[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 9 KB, 640x320, BSV_640x320px.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15861557 No.15861557 [Reply] [Original]

BCH: 32mb block cap
BSV: 2000mb block cap

What's going on BCH? I thought you were supposed to be electronic cash for the world

>> No.15861598

>>15861557

no-one cares about these altcoins. fuck off.

>> No.15861608
File: 37 KB, 601x508, q7k0p0sh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15861608

>>15861598

>> No.15861688
File: 51 KB, 651x683, BitcoinCash Roadmap.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15861688

>>15861557
BitcoinABC stands for Adjustable Blocksize Cap.
Its not smart to have gigantic blocks stuffed with weather data when you don't need them for commerce. BCH is doing it right "Peer to peer electronic cash" not Metanet. BSV is a testnet for BCH and we Bitcoiners appreciate the research, we will use snippets of BSVs open source code when it becomes necessary for real commerce on Bitcoin (BCH)

>> No.15861720

>>15861688
wtf are you talking about? the code is getting locked down.
The improvements are in the nodes shipping big blocks to eachother. That isn't open source. That's figured out by the miners who are practicing on weather data. Also anything that is opensource is patented. Stiff.

>> No.15861757

>>15861688
BSV can scale infinitely, if you're afraid of 'wasting' block space on your BCH chain you're basically admitting your chain is fragile and can't scale.

>> No.15861813

>>15861557
Its soft cap is 2mb. Most BCH miners have their cap configurated at 2mb, some have 8mb afaik. So even 32mb isn't real effectively.
However, SV also is currently soft capped effectively by miners at 256mb.

>> No.15861863

fork of a fork internet monopoly money that's running out of idiots it can scam

>> No.15861875
File: 80 KB, 378x492, 1390038213669.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15861875

>>15861757
Wrong. It just means Bitcoin(BCH) is more usable right now, and can spread to more sever farms.
BCH implemented the improvements to compact the blockchain by 99.4% (Graphne and CTR) as compared to Bitcoin v0.1 (BSV)
32mb is now equivalent to 1000mb on BSV. Even if it wasn't 32mb on BSV is more than enough to overtake paypal in transaction blocksize. When we get there, the Bitcoiner(BCH) community will raise the blocksize, and internet transmission and storage will be exponentially faster and cheaper so it won't force complete centralization as is the case in fragile BSV which demands miners handle gigmeg blocks RIGHT NOW so all the mining is done by Calvin through many fake front companies.
BCH is the reasonable middle path that makes sense between the big insanity of BSV and micro insanity of BTC

>> No.15861890

>>15861720
>not open source
Never going to make it

>> No.15862070

>>15861875
>It just means Bitcoin(BCH) is more usable right now
2mb block soft cap, that's what - 14tx/s?

>BCH implemented the improvements to compact the blockchain by 99.4% (Graphne and CTR)
Prove it first, I doubt such a thing is possible

>32mb is now equivalent to 1000mb on BSV
Why does the volume of transactions not reflect that then? Also if that is really true why havent there been stress tests yet to prove it?

>so it won't force complete centralization as is the case in fragile BSV
'Centralisation' is a meme, only chains that can't scale whine about 'centralisation' - it's sour grapes

>which demands miners handle gigmeg blocks RIGHT NOW
Miners want big blocks, big blocks = more tx fees = more money

>>15861875
>BCH is the reasonable middle path that makes sense between the big insanity of BSV and micro insanity of BTC
That's an appeal to moderation, either BitCoin scales or it doesn't, there's no middleground