i told you stinkies it was going to dump at $2

[Anonymous No.15807496]

i told you and you flat out didn't listen. KEK.

[Anonymous No.15807644]

>i told you stinkies that link was going to have a correction at a major resistance point after having a 60% upwards movement

[Anonymous No.15807717]

>>15807644
based
checked
fpbp
saged

[Anonymous No.15808371]

>>15807496
BTC whales really don't like it when Link pumps.

[Anonymous No.15809302]

>>15808371
Why? They’re so annoying

[Anonymous No.15809312]

>>15808371
That doesn't show the correlation at all. Also:
> dumping btc price to move link price
In what way does this make any sense at all, look at the fucking market caps lmao. Is this the intellect of /biz/ now?

[Anonymous No.15809343]

>>15809312
>That doesn't show the correlation at all.
It shows BTC dumping during a Link pump. Again.

[Anonymous No.15809365]

>>15809343
Not it doesnt.

[Anonymous No.15809375]

>>15809365
Except it literally does.
Link pumped from 1.6 USD to 2 USD, and then this happened: >>15808371

Just like what happened on September 24th, and many more times before that.

[Anonymous No.15809435]

>>15809375
Then show it, that chart doesn't even cover the period you talk about there.

[Anonymous No.15809476]

>>15809435
It's almost impossible to get the BTC timeline right.

But you really should be more aware of recent Link price action if you want to post in a Link thread.

[Anonymous No.15809522]

>>15807496
Sergay is literally playing you all

>OOOOO ITS MOONING
>Sirgay: thats right bitch. FOMO like the pencil dick cuck you are. HA! GOTCHA!
>Dumps 700k
>Links dumps
>"NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"

[Anonymous No.15809546]

>DUDE it's going one fucking way dude ! Triple digits overnight dude
They never listen...

[Anonymous No.15809548]

>>15807496
some fed larper at pol said i would be able to upgrade from a satchel of gold chocolates to a fucking BAG of gold chocolates with 1 link by halloween.

source was solid, milk, chocolate.

even had a picture of that guy zelda from the link game.

[Anonymous No.15809596]

>>15809476
So what you have there is a data point of one which shows that BTC, already on a bearish trend had an increased dump, causing link which was against a resistance level, to also dump in USD, which all coins would when BTC dumps.

I am literally amazed that you think this means whales are dumping BTC to dump LINK. Apart from the total incoherence of how you've interpreted that chart just think of the respective fucking marketcaps. It is pig fucking retarded to think you would dump link by indirectly doing so to BTC.

[Anonymous No.15809607]

>>15809596
>a data point
There have been many other instances of BTC dumping just as Link was pumping.

See pic for just a few.

[Anonymous No.15809633]

>>15809548
just bought 100k chocolates

[Anonymous No.15809636]

>>15809607
Once again link is against USD so what you really have is the entire crypto MC reducing as BTC does. Nor are the charts particularly analogous, you have crypto as a whole following BTC but link continues to dump long after BTC has held ground. Then the final one is just BTC falling out of the descending triangle that it was blatantly going to go down from, no manipulation needed.

Also we once again come to the most damning element: HOW THE FUCK WOULD YOU MANIPULATE A COIN WITH A TINY MARKETCAP BY INDIRECTLY USING A COIN WITH A MARKETCAP MAGNITUDES LARGER.

[Anonymous No.15809665]

>>15809636
>so what you really have is the entire crypto MC reducing as BTC does
lmao no

>you have crypto as a whole following BTC
Well sure, that's the point I'm making: people are dumping BTC to stop Link.
I'm only being half-ironic here; check the catalogs, I predicted many times that BTC was going to shit the bed very soon because Link was pumping against the market again (see pic).

[Anonymous No.15809701]

>>15809665
What time frame is that from - it's meaningless to post that without controlled time periods. I can make any single coin look like the outstanding growth story if you let me choose any time frame.

As for BTC dumping to stop link, no because on your posted charts alone you can see BTC dumping several times without link rising beforehand.

What you would need to have to show this would be:
> Every time link rises substantially there is an abnormal, high volume sell on BTC
> These sells don't come at resistance points, in bear trends or at breakouts from patterns
> The link dumps aren't likely from the previous pattern

Even with all those cases once again you run into the sheer lunacy of the idea that you would manipulate the whole market of BTC just to dump link.

It would be like being annoyed your neighbourhood milkman is doing well so you set about crashing the global dairy industry rather than just slashing his tyres.

[Anonymous No.15809702]

Today is the day we make it.

The universe confirms. Checked.

[Anonymous No.15809723]

>>15809701
>What time frame is that from - it's meaningless to post that without controlled time periods.
This is from somewhere during this Link pump: >>15809476

>no because on your posted charts alone you can see BTC dumping several times without link rising beforehand.
I'm not saying all BTC dumps are because of Link, lmao.

>you have to show it happens every time!
I'm not saying BTC dumps every time Link pumps either.

[Anonymous No.15809751]

>>15809723
You need the exact times, but yes it's clearly taken during the pump phase. The link market cap has decreased as crypto as a whole has.

As for the points on what's needed i didn't say all BTC dumps are because of link. As for the second, no but it doesn't help your thesis that lots of link pumps aren't met with a BTC dump.

It's all a bit of a boring conversation, there are the specific patterns required to suggest BTC is being manipulated to affect LINK nor is there the theoretically practicality that it can be done so.

[Anonymous No.15809788]

>>15809751
>You need the exact times
no you don't.

>As for the points on what's needed i didn't say all BTC dumps are because of link
You said I need to show that "Every time link rises substantially there is an abnormal, high volume sell on BTC".
So yes, you literally wanted me to prove all BTC dumps are because of Link.

>no but it doesn't help your thesis that lots of link pumps aren't met with a BTC dump
Since my thesis isn't "it happens literally every time", you are incorrect.

[Anonymous No.15809795]

>>15809633
wow. check.

[Anonymous No.15809886]

>>15809701
Denial on 100