Serious question from brainlet nufag

[Anonymous No.16329720]

Why is no one using LINK?

It's been 5 months since mainnet yet no one uses LINK? Or am I wrong?

Why would staking change any of this, if there is no usage there are no rewards right? You'd think that in 5 months someone would use LINK but no..

[Anonymous No.16329739]

>>16329720

[Anonymous No.16329746]

>>16329720
mainnet will be finished in early 2020.
chainlink already has dozens of partners (actually hundreds really if the breadcrumbs are true) ready to jump in once it's done. it can't really be used until service agreement is finished.

[Anonymous No.16329753]

>>16329720
nobody uses any crypto it's all a vaporware scam. You can earn money on it though.

t. 2012 oldfag

[Anonymous No.16329757]

People are using link... what do you think all those startups are doing?

[Anonymous No.16329778]

>>16329720
It’s only been 5 months? Feels so much longer. Be patient.

[Anonymous No.16329780]

>>16329746
Oh so LINK isn't fully functional yet then? So is staking and service agreement the only things missing for 100% mainnet completion? What is service agreement and why isn't it solved yet?

Not trying to fud, I own 12k links just curious how this works..

[Anonymous No.16329788]

>>16329757
Exit scamming like several already have.

[Anonymous No.16329790]

>>16329780
according to your trip you should dump on the first of may

[Anonymous No.16329801]

>>16329780
do you want to buy something when its completely done or before it pops off? I doubt you own any link you are too retarded

[Anonymous No.16329806]

>>16329780
Too late for spoonfeeding fren. You can check out the pivotal yourself.

[Anonymous No.16329807]

>>16329780
>claims to own 10K+ link
>doesn't know answers to simple questions regarding link
It's tiresome

[Anonymous No.16329809]

>>16329757
They are not doing shit that’s what they’re doing lmao

Literally no one is using link atm and mainnet has been out for like 6 months

[Anonymous No.16329817]

looks like synthetix is going to single handedly make LINK matter

[Anonymous No.16329841]

>>16329801
I bought early 2018 when I read some convincing posts, haven't updated my knowledge so I really don't know how big of a deal this "service agreement" is

>>16329806
I understand fuck all of that shit. I'm semi brainlet when it comes to all that IT shit. TLDR version for a fellow anon? :)

>>16329807
Feels good to get my baby stack doubted, thanks

[Anonymous No.16329845]

If you actually look at link, it's incredibly overpriced for what it is. It's all hype and still unproven, it shouldn't be anywhere near how expensive it is.

It's all hype, you have to have massive trust in the project, but just in general something this unproven should not be in the price range it is

[Anonymous No.16329862]

>>16329780
Sell everything you have right now because you are retarded and will never make it if you're asking these questions. Also sell anyways because the Juicening has only just begun.

[Anonymous No.16329864]

check the pivotal is a meme. i've been a dev for almost a decade and i can't understand what the fuck is going on looking at the pivotal lol. it's deliberately opaque.

[Anonymous No.16329887]

seriously though synthetix using chainlink is the adoption we're looking for. this is one of the exact use cases i've been waiting to see in all of crypto. a fuck load of assets on chain. every kind of investment on chain.

[216 No.16329892]

>>16329845
>>16329862
not selling you filthy kikes

No good anon who can explain? I'm disappointed in you

[Anonymous No.16329898]

>>16329841
Your stack is doubted not for its size, but for the stupidness of its supposed owner.

[216 No.16329935]

>>16329898
ok boomer

[Anonymous No.16329961]

>>16329720
Why would people use itt?

[Anonymous No.16330155]

>IT'LL LAUNCH GUYS
>WE HAVE BIG PARTNERS GUYS(but not really)
JUICED

[Anonymous No.16330163]

>>16329780
Are you aware how innovative technology is chainlink building ? You simply cannot expect that it will explode after 5 months of mainnet. Mainnet doesn't mean everything is finished, it is only a beginning. It is still in 0.7.9 version now. Wait for 1.0.0 at least. First of it's kind protocol that will affect many industries - be patient.

Not to mention it is possible that they already finished project "locally" and public github is simply intentionally delayed because they have to wait for something/somebody. For now just enjoy how perfectly it behaves when market is crashing.

[Anonymous No.16330165]

>>16329720

Protip: this is the link use case- to dump on retard newfags

[Anonymous No.16330190]

>>16330163
AHAHAHAHAHHAAHAH
LITERALLY A PAJEET

NECK YOURSELF BAGHOLDER

[Anonymous No.16330206]

>>16330163
Well put.

Don't get me wrong, I do not doubt the success of LINK, I was merely curious to what the next steps in the process will be since we haven't seen any usage yet. No one seems to want to address my (albeit stupid) question about service agreements, staking and how these would bring usage to the network. It's not enough for a network to succeed to have a bunch of neets wanting to make passive income on their stacks y'know

[Anonymous No.16330230]

>>16330206
You're literally taking advice from a braindead Indian who knows absolutely nothing about what he's talking about.

He actually thinks they may be done and delaying the repos LMAO holy shit dude get the fuck out, when Indians are on board and shilling during a dump it's a bad sign. You should have sold around 3 like a smart person instead of a finger crossing bagholder

[Anonymous No.16330255]

>>16329720
I would also guess that there is a security issue they have not disclosed for obvious reasons. Also look at Ari Juels work on Project Chicago which I believe is related. I am just guessing though.

[Anonymous No.16330316]

>>16329845
Awwww is somebody a little upset that they got priced the fuck out? It’s okay champ, better luck next time

TWO
W
O

YEARS
E
A
R
S

[Anonymous No.16330326]

>>16330206
my address
0x2208129e8e802b9a56e9a1372bfc8d716e0efa1e

[Anonymous No.16330364]

>>16329887
What’s the deal with synthetix? Is it worth investing into?

[Anonymous No.16330399]

>>16329753
This
All cryptos are absolutely useless, except the ones that can be used to buy illegal stuff on the internet

Sergei created Chainlink for one reason; to get rich. Now he's rich, mission accomplished for him. You are truely a brainlet if you even think chainlink has any use whatsoever

[Anonymous No.16330486]

>>16329841

Don’t worry brother. Same boat as you. I get the basics and I understand Link is revolutionary, but I don’t understand exactly how it works and what we are waiting for. I just know it’s coming and I hope it’s sooner than later.

t. 50k Link since November 2017.

[Anonymous No.16330510]

>>16330486
Based and chadpilled

[Anonymous No.16330524]

>>16330486
Larp. Nobody holding since 2017 could be this dumb

[Anonymous No.16330547]

>>16330163
>It is still in 0.7.9 version now. Wait for 1.0.0 at least
Implying these numbers really mean anything
What a brainlet

[Anonymous No.16331007]

>>16329720

Just a reminder how far Chainlink has come and continues to climb.

*this chart needs to be updated.