Anti-banking/anti-government shills BTFO by based Craig

[Anonymous No.15713973]

There is a lie that is propagated by those who seek to falsely claim that Bitcoin was created as an anarchist system designed to oppose government and banks. Such is the scam that tries to change Bitcoin into bit gold.

Bitcoin does not act outside the real world. It is not completely virtual. Bitcoin is not permissionless. At no point did I ever say so, not as myself using my real name and certainly not as Satoshi—my pen name.

People argue how I don’t understand Bitcoin; unfortunately, it’s the other way around. Government and courts in general can alter Bitcoin. A court order can force a transaction to be invalidated. A court order can change the nature of the blockchain and require that the UTXO set is updated. On hearing it, you will be told how it is not possible because all the nodes won’t accept it. My answer is simple: so what.

The nodes that matter are associated with businesses. All of them have real physical addresses, and all of them can be sued or charged with criminal offences. More importantly, an exchange or miner that decides to go against the dictates of the US court following anti-money laundering decisions will find itself cut off from global banking. To some, the argument will be about how they can simply use Bitcoin, except that such won’t be the case. Such a decision would isolate a company from the rest of the financial system and have downstream repercussions including the cutting off from suppliers and vendors.

[Anonymous No.15714019]

This coming from the guy with a private Twitter account, who wants KYC for every user and miner on the network, and cried in court while throwing documents. also, pic related

[Anonymous No.15714039]

Imagine actually buying a CIAnigger coin

[Anonymous No.15714040]

>>15713973
But why is bsv so gay? What's with them all being homos or acting like homos?

[Anonymous No.15714080]

>Bitcoin “Cryin’ Craig’s Vision” down 25% in a single day
That’s what they call efficient markets

[Anonymous No.15714119]

>>15713973
there is a lie that is being propagated by sv shills and that is their faggot idol respects the law, but he has been proven to lie in court provide falsified fraudulent documents and perjure himself.

[Anonymous No.15714221]

Craig haters so mad.

[Anonymous No.15714303]

>>15713973
poo on bsv.

[Anonymous No.15714522]

What a based man. I wish I was more like him.

[Anonymous No.15714542]

[Anonymous No.15714602]

>>15713973
nick Szabo is satoshi.

[Anonymous No.15715078]

>>15714602
ahahhaahhahaha

[Anonymous No.15715158]

>>15713973
Cringe

[Anonymous No.15715392]

I think most people have this grandiose movie like image of what they perceive Satoshi Nakamoti to be like when in reality he's just a regular above average intelligent dude trying to make crypto readily available to the unwashed masses of planet earth. Let's face it, BTC has barely any utility and the transaction fees are laughable at best. When we look at crypto in a practical sense, via utility and scalibility etc etc we come to the conclusion that BSV is the only logical choice in the cryptosphere.

[Anonymous No.15715432]

>>15715392
This. Turns out Satoshi is a sociopath and a narcisst. So what?

[Anonymous No.15716466]

>>15714019
craig is so pathetic, he has a tendency to just throw big names and words in the room but he's such a massive faggot that he never follows through. or when, he just fakes, forges, makes up some shit. there's a discription for that: criminally insane compulsive serial liar with narcism on top.

he's more of a woman than a man and you notice this after a while.A flaming faggot that spreads maximum bullshit. Anyone buying into this fork of a fork of his will figure sooner or later that clown craigs absolutely inapropriate and retarded behaviour is a total red flag to put any money near him, be he satoshi or not.

[Anonymous No.15716754]

>>15714119
>To this day, Dr. Wright has not complied with the Court’s orders compelling discovery on May 14 and June 14.
>Rather, as described above, the evidence establishes that he has engaged in a willful and bad faith pattern of obstructive behavior, including submitting incomplete or deceptive pleadings, filing a false declaration, knowingly producing a fraudulent trust document, and giving perjurious testimony at the evidentiary hearing.
>Dr. Wright’s conduct has prevented Plaintiffs from obtaining evidence that the Court found relevant to Plaintiffs’ claim that Dr. Wright and David Kleiman formed a partnership to develop Bitcoin technology and to mine bitcoin.
>Plaintiffs have also been prejudiced by not being able to try to trace the bitcoin that was mined.
>His conduct has wasted substantial amounts of the Court’s and the Plaintiffs’ time and resources. It has unnecessarily protracted this litigation.

>I have found that Dr. Wright intentionally submitted fraudulent documents to the Court, obstructed a judicial proceeding, and gave perjurious testimony.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.277.0.pdf

>willful and bad faith pattern of obstructive behavior
>submitting incomplete or deceptive pleadings
>filing a false declaration
>knowingly producing a fraudulent trust document
>giving perjurious testimony

[Anonymous No.15716778]

>>15715078
nick szabo + ian grigg are the most likely candidates if we are talking about team satoshi, but i think it was a younger man and a single person. the only one we can 100% exclude from possible candidates is faketoshi.

[Anonymous No.15716890]

>>15714602
>>15716778
if there's one guy less likely to be satoshi than craig wright it's nick szabo

[Anonymous No.15716968]

>>15716778
Nick Szabo didnt even know bitcoin is turing complete.

Ian Grigg admits Craig is Satoshi.


You might want to fud a different coin you mong.

[Anonymous No.15717176]

>>15716968
bitcoin is not turing complete everyone knows that with half a brain and this is so by design not accident.

[Anonymous No.15717850]

>>15717176
Bitcoin IS Turing complete

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwGRfJ0L5eQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ1DTeexpvA

[Anonymous No.15717868]

>>15717850
no it's not, it could easily be, but they choose not to implement any opcodes that would allow it to be.

[Anonymous No.15717869]

[Anonymous No.15718730]

>>15717850
based

[Anonymous No.15718987]

>>15718730
no anon bullshitting is not based at all

[Anonymous No.15720002]

>>15715392
>>15715432
Shitting up the blockchain with twetch and other garbage is something the real Satoshi said not to do

[Anonymous No.15721065]

>>15720002
Prove it.