/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.16170397]

Mainnet had been out for 6 months and literally nothing has happened

[Anonymous No.16170414]

At least we got GravelCoin. Nobody wants to use that garbage. Everyone wants to throw up their PowerPoint screenshots, fake ass partner images, and some lame ass Google tweets that means fuck all, but they know the gig is up. Caribbean scamcoin.

[Anonymous No.16170446]

>>16170397
Smart anons predicted no one would ever use centralized KYC oracles. They have been proven correct and linkers BTFOed.

The partnerships will never use Chainlink oracles as long as it's not decentralized, and that will never happen because the team is incompetent as fuck and hasn't even released specs for it.

0.2EOY

[Anonymous No.16170457]

>>16170397
You are autistic. And not the good kind.

[Anonymous No.16170480]

>>16170446
>no one would ever use centralized KYC oracles
lmao, you're an idiot. The KYC isn't the problem.
In fact, large companies will likely demand KYC from their oracles.

The problem is that all mainnet does so far is the USD price of ETH.
Sergey needs to speed things up and open up mainnet.

[Anonymous No.16170499]

>>16170480
>>16170446
do you enjoy samefagging or do you actually think it has any impact on anyone?

[Anonymous No.16170509]

>>16170499
Haha what?
The "muh centralized KYC oracles!" bullshit has been used as fud constantly ever since May 30th.

[Anonymous No.16170526]

>>16170397
Chainlink devs have made total bank off you neets - so something has happened, and it's working exactly as intended

[Anonymous No.16170551]

>>16170397
>Mainnet had been out for 6 months and literally nothing has happened
Chainlink successfully reports the price of ethereum. We must first crawl before we can walk, and be able to walk before we can board the rocket ship.
Just give it time.

[Anonymous No.16170559]

>>16170551
It's great that they expanded the node count and implemented aggregation; shit works flawlessly with zero downtime so it already BTFOs any centralized oracle that ever existed.
But still, god damn this slow burn.

[Anonymous No.16170569]

>12 months test net
>4 months main net
>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production
>(with proof link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan)
>Linkers: this is bullish!

[Anonymous No.16170577]

>>16170551
So price checking ETH and 20 shit tier startups costs $32 million and multiple 700k exchange dumps on you simp investors? How do you sleep at night knowing this fat faggot has your money in an off shore Caribbean account and has abandoned every other project to date?

[Anonymous No.16170592]

>>16170577
>I BORROWED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS FOR A SKYSCRAPER AND ALL I GOT WAS FUCKING PIT??????
This is you.

[Anonymous No.16170609]

>>16170509
and it's been proven correct. None of the old fud has been proven wrong, Chainlink still has no one using their oracles, they still own 65% of the supply, they're still not sybil resistant, they're still centralized, they still have no reputation or security other than KYC (hence why literally not a single dapp uses them).

calling it "old fud" thinking you refuted the claim is extremely low IQ, but what can you expect from a paid link shill that just started his shift.

[Anonymous No.16170613]

>>16170609
>and it's been proven correct.
Only in your deluded mind.

Large companies will very likely demand KYC, so trying to use it as fud is retarded.

[Anonymous No.16170657]

>>16170592
Is this one of those skyscrapers where they cheap out on all the materials, stall the building process for months, announce completion dates that never happen, and they finally run off with all the money while investors realize it’s being held up on a prayer and the shoddiest materials?

Good luck with your scamcoin. Sure he’s abandoned several other projects but this one he’s staying for sure. Also taking all you NEETs and retards to the moon.

[Anonymous No.16170661]

>>16170613
You could disprove everything by posting a single link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan, but you can't cause there are none, instead you'll post a link to a blog post "partnership" that isn't using it.

It is literally proven that not a single dapp uses Chainlink, because not a single linker has ever posted a single link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan to prove the contrary.

Go on dapp.com/dappradar, there's certainely not a single dapp on the front page using Chainlink, and many of them actually use oracles, just not Chainlinks.

Looks like you're the deluded one, and you've been BTFOed.

[Anonymous No.16170698]

>>16170661
>You could disprove everything
I've soundly disproven the "muh kyc" fud.

As for the dapps; see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ahUZjuIqqwG9dZLvlm0sgHmckRVUC6kB396narYKSyU/edit

>>16170657
>cheap out on all the materials, stall the building process for months, announce completion dates that never happen
Literally none of those things apply to Chainlink.
Chainlink does shit like acquire the pre-eminent academic TEE project (TownCrier), and get Intel to co-write papers. That's the opposite of "cheaping out on materials".
And Chainlink never ever sets completion deadlines. Ever.

[Anonymous No.16170709]

>>16170592
they already wasted $50mil and 3 years to build centralized oracles that already existed, and that no one is actually using. At this rate, it will take them 20 years and $500mil to build decentralized oracles.

Enjoy bagholding for 20 years while an actual competent team builds actual decentralized oracles that actually have users.

>muh 50 partnerships
not a single one of them is using it in production on a product that has users
>muh 12 nodes
not a single one of them is serving dapps/users, cause there are none. Also 12 nodes is fucking pathetic for 4 months kek.

[Anonymous No.16170723]

Adoption takes time; years even. If you want a quick fix go gamble on shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.16170730]

>>16170709
>centralized oracles
Flat-out lying gets you nowhere.

[Anonymous No.16170738]

>>16170730
you're the one lying. Having multiple KYCed nodes doesn't make you decentralized. It makes you centralized by the KYC provider. AWS is not decentralized because it has hundreds of datacenters. AWS is not decentralized because it has thousands of people running their software. They can ban anyone they want, so can Chainlink, cause it's KYC, centralized vaporware.

How does it feel like have low IQ and get BTFOed repeatedly by a superior man? Probably pretty bad.

[Anonymous No.16170744]

>>16170738
>Having multiple KYCed nodes doesn't make you decentralized
Of course it does.
KYC doesn't impact decentralization at all.

[Anonymous No.16170795]

>>16170738
>Having multiple KYCed nodes doesn't make you decentralized.
It absolutely does.
You’re thinking of permissioned vs permissionless.

Learn more about the basics pls.

[Anonymous No.16170804]

>>16170744
>having a single central entity that can ban you from having any reputation on the network is decentralized
KEK I'm sure dapp developers agree with you, that must be why 100s of dapps are using Chainlink.... oh wait, there's NOT A SINGLE ONE.

Not. A. Single. One.

Not a single linker has been able to post a proof link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan that a single dapp has decided to use Chainlink's KYC oracles.

After 4 months of mainnet, and 12 months of test net.

KEK

[Anonymous No.16170821]

>>16170804
>>having a single central entity that can ban you from having any reputation on the network is decentralized
Yes.
See >>16170795

Whether a blockchain is permissioned or not has no bearing on decentralization.

[Anonymous No.16170830]

>>16170821
>Whether a blockchain is permissioned or not has no bearing on decentralization.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

No. Learn to code brainlet. A permissioned blockchain is by definition, centralized.

[Anonymous No.16170834]

Glorious how pajeets, shills and plebbit can be indentified alone by the way they space. Not even a need to read the shit a mongoloid like bYZ9NYg1, the structuring of his posts gives away where he is from.

[Anonymous No.16170843]

>>16170830
>A permissioned blockchain is by definition, centralized.
You are absolutely clueless and it's hilarious.

[Anonymous No.16170864]

>>16170843
Nope, literally every programmer in the world agrees with me, you're just a non-programmer who doesn't understand the tech he's investing in.

I'm literally proven correct by the fact that not a single dapp developer has released a product with users with Chainlink in the 12 months it's been usable on test net.

[Anonymous No.16170879]

>>16170864
>Nope, literally every programmer in the world agrees with me
Except IBM, right?
https://developer.ibm.com/articles/blockchain-hyperledger-fabric-ordering-decentralization/

[Anonymous No.16170888]

>>16170864
Linkpal :)

[Anonymous No.16170896]

>>16170730
A question regarding the image, what is the allowed deviation from the consensus, before it is considered wrong? Like if one oracle says 600$ would it then be removed from the answer and considered wrong, and where does the line goes e.g. would 195$ be okay and count into the consensus.

[Anonymous No.16170900]

>>16170879
congrats on misinterpreting a blog post because you're a brainlet non-programmer. You probably thought the Google partnership was real too, didn't you?

Misinterpreting technology you don't understand doesn't make you correct, it makes you a smug, deluded brainlet who will inevitably get rekt.

Learn to code.

[Anonymous No.16170913]

>>16170900
>congrats on misinterpreting a blog post
Except it literally says "Fabric is thus designed so that the ordering service can be decentralized and can provide for your Fabric network to be fully decentralized as you would expect from a blockchain framework."

And "this has led people to think that the ordering service is actually a central server and that Fabric is not a decentralized framework. However, this is not the case."

[Anonymous No.16170969]

>>16170896
>what is the allowed deviation from the consensus, before it is considered wrong?
That's up to the user to define.

Chainlink is decentralized; there's no overarching "authority" that decides whether an oracle is being reliable or not.
It's all down to reputation and user definition.

[Anonymous No.16170982]

>>16170896
>>16170969
I mean it's only logical; different users will likely have different standards regarding deviation, accuracy, etc.

It's also likely that third-party listing services will offer packages of standard contract parameters for different use cases; suggesting the amount of oracles, level of reputations, deviation tolerances, ...

[Anonymous No.16171012]

>>16170709
https://www.stateofthedapps.com/dapps/chainlink fucking idiots.

[Anonymous No.16171038]

>>16170969
>>16170982
thanks for the explanation.

[Anonymous No.16171080]

>>16170698

He said post a link to etherscan not to a google document.

[Anonymous No.16171180]

>>16171080
The testnets and mainnet have all been out for a long time. Surely you can find them yourself.

[Anonymous No.16171423]

>>16171012
You just win

[Anonymous No.16171505]

>>16170698
Lmao fail

[Anonymous No.16171524]

>>16171012
I don't think you even clicked your own link

[Anonymous No.16172104]

>>16171423
those are wash transactions by the team to make it seem alive. Show an actual dapp using Chainlink, not the Chainlink contract itself which is 100% wash transaction by the team.
>>16171180
No, because they don't exit. Not a single dapp that has users is using Chainlink KYC oracles.

[Anonymous No.16172122]

>>16172104
>testnets and mainnet don't exist
k