/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.15715449]

So is swift utilizing an in-house Oracle or not

[Anonymous No.15715475]

>>15715449
No idea. There are only trannys trying to muddy the waters, havent got any good answers yet

[Anonymous No.15715499]

fuck you.

[Anonymous No.15715503]

Link team were brought as consultants on a private contract to guide the develop of GPI Link, most likely for some extra cash to cover operating costs at Chainlink.
There is no Swift "partnership".

[Anonymous No.15715530]

>>15715449
It doesnt matter. You brainlets exhaust me. Chainlink is not an oracle, chainlike is the SECURITY PROTOCOL WHICH ALLOWS ORACLES TO TRUST EACHOTHER.

M-I-D-D-L-E-W-A-R-E

[Anonymous No.15715584]

>>15715530
Its not even worth it anymore... clearly beyond the fuck linkers guys someome got word and theres non stop shit posting, some from holders, some probally paid..

Im gone tho. Ill be back in 18months after today theres nothing left to discuss, i dont care if anyone else makes it anymore. Not everyone can make it anyway. So dont bother. Dont feed them.. just wait.. for 18 fucking months.. but fuck it. Just wait. We are ither 100% correct or 100% wrong. Its 50 50 at this point there is no middleground... im done tho. See you guys in 18 months.

[Anonymous No.15715604]

>>15715584
See you tomorrow, cunt.

[Anonymous No.15715619]

>>15715584
>just wait.. for 18 fucking months.. but fuck
I laughed hard srs.

[Anonymous No.15715871]

they're not going to use highly insecure centralized oracles running on highly secure decentralized infrastructure

[Anonymous No.15715882]

>>15715449
fghjfgvjdgmjkdtty

[Anonymous No.15716327]

>>15715584
why not learn some programming? Then you would know for sure you are 100% wrong, like I do, because it's quite obvious to any programmer.

[Anonymous No.15716343]

why wouldn't they? they can just copy paste the open source code of link for free. imagine thinking anyone would pay anything for this shit lmao