[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 41 KB, 679x910, 1558063117843.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15698060 No.15698060 [Reply] [Original]

... they were actually live tests for binance integration

That's why the team couldn't comment on it

>> No.15698066

>>15698060
everyone knew

>> No.15698079

>>15698060
It was sells dummy follow the wallets

>> No.15698103

>>15698066
Why did they sell then

>> No.15698109

Delusional linkies

>> No.15698154

Brain let here
Please elaborate

>> No.15698194

>>15698060
from the day I knew the dev team didn't need the money.

there's zero proof they are on market sells.

>> No.15698208

>>15698154
How to test with binance? Send equal amounts of course

>> No.15698243

>>15698060
Close, they weren't live tests, but are collateral for the various pricing oracles.

>> No.15698264
File: 34 KB, 817x443, groggmissbrain.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15698264

>>15698154
LINK bagholders are trying desperately to rationalize not selling at the top of this pump and dump, and hoping that easily persuaded idiots (like you!) will buy into their pyramid scheme and inflate the price slightly so they can sell as soon as possible exit with a little bit of money... not unlike the LINK dev team, who, ever since the price popped a couple months ago, have been consistently dumping massive chunks of this shitcoin in 700,000 strong increments in order to cash out.

>> No.15698281

>>15698264
>feeling the pain of not buying at 1.70

>> No.15698298

>>15698208
Do you even understand what the announcement means? Let me explain since you seem to be retarded. You can now fetch price info off the Binance API via a Chainlink node if you want to create a smartcontract The problem is nobody is using Chainlink to create smartcontracts. So please brainlet explain to us why the 700k dumps to Binance were needed for the Chainlink team to setup a node?

>> No.15698325
File: 314 KB, 1280x720, groggcaveshilling.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15698325

>>15698281
I bought about 200USD of play money into it at under a dollar and sold at $3.40 because I have half a brain and could tell it was a pump and dump.

I invest actual money in the actual stock market

>> No.15698467

>>15698325
>I invest actual money in the actual stock market
Why are you even in this thread then? And most probably in 12 other LINK threads aswell?
lmao cope more pajeet

>> No.15698611

>>15698325
>half a brain
>pump and dump

tell us more

>> No.15698613
File: 6 KB, 250x187, 1519186341669.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15698613

>>15698467
>why are you even in this thread then?

because I enjoy watching you idiots doing pink wojak live action roleplay

>> No.15698630

>>15698298
Almost like businesses working together and try different things to see what they can gain from

Crazy for an incel NEET to understand I know

>> No.15698662

>>15698630
So you believe Binance bought millions worth of LINK just so they can monetize their API when/if staking ever goes live even though the network has no users? Have you taken your meds today, Anon?

>> No.15698691

>>15698060
This is the most desperate brainlet Corp I have ever read in my life. You specifically are not going to make it, you dumbshit faggot.

>> No.15698701

>>15698662
No I think they test and use it for staking or other things

>> No.15698719

>>15698208
630K + 70K

>> No.15698746
File: 299 KB, 500x500, 1567330404350.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15698746

>>15698719

>> No.15698774

>>15698701
eh i have a link stack and that other anon is right, there is no reason to do a transfer of 700k link to binance for this integration, let alone multiple transfers. this literally just lets you access binance API calls from ethereum mainnet. binance doesnt need any link to stake or whatever it is all the brainlets are suggesting.

>> No.15698790

It was binance dumping chainlink. Not sergey.

>> No.15698791

>>15698079
>it wasnt tests for binance integration
>it was sells to binance, just follow the wallets to binance (where they are no longer trackable onchain)
wow

>> No.15698816

>>15698613
SEETHING.

>> No.15698866

>>15698701
Except for the fact that staking is not live. Even if it was and they were testing it, why would they test a network with a collateral of millions of dollars? You must go back to Discord with the other trannies.

>> No.15698882

>>15698060
>binance integration

Literally just using their api. kek.

>> No.15698908
File: 7 KB, 350x350, 31alIFmbYpL._SL500_AC_SS350_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15698908

Did everyone already forget that Binance made LINK pairings? WTF did you people expect

>> No.15699673

>>15698264
COPE
O
P
E

>> No.15699975
File: 5 KB, 232x162, cf8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15699975

>>15698882
S E E T H I N G

>> No.15700059

>>15698060
Nobody check top LINK wallets? Seriously?

Binance is the biggest holder right now. They will pump us next to BNB.

>> No.15700135

It's obvious he was selling, why else would he be making the transfers ONLY when it's pumping? If he wasn't, why hasn't he transferred in over a month when the price has been in the gutter?

>> No.15700212

>>15698060
That's even more bearish. That means more dumps incoming when they need to raise more funds.