I just calculated Nano's fair value for 2021

[Anonymous No.16235938]

I compared Nano to Litecoin since they have similar tokenomics.

LTC:
2014: $45 -- $1 billion marketcap
2017: $358 -- $20 billion marketcap

If we get a similar 20x from previous ATH, Nano will follow this path:

2017: $35 -- $4 billion marketcap
2021: $700 -- $80 billion marketcap

Or if we track closer with Litecoin's price history and assume $20 bill is the max the market will offer a coin at that stage in its life cycle, you can expect:

2021: $175 -- $20 billion marketcap

So we will land somewhere between $175-$700 / Nano. Everyone buying Nano right now will make it.

>But my fancy shitcoin with high TPS

Nano also has the advantage of being a simple currency just like Bitcoin and Litecoin are, so the hordes of dumb money will feel comfortable understanding its value and use-case.

[Anonymous No.16236209]

>>16235938

[Anonymous No.16236232]

I just calculated Nano's fair value for 2021

50 cents

[Anonymous No.16236241]

oh no no no nano bros, what happened?

[Anonymous No.16236242]

Thanks for the hopium OP.

[Anonymous No.16236255]

>>16235938
Forgive me for the obvious newfagging. I spent some time here a long time ago. Invested what i had in nano, made some profit then ended up wasting it all on raigames. After that I left the crypto space for a while. Checked back at one point and saw the threads on link at .35 and ignored it. I finally returned and have been staking link. (sorry for blog)
Anyways the question i have is why the fuck is nano reddits coin (from what ive seen)? And why does biz hate it (other than the fact that it isnt link)?

[Anonymous No.16236269]

>>16236255
stacking, not staking.. yet

[Anonymous No.16236342]

>>16236255
basically because the community is extremely delusional. Thinking its ever going to hit ATH and not accepting that it was a PnD scheme mainly fueled by bitgrail and they ride on the "duuhh its green instant and feeless its the best coin ever why wouldnt anyone use this"

[Anonymous No.16236856]

>>16235938
I calculated Nano's fair value based on Bitconnect, as they have both similar tokenomics and even fanbase, pic related, so fair value is around zero. If you add insane and stupid fair value calculations from someone with zero understanding of basic tech and finance, plus nuts supporter group, like (OP), then Nano should probably have a negative market value.

[Anonymous No.16236876]

>>16235938
Why are none of you crazy nanoids unable to answer basic questions regarding your tech and team, here? >>16229229

Any potential Nano investor should get informed about this scam coin here:

Dangerous flaws and major problems with Nano
http://archive.is/diUnZ


Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
http://archive.is/GGWIG

Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
http://archive.is/zAtyl

[Anonymous No.16236911]

>>16236255
Right when BTC was clogged up around Dec 2017 and TPS was a huge thing, the Nano devs came and lied through their teeth that Nano could do 7000 TPS. Reality was a little over 200 and they pushed an Italian scam exchange that went bankrupt, after devs and their friends made tens of millions and moved them out right before the crash, while telling the community everything is OK.

[Anonymous No.16236919]

>>16236255
Lying through their teeth

[Anonymous No.16236928]

>>16236255
Sad reality

[Anonymous No.16236934]

>>16236255
While normal retail investors could not get verified for months, desperate to get out of Bitgrail before they lost all their money, Nano team and their friends had no such problem. Pic.

[Anonymous No.16236945]

>>16236255
While Bitgrail was closed for withdrawal for retail investors, and then only small sums, Nano devs and their friends could move out tens of millions of dollars, pic related.

[Anonymous No.16236975]

>>16236255
All the time Nano pushed, promoted and lied about Bitgrail until the very bitter end, Here is dev Zack Shapiro only days before Bitgrail went under due to a "hack" and Nano retail investors lost 170 million USD, valued around 500 million USD before it started to get obvious that Bitgrail had problems. Pic.

[Anonymous No.16237004]

>>16236911
>>16236919
>>16236928
>>16236934
>>16236945
nice attempt to derail dag satsfag

[Anonymous No.16237015]

>>16236255
Nano devs controlled over 50% of the votes and could have taken Nano from a burn address and give to Bitgrail victims if they wanted to. They did not, and instead banned all talk about Bitgrail from their reddit page. Didn't even say they were sorry for misleading retail investors about fake 7000 tps, Bitgrail endorsement etc, and didn't even bother to fake an investigation into who did the hack, could we retrieve the Nanos somehow etc. They couldn't care less. I sold my Nano when I discovered they lied about TPS, before Bitgrail, but was truly appalled by the sociopathic behabiour of the Nano devs towards Bitgrail victims. Both based on principles and that it could easily have been me.

[Anonymous No.16237024]

>>16236255
These are not good guys. Nano dev Zack Shapiro

[Anonymous No.16237040]

>>16236255
Plus Nano has by far the most nasty and stupid community in crypto, pic and:
>>16237004
nice attempt to derail dag satsfag

[Anonymous No.16237055]

NANO is the future of crypto and miners hate it.
It renders their 'business model' nonsense.
It is nonsense, searching for magic numbers is not a value adding use case.
Fuck miners, fuck stakers. Only nano is fair.

[Anonymous No.16237070]

>>16237004
Constellation (DAG) is a far better alternative than Nano, can be easily seen here: >>16215179

[Anonymous No.16237085]

>>16236255
Plus Nano has by far the most nasty and stupid community in crypto, pic and:
>>16237004
>nice attempt to derail dag satsfag

[Anonymous No.16237126]

>>16237055
no inflation or deflation either, it's just right. I see some peoples crit of nano that it doesn't do some fancy gimmick usecase, but it's my endgame because it has a huge community (50,000+) and has way more upside than any other bluechip right now.

[Anonymous No.16237163]

>>16237126
>a huge community (50,000+)
That would mostly be people emigrating from the crashed, but larger, Bitconnect community, see >>16236856
and pic.

[Anonymous No.16237172]

>>16237163
Sad miner. It's not too late. Only 133 million nano, ever.

[Anonymous No.16237195]

>>16237172
Yeah, right, "miner" that's the reason. And you are not the typical uninformed and delusional nano investor at all, ryte? Have a look at the replies to this comment: >>16236255

[Anonymous No.16237216]

>>16237195
BTC had MtGox. No one cares about ancient history. Your actions are so futile. It is just funny you believe people are going to be leaving a first mover bluechip for the fiftieth 'next eth' shitcoin that promises to do more TPS. Satsgang retard.

[Anonymous No.16237268]

>>16237216
Did Satoshi take tens of millions of dollars out of Mt.Gox, promoting Mt. Gox saying he was talking to them every day and that they were good guys, just following KYC and not exit scamming. Did Sathoshi get all his friends verified, while the rest was stuck and lost all their money? Did Satoshi ban all talk about Mt.Gox from BTC reddit page? etc etc. Your comparison is that of a child, or just the usual nuts nano fan boi.