BSV will shock the world

[Anonymous No.15876419]

[Anonymous No.15876686]

>>15876419
Bitch Lasagna

[Anonymous No.15876854]

>>15876419
shocking faggotry indeed

[Anonymous No.15876861]

>>15876419
BSV is the real BitCoin.

[Anonymous No.15876870]

>>15876861

this.

/biz/ will miss out on the real flippening.

[Anonymous No.15876909]

>>15876870
>>15876861

[Anonymous No.15877259]

>>15876870
i did not miss the judge flipping on creg
hope you didn't either

[Anonymous No.15877506]

>>15876419
it will only switch your suicide trigger once it’s 2020 and nothing happens

[Anonymous No.15877961]

>>15876419
>BSV will shock the world
by crashing another 40% in a day?

[Anonymous No.15878204]

>>15877259
He's free as a bird, judge ruled he created Bitcoin together with dave Kleiman, and they are now in settlement.

Keep coping.

[Anonymous No.15878240]

>>15878204
>judge ruled he created Bitcoin
can you, eh, kindly provide that exact quote ?
>inb4 pdf thumbnails saying nothing of the kind
otherwise, you might want to stop spreading lies about financial investments. People sue over these things you know

[Anonymous No.15878309]

>>15878240
Cope Greg

[Anonymous No.15878424]

>>15878309
cope creg

[Anonymous No.15878426]

>>15878309
>inb4 pdf thumbnails saying nothing of the kind
I missed the sentence that says:
>'I, Good Judge Reinhart, hereby declare this lying fraudulent fat fucking mess pitifully whining before me to be THE CREATOR OF BITCOIN!'
so, again. If the Judge said it, its in the transcript. Where, exactly, does it say 'he created Bitcoin', dickhead ? wouldn't want all these people to think, ALL you bsv shills are lying cunts. would we now

[Anonymous No.15878440]

>>15878426
here is what the judge said tho

>To this day, Dr. Wright has not complied with the Court’s orders compelling discovery on May 14 and June 14.
>Rather, as described above, the evidence establishes that he has engaged in a willful and bad faith pattern of obstructive behavior, including submitting incomplete or deceptive pleadings, filing a false declaration, knowingly producing a fraudulent trust document, and giving perjurious testimony at the evidentiary hearing.
>Dr. Wright’s conduct has prevented Plaintiffs from obtaining evidence that the Court found relevant to Plaintiffs’ claim that Dr. Wright and David Kleiman formed a partnership to develop Bitcoin technology and to mine bitcoin.
>Plaintiffs have also been prejudiced by not being able to try to trace the bitcoin that was mined.
>His conduct has wasted substantial amounts of the Court’s and the Plaintiffs’ time and resources. It has unnecessarily protracted this litigation.

>I have found that Dr. Wright intentionally submitted fraudulent documents to the Court, obstructed a judicial proceeding, and gave perjurious testimony.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.277.0.pdf

>willful and bad faith pattern of obstructive behavior
>submitting incomplete or deceptive pleadings
>filing a false declaration
>knowingly producing a fraudulent trust document
>giving perjurious testimony

has man ever been btfo so hard?

[Anonymous No.15878502]

>>15878424
What does it matter if it is required or not required? The fact that the entire discovery process was detailing the plaintiffs and the defendants involvement in the creation of Bitcoin and this served as the entire basis for the case in the first place is proof that the judgment was about the Satoshi mined Tulip coins. There is no dispute over this, all parts in the lawsuit agree.

But nice try at obfuscation.

[Anonymous No.15878512]

>>15878440
All that is irrelevant when the judge has ruled that Craig is in possession of Satoshis mined coins.

[Anonymous No.15878524]

>>15876419
hopefully bsv can shock my bags to 100x their worth na'imsayn?

[Anonymous No.15878535]

>>15878502
it means whenever you are trying to imply a judge ruled that craig is satoshi you are running around in the dick woods eyes closed mouth wide open. they did not rule he is satoshi very explicitly said so, they did not rule about the satoshi coins very explicitly and verbatimly denied it. what happened is craig got his shit pushed in. during fucking discovery yeah.

[Anonymous No.15878546]

>>15878512
if you can't fucking read you might think so, but it's there black and white the ruling is not about the satoshi trove.

[Anonymous No.15878577]

>>15878502
there was 'no disagreement' in cregs Australian lawsuit against W&K either. Mainly as he was playing both sides there, but, thats a matter to be revisited another day. Its odd, when a lie benefits all of the (still living..) parties in a case, no-one objects, even tho, the lie is obvious to all, isn't it ?
>mutually beneficial bullshit
and again, you are shifting the goalposts you shifty little lying toerag. QUOTE:
>'The Judge ruled he created Bitcoin'
FIND THAT QUOTE.
OR ADMIT YOU ARE A FUCKING LYING LITTLE bsv SHILL LIAR, AS FUCKING PER
>fucking weasel

[Anonymous No.15878589]

>>15876870
So many bsv threads on biz and still nobody does there own research but just parrot CSW fud back. Sergey gets hit by a bus and shitlink goes to 0, eth is full of cats and 2.0 is always one more difficulty bomb defusion away (erc20 tokens are all bound to not succeeding too much), BTC is as useful and rare as a Telex machine... BSV is the real BitCoin with or without Craig, having Craig drama keeping the price down a little longer makes me very happy.

CSW is by decree of court de facto (due to pedo judge however not de jure) now ≥50% Satoshi, you don't like it? Stiff.

[Anonymous No.15878603]

>>15878589
>by decree of court de facto (due to pedo judge however not de jure) now ≥50% Satoshi
MORE FUCKING HORSESHIT

[Anonymous No.15878627]

>>15878589
>CSW is by decree of court de facto
and an other liar shows up, what part of the "court does not decide" do you find ambiguous? or the "how much bitcoin IF ANY, dr wright controls today" how do you explain that. if any rofl. the judge called him a straight faced liar right there. done and ordered.

[Anonymous No.15878662]

>>15878535
>>15878546
>>15878577

You are actually retarded. Your anger also gives away your frustration. This is what literal paid disinfo looks like. Pay attention and learn, it is textbook pilpul and disinfo, trying to obscure the obvious fact that the entire case is detailing how Craig and Kleiman worked together in creating Bitcoin, and the ruling is about who the mined coins - that Craig is in possession of - belong to.

[Anonymous No.15878693]

>>15878662
>'The Judge ruled he created Bitcoin'
you have the burden to prove your wild claim.
you failed, again
One more go, perhaps ?
WHERE DOES THE JUDGE STATE 'I declare this fat fraudulent cunt Creator of Bitcoin', again ?
oh, thats right. He doesn't. And your making shit up, again

[Anonymous No.15878710]

>>15878693
Pilpul.

[Anonymous No.15878735]

>>15878710
you prefer pictures ?
because, this is what the Judge ACTUALLY SAID
>sad. isn't it

[Anonymous No.15878745]

>>15878662
>Your anger
no anger here pal don't mistake ridicule for salt. i'm laughing at your stupid ass because i enjoy watching you squirm.

also we were talking about the ruling where are you trying to move the goalpost?

[Anonymous No.15878756]

>>15878735
Still ruled that he is in possession of the Satoshi coins via the Tulip trusts. Otherwise Craig would be charged for perjury. Yet he hasn't.

Stiff bickies.

[Anonymous No.15878765]

>>15878756

[Anonymous No.15878770]

>>15878756
>Still ruled that he is in possession of the Satoshi coins via the Tulip trusts.
nope did not happen.

[Anonymous No.15878809]

>>15878765
Of course he didn't rule that he was Satoshi, as that is not what the court case was about.

The ruling was based on WHO THE BITCOIN MINED BY THE SATOSHI NAKAMOTO PARTNERSHIP BELONG TO, Dave or Craig.

The ruling decided 50/50, so by inference the court has ruled that Craig legally was at least 50% Satoshi Nakamoto.

More pilpul please.

[Anonymous No.15878851]

>>15878756
also if you knew anything about bitcoin you would know that the satoshi trove can't be in any trust or partnership. the satoshi trove is the coins mined by satoshi on a single cpu thread during 2009. there was no partnership no joint mining no other miner in fact. a single computer and a single core most of the time. somone even guessed the cpu type (Core 2 Quad Q6600) from satoshis posts and the hashrate

[Anonymous No.15878859]

>>15878851
Judge Reinhart disagrees.

[Anonymous No.15878868]

>>15878809
nope there is nothing decided about satoshi in the ruling, the ruling is about craigs alleged bitcoin possessions pre 2014.

[Anonymous No.15878886]

>>15878859
where exactly? and please fuck off with the questioning in the ruling! where?

[Anonymous No.15878943]

>>15878809
Nope, the fat fraudulent cunt claimed it as a 'Satoshi Nakamoto Partnership', Ira (Kleiman) happily to go along with that, because 50% of a million Bitcoins, fuckwhynot. The problem, of course, being, quite a lot of what the fat fraudulent cunt claims has little to sweet fuck all basis in reality. And mostly, the latter. The Judge specifically went out of his way to avoid dealing with 'Who is Satoshi' nonsense AND VERY SPECIFICALLY DECLARED THE ENTIRE CONCEPT of this Tulip Trust to be, literally, some of the most ludicrous garbage he had ever heard lied to his face. But still you claim 'Judge confirmed him as Satoshi!' Its horseshit, its horseshit you repeat continually, BUT you can't back any of this up. tldr, you, like creg, are a fucking liar, and you know it.
>>15878627
>if any rofl
'if any' indeed

[Anonymous No.15878947]

>>15878886

It's right here retard. >>15878309
The ruling is based off many months of discovery and deliberations where the Satoshi Nakamoto partnership was outlined and the Tulip trusts were detailed.

So the ruling is de jure about the Tulip trust coins.

Besides, Craig was never charged for perjury, despite what you blockstream shills like to exclaim, so the court ruling solidifies his testimony as credible for the basis of the ruling.

[Anonymous No.15878962]

>>15878947
it's not there
there is nothing there about satoshi or his trove

[Anonymous No.15878965]

>>15878947
The Ruling HAS NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH 'Satoshi Coins'.
you continuously lying cunt

[Anonymous No.15878968]

>>15878943
>Judge thinks the tulips are horseshit
>Still orders Craig to give 50% of them to Ira

Pick one Greg.

[Anonymous No.15878991]

>>15878962
>>15878965
Blockstream shills gonna shill.

[Anonymous No.15879002]

>>15878947
>Craig was never charged for perjury, despite what you blockstream shills like to exclaim, so the court ruling solidifies his testimony
aahahahhahahahahahahahah
OHMYFUCKINGSIDEEEEES!!!! XDXDXD

[Anonymous No.15879009]

>>15879002
Good argument.

If Craig's testimony was made up, then why hasn't he been charged for perjury?

It's a total mystery, experts are baffled!

[Anonymous No.15879013]

>>15878991
the order motherfucker the order! you say done and ordered... show me!

[Anonymous No.15879028]

>>15879009
>why hasn't he been charged for perjury?
the case is not over yet. just be patient!

[Anonymous No.15879072]

>>15879028
LOL

>I-i-t will t-totally happen...J-just wait

Well bucko, until then, the court considers him 50% Satoshi.

Actually wait, Dave is dead, so he is now legally 100% Satoshi.

GOTTEM!

[Anonymous No.15879076]

>>15879028
see they are still submitting motions and shit this will go on for some time. there might even be an appeal. but at one point in the future i hope to see creg thrown in jail for being a liar and a fag.

[Anonymous No.15879096]

>>15879072
i don't know where you get that but nothing you posted here supports this notion. and the ruling says the verbatim opposite of your stance. black and fucking white. no room for misinterpretation.

[Anonymous No.15879103]

>>15879076
are you retarded?
those are for extension because of settlement talks
gregory, take the meds

[Anonymous No.15879116]

>>15879096
No perjury.

Craig's testimony stands. Even the judge has to rule that he has the Satoshi coins.

Blockstream on suicide watch

[Anonymous No.15879173]

>>15879103
the case is fr from over, his motion was denied, that's all that happened and there was a recommendation not a ruling altho i'n no lawyer but it is my understanding that this case is far from being over and done with. craigs position tho is over and done with already.
>No perjury.
the judge literally found and stated so craig committed perjury nigga what are you smoking?

[Anonymous No.15879187]

>>15879173
>I have found that Dr. Wright intentionally submitted fraudulent documents to the Court, obstructed a judicial proceeding, and gave perjurious testimony.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.277.0.pdf
page 28 look for yourself cuck!
he was not sentenced for it yet, that much is true. bu i have my hopes up.

[Anonymous No.15879189]

>>15879173
No perjury.

[Anonymous No.15879198]

>>15878968
>options not mutually exclusive, faggot
The Judge literally declared creg a fat lying cunt and default awarded Ira EVERYTHING he asked for. Namely, 50% of the Bitcoin (which may or may not exist) and the stolen IP. Ah yes, the Stolen IP. Remind me again, WHERE IS THAT STOLEN IP NOW ? Enjoy court, Calvin ;) What winners you lot are
>>15878991
Do ypu want me to explain the difference between 'Ruling' and 'Discovery' for you, slowly, carefully ? Protip: Don't claim things are 'in the Ruling', then pull some BS form discovery out of your ass to try (and fail) to prove it. Because, only one of these things matters, and, its not fucking Discovery. You lying dickhead
>>15879116
>Even the judge has to rule that he has the Satoshi coins.
Just stop this shit already

[Anonymous No.15879200]

>>15876419
I actually perpetuate these BSV threads by not saging them and "complaining" so that I can trap retards into buying it

[Anonymous No.15879205]

The way Creg's fanboys fuss over him is just cringe. This is a real Dear Leader cult.

[Anonymous No.15879213]

>>15879189
the amount of cognitive dissonance required to be an sv cultist does not cease to amaze me.

[Anonymous No.15879218]

>>15879187
>calls someone cuck
>hopes for impeachment
>admits he hopes blockstream judge will procceeds with prejury

you're the cuck here

[Anonymous No.15879243]

>>15879218
>blockstream judge
yes, they are all 'blockstream judges' creg LOSES against, aint they ? BY Jeezus, the world is JUST full of 'blockstream judges'. I wonder which 'blockstream judge' he'll lose against McCormack with ? He IS going ahead with that, isn't he ? I do SO want to see this 'mountain of evidence' with 'rusty staples' and sheeeit

[Anonymous No.15879262]

>>15879218
>blockstream judge
every fucking time
first you try to invoke him as an authority and pretend a judge declared him.
then when you get pointed out that he ruled against craig in every possible way and explicitly denied everything you shill.
he suddenly becomes the blockstream judge the pedo the whatever.

like fucking clockwork.

[Anonymous No.15879275]

>>15879243
Very interesting that exactly this judge is the one to preside over this case. Very trustworthy!

[Anonymous No.15879276]

>>15879243
>>15879262

[Anonymous No.15879286]

>>15879218
>blockstream judge
lmao Craig gets btfo because the judge is paid by blockstream. this is a new level of bullshit coming from you BSV trolls hahaha you faggots are getting so desperate with your lies and nonsense. Craig got absolutely BTFO

[Anonymous No.15879297]

>>15879243
>>15879262
1

[Anonymous No.15879304]

>>15879286
The point is that even a Blockstream judge couldn't deny that Craig is the creator of Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.15879305]

>>15879275
>>15879276
>MUH COURT OF LAW WE WILL PROVE IT IN COURT
>b-b-but its not fair its all a big conspiracy this judge is a big meanie
absolutely ridiculous how desperate you shills are getting

[Anonymous No.15879311]

>>15879243
>>15879262
>>15879286

[Anonymous No.15879317]

>>15879275
Welcome to law. Welcome to court.

[Anonymous No.15879316]

>>15879304
this has been discussed a million times now the judge did not rule on craig being satoshi or not and you faggots are still trying to spin it as a win when Craig absolutely got his ass handed to him in court lmao

[Anonymous No.15879323]

>>15879243
>>15879262
>>15879286
>>15879305

[Anonymous No.15879333]

>>15879305
The fact that you think Craig being Satoshi was disproven by this court case just shows how mentally ill you are. It just made it even more obvious.

Also, just a tip, calling this obviously shady judge as a Good and Honorable judge signals to us who you work for.

[Anonymous No.15879334]

>>15879275
AND, remind me - which EXACT case did Reinhart preside over where Epstein was on trial, again ?
>oh, thats right.
>there wasn't one
>and youre making shit up. again

[Anonymous No.15879339]

>>15879243
>>15879262
>>15879286
>>15879305
>>15879316
even pedo vitalik knows about the connection but obviously he is "ashamed" to make such assumptions, as the pedo he is

[Anonymous No.15879343]

>>15879333
>The fact that you think Craig being Satoshi was disproven by this court case
i dont think that you absolute mong you still trying to twist facts and truth. THIS RULING WAS NOT ABOUT CRAIG BEING SATOSHI OR NOT AND THE JUDGE MADE THAT MORE THAN CLEAR. you bsvfags are the only ones trying to deny that.

[Anonymous No.15879355]

Ahahahhahahahahahhah..


Meanwhile bsv buidls and scales!!!

Like and take CSW as SN or not, BSV will rule supreme.

[Anonymous No.15879358]

this picture needs to be posted over and over again apparently when will you retards get it in your head THIS JUDGE DID NOT RULE ON CRAIG WRIGHT BEING SATOSHI OR NOT SO STOP LYING YOU FAGGOTS. once you get called out you just start babbling about epstein and greg maxwell you faggots are so stupid its unbelievable.

[Anonymous No.15879367]

>>15879343
I agree with you. The case was not about WHETHER he was satoshi or not.

But the ruling on the case necessitates that the court found that Craig is in possession of the Satoshi coins. Otherwise he wouldn't be able to rule that he has to give half of them to Ira.

[Anonymous No.15879383]

>>15879367
>the court found that Craig is in possession of the Satoshi coins
look to the skies, you lying fucking weasel.
alternatively, the picture above you will do.
FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME, 'Satoshi coins' - no, nada, phrase does not exist IN THE RULING. Be the end of this particualr bs, because, you just getting continually fucking rekt now

[Anonymous No.15879385]

>>15879333
CSW threatened that everyone would bend the knee in court, everyone would get sued. "Welcome to law, welcome to court", remember? Instead, he is now crying that all judges have connections to Blockstream. This is weakness. He's weak.

[Anonymous No.15879398]

>>15879367
>But the ruling on the case necessitates that the court found that Craig is in possession of the Satoshi coins
absolutely not true this is about a property dispute between kleiman and craig wright craig could at any point have tapped out and said he doesnt have shit and hes not satoshi but hes apparently too retarded to do that and wants to prefer to keep his scam going. all this ruling means is that kleiman deserves half of what craig wrigth claims to own, no more no less. YOU bsvfags are the delusional shills trying to spin this into something more.

[Anonymous No.15879411]

>>15879385
>CSW threatened that everyone would bend the knee in court, everyone would get sued
he got BTFO in the roger ver case as well the guy is just absolutely pathetic just like his supporters. all hat no cattle.

[Anonymous No.15879428]

>>15879339
How do we know if CSW and pedo Calvin don't have the connection too? CSW lies about everything, obviously he's hiding something.

[Anonymous No.15879433]

>>15879383
>>15879398

The rulings ARE bout the Tulip Coins. Plaintiff is saying that, and defendant is saying that. Court is not disputing it. Which other coins are in dispute here, aside from the Tulip Trust coins?

Keep spinning until the wheels fall off.

[Anonymous No.15879466]

>>15879428
all they want is the keys of the satoshi wallet
that's why nothing else will happen in this case

[Anonymous No.15879467]

>>15879433
>that pic
I suggest you look up the actual meaning of the word 'incredible' in a dictionary. I don't think it means what you think it means. Protip: you DO NOT WANT Judges telling you 'you are incredible', no, Sir. And as also stated, was in neither parties interest to declare the 'Satoshi' stuff bullshit, the Judge more or less did tho

[Anonymous No.15879469]

>>15879275
>>15879276
>>15879297
>>15879311
>>15879323
>>15879339
just fucking decide already! is he a voice of authority a respectable judge whose word and ruling has weight or the pedo blockstream judge?

fucking decide you can't have it both ways you can't change your stance depending on which line you read from him.

it's utterly pathetic.

>But the ruling on the case necessitates that the court found that Craig is in possession of the Satoshi coins.
blatantly false. it's hard to pinpoint which fallacy this is something between the slippery slope and false cause

[Anonymous No.15879491]

>>15879433
for the last fucking time, look at this >>15879358
>The court also is not required to decide, and does not decide, how much, if any, Dr. Wright controls today.
!!!
Even your own screencap claims his statement is "incredible". All this ruling says is that kleiman deserves half of what craig wright CLAIMS to own there is absolutely no evidence he owns anything and you faggots are still trying to spin it as a win when in fact CSW got absolutely BTFO in court after bragging for weeks on end how he would mop the floor with Kleiman. BSVfags in full damage control mode.

[Anonymous No.15879497]

>>15879466
Or maybe Craig and Reinhart shook hands behind the closed doors because he's their puppet in the first place and already gave them whatever they asked?

[Anonymous No.15879500]

>>15879433
>The rulings ARE bout the Tulip Coins.
that is correct, but there is no equivalence between the ""tulip trust coins"" and satoshis trove - the 1m bitcoin we actually know with fair enough certainty satoshi himself mined in 2009 - made by any respectable person on this planet. certainly no judge made such insinuation.

[Anonymous No.15879505]

>>15879497
explains how retarded you are.
>hey let's waste 200k in lawyer fees just for the giggles

[Anonymous No.15879510]

>>15879491
>BSVfags in full damage control mode.
this is not just damage control this is full blown psychosis man... i never seen denial this strong.

[Anonymous No.15879524]

>>15879510
>full blown psychosis man
I guess thats what losing 40% of your investment in a day will do to you

[Anonymous No.15879527]

>>15879467
1.100.111 Bitcoin. Done and ordered.

Craig is Satoshi.

[Anonymous No.15879539]

>>15879491
1.100.111 Bitcoin. Tulip Trust is real. Craig is Satoshi.

Done and ordered.

[Anonymous No.15879547]

>>15879527
>>15879539
>i-i-its real in my mind
lol full blown mental breakdown over here
see >>15879358

[Anonymous No.15879552]

>>15879500
1.100.111 Bitcoin. 50% belongs to Craig.

Done and ordered. Now neck yourself for being a disgusting blockstream paid shill.

[Anonymous No.15879577]

>>15879505
This theory makes more sense than yours. It explains why Craig is so enthusiastic about law and court yet squirms and wriggles at anything else. He already gave them whatever they asked. What a weakling.

[Anonymous No.15879579]

>>15879527
>>15879552
not in the ruling actual
sorry cuck

[Anonymous No.15879582]

>>15879552
there is absolutely no proof those bitcoin exist
judge himself claims CSWs statements on said bitcoins "incredible"
and IF they exist craig just pissed away half by being a complete retard after bragging for weeks on end how he would win this case
congrats to this massive win you retarded bsvtards!

[Anonymous No.15879587]

>>15879547
I love this case because even with a friendly judge it becomes impossible to spin how Craig is not Satoshi without the most incredible mental gymnastics ive ever seen.

I am taking notes here, Greg Maxwell has been working overtime on this one.

1.100.111 Bitcoin in Craigs possession. Judge rules 50% belongs to Craig. But Craig has nothing to do with Satoshi. OOOKAY lmfao

[Anonymous No.15879605]

>>15879582
>there is absolutely no proof those bitcoin exist
These coins are what the judge is ruling on. Are you saying the court is lying now?

[Anonymous No.15879609]

>>15879587
>it becomes impossible to spin how Craig is not Satoshi
>1.100.111 Bitcoin in Craigs possession.
according to you
but here is the shocker according to me he has a big fat zero

[Anonymous No.15879610]

>>15879355
oops
https://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2017/02/money-blockchains-and-social-scalability.html
looks like your scaling type is off

[Anonymous No.15879613]

>>15879587
>1.100.111 Bitcoin in Craigs possession
you keep saying that and I will keep telling you waht your own little pet judge said
>>15879358
can you read faggot?
Ill spell it out for you
>the court is not required to decide, and does not decide, how much bitcoin, if any, Dr. Wright controls today
>IF ANY

[Anonymous No.15879621]

>>15879605
>These coins are what the judge is ruling on.
show don't tell! post link, post page and paragraph!

[Anonymous No.15879625]

>>15879609
>but here is the shocker according to me
roflmao, then you should probably take your meds.

[Anonymous No.15879629]

>>15879587
Craig is Satoshi. Craig and Jimmy are not gay. Craig and Calvin are not pedos.

[Anonymous No.15879633]

>>15879539

[Anonymous No.15879634]

>>15879613
>IF ANY
erry fucking time this cracks me up

[Anonymous No.15879637]

>>15879605
we can do this all day you moron
>>15879358
>The Court also is not required to decide, and does not decide, how much bitcoin, if any, Dr. Wright controls today.
you still trying to spin this as a win?
THIS IS ABOUT A PROPERTY DISPUTE BETWEEN KLEIMAND AND WRIGHT. CSW got btfo. he lost 50% of what he CLAIMS to own. that is all this case is about. no proof hes satoshi. no proof he owns any coin. I know its hard to understand but if you try really hard you might wrap your head aruond it. now keep copeposting your epstein and greg maxwell memes

[Anonymous No.15879648]

>>15879587
how hard is it to understand
he does not have the private keys to Szabo's coins
he simply does not
the judge can rule whatever he wants, bitcoin has no jurisdiction

all you can do is COPE

[Anonymous No.15879656]

>>15879625
see opinions are like assholes everybody has one few people are interested in others. but the facts are stacked high against you.

judge explicitly did not rule about satoshi or satoshis coins. it's all in your head. the amount is not specified in the ruling at all. nor is the origin.

[Anonymous No.15879666]

>>15879648
>the judge can rule whatever he wants
yeah but he choose to btfo creg, which is a plus

[Anonymous No.15879669]

>>15879666
kek'd and checked

[Anonymous No.15879721]

>>15879648
Oh, so now a new delusion enter the discussion. Szabo is Satoshi eh? Where is the proof of that? Oh, you don't need cRYpToGrApic pR0of of that this time, because it's ANYONE BUT CRAIG. We only demand "proof" from Craig, but anyone else can be Satoshi but with no "proof" required.

Double standard status: >EXPOSED<

Keep exposing your stupid narratives, I am quite entertained here as you reveal all your faulty shill non-logic.

[Anonymous No.15879739]

>>15879721
>Where is the proof of that?
what you suddenly want proof? rofl i can't take this shit anymore i'm gonna pull a muscle laughing.

[Anonymous No.15879740]

>>15879666
>>15879669

Satanic digit status: >EXPECTED<

[Anonymous No.15879752]

>>15879739
You are the one demanding "cryptographic proof", not me lmao.

Try to keep track of your own narratives.

[Anonymous No.15879785]

>>15879752
from anyone that claims to be satoshi yeah, step 0 is to sign. szabo would be no exception but it's funny that you would follow craig blindly on fiat but would demand proof from anyone else... some double standards.

[Anonymous No.15879818]

lmao

[Anonymous No.15879825]

>>15879785
Are you literally braindead or something? I don't demand cryptographic signing as proof, but YOU DO. Its all you fucking talk about. Every single fucking day. SIGN THIS SIGN THAT SIGN SIGN SIGN. Yet not for Szabo, which you willingly accept as Satoshi without ANY of the standards you apply to Wright.

This means you are a lying faggot shill.

Holy fuck paid propagandists like you with single digit IQ get the rope.

[Anonymous No.15879850]

>>15879825
>but YOU DO
damn right
>Yet not for Szabo
damn wrong
no exceptions

[Anonymous No.15879862]

>>15879721
I seriously hope you are being paid to post these dude, for real. You would never actually say you're being paid, so we can never really know, but I sincerely from the bottom of my heart hope you are being paid.
If you're not, it's just the saddest thing to see

Seeing you BSV guys talk about courts and judge decisions is like a Grand Finale, it's the END OF AN ERA
The whole point of crypto is to substitute tursted parties and authorities for trustless mathematical proof. The whole concept, back to Tim May's cypherpunk's utopia, revolves around the elimination of trust and introduction of simple, easy and almost free to provide proof.

The end of (((institutions))), and at the helm is you guys, you're the ones trying to bring out a swagger, but it's outdated, so it has no effect. In any other field, things like getting the copyright for bitcoin would have been grand happenings, fought and sought over. But here, it's irrelevant, it's unimportant, it's even funny.

I HOPE you're being paid, sincerely.

[Anonymous No.15879873]

>>15879850
>he does not have the private keys to Szabo's coins
>privat key to Szabos coins
>Szabos coins
>>15879648

The lies just never stop.

[Anonymous No.15879897]

>>15879873
dude are you blind? just fucking look at the ids you retarded cuck!

[Anonymous No.15879916]

>>15879862
Possession of coins is not proof that he created the system. If Craig signed he could've just stolen the coins. In fact that is exactly what you are going to say when he eventually does sign.

If some 6 year old girl came out and signed with the key to the genesis block tomorrow, would that prove she created Bitcoin?

Yes or no?

If the answer is no, then you understand why signing means nothing.

If you answer yes, then you just prove that you belong in a mental institution.

You fail at logic.

[Anonymous No.15879924]

>>15879873
whoever has access to those keys can move them
if craig has access to those keys, he can move them
now, I'm telling you, that the coins will not move
not now
not in 2020
do you agree? lol

[Anonymous No.15879932]

>>15879916
>If Craig signed he could've just stolen the coins.
whoever proclaims himself as satoshi first and foremost has to sign with the right key.

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
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=3FTe
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

[Anonymous No.15879934]

>>15879897
All blockstream shills are the same to me, you are literally 1 person with the exact same narrative (hi greg) changing IDs anyway lmao

[Anonymous No.15879950]

>>15879916
>signing means nothing
jesus the amount of cope
>some 6 year old girl came out and signed with the key to the genesis block tomorrow
yeah or an asteroid hits earth and splits it in two tomorrow making this point moot
which is more likely? protip:it's the asteroid thing.

[Anonymous No.15879957]

>>15879924
If he does have access to the keys, yes he can move them

But that doesn't mean he wants to do that, or that it is in the interest to move them.

The point is that proving you are in POSSESSION of the coins does not mean you are the creator of Bitcoin. He could be a fed who seized them from the real Satoshi.

Proof of possession =/= proof of creation.

You are asking for the wrong "proof".

[Anonymous No.15879967]

>>15879916
it doesn't matter
if a 6 year old girl can access to the private keys, the coins that are assigned to that address are her coins
she has control over them, and she can do anything she wants with them

do you understand now?

[Anonymous No.15879972]

>>15879950
Its not about likelihood, it is about absolute proof remember.

You just destroyed your own point. Signing with the key is NOT absolute proof that you are Satoshi.

Learn basic logic. Next.

[Anonymous No.15879989]

>>15879967
Thanks for proving my point retard LOL. You don't even realize how unintelligent you are.

[Anonymous No.15879990]

>>15879934
...
ohnonononono you just realized you fucked up colossally and try to wiggle out without an apology? who would have seen this coming?

[Anonymous No.15880007]

>>15879957
I'm not asking for any proof nigger, go read the posts by my ID lol
I'm telling you, that whoever controls the private keys to an address controls the coins in that address

that's the point of this whole project LOL

and that's why Craig can get a document signed by Donald Trump that he is Satoshi Nakamoto
That STILL does not give him the ability to move any coins

are you starting to understand the point of crypto now? If Craig has access to a million bitcoins he can move them right now
he does not need permission from anyone
you have the private keys? your coins, you do whatever the fuck you want with them

[Anonymous No.15880018]

>>15879972
>it is about absolute proof
it's about probabilities there is no absolute proof obviously.

but math is not that hard. the chances of a 6yo little girl signing with satoshis keys are less than a cataclysmic event destroying human life.

so until that for every satoshi wannabe either sign or gtfo!

[Anonymous No.15880019]

>>15879990
Whats the difference when you all have the same scripted talking points?

I am talking to a blogstream borg reading from an employee script.

>sZaBo iS sAtoShI

Herpaderp

[Anonymous No.15880025]

>>15879972
this is literally the same faggot arguing that this court case somehow proves CSW is satoshi... but signing with the key means nothing. LMAO the absolute state of BSVers

[Anonymous No.15880049]

>>15879989
if your point is 'it doesn't matter who it is, the coins are belong to whoever has the private keys', then your point and mine are the same, friend

if craig wants to move 1 million bitcoin from the addresses that are supposedly belong to satoshi nakamoto, he needs the private keys, and the only way to get them is if he had them in the first place

now, when these coins move, we will know it, you see, the ledger is public ;)

[Anonymous No.15880057]

>>15880025
it's the end of the trust era
they're the final symphony

[Anonymous No.15880075]

>>15880007
1) You want Craig to prove he is Satoshi.

2) The only proof you will accept is him signing the genesis block

3) I explain to you have signing with the genesis block is not proof that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin. It only proves that he is in possession of the early keys.

4) If Craig signed, he could be a federal agent who seized the genesis block from the real Satoshi.

5) Having possession of genesis block is not the proof that you are the creator of Bitcoin.

6) Therefore, the proof that you demand doesn't even meet your own standards of evidence.

7) A 6 year old signing the genesis key destroys your entire line of argument.

8) There is no mathematical way to prove that you are the creator of the Bitcoin system.

Take a course in logic.

[Anonymous No.15880079]

>>15880075
it would mean a hell of a lot more than the court case you retard like to parade around lmao

[Anonymous No.15880084]

>anyone who questions this alcoholic fraud being satoshi is either greg or a blockstream shill
fuck off schizo pajeets

[Anonymous No.15880100]

>>15879972
while signing is not absolute proof, it is about probability and credibility. IF creg were Satoshi, he would have probably just signed in the normal manner, instead of being paid to pretend he is Satoshi, repeatedly claiming he would publicly sign, then, failing to do so miserably. That he does not choose the probable path and lies in failing to do so, despite promises to the contrary, further damages his credibility.
SO, we now have one fat fraud who is paid to act out the Satoshi charade, cannot sign, has little to no credibility left, and therefore is, in all probability, EXACTLY that which he appears to be. Namely, a fat fucking disreputable fraud who is being paid by nTrust/nChain to pretend he is Satoshi. And logic tells us, the REAL Satoshi would hardly need to bother with that shite. would he ?
>tldr, sign or gtfo, you fat fucking conman

[Anonymous No.15880106]

>>15880084
Hi Greg.

[Anonymous No.15880124]

>>15880100
So now you lower the standards from ABSOLUTE MATHEMATICAL PROOF of Satoshiness.

To probability and likelihood. Ok great that's a start. Suddenly we opened up many other avenues of evidence. Remember this next time we have this discussion.

[Anonymous No.15880134]

>>15880124
literacy. it may be an art, but, its a learnable one.
try it before typing next time, you cunt

[Anonymous No.15880141]

>>15880075
1) I don't
2) I think a simple login to the forum would be alright, but sure, sign the genesis, Vitalik has done it, Lee has done it too
3) whatever
4) craig can sign, he can do whatever he wants with whichever private keys he has, they're his private keys, he controls them
5) it sorta does, but whatever, the genesis coins cannot be moved
6) I'm not demanding anything, who the hell am I?
7) a 6 year old has some private keys, she can do whatever she wants with the coins that those keys control ;)
8) there is mathematical proof that you own an address and therefore the coins in that address

funny you said about the logic course, I'm taking a programming logic course this evening

[Anonymous No.15880151]

>>15880141
So you admit that signing is proof of possession and not proof of creation? Got it. Thank you for making my argument for me.

Retard.

[Anonymous No.15880163]

>>15880134
Not an argument.

[Anonymous No.15880192]

>>15880019
well if you read any you wouldn't talk shit like that. it's obviously different people despite what your addled brain hallucinates about. szabo is a billion times more likely than craig for a candidate to the satoshi mantle but he would have to prove himself just the same. so your argument is bollocks. i would only give about 1% chance for szabo + grigg (+finney?), my gut tells me satoshi is an unknown and he was a very young man in 2009 in his late twenties. craig has btfoed himself so badly that unless he provides a very definitev proof he will forever stuck on the leading position of the "definitely not satoshi" list.

[Anonymous No.15880193]

>>15880163
SO, why would 'the real Satoshi' have to be paid by nTrust/nChain to pretend he's Satoshi ?

[Anonymous No.15880200]

>>15880193
Craig created both nTrust and nChain. They are his companies.

[Anonymous No.15880207]

>>15880200
Thats not what he says
For fucking sure

[Anonymous No.15880212]

>>15880192
>szabo is a billion times more likely than craig for a candidate to the satoshi mantle

Prove it shill.

[Anonymous No.15880232]

>>15880207
Prove it.

[Anonymous No.15880240]

>>15880232
YOU are making the claim here, not me

[Anonymous No.15880290]

>>15880151
>signing is proof of possession
yes
and Craig has no bitcoin
he had bitcoin, when he bought it on Mt Gox

[Anonymous No.15880313]

and in the end
2020 comes
and 2021
and so forth
and the satoshi coins still don't move
doesn't matter why, really, they just don't move
Craig said they would move
but saying it doesn't make it so
lmfao

[Anonymous No.15880333]

>>15880212
okay, this is not very hard math:
like i said szabo has about 1% likeliness
craig has 0.000000001% likeliness of being satoy.
but here is the kicker: if craig never said anything his likeliness would be much higher: 0.00000003%

[Anonymous No.15880341]

>>15880240
You made the claim that Craig is paid to pretend he is Satoshi. I made a counter claim that Craig founded those companies, which is public record.

http://crypto.marketswiki.com/index.php?title=NChain

[Anonymous No.15880362]

>>15880333

[Anonymous No.15880366]

*Stegos will shock the world, its faster and more secure.

[Anonymous No.15880399]

hey buf+fmY+
when is Craig moving those coins? Has he said it yet or not?

[Anonymous No.15880425]

>>15880232
creg did have an agreement where he was paid by nTrust - or, are you denying that ? So, according to you, creg pays himself to act out this Satoshi charade, is also founder/owner of nTrust/nChain ?
https://news.bitcoin.com/nchain-claimed-to-be-largest-acquisition-in-bitcoin-history/
SO, whats all this fucking horseshit then ?
while thats obviously more lies anway (its got quotes from congenital liars nChain in it, so..), interesting, creg claims to be the founder (and presumably part owner) - soon see how quick that gets denied in court. won't we

[Anonymous No.15880435]

>>15880399
It's not some huge secret. The tulip trust unlocks January 2020, so you will get your much awaited coin movement next year.

But you can keep lying and sperging as much as you like until then.

[Anonymous No.15880459]

>>15880425
So Greg, you worked for Mr. Wright once yes? Why don't you talk to us about that?

[Anonymous No.15880465]

when craigs own mother called him a liar in a book i was like can man be btfo any harder?
>"Wright’s mother had told me about her son’s long-standing habit of adding bits on to the truth, just to make it bigger. ‘When he was a teenager,’ she said, ‘he went into the back of a car on his bike. It threw him through the window of a parked car. That’s where his scar comes from. His sister accompanied him to the hospital and he’s telling the doctor that he’s had his nose broken twenty or so times, and the doctor is saying “You couldn’t possibly have had it broken.” And Craig says: “I sew myself up when I get injured.”’ What his mother said connected with something I’d noticed. In what he said, he often went further than he needed to; further than he ought to have done. He appeared to start with the truth, and then, slowly, he would inflate his part until the whole story suddenly looked weak."
but then this court case came along and the judge was even harsher
>"Oh! What a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive."
but he didn't stop giving there
>willful and bad faith pattern of obstructive behavior
>submitting incomplete or deceptive pleadings
>filing a false declaration
>knowingly producing a fraudulent trust document
>giving perjurious testimony

and his cultists are still shilling this mongrel this compulsive liar and narcissistic sociopath. for what purpose? are those bags so heavy?

[Anonymous No.15880495]

>>15880435
Assuming the bonded courier arrives.
>HONK HONK- delivery for Mr Creg- HONK HONK

[Anonymous No.15880503]

>>15880459
why don't you tell me, how creg 'founded' a company in 2017 that was formed in 2015 ?
Its like that time he created the Tu;lip Tust in 2011. With an 'aged' off-the-shelf company he bought in 2014. Your stories are JUST so much more interesting than mine, don't you find ?

[Anonymous No.15880512]

>>15880459
>So Greg, you worked for Mr. Wright once yes?
now that would be an interesting angle, you got any actual sauce?

[Anonymous No.15880519]

>>15880495
they 'resolved' that little difficulty
creg is (now) also the courier
and 100% of the still living/traceable trustees
>incredible. dont you think ?

[Anonymous No.15880535]

>>15880503
>Your stories are JUST so much more interesting than mine
>than mine

Oopsie gregory, you are not supposed to admit that it's actually you xD

[Anonymous No.15880561]

>>15880535
>we r all gregs
whatever keeps you happy. I'm not sure, you have any room for further contradictions n your world, y'see

[Anonymous No.15880569]

>>15880519
How does that work?? Genuinely curious as this seemingly goes against his testimony in court.

[Anonymous No.15880583]

>>15880569
It doesn't, basically.
It 'resolved' a contradicition going forwrds, which is the maximum extent of the care they take in making up bullshit. It also contradicted a ton of shit previously claimed under oath, but, hey, whats past is past, an all

[Anonymous No.15880597]

>>15880561
>we r all gregs
okay but can i be the greg without that disgusting beard?

[Anonymous No.15880615]

>>15880597
as long as bsv shills can still INSTANTLY recognise you(us/we/whatever) - fresh shaven gregs is all good with me tbqh

[Anonymous No.15880633]

>>15880615
It's much easier than you think.

[Anonymous No.15880677]

>>15880633
yeah my only regret is we can't just kick lukejr out of core dev team, he is a fucking lunatic.
peter rizun is the only cashie i have any respect for.

[Anonymous No.15880717]

>>15880633
Isn't it funny that Peter Rizun BTFOed Craig lots of times.

[Anonymous No.15880721]

>>15880677
As a BSVer I like these kind of naked admissions of who you like and don't like.

It tells me who is a snake and who isn't. Rizun, check. I've always been suspicious of him, esepcially leading up the fork.

So tell me friend, Is there someone in the BSV ecosystem you are taking a liking to? Or can tolerate?

[Anonymous No.15880724]

>>15876419
Big Stinky Vagina

[Anonymous No.15880732]

>>15880633

[Anonymous No.15880746]

>>15880717
because he is actually a man of science. not without flaws but he is the only one that laid out a legitimate explanation why segwit is a bad idea as is and how it could go wrong. all the rest of the fudders are just "hurr it's bad, cause it's bad don't you see?" and "blockstream this and that, the (((jooos)))"

[Anonymous No.15880751]

>>15880717
>>15880732
See >>15880721

The fact that BTC shills like Rizun tells me everything I need to know about him.

You are proving my point exactly.

[Anonymous No.15880759]

>>15880721
>Is there someone in the BSV ecosystem you are taking a liking to?
i kinda like unwriter his crippling autism makes him quiet endearing.

[Anonymous No.15880774]

>>15880759
Pretty mediocre attempt at reverse psychology, but nice try.

[Anonymous No.15880800]

>>15880751
anyone that has proof that craig is a fraud is a shill? go back to your gardening and painting, syd b

[Anonymous No.15880809]

>>15880751
you are a special kind of retard aren't you?

[Anonymous No.15880883]

>>15880809
Why do you keep projecting?

[Anonymous No.15880905]

>>15880883
>The fact that BTC shills like Rizun tells me everything I need to know about him.
what kind of fucked up thought process is that? and how can you be proud of it? it shouldn't surprise me coming from an sv shill but jesus christ...

[Anonymous No.15880926]

>>15876419
BSV is Craig Wrong's attempt at a cash grab using Bitcoin's fame.

[Anonymous No.15880938]

>>15880926
craig is a willing clown this is calvins shitshow

[Anonymous No.15880990]

>>15880905
The easiest way to spot infiltrators, turncoats, saboteurs and other nefarious operatives is simply to pay attention to who your enemies refrain from criticizing, or even show praise towards.

YOU are my enemy, but you still do not recognize that every value judgement you make about a person or a process helps me better map out who else might be an enemy. I am literally giving you free shilling tips here.

When you call Reinhart an "honorable" judge, I know that he is corrupt. If he was in fact an honest judge, you would call him a fraud.

When you display likeness towards Rizun it confirms to me he is a snake.

The people you attack and smear the most are ones who are being the most effective in fighting you.

I listen closely to what my enemy is doing, and you are giving me many of the signals I need.

You are drawing the map for me.

[Anonymous No.15881033]

>>15880990
>The easiest way to spot infiltrators, turncoats, saboteurs and other nefarious operatives is simply to pay attention to who your enemies refrain from criticizing, or even show praise towards.
no that's actually retarded, cause if there was an actual conspiracy there would be subterfuge and if there is no conspiracy then you just cucked yourself with your retardation.

[Anonymous No.15881056]

>>15880990
>When you display likeness towards Rizun it confirms to me he is a snake.
btw ther is very few people more openly hostile towards craig and the bsv retardation than rizun. so like wtf dude? are you even serious? you claim to just learned he is your enemy? really? like the last 100 times he talked about bitcoin wasn't a clue? ahahahahah.

[Anonymous No.15881067]

>>15881033
There is a conspiracy, and plenty of subterfuge to go around. In fact the deceptions never end. Retards like you (and Greg) who simply blabber unwittingly helps me know who to watch out for and who to back, because you just can't help give it away.

You are really terrible shills, and I am thankful for that.

[Anonymous No.15881080]

>>15881056
I didn't just "learn" that, I've always known he was hostile to the real vision of Bitcoin. I never liked him much, but he did some good work back when BitCoin was still under the BCH exchange ticker. But whether he was an organic retard just bumbling through the world or a paid operative is something that I am not in a position to KNOW.

But people like you help me determine that.

[Anonymous No.15881106]

These threads are so useless. "Some will believe, others won't." End of story. Until there's ever a strong court verdict, none of these arguments matter one iota of a fuckshit.

[Anonymous No.15881198]

>>15881106
they are useless but for some reason letting the sv shills run their mouth unopposed feels wrong. they are like nazis and commies and all other loud mouthed retarded scum. world needs voices of reason even if it's tiresome even if it's been done to death.

[Anonymous No.15881274]

>>15881198
You could just admit that you are paid to do it, it's obvious to everyone.

[Anonymous No.15881281]

>>15876419
>double digit

[Anonymous No.15881551]

>>15881274
you could just admit that you have brain damage, it's obvious to everyone.

[Anonymous No.15882554]

>>15880435
and then IF the coins don't move, what would you make of it? would you consider the possibility that if the coins don't move until the end of January (2020) that there might be some inconsistency to what Craig said?

[Anonymous No.15882955]

>>15882554
I don't actually care what Craig does with his coins. It matters very little to me in any way. I know for a fact that he is Satoshi, not because of anything to do with the tulip coins, signing or not signing, court case or no court case.

I am focused on building and scaling the technology of BitCoin. The more time that you spend focusing on Craig and whatever coins he has, the less time you have to build and develop a scaling competitor to BSV.

I regret to inform you, but if you don't have a blockchain that can compete, you simply lose by default.

Craig and the tulips is the laser pointer, and you are the cat. Keep chasing, while he keeps building. It's a losing strategy.

[Anonymous No.15883007]

>>15882955
None of the good devs want to go to bsv simply because of craig. He burned every bridge. Its sad to see calvin practically begging devs to switch

[Anonymous No.15883055]

>>15883007
That is interesting, because the BSV dev space is growing rapidly at the moment. Lately we have many devs who has been working on eth switching over now, because they realized that eth can not scale. It's a dead end project.

All the innovation is happening on BSV now, because the technology just WORKS. Extremely low fees, instant transactions and it actually scales. It is really just Bitcoin as it was always meant to be.

This is the best advice I will give you: build a viable scaling competitor, or BSV is simply going to run you over. You are focusing on short term market prices, Craigs personality and other irrelevancies, while the superhighway financial infrastructure of the future is being built right in front of you.

[Anonymous No.15883097]

>>15882955
>I know for a fact that he is Satoshi
He's not Satoshi. He's just some weird faggot that lies constantly

[Anonymous No.15883113]

>>15883055
Your claim ETH devs are going to BSV is baseless and lacks proof, just like craig claiming to be Satoshi

[Anonymous No.15883286]

>>15883113
You can believe that, but it doesn't matter in the end. Soon enough you will find out how hard Craig has outplayed you.

[Anonymous No.15883737]

>>15883286
Nobody cares. craig has told so many lies that him making bullshit claims like your infographic mean absolutely nothing.

[Anonymous No.15884490]

>>15882955
they're not his coins since he doesn't know the private key, doesn't have it, doesn't have a trust with the keys or whatever the fuck

here's another hint, the real scaling of bitcoin is called social scalability, it means that we have a surplus of computational power that can substitute big institutions like banks and insurance companies
https://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2017/02/money-blockchains-and-social-scalability.html

your scalability is fucking useless, a centralized service is much faster than any of your bsv apps. and since decentralization is the whole point of crypto, you lose value on both ends, you are at the same time less decentralized than BTC and less efficient than paypal, congratulations lmao.
you don't have to take my word for it, the BSV coin is worthless and it will continue to be worthless since it serves no real niche. the market has decided the value of your coin: 1%, since Calvin still mines it at a loss, you have some hashrate left. but that's it, the moment calvin drops it, it's over.

you might never get it
my suggestion to you, if you want to truly understand what bitcoin is about, is to read Tim May's cypherpunk texts.
that is, if you're not just being paid to post here lmao

[Anonymous No.15884506]

>>15883286
>I have built
the funny part is that Craig has no commits to BSV code, so he hasn't built jack fucking shit, even for the BSV ecosystem
https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv
there's 14 thousand commits, none made by craig

[Anonymous No.15884604]

>>15882955
>They pay nChain a base 1.5 transaction fee on all transactions and they can use our IP
HAHAHAHAHA, THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF THIS DELUSIONAL FAGGOT

[Anonymous No.15884634]

>>15883055
>dat infographic
dude half of those are unfinished shitprojects and stuff some nerd slapped together in an afternoon. lmao at you for parading this shitty infographic around like SV skull and oracle of bitcoin will change the world these are complete hobbyist tier projects hahahahah

[Anonymous No.15884663]

>>15884506
that's so retarded, i seriously hope you're trolling.

[Anonymous No.15884690]

>>15876861
>>15876870
Forgot to change ip?

[Anonymous No.15884697]

>>15883286
>>15883055
>>15882955
>63 posts by this ID
I go to sleep, wake up again and this faggot is still at it lmao. really hope youre getting paid for this boyo

[Anonymous No.15884786]

>>15884490
>want to truly understand what bitcoin is about, is to read Tim May's cypherpunk texts

No thanks, I'll read the white paper and the posts by its creator Satoshi Nakamoto.

Also funny side note that your airheaded comment reminded me of. Pull up the Bitcoin white paper and do CTRL+F

Type "decentralized"

>0 results

"decentralised"

>0 results

You know nothing about Bitcoin or how it is supposed to work. You are a first class brainlet with Dunning-Kruger syndrome.

[Anonymous No.15884798]

>>15884506
Imagine being this retarded.

[Anonymous No.15884812]

>>15878240
Faggot

[Anonymous No.15884843]

>>15879721
Thx anon for some common sense among all these blockstream bandwagon faggots

[Anonymous No.15884850]

>>15884690
Hahahaha Stupid ass calvin ayre just wasting money on shilling some shit nobody wants

[Anonymous No.15884860]

>>15884786

Type "Paul Le Roux"

>0 results.

You all fucking fail at this. The main head was Le Roux.

[Anonymous No.15884869]

>>15880313
Low energy

[Anonymous No.15884880]

>>15880746
Fuck you jidf

[Anonymous No.15884892]

>>15881056
You are seething feces right now

[Anonymous No.15884898]

>>15881551
>52 posts

[Anonymous No.15884901]

>>15884663
Wow great argument hadn't thought of that!

No wait, Craig is still a fraud and can't even code for the shitcoin he endorses.

[Anonymous No.15884918]

>>15884850
hi greg

[Anonymous No.15884923]

>>15884901

[Anonymous No.15884940]

>>15884918
hi jimmy

[Anonymous No.15884951]

(((blockstream)))

[Anonymous No.15884958]

>>15884918
is it true you gave craig aids?

[Anonymous No.15884969]

>Brock Pierce
>founded Tether
>caught up in a Hollywood pedophile ring scandal
>known to rub shoulders with convicted pedophile Jeffery Epstein
>active member of the Clinton Global Initiative
>received millions of dollars of investments from Goldman Sachs
>>15879323

[Anonymous No.15884973]

>>15884969

[Anonymous No.15884979]

>>15884969
>>15884973
Keep going jimmy, /biz/ is totally gonna buy your bags.

[Anonymous No.15884990]

>>15884901
nice ID changing Gregory
what an epic fail

[Anonymous No.15885084]

>>15876419
How can anyone give any credibility to bsd is beyond my understanding

[Anonymous No.15886083]

>>15880561
Go to bed rory

[Anonymous No.15886407]

>>15884898
switched id have you sv cuck?
samefagging thos hard

[Anonymous No.15886423]

stop the debates and look at low market cap hidden gems. my recent find is Stegos

[Anonymous No.15886428]

>>15885084
its a specific form of brain damage where you are unable to properly weigh evidence and probabilities and find the least likely thins most plausible

[Anonymous No.15886479]

>>15886423
nobody cares about shitcoins m8
bitcoin is the only one that matters so kinda important question what is bitcoin? before 2017 this was a relatively simple question today however a loud minority raises hell about everyone being wrong.

[Anonymous No.15886744]

>>15876419
Only because I'm about to hijack their whole operation

[Anonymous No.15886905]

>>15876419
Smart /biz/ posters are accumulating patiently

[Anonymous No.15887087]

>>15886905
Mid 2021. Keeps pushing up the date. Yawn.

[Anonymous No.15887495]

>>15886905
this is an old screenshot and since then calvin has already backpedalled and said they actually dont want to hurt BTC and are all about peaceful coexistence. see the thing with these flip flopping retards is that sooner or later noone buys into their shit anymore when they just keep walking back on their promises.

[Anonymous No.15887735]

>>15887495
apparently this can go on forever
true believers gonna ignore every red flag

[Anonymous No.15887751]

>>15876419
I'm shocked of laughing

[Anonymous No.15887765]

>>15882955
Very generous %.
It doesn't matter anymore. Shitcoins are being reviewed by bog standard players, BSV is getting an audience with central banks.

[Anonymous No.15887769]

>>15883286
You can't crash an entire market like that.

[Anonymous No.15887938]

BSV is growing in use. In a few weeks would have more transactions than btc and a few months more than every other crypto.

It is too late to stop it now.
The racist, sexist and homophobic campaign against CSW is so anachronistic that only can be promoted by trolls.

It is time to bend the knee

[Anonymous No.15888229]

>>15887938
what's the daily tx count without the shitty weather app? 2-3?

[Anonymous No.15888461]

>>15887769
Oh yeah? Maybe you should look up what happened to the market when the MtGox coins from the Karpeles litigation were sold off.

A Tulip dump will obliterate everything.

[Anonymous No.15888742]

>>15888461
unicorns will shit rainbows

[Anonymous No.15888815]

>>15888742
Cope

[Anonymous No.15888939]

>>15879587
I don't know why but I imagine his cheeks to be very soft and pillowy. Imagine thrusting your manhood into his faggot ass until his cheeks get totally BUSTED leaves me feeling hot. I'd imagine he would squirm a bit but ultimately capitulate allowing me to inseminate properly. At the end of act, his entry completely ruined and his soft tender cheks rosy red ugh mmmmm.

[Anonymous No.15889360]

>>15884663
>>15884798
name calling
0 COMMITS
zero

[Anonymous No.15889386]

>>15884786
lol
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/16/
Announcing the first release of Bitcoin, a new electronic cash
system that uses a peer-to-peer network to prevent double-spending.
It's completely decentralized with no server or central authority.

>It's completely decentralized with no server or central authority.
>It's completely decentralized with no server or central authority.
>It's completely decentralized with no server or central authority.


oops

[Anonymous No.15889403]

>>15889360
when that fat alky bullshitter finally gets committed, I doubt it will be to github
>>15889386
rekt. as fucking per

[Anonymous No.15889456]

>>15888939
>>15889360
>>15889403
>>15889386

[Anonymous No.15889507]

>>15889456
you can insult me all you want
doesn't make the private keys appear in his possession
no matter how much you want it

[Anonymous No.15889725]

>>15888815
what you no longer like imaginary things?

[Anonymous No.15889896]

>>15888461
I wish I could see your face on the last day of January

[Anonymous No.15889918]

>>15889360
Why would a private software development company have commits to a public github. Are you that fucking stupid?

Welcome to patents.

[Anonymous No.15889930]

>>15876419
BSV is bullshit and CSW is a scammer retard

[Anonymous No.15889943]

>>15889360
zErO cOmMitS oN gIRtHurb

herp da fucking derp

[Anonymous No.15890027]

>>15889943
anything pre 2016? cause by 2016 everything worth of mention in crpyto was published and mos things released...

[Anonymous No.15890061]

>>15890027
LOL imagine believing that.

[Anonymous No.15890216]

>>15890061
it's true actually the most important things were published pre 2009

[Anonymous No.15890229]

>>15889943
what the fu......

[Anonymous No.15890243]

>>15876419
Naaah,just don’t like gay porn.that’s all

[Anonymous No.15890270]

>>15876419
it already did
the worst piece of shit in the entire crypto
congrats for the first place

[Anonymous No.15890407]

>>15890229
no worries it's just patent trolling, it doesn't not affect any crypto that is not a commercial product and also nothing released pre 2018

[Anonymous No.15890559]

>>15890407
>Don't trust your eyes goy, these hundreds of patents on blockchain related and digital financial services technology is nothing. Hehehe. It's just patent trolling, you know I called it that so you don't think about it more. Hes just trolling hehehe, don't look anymore into this goy, you understand???

[Anonymous No.15890643]

>>15890559
it's patent trolling but it's actually clever
they can hold oracle microsoft ibm and the rest at ransom when these retarded corps try to make their private blockchain solutions. if they play this right... then again going up against those giants fora toddler in diapers like nchain is very brazen.

as for the real cryptos this is inconsequential.

[Anonymous No.15890682]

>>15890643
yes, creg versus Larry Ellison's Lawyers.
dear god. idk if nChain actually know that 'patents' are not a license to print money, but, an invitation to take someone else to court. And, they are provenly not very good at that court stuff, even up against complete amateurs. Larry'd fucking laugh at them

[Anonymous No.15890698]

>>15890643
Actually makes sense what these dumb patents are all about.

[Anonymous No.15890767]

If he is Satoshi, why is BSV do unimpressive and why is no one using it?

BOOM.

[Anonymous No.15890787]

>>15890767
so*

[Anonymous No.15890794]

>>15890698
yeah calvin is no moron he saw a new frontier years ago and decided to carve out as big a slice of it - by any means - as it is possible.

pre 2019 patents were very low quality easily dispensable. these look better just by the title at least 10% would stick. rest will be thrown out on the grounds of previously published and known / too generic / too specific and not applicable. but the sheer numbers make it a possibility they win some. patents cost a few grand a possible settlement a few millions or maybe more.

[Anonymous No.15890916]

Can't wait to see what this board will look like in 5 years when BSV dominates

[Anonymous No.15891109]

>>15889943
LOL
no code
>>15889918
>patents
lol that's why I said grand finale
you came to the open source town and can't seem to get anything
also none of these patents are enforcing anything

[Anonymous No.15891127]

>>15890916

[Anonymous No.15891562]

>>15890682
craig was abysmal in court but calvins lawyers might actually do a lot better. not a high bar i admit.

[Anonymous No.15891717]

>>15891562
I'm kind of assuming (maybe wrongly) cregs lawyers were calvins. Because, if my firm was relying on stolen IP, I know where Iras lawyers will come knocking next. Still, maybe they'll settle, maybe cregs the real owner of nChain, maybe pigs will fly. And while its also unfair to judge any lawyers given that fucking idiot creg for a client, even removing him frm the equation won't help much. Oracle Larry is, as suggested, different calibre altogether. He'd have calvin 'n co. dangling off one of his yachts as live fishbait, time he was done. Assuming any of these patents are worth jack in the first place

[Anonymous No.15892378]

>>15891109
>lol that's why I said grand finale
>you came to the open source town and can't seem to get anything
>also none of these patents are enforcing anything

Wrong!
Bsv has prven to have best tech right now, Satoshi will not allow scamer take advantage of the next pahse invention as they did with bitcoin and so called cryptocurrencies.

He knows how to build, but he don{t want to be the mighty god, He knows that is some sort of poison, he is christian.

So he is allowing plebs to build and be rich, because, you know, he already madde it.

The problem of this board is that most people want to be rich by crypto, he already did that and he is looking for something bigger. Think of him like temurlan, julius cesar, or gandhi, he is in another level