RLC

[Anonymous No.15672537]

Easiest 2x in 20 days.
Here's why

[Anonymous No.15672543]

That is why you stupid faggots

[Anonymous No.15672551]

>>15672543
because bagholders are trying to pump their bags in the telegram ?

[Anonymous No.15672558]

>>15672551
fuck off cumbrains

[Anonymous No.15672562]

>>15672558
Its over Callum. No one is paying for Gilles trannies anymore.

[Anonymous No.15672570]

Yeah man, I can't wait for them to announce iExec v7, it will definitely pump our bags this time!

[Anonymous No.15672575]

>>15672570
>>15672562
hey faggots I am trying to be helpful here. you can go and fuck right off but this shit will 2x in 20 days

[Anonymous No.15672604]

2x?

I need 5x to breakeven.

although I´m doing some TA...nice anon, going to buy some again

[Anonymous No.15673285]

>>15672537
It's over Gilles

[Anonymous No.15673306]

>>15672537
Damn you Gilles I need to break even to afford tuition but i can't even cash out in burgerland. You baguetted me for the last time.

[Anonymous No.15673699]

Gilles is a genius , we gonna be fucking rich , merci iexec

[Anonymous No.15673712]

>>15673699
> Gilles defending himself
Fuck you Gilles, it's over, no more trannies

[Anonymous No.15673923]

>>15672537
Nope

[Anonymous No.15674180]

>>15672537
>still at ICO price from 2,5 years ago
>has had hundreds of announcements

I'm sure this time is different, op

[Anonymous No.15674264]

>>15674180
A utility token needs users with RLC currently at 0 users. What are partnerships good for if they aren't using the token?

[Anonymous No.15674278]

>>15674264
IExec will be shrimp tracking by EOY

[Anonymous No.15674416]

the market just hates iexec because no industry insider whales hold a large stake and shill/promote the token.
having intel and ibm both confirmed partners should be marketable to justify a higher marketcap when you look at the the projects in the top 100 yet it struggles to climb above $20m

>>15674264
same could be said for link and every other token
your argument is that of a 10 year old that doesnt understand the concept of speculation

[Anonymous No.15674444]

>>15674264
Agreed. The project sounds cool and all, but the crypto-token-thingy just seems like a meme that makes it harder for an actual adoption


It would be like people would need to buy facebook/google shares in order to be able to use the service.. just makes no sense and adds an unnecessary hinder for people to use the service

[Anonymous No.15674452]

>>15674416
>your argument is that of a 10 year old that doesnt understand the concept of speculation

lmfao, so your argument to "invest" in it is to speculate. thanks, feeling confident in this

[Anonymous No.15674462]

Problem is that CEO organizes tranny parties using investors money

[Anonymous No.15674463]

>>15674462
GIVE ME THE FUCKING SOURCE

[Anonymous No.15674478]

I can't anon, iExec hq is like a fortress now, i don't want to lose my job.

[Anonymous No.15674482]

>>15674478
bro like just post the original image

[Anonymous No.15674484]

I can assure people here that every single RLC they buy is dirty with tranny cum, litterally digital tranny cum

[Anonymous No.15674488]

>>15674482
I did
They are here and report it as porn.

[Anonymous No.15674501]

>>15674488
post it again on another board maybe?

[Anonymous No.15674511]

>>15674501
Do you want to jerk off rlc reserved footage?

[Anonymous No.15674529]

>>15674452
>invest
I'm gambling
at this point we have to accept that crypto is one large ponzi and have to bet on projects we can justify mooning (winning) if we want to play the game

[Anonymous No.15674533]

>>15674511
yes

[Anonymous No.15674543]

>>15674529
Do it, just be careful, they're very nervous and they know that a lot of people understood the dump game.
So they will make it start sooner this time.

[Anonymous No.15674867]

iExec's intel partnership is so strong they have to use Golem's Graphene to make use of SGX.
Real projects don't bullshit, they build.

[Anonymous No.15674920]

>>15672537
>buying a bleeding 2017 shitcoin instead of 17M circulating BAND 2x from ICO.

not gonna make it

[Anonymous No.15674939]

>>15674920
Band is just another piece of shit that will drop in a week

[Anonymous No.15675175]

just get EDGE if you want a computing token with actual adoption and economics. No mumbo-jumbo speculation needed, it is literally rising from adoption and people onboarding nodes.

[Anonymous No.15676278]

>>15675175
Definitely. It has more volume than this french scamcoin. Bump it's over Gilles

[Anonymous No.15676357]

>>15674867
They don't have to...
Scone works perfectly fine and arguably better
More likely Intel pushed for iexec to use it
>>15675175
Edge is decentralized and works with smart contracts?

[Anonymous No.15676387]

Oh dadi rebranded to edge lol
Isn't dadi a scam? I stopped following them after the whitepaper issue

[Anonymous No.15676473]

>>15672604
you can't make this up

[Anonymous No.15676502]

>>15676387
>>15676357

Jup its decentralized, it works with smart contracts but not every task is put on the blockchain like with iExec because that's terribly slow and prevents real-time applications like web-hosting/IOT/video streaming.

Nah, never has been a scam, they actually won the award for best edge computing platform last week (https://twitter.com/edgenetwork/status/1174297937251393536)) and nodes are serving production traffic since close to a year now, average earning on a raspberry PI is between $20 and $50 a month, onboarding your own PC is pretty easy as well (https://edge.network/en/updates/network/edge-network-now-onboarding/).).

[Anonymous No.15676594]

>>15674278
kek thank god i only stayed with that shitcoin for a month

[Anonymous No.15676782]

>>15676473
only way to recoup loss after 80% drop is to buy more and wait for 2x up:

100-80%=20

50 x 200%= 100

50-20= 30 sure, throw 150% of what you initially invested again to gilles and hope for a pump at v4.

[Anonymous No.15676852]

>>15676502
Imagine being so stupid to think that edge is in any way similar to iExec

[Anonymous No.15676919]

>>15676852
did I say that brainlet? its actually a lot more advanced and flexible in many points but keep jerking off to "muh poco and muh doracles" or some shit.

[Anonymous No.15676942]

>>15676919
You clearly tried to but failed miserably.

[Anonymous No.15676947]

>>15676942
It's over Gilles, go home

[Anonymous No.15676959]

why is RLC's marketcap way lower than GNT's one?
Golem didnt achieve anything at all yet whereas RLC has a lot of partnerships and nice development

[Anonymous No.15676969]

>>15672537
You forgot a minus sign before that 2x

[Anonymous No.15677000]

>>15672575
zip it
is it another alibaba cloud pump?