/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.15547071]

It’s all just so tiresome

I knew this was gonna get delayed. No way there are 50 startups willing to use chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15547121]

>>15547071
We need only one.

[Anonymous No.15547144]

Uh-oh! Pissed STINKERS incoming!

[Anonymous No.15547167]

>>15547071
You don't know anything pajeet that's why you're poor and shit on the street.

[Anonymous No.15547176]

>>15547071
>after Oracle OpenWorld
So after September 19th.

What's the problem?

[Anonymous No.15547190]

>>15547144
Checked my life rn
He said we would make it last month and all he did was dump his bags. Now there is no hopium left and my dopamine is low.

[Anonymous No.15547218]

>>15547071
As a startup, why the fuck would you want to divert attention from your core business and go through the trouble of running a node to earn $15 per month from selling your literally worthless data. I swear to God this is the most brainlet idea ever.

[Anonymous No.15547235]

>>15547218
>data is worthless
so this is how the mind of a poor person works

[Anonymous No.15547257]

>>15547235
just keep throwing money

[Anonymous No.15547265]

>>15547176
Problem is they delayed it because they don’t have close to 50 startups that wanna use chainlink. Why else would they not announce at their conference as planned

[Anonymous No.15547274]

>>15547218
lmao, the start-ups aren't (all) going to be data sources you dip.
The whole point is applications that implement smart contracts, which may very well power 90% of all mainstream transactions soon.
As it stands now, probably the majority of all crypto projects need oracles.

[Anonymous No.15547277]

Wtf so Fernando won't be giving a talk, this will just be a blog post? Mother fucker

[Anonymous No.15547283]

>>15547274
These aren’t blockchain startups you brainlet

[Anonymous No.15547288]

>>15547071
So my insider information was correct.
They can't find 50 startups willing to bother with this bullshit

[Anonymous No.15547306]

>>15547265
lmao, talk about wishful thinking.

>>15547283
You really have no idea what this is about, do you?
You don't have to be a 'blockchain startup' to develop smart contract-based applications and use cases.
Ever heard of "smart bonds"?
Smart flight insurance?

[Anonymous No.15547309]

So my insider sources were correct: they can't do anything until after SIBOS due to certain NDAs

[Anonymous No.15547344]

>>15547306
Oracle for startups program is only looking to help startups sell their data using chainlink not integrate chainlink to trigger their non existent smart contracts. You need to watch that speech again read that Forbes article.

[Anonymous No.15547428]

>>15547071
guys i found this leak. we all gonna make it

[Anonymous No.15547449]

>>15547428
kek

[Anonymous No.15547553]

>>15547265
>Problem is they delayed it because they don’t have close to 50 startups that wanna use chainlink. Why else would they not announce at their conference as planned
how the fuck did you get to this conclusion you fucking cocksucking whore?

[Anonymous No.15547573]

>>15547428
LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO LITERALLY WHO

[Anonymous No.15547647]

>>15547344
>Oracle for startups program is only looking to help startups sell their data using chainlink not integrate chainlink to trigger their non existent smart contracts.
You have a very narrow understanding of this.

"The program is enabling a new generation of start-ups and developers to collaborate, build, and scale on enterprise-grade solutions like Oracle’s next-generation cloud infrastructure and blockchain-as-a-service.”

[Anonymous No.15547658]

>>15547647
He’s just trying to fud without knowing what he’s fudding about. ignore him

[Anonymous No.15547674]

I've been saying this from the start. Fernando is a good guy but this whole stunt felt completely pointless and amateurish from the start.

[Anonymous No.15547681]

>>15547674
You’re evaluation skill is completely shit

[Anonymous No.15547747]

>>15547681
Did you look into the 3 startups already announced? Seriously they're fucking pajeet bullshit tier even by startups standards. Did you see Fernando interacting on Twitter with the linkies like a complete retard? Did you see the kind of startup people that reached out to him in the Twitter comments? I swear I saw him reply to a roastie running a horoscope website telling her to reach out to him if interested. This whole thing is a joke. He's not gonna deliver 50, and none of them will be valuable data sources. Also in case you haven't noticed all the nodes are running at a loss except for the heartbeat paid for by chainlink itself. No start-up is going to focus on a side gig they don't understand the value of and is bleeding money anyway, even with oracle doing the heavy lifting for them and giving them cheap cloud service. No one is using smart contracts for defi use cases, much less the kind of retarded use cases Fernando presented like clothing inventories.

[Anonymous No.15547779]

>>15547747
Sorry I triggered you nolinker.

[Anonymous No.15547792]

>>15547573
>>52315063
>>52315120
>>52315233
>>52315302
>>52315327
>>52315343
>>52318849
>>52321145
>>52321619
>>52324919
stop

[Anonymous No.15547813]

>>15547647
Yea I’m thinking you’re not getting it bud

[Anonymous No.15547827]

>>15547813
>Chainlink (...) will be leveraged to monetize APIs via smart contracts
So exactly like I said.

[Anonymous No.15547831]

>>15547344
so it'll basically just be 50 more nodes on linkpool marketplace that nobody ends up ever using? Very bullish.

[Anonymous No.15547840]

>>15547827
Honestly whose APIs do you think they are talking about? Startups are the ones selling the data

[Anonymous No.15547846]

>>15547747
>No one is using smart contracts for defi use cases
>No one is using cars for transportation
>No one is using telephones for communication
>No one is using internet for commerce

No one is, until someone does. And then everything changes, forever.

[Anonymous No.15547922]

>>15547747
>roastie running a horoscope website telling her to reach out to him
>valuable data sources
can't wait for the astrological oracle.
>this smart contract is going to pay 1 ETH to X if the stars favor X, and 1 ETH to Y if they favor Y

[Anonymous No.15547928]

>>15547071
It wouldn't matter if they did anyway

[Anonymous No.15547967]

>>15547840
>Honestly whose APIs do you think they are talking about?
According to Fernando, "other enterprise systems".

“In addition, some of our enterprise customers need their blockchain applications to access data from other enterprise systems, and Chainlink approach could potentially be an interesting way to achieve this.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/darrynpollock/2019/07/30/oracle-building-a-virtuous-cycle-of-innovation-with-start-ups-through-chainlink-and-blockchain/#1fc0e1b44ffc

[Anonymous No.15548067]

>>15547967
>enterprise customers

We are talking about the 50 startups. What other enterprise customers will do is just speculation

[Anonymous No.15548135]

>>15548067
Holy shit, you're clueless.
The startups could help Oracle's "enterprise customers" gain access data from "other enterprise systems".

That's literally what that sentence says. How do you misunderstand a simple statement this spectacularly?

[Anonymous No.15548155]

>>15548135
There is no one in the mean on this board. Either sub 90 or over 120

[Anonymous No.15548200]

>>15548155
Unfortunately true, Dunning-Krueger mixed with Poe’s law leaves only old fags insight into the truth.

[Anonymous No.15548211]

>>15548155
i wish you guys would use more pics and fewer words. Not all of us can follow what you guys are talking about

[Anonymous No.15548262]

>>15548211
Gagagoogoo that is a nice peepeepoopoo soon you can go to the looloo

[Anonymous No.15548269]

>>15547190
That is the best time to buy. How do you think we felt at $.17? Nothing but despair and apathy. Most LINKers were too lazy and depressed to buy. Except those smart enough to see the bottom.

Though, I don't think we have completely bottomed out yet. There's still too much hope.

[Anonymous No.15548278]

>>15548135
Lmao you have no idea what you’re saying do you?

Earlier you said “other enterprise systems” would provide the API for the startups. But the startups are the ones selling their data.

>The startups could help Oracle's "enterprise customers" gain access data from "other enterprise systems".

Now tell me how the above statement makes sense to you. You have no idea what an API is do you?

[Anonymous No.15548312]

>>15548278
The more you post the more retarded you sound. I suggest you stop

[Anonymous No.15548353]

>6 years

[Anonymous No.15548360]

>>15548278
>Earlier you said “other enterprise systems” would provide the API for the startups.
Yes.

>But the startups are the ones selling their data.
They're taking API data and putting it on the blockchain

>Now tell me how the above statement makes sense to you.
The Chainlink oracle (run by a startup) fetches data from an API (run by "other enterprise systems") and feeds it on-chain for use in smart contracts by Oracle's "enterprise customers".

You are visibly struggling over the absolute basics here.

[Anonymous No.15548505]

>>15547747
Link to the start ups announced?

[Anonymous No.15548521]

>>15548505
Haven't you seen the quantjeets shilling the shit out being on board. Others are keeping it quiter

[Anonymous No.15548593]

>>15548521
I filtered quant a while ago.

[Anonymous No.15548622]

>>15548593
They are the most amusing shill. Remind me off pajeets in Bombay trying to sell trinklets to tourists. You don't buy but it is fun to watch how engaged they are

[Anonymous No.15549700]

>>15547218
How the fuck do you think smart contracts work? If there's no data, there's no smart contract with real world use case. More data, more smart contracts. More diverse data, more diverse opportunities and scenarios to employ smart contracts.

Do you know what you've invested in in the first place?