[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 18 KB, 398x398, 8987e61df25787ec17f7044de4fe57bc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16051037 No.16051037 [Reply] [Original]

If only BSV can scale why would any serious company build on another chain?

>> No.16051063

>>16051037
They wouldn't. I'm all in BSV. I pray for all others with pure hearts to see the truth.

>> No.16051077

>>16051037
They wouldn't

>> No.16051095

>>16051077
>>16051063
>>16051037
Niggers someone explain to me what BSV does. Is it a tier 1 blockchain? Does it scale already? If so then why's nobody using it? If it doesn't scale then you realize how much competition it has?

>> No.16051106

>>16051037
what company ever built on any chain instead of making an other shitcoin?

>> No.16051121

>>16051095
its scaling solution is basically going full retard and hope for the best.

>> No.16051151

>>16051095
Its literally just Bitcoin. It scales indefinitely. People have been apprehensive about doing business on Bitcoin BECAUSE of BTC. We lost Steam because of its nonsense. Hell even a Bitcoin convention refused to take Bitcoin for the tickets because it was so fucking expensive and slow.

There are a lot of wounds to heal.

>> No.16051176 [DELETED] 

is BitcoinSV better than Bitcoin cash?

>> No.16051212

>>16051151
>Its literally just Bitcoin
sv is sure as hell not bitcoin
there is only one bitcoin and that is always the consensus fork.

>> No.16051214

>>16051095
We're 11 months in and plenty of proof of concepts have been built. The chain only barely got to a 2gb block size a few months ago. You can't expect major enterprise to build on BSV until it has 100-1000gb blocks guaranteed and its scaling solution is "set in stone", so to speak.
This is why now is the time you get in, dumbo McDumbrain.

>> No.16051229

>>16051212
bsv is shit tier engineered, removing all the limits btc implemented. its a shitcoin from the scammer craig wright.

>> No.16051243

>>16051212
Imagine thinking consensus isn't just a word that means "today we say this thing, tomorrow,... Hmm we'll see what happens tomorrow."
BSV has been growing in people saying it's the real Bitcoin these last few months. It's quite noticable on social media. Not that this really matters, still interesting to see.

>> No.16051260

>>16051212
There are few major forks that compete for the same hash power.
Longest chain (fork) will win. We are seeing strong signs its BSV.

>> No.16051265

>>16051212
Are you going to keep saying this after most the hashpower has switched to BSV?

>> No.16051326

>>16051229
>BSV is Bitcoin without the constrains Core added
You are literally saying that BSV is the original bitcoin, but you say it as that is a bad thing. I'm starting the understand what Orwell meant by double speak. It's actually eerie to see it in real life and not just read about it in a dystopian novel

>> No.16051329

The next hardfork ("upgrade") comes in three months. It looks like it will be the final exist scam, funds from ancient addresses will be redistributed to Craig & co. Too many hints pointing to it lately.

>> No.16051330

>>16051037
It can't

>> No.16051360

>>16051329

cope, and watch how BSV is going to replace Bitcoin cash at soon

>> No.16051389

>>16051360
It's technically possible to redistribute certain funds with a hardfork. Craig has been talking about how "private keys are not proof of ownership" and "transactions can be reversed by a court order", this is not a coincidence. There will be a redistribution.

>> No.16051415
File: 1.83 MB, 200x200, 1412024262370.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16051415

>>16051037
BSV cant scale, its blocks are too big.

>> No.16051477
File: 49 KB, 492x577, happy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16051477

>>16051415
>BSV cant scale, its blocks are too big.
kek

>> No.16051802

bsv is a ridiculous scam by a serial criminal

can you believe these idiots actually believe csw is satoshi?

>> No.16052221

"A higher limit can be phased in once we have actual use closer to the limit and make sure it's working OK.

Eventually when we have client-only implementations, the block chain size won't matter much. Until then, while all users still have to download the entire block chain to start, it's nice if we can keep it down to a reasonable size.

With very high transaction volume, network nodes would consolidate and there would be more pooled mining and GPU farms, and users would run client-only. With dev work on optimising and parallelising, it can keep scaling up.

Whatever the current capacity of the software is, it automatically grows at the rate of Moore's Law, about 60% per year." SN

all blockstream shills are smarter then SN??