WHAT THE FUCK

[Anonymous No.16158813]

I thought RLC was a scam you fucking pajeet spammers

[Anonymous No.16158881]

>>16158813
It serves you right for not DYOR

[Anonymous No.16158906]

>>16158813
That’s what you get for sucking ChainLink off

[Anonymous No.16158979]

It's over Gilles

[Anonymous No.16158988]

ChicoCrypto made a video on it yesterday after accumulating and shilling it on his Telegram for 2 months.

Somebody's gotta get dumped on HARD as fuck and It'll be hilarious.

[Anonymous No.16159034]

>>16158988
not before it goes to $2 by v4

[Anonymous No.16159050]

I lost a ton of money on this shitcoin and now it moons. Gg.

[Anonymous No.16159079]

>>16159034
whatever you say, anon. I've been on several of Chico's telegram PnDs. Same old story, this is due to correction.

It's up 5x BTC in a non-alt season and up 4x over the past month and a half. Be careful out there and lay off the moons after 2 months of whale accumulation to dump on you too.

[Anonymous No.16159087]

>>16159079
>It's up 5x BTC in a non-alt season and up 4x over the past month and a half.
On zero news either lmao

[Anonymous No.16159097]

>>16159087
"on zero news either lmao"
have you been living under a rock or are you too arrogant to DYOR?

[Anonymous No.16159100]

>>16159097
Do tell us what the news was.

[Anonymous No.16159113]

>>16159100
Not going to spoonfeed you faggot

[Anonymous No.16159118]

>>16159113
Nice cop-out while exposing your ID-switching samefaggotry.

There was no news.
Zero.

[Anonymous No.16159120]

>>16159100
it's not my job to spoon feed you, stay poor fag

[Anonymous No.16159123]

>>16159079
yeah no, we just broke through the downtrend line starting from the 32k sats top yesterday, if this breakout confirms there's no reason to drop below the line again anytime soon

[Anonymous No.16159131]

>>16159097
>>16159113
This is what you're dealing with, boys.
Faggots spamming the board switching IDs constantly to pump their latest PnD.

>>16159120
lmao nice save, good job.

[Anonymous No.16159132]

>>16158813
Some Anons here are just trolls Fudding RSR too
If they did their research they'd know a thing or two about RSR like:
>App launched in Venezuela
>Backed by Peter Thiel, coinbase, ycombinator and all funds
>Ties with Venezuela's guy who made Petro
>Targeting adoption in Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina, Turkey, Greece
>Paypal $ in VZ moving to Rsr

[Anonymous No.16159135]

>>16159118
yikes you are schizo, let me guess, you are holding gravel coin?

[Anonymous No.16159173]

>>16159118
I wasnt even switching fag. I'm another user. I don't even care what you do. Don't buy. Want you to off yourself while watching RLC moon wishing you listened to some random anons trying to help you.

[Anonymous No.16159179]

>>16159173
>I wasnt even switching
t. faggot who was switching

[Anonymous No.16159182]

>>16159179
imagine being this schizo

[Anonymous No.16159187]

>>16159182
Imagine putting all this effort into bitchfighting about switching IDs (while switching IDs), but not simply saying what the news was.

[Anonymous No.16159190]

>>16159123
Dude. I have 10k RLC right now and have sold through all of the PnDs near their version. My pure profit off this coin is 2.5 BTC because the pattern repeats every time. Don't talk about trendlines or chart shitcoins, especially lowcap coins like RLC.

I like the project and that's why I keep a 10k suicide stack. However, even Chico is retarded because he shills Avalon despite the token NOT being used in the Avalon framework at all.

Go PnD plebbitors or shit, but keep biz clean. We're all autistic fuckers here, we should at least watch out for each other.

This will go max 2x from here and then it's gonna drop like it did over previous versions until it PnDs late March - May for V5. If you think otherwise you're delusional.

[Anonymous No.16159207]

>>16158813
Biz is wrong in 99% of cases.

[Anonymous No.16159237]

>>16159097
There really was nothing though.

[Anonymous No.16159264]

Its an obvious PnD, just look at the nice and organic straight vertical pumps everytime it starts to drop. There is 0 news as well, its literally just whales trying to get people to fomo in so they can dump on them. Anyone who thinks that this will get massive adoption after V4 is straight up deluded, the team even said in their last AMA that they don't have any adoption news for V4. Its a regular old "version release" pnd, like the last two. Sure, you might get out a 30% or even a 2x from here if you're very lucky. More than likely, whales will dump on you BEFORE V4 though because they anticipate everyone else holding until then.

[Anonymous No.16159286]

>>16159187
>>16159237
Yeah I'm sorry anon. I'm switching IP and you're right, there's been no news since V3 and this is a textbook P&D. Also iExec has been extremely overpriced, it's competitors, SONM and Golem and far superior in every aspect. I'm sorry for offending you anon.

[Anonymous No.16159299]

>>16159286
I’m not hating, all I care about is money so I keep tabs on a ton of shit.
But there’s been no news whatsoever to justify this pump.

[Anonymous No.16159320]

>>16159299
It was flying under radar for mounths
Imagine not buying RLC when >170 while Golem was in top80.
If you can’t catch good opportunities bro we can’t do anything for you

[Anonymous No.16159329]

>>16159320
>It was flying under radar for mounths
Nothing changed though.

[Anonymous No.16159338]

>>16159329
RLC is unironically one of the top uses for blockchain tech even though the moonbois overstate them taking over a big portion of the future fog market.

I advise you to look into getting a position into it, anon, but maybe around early January 2020 - February 2020 when things calm down. It IS flying under the radar usually, but not right now.

[Anonymous No.16159342]

>>16159329
Why did LINK pump from 0.2$ to 1.X$ with no news till mainnet? It must be a scam right?

[Anonymous No.16159377]

>>16159338
But nothing changed.
Literally no news.
Every crypto out there claims to be the hottest shit ever and most even have some connections.

>>16159342
The mainnet announcement is what finally pushed Chainlink over the historic 60 cent barrier. Get your facts straight.
And there was tons of news and announcements since the start of Chainlink’s rise; starting with Accord in the summer of ‘18.

[Anonymous No.16159386]

>>16159377
>77
RLC confirmed next LINK gains

[Anonymous No.16159414]

>>16159377
Your gibberish has no power here

[Anonymous No.16159419]

>>16159377
>And there was tons of news and announcements since the start of Chainlink’s rise; starting with Accord in the summer of ‘18.
this

[Anonymous No.16159449]

Rlc has been under ICO price several times. Despite everything they achieved. Won’t spoonfood you but if you can’t see that this shit was undervalued af there is a problem.
Have a look on their achievements, and ask you why it was UNDER ICO. It means they destroyed value while develop like gods

[Anonymous No.16159453]

>>16159377
So it was an announcement of an announcement that pumped LINK right? Don'y you know there's V4 in Dec? Every version release has pumped RLC, you're stupid if you don't see the pattern

[Anonymous No.16159459]

>>16159449
Moves like this on zero news are generally not a good thing.

[Anonymous No.16159483]

>>16159459
You really should kys. The 0 news fud won’t work they have like hundreds of news in past years that never been priced in

[Anonymous No.16159494]

>>16159453
>So it was an announcement of an announcement that pumped LINK right?
Link had already been pumping for nearly a year at that point.
Chainlink’s mainnet was one of the most hotly anticipated events in crypto by then.

>Don’t you know there’s V4 in Dec?
This has been known for ages though.
Also, Iexec has a shitty history with hypinf up its version releases.

[Anonymous No.16159499]

>>16159453
...and it's dumped it right back. Accumulation for mainnets begins several months of advance and that's why Chico and his gang accumulated over the past 2 months.

Look at when Theta started pumping a lot and trace it to the mainnet. Hint: wasn't only a few weeks before it.

>>16159377
Anon, you mistake me for some of these pajeets. I don't need current news about RLC. The project is good, but the current time isn't if you want to get in. I won't gather all the stuff they've been doing under the hood but check their PoCo series and Dev letters on medium. It's good shit, despite the public tests being a bit clunky. I participated in the worker pool testing and there was a lot to be improved, but it was a good start anyways.

As I said, if you want to jump in, wait for the retrace around late January-early Feb but not later cuz the 2020 May pump will begin around then. Works like a clockwork with every version of RLC.

[Anonymous No.16159502]

>>16159483
Whatever you say pal.

[Anonymous No.16159555]

>>16159190
V5 is in december 2020 though, so it's probably gonna dump until september

[Anonymous No.16159643]

>>16159555
V4 was apparently pushed up so maybe V5 is too. Idk but I bought after making this post and I'll hold til then if I really have to, RLC seems pretty good

[Anonymous No.16159691]

>>16159643
V5 was scheduled for May 2021 but it will be released sooner in Dec 2020

[Anonymous No.16159721]

>>16159502
Lmao what a pajeet tier answer

[Anonymous No.16159768]

>>16159453
>Every version release has pumped RLC, you're stupid if you don't see the pattern
And then it always started bleeding and reached all time lows

[Anonymous No.16159797]

[Anonymous No.16159806]

>>16159768
So what? You can profit from it you retard

[Anonymous No.16159807]

>>16159797
Oh shit glad I bought lol I thought I saw something about iexec and french government on biz before was that real?

[Anonymous No.16159845]

>>16159807
Partnered with Wuhan municipal goverment (10mil citizens), partnered with Shangai university, iExec cofounder Haiwu He is chinese and has a lot of connections in China, also won honors and shit from goverment from his involvement into computer science

[Anonymous No.16159857]

>>16159845
"In 2017, he was elected as a member of Blockchain expert committee of CCF, and Chinese Institute of Electronics". So yeah, he's a pretty big deal

[Anonymous No.16159873]

>>16159097
The news is that chico army is running a pump n dump again. Look what happens after he shills a coin. It goes way up and then way down.

[Anonymous No.16159893]

>>16159873
Wow nice description of a pump and dump. Did you find this yourself ?

[Anonymous No.16159896]

>>16159845
>>16159857
Well fUUUUUUUUUCK me then I wish I bought more

[Anonymous No.16159922]

>>16159807
Gilles met with Bruno Le Maire (minister of economy and finance) 2 years ago, and has worked for INRIA for more than 10 years. INRIA is also under the supervision of Bruno Le Maire so INRIA may (and it probably will) use iExec in the future. I don't think there's something more about iExec and the French government.
Anyway you should dump before the V4 release, because iExec won't be competitive with bigger cloud providers before the V5, and there will be years of testing before it's used by entreprises,cities or research institutes

[Anonymous No.16159967]

>>16159922
This pic is fucking turbocringe.

[Anonymous No.16160003]

>>16159967
Idk Gilles is kinda cute

[Anonymous No.16160059]

>>16159922
Thank god Sergey never pulls any of this shit.

[Anonymous No.16160060]

>>16159922
>>16159967
>>16160003
This photo is a shop. Someone find the real one where it's him at one of his tranny dump parties.

[Anonymous No.16160243]

>>16159132
People in Venezuela can't even afford rope to hang themselves. I know from threads on /suicide. Fucking gross

[Anonymous No.16160350]

>>16158988
>Implying “chico crypto” is a market mover

WEWLAAD

[Anonymous No.16160356]

>>16159131
>>16159118
>>16159100
>>16159087
>sold the bottom
>hurt

[Anonymous No.16160393]

>>16160350
>looks at volume
H-heh yeah anon. Moving that price would be like moving a mountain, no way fanboy fagteams like chico and satsgang / cryptowolf / iexecmonopoly would have a shot at manipulating this. This isn't another shitcoin waiting for the greater fools to come along, because v5 will totally be different.

[Anonymous No.16160426]

>>16160393
>literally half links volume on binance
>lists a bunch of boogie man tier imaginary groups they believe move the price of alts

No wonder you are poor

[Anonymous No.16160447]

>>16160426
> reflexively compares itself to a larger scamcoin which has a known history of being manipulated in pump and dump schemes
Really speaks volumes, Ranjesh.
The absolute state of shitcoin peddlers.

[Anonymous No.16160563]

>>16160447
Point is its a top ten token and there is a lot of money to be made in RLC, which is extremely undervalued, low IQ poorfaggot.

[Anonymous No.16160632]

>>16160563
>b-better fomo in buddy! Buy these double price bags! Organically grown for sure! Not manipulated at all!
LMAO. No, pajeet. No matter how much you faggots try to shill, this board has shown an overwhelming rejection of it because of how obvious it is when the same 5-6 pajeets spam with threads over and over. The only other people who own it are retards who want to play chicken with Gilles' vX release celebratory dump extravaganza.

[Anonymous No.16161405]

>>16159123
over 70 cents

so much fucking FUD on RLC

buy now you faggots or miss yet another train, their offices in china go operational next year, china invited them to build in their silicon valley even though bitcoin mining is banned wahahaha

[Anonymous No.16161538]

>>16160632
>this board

This board is filled with 99% low IQ retards. If you followed the majority of baby dicked bag holders like you advice, you’d be broke in a week.

[Anonymous No.16162014]

double top confirmed
now we go down
time to start dumping

[Anonymous No.16162018]

7000 sats is the new floor.

[Anonymous No.16162135]

>>16159118
>Microsoft
>v4
>hit ICO price a MONTH AND A BIT ago
>main authors of eth protocols like TEE
you had TWO YEARS

[Anonymous No.16162147]

>>16162135
>main authors of eth protocols like TEE
You have no idea what TEE is.

And none of that shit is news.
Not even sure what you mean by "Microsoft".

[MarsLander22 !blxNPwk5hw No.16162151]

>>16162014
whales paint the chart just like this so manjeet like you dump early and get rekt when we clear the new highs

[Anonymous No.16162589]

>>16162147
>I don't know what you mean by Microsoft
>but I am informed enough to tell you you don't know what TEE is
fuck off kike.

https://medium.com/iex-ec/iexec-demonstrates-confidential-computing-application-with-eea-intel-consensys-microsoft-at-devcon5-826caea74378

https://entethalliance.org/enterprise-ethereum-alliance-releases-dff-chain-trusted-compute-specification-1-0/

[Anonymous No.16162607]

>>16162589
>trusted compute at devcon 5
By that logic, Chainlink also has a partnership with Microsoft.

[Anonymous No.16162617]

>>16162589
And yes, you are absolutely clueless as to what TEE is.
Protip: it's not an "ETH protocol" fucking lmao.

[Anonymous No.16162959]

>>16162589
holy shit, so the claimed microsoft partnership is that they are on they edited the same document as microsoft? KEK

I have a partnership with Apple, because I signed their T&Cs, which makes me have a legal contract with them, therefore I'm partnered with fucking APPLE. MOOOOOOOOON!!!!

[Anonymous No.16163068]

>>16162607
Where did I say partnership you fucking braindead mongoloid?
>>16162959
Same with you, learn to read, jesus christ, who even said partnership?
>>16162617
>it's not a protocol, lmao
>im going to argue incredibly pedantically, thatll show him
specification then, not protocol. fucking whoop-dee-doo. at least now you get to revel in being 1/10th right.

[Anonymous No.16163211]

Please buy the top sirs

[Anonymous No.16163437]

>>16162959
Imagine thinking this is english

[Anonymous No.16163776]

>>16163068
>Where did I say partnership you fucking braindead mongoloid?
lmao, doesn't matter what you want to call it,

>im going to argue incredibly pedantically
There's nothing pedantic about it you brainlet.
TEE is not an ETH protocol.
The fact that you thought it was is absolutely hilarious.

>specification then
You're STILL talking about the wrong thing.
How fucking dumb are you?

[Anonymous No.16164035]

Shitcoin with no volume that gets shilled when pajeets want to dump their bags.

No users, no volume, no future.
You'd have to be a literal subhuman mongrel to buy and hold this thing.