[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 293 KB, 500x500, darkshekels BUY NOW.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
159652 No.159652[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Goys! It's happening!!!
http://cryptogeeks.com/darkcoin-dev-says-anonymous-transactions-are-working-moving-public-beta

DRK getting DarkSend feature, anonymous transactions beta coming out, trade your cryptoshekels for DRK!!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?PHPSESSID=c4kda3v2et7fo6hvkc0orb8hl1&topic=421615.0

http://darkcoin.io/

0.00000% Pre-mined
Super secure hashing algorithm: 11 rounds of scientific hashing functions (blake, bmw, groestl, jh, keccak, skein, luffa, cubehash, shavite, simd, echo)
Block reward is controlled by Moore's law: (11111 / (((Difficulty+51)/6) ^ 2))
Block generation: 2.5 minutes
Difficulty Retargets based on Kimoto's Gravity Well
84 Million Coins Max
Encrypted transaction network: Work In Progress
Anonymous blockchain using coinjoin technology: Work In Progress

>> No.159663
File: 74 KB, 459x323, ak12 bullpup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
159663

>>159652
DRK is already at 0.00146969 BTC and rising, get in while you still can.

Basically how this works is:

Buy buttcoins, trade for DRK, transfer your DRK around the encrypted blockchain and transaction network, trade back to buttcoins, and you're anonymoose.

Anyone that doesn't expect a significant rise in market cap (and price) when this is working is foolish.

>> No.159668

>>159652
MINING POOLS:
http://pool.darkcoin.io/
http://dark.suchpool.pw/

>> No.159672

>mining a coin that requires a "special" custom altered mining program that is may or may not be, but definitely is, a trojan.

>> No.159676
File: 40 KB, 650x318, 1393656576807.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
159676

>>159672
>his AV reports minerd as a trojan

It's called a false positive.

>> No.159680

>>159672
Is it Comodo antivirus?

Because I have since switched to Kaspersky and no longer get false positives on minerd.

>> No.159684

>>159676

no, if it was regular minerd that would be true.
But they "had" to alter it
yeah really? ok sure.
>scamcoin

>> No.159692

>>159684
there are at least two new altcoins coming out that require an updated miner

you can use sgminer for it if you include "--kernel darkcoin"

or maybe it's cgminer...

i have it somewhere on here

>> No.159698
File: 135 KB, 1004x849, is normal SGminer noob.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
159698

>>159684
sgminer has kernels for different coins

>> No.159710

>>159698
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/sgminer-darkcoin/

and bitcointalk thread

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.1840

>> No.159712

Huh, looks like I actually still have 4 DRK from the time my dedicated server had nothing better to do.
Am I on the train, /biz/?

How exactly do their anonymous transactions work anyway?
Is it a better implementation than the shitty trust-requiring TIPS one?

>> No.159721

>>159712
here's a plebbit thread on it

plebbit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1y9cwc/how_does_darkcoin_compare_to_zerocoin_in_terms_of/

and Vertcoin pussied out and didn't implement zerocoin into it cuz "muh big bad gubbermint will murder us all"

and 4DRK is 0.00438700 BTC ($2.50) and rising

>> No.159726

i want to buy a few DRK
Would anybody be willing to trade 20 DRK for 500k PND?

>> No.159727

>Darkcoin is not currently anonymous. That feature is still in testing and should be released soon.

Meaning the price is about to rise when the anonymous features are implemented.

>> No.159733

>>159726
I have 25 DRK but I wouldn't trade them for PND before the anonymous features are released, sorry.

>> No.159738

So how's nVidia GPU mining on this thing?
How much can I mine on a 750ti?
Or are they CPU/AMD only like quark?

>> No.159747

>>159738
Don't know, haven't tried Nvidia. You're welcome to download Sgminer with the Darkcoin kernel and let us know how it goes.

I've been tracking Darkcoin for a little bit now and thought I would help /biz/ out.

>> No.159750

What's the expected rate of coin generation for a typical CPU?

>> No.159767

>>159652
Damn you post a ton on your own thread.

>> No.159782

>>159750
GPU mining has been out for a while now, so probably not much.

>> No.159802

What is the current difficulty?

>> No.159805

>>159747
Meh, tried it.
My 750ti can barely get over 135 kh/s.
My Xeon E3 1230v2 got over 360 kh/s from what I remember.
I'll stick to PND for my GPUs ;)

>> No.159825

>>159652
>Goys! It's happening!!!
>Goys
>Not goyim

>> No.159829

>>159805

Good idea, this is a shit coin that requires hacked miner software. People who mine this are the type who go to video sites and install the special plugin that no one has ever heard of and get infected with every virus ever made.

>> No.160013

I'm mining with the modified sgminer and a gtx 550 ti. seems profitable. also bought some on cryptsy and cryptorush.

I think it isn't a shitcoin because it has a novel feature.

>> No.160019

Difficulty?

>> No.160064
File: 46 KB, 163x150, 1366766566551.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
160064

k ill mine your shitcoin for tonight, currently getting 550 k/hash. If im not rich by the morning i will come looking for you

>> No.160118
File: 90 KB, 1213x741, 0014.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
160118

Can someone tell me what the fuck is going on with my hashrate? I have a single 6870 with stock clocks mining at an average of 650 khash. Is this normal? I mine scrypt coins at around 260 khash with CGMiner.

>> No.160155

>>160118
Your WU is 0

I don't think thats good

>> No.160160
File: 954 KB, 320x240, 1379508890909.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
160160

>>160155

My unconfirmed balance keeps rising though. How the fuck am I getting payed with 0 WU?

>> No.160167

mitebinteresting

>> No.160368

>k/hash

It's khash/s you moron. Don't you even think what your words mean before you write them?

>> No.160373

>>160368

No

>> No.160377

>>160368
i can has kilo of hash pls

>> No.160390
File: 3 KB, 209x215, 1391758242542.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
160390

Can't decide between Vertcoin or Darkcoin. Both look like they're gonna takeoff.

Cons:

Vertcoin look like the take themselves too seriously but won't actually push for success

Darkcoin looks like a tryhard hacker/blackmarket coin, so it doesn't ooze confidence either.

But Darkcoin actually does end up being successfully anonymous, I think it might win out.

What does /biz/ think? VRT or DARK?

>> No.160402

>>160390
Dark, if they actually can make the blackmarket use it.

>> No.160405

>>160390
dogecoin

>> No.160406

>>160390
crypto credits

>> No.160407

>>160405
Doge's value is actually crashing.

>> No.160411

so i a need different mining program for this coin, am i right? i can't just use for example the normal cudaminer?

>> No.160412

>>160407
you're meant to buy and mine the things that are crashing, dum dum

buying coins on the rise is stupid. none of the shitcoins on the market currently are any better than the others

>> No.160420

>>160412
Mining isn't worth it anymore after the halving.
And buying meh. The problem is that the value of Doge is not currently crashing because of some stupid news or market manipulation, it's crashing because people are losing interest in it, and doge really doesn't have that much of an investment behind it to inspire trust (=BTC).
It's a slow decline, the one that brings a coin's death.

>> No.160454

>>160390
Is darkcoin asic resistant like vert?

>> No.160513

>>160454
>DarkCoin uses a new chained hashing algorithm approach, with many new scientific hashing algorithms for the proof-of-work. This is so that the processing distrubution is fair and coins will be destributed in much the same way Bitcoins were originally. ASICs will be much more difficult to make for these algorithms and will take years.

>> No.160523

>>160513

that sounds like a lot of nerd talk

is this coin EPIC or not

>> No.160526

>>160523

Definitely epic. Should be hitting anywhere from 3 to 5 dollars at the peak, possibly moar.

>> No.160528

>>160526
>bought when this thread was started
>already earned 0.1btc

Thanks OP

>> No.160538

> cryptorush.in
> The site is currently in maintenance mode, please try again later and check Twitter for updates.
super.

>> No.160539

>>160528

Bought 2btc's worth mice elf@1400....hodling til we flirt with 3000 resistance :)

Mind you, the prices right now still aren't even at it's average moving price since inception. There's still a lot of headroom left once the new implementation takes place.

>> No.160699

>>160407

> ~ 250k * 3600 coin inflation a day
> Price holding steady at 190.

> "crashing"

u wot m8

>> No.160719

Top 10 market cap by the end of next week.

If you thought vert's initial rise was good, you ain't seen nothin' yet. Mintpal hasn't even started to eclipse the 30btc volume..just wait til the rest of the amerifags wake up.

Once the dark system is publicly released, shit goan get cray.

>> No.160737
File: 461 KB, 1920x1200, shares.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
160737

How's my 5970 from 2009 doing?

>> No.160745

Do you think this is a pump and dump?

>> No.160774

>Difficulty
>2.00

>> No.160781

>>160774
For what coin?

>> No.160793
File: 87 KB, 1662x245, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
160793

>>160781
Read the thing wrong, the current difficulty is 209.

Also
>https://twitter.com/barrymansfield/status/436996419573280769
>eduffield=Darkcoin creator
>#1 hasher
Just another pump and dump scheme

>> No.160826
File: 17 KB, 200x320, Amartya_Sen_NIH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
160826

>investing in hackercoin not appealing to investors nor chinameng
>not buying mint at these prices

nigga do you even wall street?

>> No.160971

>>160745
If their encrypted transactions and blockchain actually work... No, it's going to be big.

Also
>price of DRK on cryptsy right now

I told you fucking PND retards DRK was king.

OP here BTW, you can all thank me now.

>> No.160976

>>160390
Vertcoin decided not to implement Zerocoin because "hurrrr durrr da gubmints gonna murder us all".

>> No.160981

>>160971
>the price of a coin has any relation to it's wealth over a month or even a week

/biz/ lotto ticket general

>> No.160994

>>160971
lel

>> No.160998
File: 982 KB, 2361x1728, 100_0848.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
160998

>>160981
>I'm sorry I can't understand why shuffling money around an anonymous network is helpful.

Even if DRK isn't preferred over Bitcoin, there will still be people shuffling buttcoins around to DRK and back to BTC for the anonymoose it provides.

>buy buttcoins with bank account and US PATRIOT act approved identity
>trade buttcoins for DRK
>shuffle it around DRK network
>back to anonymous buttcoins

It's called freedom son, sorry you don't understand it.

>> No.161007

>>160998
>Implying one can't use blockchain's Shared Send feature to achieve a similar effect.
>Implying I can't just transfer my BTC into an Altcoin and then sell that altcoin for BTC again.
>Implying I can't buy bitcoins on localbitcoins by depositing money into someone's bank account.
I'm sorry, what were the benefits of DRK again?

>> No.161071

>>161007
>>Implying one can't use blockchain's Shared Send feature to achieve a similar effect.
>>Implying I can't just transfer my BTC into an Altcoin and then sell that altcoin for BTC again.
>>Implying I can't buy bitcoins on localbitcoins by depositing money into someone's bank account.

>because BTC is anonymoose guise! FOXNews told me so!

>because retardedly visible altcoin blockchains will never be looked at!

>because I trust random hobos selling buttcoins!

>> No.161090

>>159712
4 DRK is now about $4

>tfw we hit $2/coin

>> No.161099
File: 54 KB, 1096x697, 1389855761093.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
161099

>>161007
>>Implying I can't just transfer my BTC into an Altcoin and then sell that altcoin for BTC again.

The buttcoin that was in your name can be found to have been transferred to the exchange wallet, then have the exchange record subpeona'd and see it went into altcoins, from there the blockchain would reveal you.

Perhaps some helpful obfuscation though.

>> No.161103

>>161071
Now you're just talking out of your ass.

>because BTC is anonymoose guise! FOXNews told me so!
https://sharedcoin.com/
Get read nigga. Also, bitcoinfog.
And if anything, FOXnews would be saying the opposite in order to discourage people from using anything other than the USD.

>because retardedly visible altcoin blockchains will never be looked at!
You may have a point here, I'm just not sure how someone would track this kind of transaction down.

>because I trust random hobos selling buttcoins!
If I use localbitcoins, all I have to do is go to Chase/Bank of America/TD Bank and deposit money into the seller's account, no questions asked. The funds are held in escrow as well, giving protection for both the buyer and the seller. This is my preferred method.

>> No.161125

>>161099
You're assuming that I'd buy BTC from any exchange requiring my ID, which would be pretty funny considering the line of work I'm in.
You do have a point though about the subpoena, an exchange would give that information up in a heartbeat.

>> No.161202

fuck it, sold all my 22 thousand zeitcoins at 15 and bought about 1.2 dark coins. Maybe it will hit btc level value and ill have a nice few hundered dollars :)

>> No.161681
File: 55 KB, 510x345, 1393708183800.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
161681

Fuck it, I've just bought 114 DRK.

This better go to the Moon.

>> No.161814
File: 466 KB, 1045x830, life.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
161814

love this miner 2.5x hashrate and my gpu temp dropped by 20°
yes i know, ill get all the trojans in the pharmacy

>> No.161851

>>161814
I'm mining these things at a painfully slow rate. Like .5 mining 24 hours straight. Whats your setup>? and pool?

>> No.161871

>>161851
sapphire dual-x r9 280x oc edition, clocks eng 1010 mem 1250
sgminer.exe --kernel darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://pool.darkcoin.io:3333 -u x.x -p x -o stratum+tcp://stratum1.suchpool.pw:3335 -u x.x -p x -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.suchpool.pw:3335 -u x.x -p x -g 2 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --shaders 2048

>> No.161899

>>161871
How many/day`?

>> No.161919

>>161899
3 cards 5.6 Mh i got about 30 coins in last 24h

>> No.161926

>>161919
How many would I get with 420 kh/s?

>> No.161956

>>161926
2-3-? coins depends on your/pool luck and diff change

>> No.162081

cudaminer should have added support for this coin already. gdi. Im stuck with cpu mining

>> No.162146

Holy shit i'm getting 1.2 mh/s with a 270

>> No.162360

>>161919
>$30/day

holy shit

>> No.162425

>>160412

I'll have a spot for Dogecoin because it introduced me to crypto's, and I learnt the ins and outs because of it, but it was never going anywhere.

The community is desperately trying to ignore the fact it's value is plummeting, acting like it doesn't matter. It's like watching a dog that's been shot spasm on the floor helplessly.

>> No.162548

>>162425
>plummeting
compared to what?

>> No.162551
File: 154 KB, 444x341, Untitled3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
162551

https://www.cryptsy.com/currencies/view/113

I'm also tempted to try to get involved with the development of the anonymoose features.

>> No.162582

>>162548

BTC

>> No.162908

started mining with sgminer, getting 980 Kh/s with a single 7870

is that good, or should I tweak the settings a little bit?

>> No.162998

>>162908
sounds good, settings from cgminer?
difficulty doubled since it hit cryptsy so its not most profitable now
i like this miner tho

>> No.163018

>>162998
yeah, i use the same settings as for cgminer

intensity 12
thread-concurrency 5120

i could get 380 kh/s at best with scrypt while mining dogecoin

>> No.163396

So how does money generation with these shitcoins work?

Where does the money to make profits come from?

>> No.163422

>>163396
you trade your bumcoins for asscoins that can be exchanged for USD and cash out
or play around like with stocks, only some exchanges have 0% fees which is so fucking cash for a day trader

>> No.163439

>>163422

No, I mean what fuels the increase in value of your shitcoin, allowing you to extract profits?

>> No.163466

>>163439
What people are willing to pay for it.

>> No.163472

>>163466

Right. So why would anyone dump money into a shitcoin knowing that it's just a pump and dump scheme made by a few miners?

Why would anyone even bother?

>> No.163543

>>163472
buy low sell high, you just have to feel it/have reliable info

>> No.163547

>>163543

But why would I buy, knowing that it will only inflate the value of people who created or mined the coin at a very early stage and are only waiting to pull out and cash out their shitcoin into something of actual value - like fiat.

>> No.163596

>>163547
because as long as people are inerested in making money trading pigcoins, so can anyone

>> No.163653

>>163596

But there's no interest in trading this particular shitcoin because it doesn't have any other purpose than to make a few miners money..

>> No.163723
File: 2.64 MB, 490x490, ..gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
163723

>>159652
thats better

>> No.163745

>11 hours later
>still talking about this scamcoin

>> No.164093

>>163396

Either pump n dumps or developer news/speculation (just like stocks). In Dark's case, it actually is a crypto that might have something new to offer unlike the rest of these clone shitcoins. If you have faith in their new dark anon implementation, then the longer you wait, the more you'll regret.

>> No.164120

>>159652
how much of a fucking ripoff is this shit gonna be?!!?1

>> No.164139

Which exchange should I use?

>> No.164270
File: 1.37 MB, 320x240, 1388006153033.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
164270

>>164139
cryptsy I guess

>> No.164324

Why do you guys think this will go big? They haven't confirmed they can actually anonimize right?

>> No.164608

There is no mining tutorial for non nerds for this shitcoin. Wtf is "invalid nonce count: error"

I am using sgminer with -k darkcoin, what else do I need to do for this shit to work?

>> No.164904

>>163653
you ever play the stock market?

>> No.164929

>>164324

Supposedly it's just going to be a shit ton more anonymous than btc. But 100 percent anonymity is theoretically impossible, according to the devs.

At least it's bringing something new to the table, unlike 98 percent of these alts.

It also appears people are mining between 1 to 2 of these coins A DAY per each mh of hash power and the current difficulty.

Now you tell me if it isn't severely undervalued at 1 dollar a piece.

>> No.165039

>>164929
>Now you tell me if it isn't severely undervalued at 1 dollar a piece.
I dunno. Maybe because it's not really used anywhere. Maybe it's not even anonymous yet. Maybe because it has a stupid name.

Lots of reasons. The only people to whom the whole anonymity thing will appeal are criminals.

>> No.165071

>>165039
Yeah, and criminals need a better exchange/communication platform that is more private and keeps out the feds. Tor seems comprimised.

I don't think the coin itself will help with that.

>> No.165094

Somebody tell me why this one ain't gonna fail like the other one(s)?

>> No.165101
File: 15 KB, 231x160, 1355953989071.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
165101

>>164929
>Now you tell me if it isn't severely undervalued at 1 dollar a piece.
You must be a professional crypto analyst.

>> No.165139

The name sounds retarded.

Why would a mother of two use "darkcoin" to buy her shopping?

I could imagine it with bitcoin.

>> No.165230

>>165139
The target market isn't mothers of two. It's people who want anonymity to buy illegal shit on the internet.

>> No.165235

>>165230
But we have bitcoin for that.
Theoretically it isn't totally anonymous, but in practice it pretty much is.

>> No.165241

>>165235
Tell that to dread pirate roberts

>> No.165247

>>165241
He fucked up by leaking his own information on a forum. It was human error.

He got sloppy, don't blame the system.

>> No.165296

sgminer, how do I specify a GPU?

>> No.166619
File: 77 KB, 600x800, db_file_img_12242_1200xauto.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
166619

Alright goys, here's some info on Darksend.

http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/DarkSendDocumentation.pdf

Darksend Beta download link is on the last page.

Interestingly the words "Anonymous transaction network" were removed from the darkcoin.io website, ask around the forums if this is worrying.

>> No.166630

>>166619
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.0

>in the FAQ, an anonymous transaction network like TOR or I2P is necessary

>> No.166676

>>166619
>>166630
Now to see if DRK is going to be $6 trillion dollars/coin, we need to figure out if it uses coinjoin properly.

from coinjoin:
>Don't the users learn which inputs match up to which outputs?

In the simplest possible implementation where users meet up on IRC over tor or the like, yes they do. The next simplest implementation is where the users send their input and output information to some meeting point server, and the server creates the transaction and asks people to sign it. The server learns the mapping, but no one else does, and the server still can't steal the coins.

More complicated implementations are possible where even the server doesn't learn the mapping.

E.g. Using chaum blind signatures: The users connect and provide inputs (and change addresses) and a cryptographically-blinded version of the address they want their private coins to go to; the server signs the tokens and returns them. The users anonymously reconnect, unblind their output addresses, and return them to the server. The server can see that all the outputs were signed by it and so all the outputs had to come from valid participants. Later people reconnect and sign.

Similar things can be accomplished with various zero-knowledge proof systems.

Does the totally private version need to have a server at all? What if it gets shut down?

No. The same privacy can be achieved in a decentralized manner where all users act as blind-signing servers. This ends up needing n^2 signatures, and distributed systems are generally a lot harder to create. I don't know if there is, or ever would be, a reason to bother with a fully distributed version with full privacy, but it's certainly possible.

>> No.166984

What you guys don't realize is that nobody really needs that fully anonymous feature in the coin.

It's not that important unless you want to do a Goxxing.

Dark coin is a niche coin that will appeal to conspiracy theorists.

In reality, Bitcoins are already hard to trace and practically untraceable if you are using tumblers.

What we need is an anonymous exchange.

There is no use of Dorkcoin if you have to declare your ID once you want to convert it to fiat.

Don't worry, cops won't be tracing after your buttcoins once you purchased a bag of weed. No need to go ballistic and make a new coin just because of that one feature.

And the name is a bit infantile and edgy.

Might work for short term speculation, but not a long term investment

>> No.167082

>>166984
i like this miner and its not scryptcoin #3894
thats why i mine it now

>> No.167107

>>166984
Any ideas for setting up an anonymous exchange? That would be quite difficult because of legal issues...right?

>> No.167275

all in niggers wish me luck

>> No.167298

>>167275
>going all in
>ever
nigga u dum

>> No.167317

>>167275
all in what?

>> No.167329

Do we really need super anonymity? Rather just rock on with Credits honestly.

>> No.167331

Just tried mining this with sgminer, I'm getting 100% rejects and a shit tonne of errors on my XFX 7950 - Any tips?

>> No.167339

Have fun investing in your shitalts with zero innovation, niggers!

Smart money is in dark, will bamp 4 justice in 2 weeks when I'm fucking space bitches on da mune.

>> No.167335

>>167329
if it will be most profitable coin to mine, sure why not

>> No.167345

>>167331
is cgminer working fine on your system?

>> No.167346

>>167335
Idk bout that but they have this marketplace and new block reward thing going

>> No.167351

>>167345
yup, was mining mint earlier.

>> No.167355

>>167351
paste your bat here

>> No.167356

I thought shilling was banned? I'm getting tried of these threads of released coins looking for bag holders.

>> No.167385

>>167356
talking serious /biz/ here, go /b/, no shilling there

>> No.167460

>>167355
Just reconfigured it and pinched a kernal from another version, working fine @ 1.5MH/s

Thanks anyway!

>> No.167539
File: 922 KB, 400x225, 1389312016889.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
167539

BTC and LTC went DOWN over the weekend. Vertcoin did too.

I logged in to my exchange expecting to see Darkcoin down, and it had gone up.

Fucking buy this now guys before it skyrockets.

>> No.167540

>>166984
Are you retarded?

see here:
>>160998

now realize all of the cash easily flowing through Darkcoin when someone feels like buying a porn subscriptoin or a new dildo

>> No.167544

>>167539

I tried to tell these niggers.

>> No.167554

>>167544
I'm OP and I *did* tell these niggers.

I've made a few bucks on it, but I didn't sink a whole BTC into it like some others (who claims to have made gains)
>>160528
>.1btc

>> No.167568

>>167107
Why would you wish to? DRK is more useful as a complement to Buttcoin.

>still buying buttcoins with your PATRIOT act approved identity verification and three day waiting period

>> No.167574

>>167331
did you add -k darkcoin

set the kernel to darkcoin

>> No.167620

>>167574
check
>>167460
also, were the files corrupted? where did you get the miner?

>> No.167628

Has anyone successfully compiled Dark Coin on a Linux machine?

>> No.167697

>>167628
why wouldnt they?

>> No.167701

>>167697
Because it's not working for me you fat nigger

>> No.167712

>>161926
420 BLAZE IT

>> No.167725

>>167298

it's only 1k my man. fuck it imagine if this skyrockets though? shits cash as fuck, id rent a cabin by the beach and roll in dosh.

I see dark taking off this week.

>> No.167736

>>167628
install the QT libs first?

>> No.167741

>>167701
okay
sadface.png

>> No.167739

>>167725
$1/coin

>jumps to $10/coin

shieetttt we goin bowling

>> No.167751

>>167736
yeah i did. i think it's an issue with elementary os.

>> No.167787
File: 105 KB, 1024x612, G34KKMCOMP3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
167787

>>167751
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1zde2w/darksend_beta_is_live_now_drk_darkcoin_the_worlds/

We're all still basically speculating coinjoin is implemented in a de-centralized way. I mean some fairly reliable sources say it's decentralized in the wallet, but we need to analyze the source code before pumping lots of shekels into this.

>> No.167800

http://coinmarketcap.com/

DRK #19 on coinmarketcap

>> No.167802

>>167739

>literally happened to vert

are multipools mining this shit? does coinwarz know about it?

>> No.167815
File: 105 KB, 640x480, for more conservative taste.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
167815

>>167802
multipool.us isn't mining it yet

probably still fairly profitable for mining

I've just been trading my BTC and Mint/shitcoins for it on cryptsy, buying low, selling high.

>> No.167826

>using other people's coins instead of making your own scamcoin
ISHYGDDT

>> No.167830

IMO, it's much more profitable to buy and hold right now at this price than it is to mine, unless you have some ungodly pvc riser rig.. Far more, actually.


But if you're a poorfag and doesn't have any buttcoins, by all means, mine away. Shit's gonna go up regardless.

>> No.167842

>>167830
they can trade all the other scamcoins they mined for DRK and make some profits

>> No.167896

>>167842

Eh. Most skepticfags will wait too long and by then it's going to be $5 per and they'll be jewragin asking why it's so high and they cant afford it.

>goy101

>> No.167904

>>167830

how much DRK do you need to be bagholding to be on the hookers and blow train?

>> No.167929

>7btc wall@1950 devoured like ozawa-tier gokun

>> No.167969

This is dumb. This coin thing is dumb.

>> No.167994

>>167904
1BTC worth

if it gains mainstream popularity 500 DRK (1 BTC or so) would be massively valuable

>protip: it's like the TOR of altcoins/money

>> No.168287
File: 2.00 MB, 250x245, 0KFXlg9.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
168287

Any good explanations for the details of how durkcoin works for a guy like me who groks the bitcoin blockchain? Or does it require a PHD in cryptographic mathematics to fully appreciate?

One holdup I have is that things like coinjoin can be performed as supplements to bitcoin without changing its protocol. Tell me why that is impossible to do with darkcoin's features and how it needs to be its own coin.

>> No.168301

>>168287
>Tell me why that is impossible to do with darkcoin's features and how it needs to be its own coin.

Would require a new blockchain, I think (or would be an inferior implementation or something).

>> No.168305

>>168287
Also, DRK is pretty fucking happening on cryptsy. Haven't seen such adoption.

>> No.168312

Nah, man, nah.

Coin has a shit name and it's too far into the life cycle.

>> No.168318
File: 116 KB, 565x555, jews win.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
168318

>>168312
>Goy mad he didnt' get on the train when I first started the thread

Oh don't worry the distributed coinjoin implementation is only beta tested right now.

>> No.168355
File: 86 KB, 769x392, DRK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
168355

>>168312

>You will never waste a few minutes of your life buying low and selling high to make a few bucks on DRK.

>or will you?

>> No.168393

>>168355
I mine new coins then forget I have them.

I probably would be trading DRK with profits from mtgoy related BTC dip, but I'm extremely lazy and would rather just sit here and watch you post jew related things.

>> No.168424

>>161681
>114 DRK at 0.00136/BTC
>is now 0.00175 BTC

if you sell now at 0.00175 your DRK is worth 0.19890150 BTC

or $113.80

might wait for another spike though to skim another ten bucks

>> No.168432

>>168424
>he spent $88.89
>now worth $113
>$25 profit

Nice, go buy you a new video game like a good goy!

>> No.168984

>>167802
Coinwars only supports sha and scrypt, and making a multipool for an algorithm that only has one coin using seems kinda retarded.

>> No.169029
File: 163 KB, 951x471, 2014-02-19 11.16.17.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
169029

Um guys what am I missing here, I have 7 r9 290's and 2 280x's 7.7 mhash on scrypt did the calculations and it seems I would have around 21 mhash on darkcoin, which is around 36 coins a day so .065 btc a day I don't see this being more profitable then other scrypt coins. I am feeling like I am missing something here or did my calulations wrong?

Also pic related my machines will transfer over if calculations are good.

>> No.169533

>>169029
yeah its not very profitable now
too bad i didnt get more before diff exploded

>> No.172761

>>169533
at least it's still easy to make money on volatility on cryptsy

>> No.172968
File: 108 KB, 500x334, 1390089732283.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
172968

>>159652
Oh look another fork of bitcoin/litecoin that has an unimplemented feature as it selling point

>> No.173445

>>172761
you must be the guy who bought 0.2 of my 20 order -.-

>> No.173524

>>172968
it's beta testing right now stupid goy

>> No.174739

>>173524
Then they should have waited with the release until the feature was finished.

>> No.174950

>>174739
why? you can get in on the speculation right now!

>> No.174961

>>174950
Because releasing an unfinished product only makes the devs look like a bunch of amateur basement freetard neckbeards.

Which they probably are.

>> No.174973

>>174961
IMO (being a CS major with a couple projects under my belt)

it isn't that uncommon, sure there's potential for abandoning it if they feel unappreciated, but more chance for feedback

>> No.175461
File: 67 KB, 552x344, 1391208883881.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
175461

>>159652
DRK getting Wrek'd this morning, which is to be expected as long as there is no real news from the devs on the coinjoin beta.

Bide your time waiting for more good news, buy the dip.

>> No.175469

>>175461
re-evaluate the options in the meantime too

>better anonymous coin anywhere??

>> No.176912

So as near as I can tell, darkcoin uses the same kind of transaction blockchain as bitcoin & dogecoin & every other shitcoin, right? (albeit with a new fancy "better-than-scrypt" hash algo)

And this "darksend" is simply a phase before transaction broadcast where a bunch of p2p nodes shuffle around denomination-based transaction amounts using coinjoin, right?

So what's to stop me from making a "darkbitcoin" client that uses an additional p2p network (let's say it's done over tor) to perform darkcoin-like coinjoin operations on transactions before broadcasting them on the vanilla bitcoin network? (Without changing the precious vanilla bitcoin protocol)

I'm not convinced yet that darkcoin is doing anything inherently special. Why have a new coin when the features can be a non-forking addition to bitcoin? Prove me wrong with technical explanations pls.

>> No.177104

the fuck is wrong with cryptsy cant see my orders, market display is messed up, i want to trade!

>> No.177311

>>159652
Finally it stopped being a clonecoin
Now we only need this to actually work

>> No.177486

welp, I just sold, price will probably skyrocket

>> No.179435

>>176912

>>So what's to stop me from making a "darkbitcoin" client that uses an additional p2p network (let's say it's done over tor) to perform darkcoin-like coinjoin operations on transactions before broadcasting them on the vanilla bitcoin network? (Without changing the precious vanilla bitcoin protocol)

nothing and it's already been done and you don't even need to alter the client

>> No.180334

>>177104
Don't use cryptsy bro.

>> No.180339

>>176912
Darkcoin is nothing special. And the price reflects that.

If you want to anonymize Bitcoin, use a tumbler.

End of story.