[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 57 KB, 850x680, EJ5ReC0X0AI50mQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16328190 No.16328190 [Reply] [Original]

wtf /biz/? You told me he was just larping. How can he have more patents than anyone else in the whole world if he was just cosplaying? Fuck you biz!

>> No.16328197

google the word: patent troll

>> No.16328200

omg he must be satoshi...

fucking retard

>> No.16328213

>>16328197
>google the word: patent troll

Patent troll:
>In international law and business, patent trolling or patent hoarding is a categorical or pejorative term applied to a person or company that attempts to enforce patent rights against accused infringers far beyond the patent's actual value or contribution to the prior art, often through hardball legal tactics

So it is trying to enforce a patent beyond what the patent covers. I don't really see your argument. Care to explain?

>> No.16328215
File: 7 KB, 200x200, 1573471309862.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16328215

is this cunt really satoshi?

>> No.16328222

>>16328213
Low iq

>> No.16328223

>>16328215
too early pajeet, you were suppoosed to wait for the trigget post

>> No.16328238

>>16328223
im serious. so much stuff is pointing to him being satoshi but hes never proved it so idk

>> No.16328267
File: 435 KB, 305x205, kek.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16328267

>> No.16328324
File: 61 KB, 1200x526, 1574337589480.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16328324

>>16328238
the proof is all there if you just care to do some digging and reasoning

>> No.16328334
File: 111 KB, 1691x755, 1573328380815.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16328334

>>16328324

>> No.16328340
File: 226 KB, 1434x674, STIFF Satoshi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16328340

>>16328334

>> No.16328353
File: 118 KB, 1854x331, setinstone.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16328353

>>16328340

>> No.16328370
File: 148 KB, 1062x573, d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16328370

>>16328353

>> No.16328383

>>16328238
>so much stuff is pointing to him being satoshi
doubt.

>> No.16328405

>>16328190
$12.00 eoy

justed

>> No.16328469

>>16328190
Did anyone analyze what they patent?

>> No.16328487

>>16328469
Blockchain related tech. You can find it on google

>> No.16328499
File: 1.30 MB, 1760x1850, patents.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16328499

>>16328469
Here's a small list if you just want to read the headlines

>> No.16328516

>>16328499
That's exactly what i don't want to do. Some meta-analysis of what get's patented would be nice.

Methods for smart contract?
wallet patents?
Copypaste on the same basic blockchain tech?

Would be interesting to know.

>> No.16328532

>>16328516
google it and you can find the complete pdfs for the patents.

>Copypaste on the same basic blockchain tech?
No, not copypaste. Contrary to what the retards here say, it is a very rigorous process to get a patent granted. You will not get a patent for something that is already in the public. It has to be something NEW and USEFUL

>> No.16328542

>>16328532
Patents get retracted all the time because someone proves it already existed beforehand. The system is anything but perfect.

Also
>round corners patent
ain't nobody taking the system serious.

>> No.16328567

>>16328542
>The system is anything but perfect.
I mean it is perfect. The process is very rigorous, not unfailable. You won't get 800 patents granted and then it turns out half of them are prior art and not valid. 2 or 3 maybe

>> No.16328575

>>16328567
>I mean it is perfect
*I didn't mean

>> No.16328688

>>16328567
If i remember right it's possible to lose a lot in one go given right circumstances. If you build a tower where one patent relies on another and the bottom goes bust you can lose the tower because suddenly it's not yours and the new application is not big enough to warrant giving you rights considering you don't own the base method.

-was info from a lecture on patents for chemistry. Software might be different though.

>> No.16328721

>>16328334
How does this point to CSW?

>> No.16328757

>>16328721
>How does this point to CSW?
why do you ask me?

>> No.16328760

Why do you retards have this discussion every day? Not a single person believes there is a 1% chance he is Satoshi and you all know that. You are just trolling each other

>> No.16328816

>>16328542
USA moved to a first to file system recently. Now it doesn't matter who invented something, only who filed for the patent first.

>> No.16328817

>>16328757
Cuz you're the fag who posted it

>> No.16328830

>>16328816
So can you retroactive patent Pythagoras work or how does it work now?

>> No.16328856

>>16328830
thanks for the tip anon
on my way to the patents HQ with my high school math book

>> No.16328857

>>16328817
>Cuz you're the fag who posted it
and? Why don't you ask yourself instead? Please stop harassing me

>> No.16328968

>>16328857
GREG GO SPEND TIME WITH YOUR KIDS. GET OUT OF HERE.

>> No.16329235
File: 164 KB, 1600x1700, depositphotos_137029196-stock-photo-dog-playing-in-basketball.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16329235

>>16328324
lulz, imagine if that post was real

>> No.16329311

>>16328721
Because this scaling model is exactly what Craig a.k.a. Satoshi and nChain is doing.

>> No.16329392
File: 441 KB, 1077x744, 1574298869602.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16329392

>>16329235

>> No.16329497
File: 73 KB, 1332x662, now.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16329497

"A higher limit can be phased in once we have actual use closer to the limit and make sure it's working OK.

Eventually when we have client-only implementations, the block chain size won't matter much. Until then, while all users still have to download the entire block chain to start, it's nice if we can keep it down to a reasonable size.

With very high transaction volume, network nodes would consolidate and there would be more pooled mining and GPU farms, and users would run client-only. With dev work on optimising and parallelising, it can keep scaling up.

Whatever the current capacity of the software is, it automatically grows at the rate of Moore's Law, about 60% per year." Satoshi 2010

>> No.16329501

Buying more today.

Thank you greg

>> No.16329558

>>16328532
As a guy who’s balls deep in IP shit, most of what you wrote is nonsense. If you can afford the fees you can patent just about bullshit you want (as long as it can’t be shown to infringe on someone else’s bullshit).

>> No.16329586
File: 53 KB, 500x365, ewrwet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16329586

>>16329558
>As a guy who’s balls deep in IP shit
lmao cool story bro

>> No.16329644
File: 93 KB, 500x481, CEBEC905-CFCA-4F3B-A3B2-3BA261B3DF54.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16329644

>>16329586
How many patents do you hold boss?

>> No.16329873
File: 134 KB, 970x2048, 1573367977429.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16329873

>>16328190
alibaba is a monster wew lad

>> No.16329958
File: 317 KB, 1218x1631, if_im_not_satoshi1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16329958

>>16329873
It's Ali Barber for you sir.

>> No.16330106
File: 200 KB, 1243x1051, if_im_not_satoshi2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16330106

>>16329958
Lots of cope inc.

>> No.16330115

>>16328324
>>16328334
>>16328340
>>16328353
>>16328370
none of that is really proof though. and Im not trolling here I want to believe. craig blows my mind on the regular with the stuff he says on podcasts and interviews. but then he turns around and does some straight up retarded shit that makes him lose all credibility in my eyes. I wish it would be a clearer picture but I guess he just doesnt give a fuck. either hes the hardest working scammer on the planet or hes the real deal I dunno. either way I have a small stake in BSV so I can at least board the citadel if this is all for real.

>> No.16330129

>>16330115
>none of that is really proof
who said it is?

>> No.16330441

>>16330129
>who said it is?
I just realized I said it is. Ouch...