/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.15818171]

>Mixicles go live on mainnet
>Service Agreements go live on mainnet
>Threshold signatures go live on mainnet
>Microsft partnership announced
>Docusign partnership announced

>pumps to $3 then back to $2

this is unironically what will happen

[Anonymous No.15818176]

>>15818171
shit they know my plan to sell at 3$

[Anonymous No.15818181]

>>15818171
I don't doubt it at this point. This is a clown market.

[Anonymous No.15818185]

>>15818171
lol, microsoft wont be announced

[Anonymous No.15818199]

Wen smile?

[Anonymous No.15818205]

>>15818171
Mixicles and threshold signatures really do nothing to make Chainlink decentralized or appeal to developers. Learn to code brainlet.

[Anonymous No.15818210]

>>15818185
Still don't know LINK isnt just oracles hey
You had 2 years

[Anonymous No.15818215]

>>15818171
>>pumps to $3 then back to $2

Then I am going to kms, cancelling out 40k LINK from the supply

[Anonymous No.15818219]

>>15818171
Mixicles won't be a big deal for a long time. Some of the easiest and most basic elements of chainlink for businesses to use have been live for months with no takers. The use of mixicles is far more complex and for bigger businesses.

[Anonymous No.15818222]

>>15818215
Is this what they meant by staking? An occult network of holders locking out their supply with a suicide contract?

[Anonymous No.15818223]

>>15818171
About the price of a coffee cup. It's in the white paper. Amazing that nobody still gets it.

[Anonymous No.15818226]

>>15818171
How come Linkers are on suicide watch when it comes to RLC?
Is RLC taking away marketshare from Chainlink?

[Anonymous No.15818236]

>>15818215
>>15818219
LINK is a solid project but this market is fucking retarded and unless we get corporate money soon this price suppression will never end. You should look forward staking instead and eventual adoption by the big boys.

[Anonymous No.15818259]

>>15818236
>You should look forward staking instead and eventual adoption by the big boys.

I do, hold 0.25 LP or so. Thus far that generated a sweet sweet 0.9 LINK in passive income.

So with $1000 it's almost enough for one month

[Anonymous No.15818267]

>>15818185
>I don't know
>I'm not sure
>I don't know
Great informations

[Anonymous No.15818273]

>>15818205
Lol
Lets just waste time and money by implementing useless features nobody want
Sounds like a great move

[Anonymous No.15818281]

>>15818236
OG Linkers are selling off and buying RLC.
It has been confirmed in the Chainlink Telegram.

[Anonymous No.15818307]

>>15818181
The only clownish thing about this market is that an oracle provider is worth almost a billion dollars.

[Anonymous No.15818869]

>>15818171
>>15818176
>>15818215
chainlink is not 2USD nor 4USD nor 3USD
chainlink is 23k sats now
had a 36k sats ATH
reajusted to 15k low
came back to it's current 23k

USD is not money

[Anonymous No.15818883]

>>15818869
my bad, ill sell link at 0.001995 ounce of gold

[Anonymous No.15818890]

> microsoft parntership
AHAHAHA delusional. Microsoft chose iEXEC and linkers will be btfo and poor while RLCchads are spitting on you faggots from our super-yachts.

[Anonymous No.15819131]

>>15818883
selling link at 0.01304 apple stocks

[Anonymous No.15819151]

why do linkies even think developers would pay for their tokens? There are other companies developing oracles who will provide tokens free of charge, your Chanlink is worthless.

[Anonymous No.15819233]

>>15818869
>hey guys I know you want to measure purchasing power by using the actual unit of purchasing power accepted by 100% of the world, but instead use this digital unit accepted by less than 1% of the world.

[Anonymous No.15819261]

Mixicles my testicles you dumb linkie rofl

[Anonymous No.15819319]

>>15818171
Theoretically, once service agreements/staking is live, the full game theoretical implications of chainlink market tokenomics will be in play, and then it's just a matter of time.
TA and crypto precedent won't mean shit.
I expect a huge % of tokens to be staked.
The thing that might fuck it up is whale traders trying to swing their stack, but that's nothing new--eventually it will be clear to most traders/holders that it's more lucrative to hold and stake rather than risk one last swing trade.

[Anonymous No.15819412]

>>15818236
>LINK is a solid project
no, reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.