[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 31 KB, 298x300, nickszabo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16214956 No.16214956 [Reply] [Original]

Satoshi

>> No.16215821
File: 65 KB, 616x310, n2sjtzhujrs01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16215821

>> No.16215825

>>16214956
We know.

>>16215821
Cringe

>> No.16215828

>>16215821
absolutely based

>> No.16216246

>>16215821
he's got nothin

>> No.16216261

>>16214956
It was Hal Finney

>> No.16216268

>>16214956
Based.

>>16215821
No, Ranjesh. For a millionth time, no.

>> No.16216270

based people are always hated by the crowd

>> No.16216274

>>16214956
LOL isn't that the guy who said to Craig, live on stage, that Bitcoin is not turing complete and that he should write a paper on it if he was stupid enough to think so? Then a year later Craig published a peer reviewed academic paper proving that Bitcoin is turing complete. Haha you can't make that shit up. What a loser

>> No.16216299

>>16216274
Update your script, even the BSV Reddit already admits that Bitcoin script is not Turing-complete, like Szabo pointed out. The rest is semantics.

>> No.16217136

Why does one picture of Nick Szabo make CSW shills seethe so violently

>> No.16217538

>>16215821
https://archive.is/TEykO

>> No.16217562

>>16217136
if you're ever at a con, and you see CSW, you can make him fume and go insane if you just shout BITGOLD at him
he gets angry because he thought that Hal was satoshi, and only later found out that he was already ridiculed on stage by the real one in front of a gorrilion jews

>> No.16217585

>>16216261
https://www.ofnumbers.com/2018/10/01/interview-with-ray-dillinger/
it wasn't Harold
Harold audited the code with Dillinger

>> No.16217588

>>16217562
Noted

>> No.16218619

>>16217588
checked