL WAITING TO USE CHAINLINK.

Think about it. If and when we start to see millions of dollars transacted through smartcontracts being fed data through the oracle network and somehow that network fails Seucrity wise. Well, that would be it. NO INSTITUTION will trust this whole process. Because in the end its about TRUST. TRUST IS HUGE when it comes to finance.

Crypto people losing millions due to a hack is one thing. A financial transaction done by an legacy institution getting hacked for 10s of millions? A WAY BIGGER DEAL.

Anyways. Still though, its true what they say. Crypto succeeds if Chainlink succeeds. If you are not at least 90% all in chainlink, your doing it wrong.

[Anonymous No.16437543]

>>16437505
Also, notice, all the tech advances that Chainlink is pushing out DECO, Mixicles, Homomorpic encryption, TEE, TownCrier etc. is all about Security. Security and audibility. Thats all they talk about.

You guys in here trying to talk about "decentralization first" don't have a clue of whats needed in the real world. Without Security and Audibility chainlink would not be able to tap into the trillion dollar market run by main-street. Thats a clue for you guys.

Good luck hunting and get out of non regulatory projects.

[Anonymous No.16437588]

>>16436387
lmao I almost forgot about motherfuckin' GRAVEL COIN! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! THE FUKING STATE OF CHAINSTINK!

[Anonymous No.16437596]

>>16433712
HUNNITS OV TEEEEMS !!!

[Anonymous No.16437599]

>>16436536
>nuclear levels of cope detected
i'm sorry you were too stupid to buy at .20-.30c
truly

[Anonymous No.16438299]

>>16433712

[Anonymous No.16438692]

Well fuck

[Anonymous No.16438782]

>>16433712
i bought in at 0.17 dollars and sold at 4 dollars.
your dummy moon mission memes are for late adopters and redditors.
any one who bought link for more than 1 dollar is literally a bag holder for all eternity at this point.
your best option is to keep letting daddy Serg fuck you in the ass and DCA by buying more or cutting your losses and cashing out at a loss.
trust me the latter is the correct decision.
I bought 1 btc of BAT and lost 2k USD when the coinbase listing happened

[Anonymous No.16438810]

>>16435362
When you gotta go you gotta go, Pajeet. No need to be ashamed of that.

[Anonymous No.16438849]

>>16436536

[Anonymous No.16438855]

>>16433712
It was $0.20 a year ago.

[Anonymous No.16438879]

>>16438782
larper
prove or didn't happen

[Anonymous No.16438911]

>>16438782
Screencapped. I'll repost this shit in 3 years.

T. 55k link marine that isn't selling a single one

[Anonymous No.16439114]

Link and everything else is getting bitcorned yet y'all still priced out

[Anonymous No.16439276]

>>16438911
kek congrats on holding proven vaporware
>1+ year test net
>5 months main net
>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production
>(with proof link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan)
>Linkers: this is bullish!

[Anonymous No.16439377]

>>16439276
kaik siddh vaashpasheel padaarth dhaaran karane par badhaee deta hai
>1+ varsh pareekshan net
>5 maheene ka mukhy jaal
>koee bhee utpaadan mein chainalink orachlais ka upayog karane vaale upayogakartaon ke saath ek bhee naam nahin de sakata hai
>(dapp.chom/dappradar/aithairschan ke prooph link ke saath)
>linkars: yah tejee hai!