[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 26 KB, 320x320, avatar.jpg.320x320px.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073580 No.16073580 [Reply] [Original]

this fat fuck put together the best possible fud yesterday.

>> No.16073587

This shit is gonna tank.
>Massive Stop losses at $2.53.
Whales will target these SL's and then tank the price to sub $2. Whales have had their fun. What do you think that the pump was to $3 before the announcement? Whales are exiting their positions as we speak at this premium. $2.50 is coming. You honestly thought that price action was completely normal? About as organic as a McDonald's Chicken nugget. You fucks are going to be taught a very expensive lesson. Blatant insider trading....
Notice the sell off after the pump to $3 just before the anouncement? Fernando or someone at Oracle or someone within ChainLInk core team is fucking with you. If they are fucking with you it also means the whales are.

If whales are fucking with you then the CL team is fucking you as well. The fucking symbiotic parasitic relationship between the two is well known. I hope you sold anons.

>> No.16073604

Literally a new paradigm of fud. Impressive. Gravel Coin was a genius touch.

>> No.16073639
File: 17 KB, 410x230, images (18).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073639

>>16073587
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

>> No.16074224
File: 110 KB, 1278x617, 9F2438A5-BCB2-48AB-B9A5-424F5590C1C8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074224

>>16073587
>>16073639
>He doesn’t know

>> No.16074793

>>16073580
This Brazilian basically controls the price of LINK

>> No.16075024

this guys fucking smug face makes my day everytime I see him, WHAT a head, based oblong face

>> No.16075114

>>16075024
Post the stickied version with the champagne please

>> No.16075172
File: 99 KB, 732x836, 09E72A6E-6DEB-4397-8535-F305B36EB15E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075172

>> No.16075209

>>16073580
Based Fernando.

>> No.16075222

>>16075209
LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.