[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 44 KB, 1081x428, ghYftdk.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16012706 No.16012706 [Reply] [Original]

mETHeads BTFO again

>> No.16012717
File: 381 KB, 592x654, 1571663212796.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16012717

Sell ETH
Buy LINK

>> No.16012725

>>16012717
Nigger Link runs on eth. Justed.

>> No.16012739

>>16012725
Link is blockchain agnostic you fucking brainlet

>> No.16012762

>>16012739
It still runs on on ETH as of now, retard

>> No.16012774

>>16012706
/biz/ brain's BTFO.

>> No.16012783

>>16012706
ALL IN XTZ

>> No.16012795
File: 2 KB, 126x97, 1542662242872.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16012795

>>16012706
And you are tech illiterate again lol and where the fuck you get this "news" from lmfao

Also "reaserch suggests" something that is done and public fucking deposti contract is formally verified by now
Also its 1 way bridge now -not 2 so you cant swap eth 2.0 back for eth 1 not in early years but NEVER
Also not 1024shard but 64 shard with 8x bigger blocks so in theory ONLY thing correct in article is last line about 2x less capacity

I dont know are crypto "news" or retards like you sharing they take on them more cringe

>> No.16012817

>>16012795
lol cope harder

>> No.16012819

>>16012739
oooh, that does not bode well for LINK though
Once ETH fails, LINK would have to migrate to another chain. This would mean rewriting the whole code to another language. Judging by the recent rate of development on LINK, it would take around 3 years of work. Can nulinkers hold on for so long?

>> No.16012827

>>16012795
Im not coping i have 0 eth you cant read with comprehension anything i wrote HAHAHAHAHAHAH

>> No.16012837

>>16012819
I guess they could hire a lot of new developers though, but that would mean more of those 700k dumped on to the market.

>> No.16012847

>>16012706
Sound like a paid fud article from a rich eth whale. Baseless.

>> No.16012848

>>16012817
No for real whats your take on this "news" is it eth 2.0 is slow as fuck?, i really need to know how sub 80 iq anons who still can use internet think, it intrigues me

>>16012819
Yes "blockchain agnsotic" is meme in theory it is in real world what you wrote stands (-arbitrary dates +/- years)

>> No.16013321

>>16012706
>fuds but article is sub niger IQ and + acually bullish
Are you retarded?
>>16012795
>Also its 1 way bridge now -not 2 so you cant swap eth 2.0 back for eth 1 not in early years but NEVER
Yeah read it yesterday so how are eth1 and eth 2 prices peggd? They count on someone always making profit of arbitrage?

>> No.16013940

>>16012762
>as of now
who fucking cares moron. the switch will probably come and there is no rush. this argument does not save the clusterfuck platform nor will it gain you allies faggot

>> No.16013961

>>16012706
>>16012717
>>16012819
come on dudes. its clear this is a buy for ETC. you dont deserve to be in biz.

>> No.16013977

>>16012706
You mean I'll get two tokens like when BTC and BCH split?

>> No.16013983

Not buying Fantom right now is criminally retarded.

>> No.16014008

Out of curiosity
If ETH can’t even be ported to ETH 2.0

How will an ERC667 token built on ETH port to another blockchain?

Isn’t the original contract and ownership(s) on the ethereum chain?

We could be blockchain agnostic for sure and the network could move

But the tokens would still be on Ethereum and would require Ethereum continuing to exist