[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 3 KB, 225x225, RLC.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16207966 No.16207966 [Reply] [Original]

Yeah, I'm thinking we're gonna make it.

>> No.16208181

>>16207966
Hi satsgang / cryptowolf / iexecmonopoly / cryptochico / rlc's actual marketing team and whatever other pajeet tier pump groups are trying to spam biz.
Yes, we see you. No, we still aren't interested in your ripped off shitcoin memes or pajeet tier shilling tactics.

>> No.16208271

>>16207966
digits...ofcourse we're gonna make it...we already won.

Now Just sit back and relax and wait for the money to reap in./

>> No.16208704
File: 134 KB, 1300x650, 13245E93-E157-412B-8122-D95C7F26D18D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16208704

>>16207966
>66
THE TIME HAS COME
UNLIIIMMMIIIIITTTTTTEEEEEEEEDDDDDD OOOOIIIIILLLLLLLLL

>> No.16208743
File: 131 KB, 334x506, 1557932647552.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16208743

>>16207966
>66
6's are RLC gets
WE ARE GOING TO MAKE IT

>> No.16208752
File: 197 KB, 570x451, DIGITAL-OILY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16208752

>> No.16208926

is 4k barrels enough to make it guys

>> No.16208966

>>16208926
10k is the standard.

You'll be comfy though

>> No.16208991

>>16208966
>66
>Yellow ID
KEK IS WITH US, HE WHO CONTROLS THE DIGITAL OIL CONTROLS THE DIGITAL FUTURE

>> No.16209012
File: 794 KB, 1920x1080, 1547952433246.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16209012

>>16208966
>>16208991
HOLY SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT

>> No.16209042

>24h volume $2,193,505

>> No.16209054
File: 242 KB, 1200x800, 1573116461837.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16209054

were all gonna make it

>> No.16209076

Another cringe shill thread of no value.

>> No.16209097

>>16209076
You want us to spoon feed you fagboys like we have over the last 2 years?
OH THATS RIGHT YOU HAD 2 YEARS

>> No.16209114

>>16209097
>digital oil
>you had two years
Do you brainless shills ever come up with anything original or just repeat things everyone else has already said about chainlink?

>> No.16209124

>>16209097
If you bought at any point during the last 2 years you lost money compared to a simple savings book

>> No.16209296

>>16209114
Imagine thinking LINK was ever digital oil and not the extractor of said digital oil.
>>16209124
Except I bought when it was under ICO price like a good boy