I’m too stupid to understand the reading

[Anonymous No.15483438]

But I can tell that they have put lots of time and energy into this. Corporations are going to be using Chainlink aren’t they.

[Anonymous No.15483449]

>>15483438
As much as they are using it at the moment.

[Anonymous No.15483461]

>>15483438
>doesn’t understand it
>looks like they spent time writing this thing
>corporations must use it then

your average linktard

[Anonymous No.15483470]

>>15483461
Somethings are beyond my reach, but Chainlink is going to be pulling in big companies

[Anonymous No.15483492]

>>15483461
I may be too stupid to understand all the technical details, but I know a winner when I see one

[Anonymous No.15483497]

>>15483438
Should be 1k by about 2027. Hopefully you aren't miserable because if you are you probably aren't going to make it to 2027.

[Anonymous No.15483507]

>>15483492
Life is like a box of chocolates.

[Anonymous No.15483511]

Defi is the new boomer buzzword

[Anonymous No.15483519]

>>15483507
I’m going. All the way to the top. You can’t stop me fren. I’m taking link with me

[Anonymous No.15483520]

>>15483492
How do you know it’s gonna be a winner if you dont even understand what it does

[Anonymous No.15483524]

>>15483497

[Anonymous No.15483528]

>>15483438
Sergey paid 20 million for that shit.

[Anonymous No.15483530]

>>15483438
its all talk...its been years of talking

[Anonymous No.15483545]

>>15483519
Jennay, noooooo.

[Anonymous No.15483563]

>>15483520
I know other stuff. I’m pretty smart fren. I’m just technically Illiterate. I know that Google uses Chainlink. Thier Project is ambitious enough to bring in the banks and the jews.

[Anonymous No.15483571]

I just realized there is an 85% chance I’m going to be rich

[Anonymous No.15483573]

>>15483530
YouTube has 20 hours of Chainlink staff pointing at whiteboards and just talking.
Meaningless right?

[Anonymous No.15483578]

>>15483563
No they don't holy shit this meme has to die. They it possible for organizations using link to also use their big query services. They themselves are not, and would not use link.

[Anonymous No.15483585]

>>15483578
That is completely untrue. Google talks about how they use Chainlink. They literally talk about it and have tweeted about it. How dumb do you think I am?

[Anonymous No.15483607]

>>15483585
Show me these tweets where they say they are using chainlink. You're too ignorant of the tech to really get the difference, but I assure you, all they did was make a big query node. That isn't for them. It's for people using links decentralized oracles to connect to their big query services. Google themselves have no use for link beyond cross marketing users of links decentralized oracles.

[Anonymous No.15483608]

>>15483520
Probably because the "best" arguments you swinglinkers / nolinkers (kek I can't even imagine) bring against CL have about as much technical depth as your average "WHEN LINK $1K EOY?" posts.

[Anonymous No.15483610]

>>15483585
>>15483563
>>15483492
>>15483470
>>15483438
Nice bait

[Anonymous No.15483638]

>>15483607
Nice try fren. But I can read. Imagine my lack of shock when I prove myself right by reading 2 paragraphs.

[Anonymous No.15483665]

>>15483638
No...you literally just proved my points, that A. You are too ignorant of the tech to understand the difference, and B. All they did was make a big query node to allow link users(who already have generated a smart contract on the ETH platform) to connect that contract to big query.

[Anonymous No.15483690]

>>15483665
Huh. Good thing I have an IQ above 60. I’ve been on 4chan since 2003. I know when someone is backed into a corner. I know when someone is lying to my face.

[Anonymous No.15483695]

>>15483665
Yea... This allows smart contracts (A NEW INDUSTRY) to use google data in them. Pretty huge. So you think no one wants google to put their stuff in smart contracts? Or just trust google to handle it for them? The answer is they’ll choose the former. Smart contracts will use google data because people trust google with their data but want additional guarantees of security. All it take is an adapter.

[Anonymous No.15483723]

>>15483690
Well..I really doubt it's above 95, because I'm a link maximalist, despite the truth I've laid out for you. It literally says exactly what I'm saying to you. It may as well be an advertisement, here this will sum it up for you in a hopefully easier to understand format
> Hey faggot
> Do you have a smart contract(Dapp) and want to connect it to the big query service?
> Now you can do that by using the middleware Chainlink!
Again, Google themselves is not using it. Fucking 50+ Oracle startups are launching in days, and You're obsessing over this old news that you don't even understand?

[Anonymous No.15483734]

>>15483695
Yes exactly, way to properly frame the bullish angle of the news. It doesn't change the fact at all that Google is not using chainlink. They aren't. They are allowing people using link to connect to them, Which is pretty bullish by itself.

[Anonymous No.15483753]

>>15483734
I’m sorry. It sounds like what you are talking in backwards fancy talk.

You are making a distinction without any real difference. I know that much.

>>15483723
>95

How generous. I’m not here to insult your intelligence. I’m insulting your motives. It’s almost like you are arguing in bad faith. You know - from talking points

[Anonymous No.15483780]

>>15483753
Oh my god...no...I'm not doing either one and I had no interest in insulting your intelligence. They are entirely different things. Google is NOT using chainlink. They simply made it possible for people using link to also use Googles Big Query services. How this could be a distinction without difference to you again is only because you don't understand the tech.

[Anonymous No.15483812]

>>15483780
Have you read the blog article tard?

Google big Q is a nothing burger that shilled the link market to the crypto community.

[Anonymous No.15483840]

[Anonymous No.15483853]

>>15483438

He inhales deeply then takes out a Cuban cigar. Lighting first a $100 bill then using it light the cigar. You can smell the ashy scent lingering in the room as the smoke drifts up.

"Th-they said... $32 million dollars isn't worth my Oracle solution."

Ecstasy over-flowing your body, you prepare yourself for the joy.

"Just imagine all the data being sanitized by reputation, like Uber. No sybil attacks, all ERC20 based."

He lets out another fart and grunts again.

"Another 700k!"

You shout ecstatically, "build that oracle solution, buy that towncrier! hire more devs!"

"I've give you something to cry about" He replies. Once more he grunts again and shits a violent flow of diarrhea, this time getting on your chin and lip.

"Who needs toliets?" He questions a shadowy figure in the corner.

"One of my Pajeet devs" He says smiling.

"I'll shill for you Master!" As you cry out, the sloppy heap of shit covering your body as it slides down.

"1k EOY is FUD!"

"No... I will give you the fud." He grunts again and proceeds to let out a gassy fart.

"Another 700k!" He cries out as he lets his sweet, hairy cheeks flap as another shit dumps out.

"Yeah, you like it linklet don't you? Who's my marine?"

[Anonymous No.15483906]

>>15483780
Well now come the actual retards fighting you tooth and nail. Google letting companies connect to them via Link? Sounds like Google is using link. Maybe I’m too dumb to figure this out, but I don’t think so.

See you at the top fren :)

[Anonymous No.15483966]

>>15483438
lol the chainlink people are still not in jail yet

[Anonymous No.15483979]

16.8k SATSSSSS STINKERS HOW MUCH BTC HAVE YOU LOST HOLDING

[Anonymous No.15483983]

>>15483906
Well yeah, those are just the normal link posters, but I really don't understand how you don't understand the difference. Google isn't using link. People who use link can now use Google. These are completely different things. But yeah, see you at the top.

[Anonymous No.15484001]

>>15483438
It means chainlink $10k eoy

[Anonymous No.15484015]

>>15483983
We pump tonight

[Anonymous No.15484054]

>>15483578

[Anonymous No.15484083]

>>15483780
>>15483723
>>15483665
>>15483607
>>15483578
>hurrrr Google is not using Chainlink!
See pic.

Google Cloud has been running a testnet node.

[Anonymous No.15484091]

>>15484083
>>15483780
>>15483723
>>15483665
>>15483607
>>15483578
>>15483983

... and also see pic.
Pay attention to the red box.

[Anonymous No.15484154]

>>15484083
>>15484091

Make sure you rub it in thier face for ALL eternity. Even a retard like me can read Google documents and see what’s plain as day. They want to split so many hairs they end up sounding - well - foolish.

[Anonymous No.15484176]

>>15484154
>They want to split so many hairs they end up sounding - well - foolish.
There's been a lot of that regarding Chainlink.

Like how people keep fudding "muh centralized data sources" as if that defeats the purpose of decentralized oracles. Meanwhile the entire world as we know it is currently running on those same "centralized data sources".
To put it in an analogy: they're basically fudding the earth's atmosphere to convince you never to breathe from Scuba air tanks.

[Anonymous No.15484404]

>>15483492
just wait for link to reach 1000$ THEN buy link because then itd be a winner.

[Anonymous No.15484933]

>>15483983
they literally integrated chainlink into their blockchain connectivity protocol you dumb nigger.
its not like google is just opening an api endpoint.
google actually integrated chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15484952]

>>15484176
based, tgis just shows that those fudders are just retards who want to buy cheap

[Anonymous No.15484970]

why everyone is looking into Chainlink and ignoring projects for normies? Like ambrosus for supply chain, VID for social media, Pledgecamp for crowdfunding

[Anonymous No.15485030]

>>15483563
>I know that google uses chainlink

[Anonymous No.15485420]

>>15485030
kek linkers are so technically illiterate they still haven't figured out Google was a fake partnership. No wonder they think Chainlink has great tech, they understand nothing of it. They're definitely gonna hold this to 0.

[Anonymous No.15485472]

>>15484970
Because LINK can do all that as well. And it will.

[Anonymous No.15485783]

>>15484083
>>15484091
Holy shit You're retarded. Yes like I've said over, and over for the other retard, they have a big query node. IT IS NOT FOR THEM. THEY ARE NOT USING LINK. THEY HAVE A NODE THAT ALLOWS USERS OF LINK TO CONNECT TO THEIR BIG QUERY SERVICES. Like seriously how do you faggots not understand this?

[Anonymous No.15485792]

>>15485783
>yes they have a Chainlink node
>no they are not using Chainlink

Pick one please.

[Anonymous No.15485824]

>>15485792
> Google is using Chainlink
> Google created a way for link users to use their big query services
> Being so fucking stupid you see these as the same thing

[Anonymous No.15485839]

>>15485824
"Running a Chainlink node" = "using Chainlink".

It's not just the end user (client) that's using Chainlink, it's also the node operator.

[Anonymous No.15485840]

>>15483571
What's your stack size Anon

[Anonymous No.15485867]

>>15485839
Sure, but their node has 1 purpose. To allow people to access their big query services. They are not using link in ANY of their operation, at all, they are selling their services to link users. Saying that's Google using link is disingenuous at best, retarded at worst. It's closer to cross marketing than it is them 'using' it.

[Anonymous No.15485882]

>>15485867
>They are not using link in ANY of their operation, at all

[Anonymous No.15485897]

>>15485882
Okay I'm done, you're as technologically retarded as the other anon. Google is totes using it, it's such a crucial part of the company, where oh where would they be if they didn't use link.

[Anonymous No.15485904]

>>15485897
Cope, I guess.

[Anonymous No.15485940]

>>15485904
How is it a cope when as I said in an earlier post, am all-in link? You're again just too retarded to even understand the difference between using something internally which is what is heavily implied when one says 'Google is using link', and receiving link tokens as payment for allowing smart contract users access to their big query services. At least the other anon admits he doesn't understand the tech, meanwhile you keep on pretending.

[Anonymous No.15486002]

>>15485940
>using something internally which is what is heavily implied when one says 'Google is using link'
Running a node = using Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15486021]

>>15486002
Yup totes man like i said, where oh where would they be without the crucial integration that chainlink was, they use it oh so much for oh so much, it's a partnership really.

[Anonymous No.15486027]

>>15486021
You can keep babbling, but it won't change the fact that you're wrong.

Please explain how running a Chainlink node is not using Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15486056]

>>15483438
You a dumb nigger no one is using chainlink, there is no use ir need. Sorry you got scammed. Not sorry faggot

[Anonymous No.15486070]

>>15484091
I can run an Ethereum node on GCP right now in a few clicks lmao. How absolutely backward are you?

[Anonymous No.15486072]

>>15483438
testing pass

[Anonymous No.15486082]

>>15486070
haha what?

[Anonymous No.15486084]

>>15486027
Because they are only 'using' it as a way to sell big query services to smart contract developers. They don't use it themselves, for anything internal to Google. They are using link to access a market. You can keep pretending this is some mega huge thing, but the price is more than enough evidence that the market as a whole has already realized the insignificance of their 'using' link. Openlaw uses link in the way you're pretending Google does, which don't, only to sell their services to actual users of link, like openlaw and other literal who's. Again fucking Oracle startups launch in days, and you're obsessing over news everyone else has already understood, processed, and disregarded. The only bullish aspect of this is that Google sees it as a market worth reaching.

[Anonymous No.15486089]

>>15486084
>Because they are only 'using' it
Thanks for conceding.
Took you a while though.

[Anonymous No.15486096]

>>15486084
>They are using link to access a market.
How would that even make sense?
Google Cloud/BigQuery does not develop smart contracts, they provide data analysis.

[Anonymous No.15486103]

>>15486021
in order to run a node, you have to create an oracle contract that uses the chainlink SDK.
in order to run a chailink node you have to install chainlink on dedicated servers, and create specific adapters to supply the bigQuery data.

so google is :
- creating chainlink adapters for bigquery
- accepting link tokens as payment for requesting their node
- creating oracle contracts on the ETH blockchain
- creating consumer contracts to test their chainlink node
- have a chainlink ETH adress for their node

[Anonymous No.15486108]

>>15483438
dumb fucking linkers

[Anonymous No.15486117]

>>15485867
>>15486089
I said the same thing here you fucking moron. They are using link. To sell their big query services to dapp developers. How one can pretend this is the same as any other link node operator is simply delusion. Again, Google is not using it in any of the same regards the literal whos like open law are. It's again closer to cross marketing than it is an actual use of link.

[Anonymous No.15486122]

>>15486117
>They are using link.
Thanks for conceding again.
I heard you the first time, but thanks anyway.

[Anonymous No.15486138]

>>15486117
google will probably release a bigQuery external adapter for other node operators to run.

to allow for decentralization.

so google is going to contribute to the chainlink network by providing adapters also.

[Anonymous No.15486144]

>>15486122
> Doesn't seem to understand the entire market has already realized exactly what I'm saying
> Doesn't understand it's closer to cross marketing than actual usage
Dude I just an ad for Google on Direct TV, Google confirmed for using Direct TV, LONG DIRECT TV NOW!

[Anonymous No.15486150]

>>15483438
Chainlink (CHINK) will fail because ETH is about to fail. Blockchain agnostic is a meme.

[Anonymous No.15486192]

>>15486144
You said Google Cloud wasn't using Chainlink. You then said they were.
This is you conceding.

My point has been made.

>Dude I just an ad for Google on Direct TV
But did you see an ad for Direct TV on Google?

[Anonymous No.15486268]

>>15486192
>an ad for Direct TV on Google?
and BY Google, of course.

[Anonymous No.15486307]

>>15486268
a better analogy would be to say that google provides directTV through their cloud platform.

[Anonymous No.15486325]

>>15484176
>fudding the earth's atmosphere to convince you never to breathe from Scuba air tanks
Nice analogy

[Anonymous No.15486336]

>>15486307
Just going with his dumbass example.

[Anonymous No.15486367]

>>15485940
>Derrrrrrrr

[Anonymous No.15486385]

>>15483853
LMAO

[Anonymous No.15486401]

>>15486325
Dorner survived his Big Bear cabin fire by breathing from one of his scuba tanks in its basement.

[Anonymous No.15486465]

>>15484176
>they're basically fudding the earth's atmosphere to convince you never to breathe from Scuba air tanks.
this should be a banner

[Anonymous No.15487292]

They were funded to build impossible to build decentralized oracles, when they realized they spent all the money without delivering a functional product, they quickly wrote a techno babble paper that no one understands to divert attention

[Anonymous No.15487337]

>>15486401
I unironically hope this is true. Guy was a patriot.

[Anonymous No.15488371]

We are moving up

[Anonymous No.15488387]

>>15488371
aaaaand it is gone

[Anonymous No.15488399]

[Anonymous No.15488410]

>>15483507
we've all been pasting law of attraction maniac pastas every single day for the past 2 years, life is a box of chocolat isn't beyond us fren

[Anonymous No.15489312]

>>15485030
Lmao you have no idea what is coming
Chainlink will be used to monetize data that previously couldn't be monetized. Lot's of that kind of data sitting in Google cloud.
>Be Uber
>Be use Google Cloud for backend
>Have collected an incredible amount of data but unable to sell it due to privacy concerns
>Enter Chainlink
>Be Privacy preserving transport layer
>Use this layer to sell data directly over various blockchains (Ethereum, Hyperledger, Corda, etc.)
>No need to hire legal teams
>No need to invest your own resources in developing generic privacy preserving tech
>Just rely on smartcontract.com + IC3
You actually just win.

[Anonymous No.15489348]

>>15487337
If you don't have a fireproof basement spider hole and oxygen tanks on standby then you're just asking ZOG to bbq your black asshole.

[Anonymous No.15489369]

>>15489312
Can you explain more about this? I've never understood about selling API data. I know that companies could sell it to smartcontracts that need that kind of data, but why would regular businesses get involved in blockchain and then buy data. Couldn't they just spin up some server and be compliant with some privacy regulations? Or is it because with blockchain you don't have to trust them to be compliant?

[Anonymous No.15489443]

>>15489369
Bump

[Anonymous No.15489547]

>>15489369
The entire point of oracles is to tansmit data to the blockchain for use in smart contracts.

Smart contracts are automatic, and so far blockchain is the only medium that is "trustless" enough to carry them out.
Only problem is: blockchains are deterministic by definition, and they need "oracles" to insert external data.
That's why ETH smart contracts so far have only been able to create and transmit crypto tokens.

In that guy's example with Uber, you could for instance use GPS and clock data from both the driver's phone and the passenger's phone (i.e. two independent data sources) to confirm a ride took place and the length of said ride.
This GPS and clock data could then be transmitted to the blockchain, where the smart contract automatically pays the sum for that specific distance/time from the passenger's bank account into the driver's bank account.
All automatic, and hardly ever any disputes.

If said payment involves fiat, then that transaction would also involve oracles and a smart contract; after all, fiat-to-crypto is one of iconic use cases for oracles/smart contracts.

[nj No.15489561]

>>15483438
yeah they will, eventually everyone will join the crypto bizz and if we should too, so instead of thinking about how and why, just invest in Telecoin,TELEX etc before its too late..

[Anonymous No.15489724]

>>15483438

So, A lot of what Mixicles, DECO, Towncrier is offering is about an extra layer of security and privacy.

However, when we talk about privacy everyones mind goes to something like that of Monero.

Id like to start a discussion of what I think Chainlink oracles + extra layers (Mixicles, DECO, TC) is leading to.

For starters, I think this part of the blockchain stack will enable users to verify identity and while staying private. Like..

Name, Bank account info/value, Crypto account info/value, Drivers license, passports, any other type of verification id, Age, home address etc....

Why is this valuable?

This is needed for a plethora of applications that is coming for smartcontract execution. Like...

If your gonna buy something utilizing a smartcontract are you who you say you are and do you have the funds to execute this transaction if off chain events occur. With privacy, you can prove this without comprimising any information to the parties your dealing with.

How about logging into a website that uses smartcontracts on the back end. privacy, its your data, but will be used to enter the contract aka buy and sell something.

How about wallets and send/receive functions that don't require getting to know tediously long address. with privacy and verification authentication you can just send the funds and which creates an environment that the normy is used to and will help onboarding people into using smartcontracts and crypto.

anyways, just throwing out some thoughts.Would love to here some feedback.

[Anonymous No.15489729]

>>15486084
>the market realizes
What market bro?
We ARE the new fund managers
Marines office who hold will qualify as INSTITUTIONAL node operators
Welcome to the 4IR

[Anonymous No.15489755]

>>15489724
Eat a fucking dick you cock sucking motherfucker. We can hollow all over each other AHWAHAHAHAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAWAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.15489777]

>>15489547
>In that guy's example with Uber, you could for instance use GPS and clock data from both the driver's phone and the passenger's phone (i.e. two independent data sources) to confirm a ride took place and the length of said ride.
>This GPS and clock data could then be transmitted to the blockchain, where the smart contract automatically pays the sum for that specific distance/time from the passenger's bank account into the driver's bank account.
>All automatic, and hardly ever any disputes.
And then the passenger's phone die out or GPS is non functional or clock is manually set on wrong timezone and either the passenger or the driver is getting fucked because some dump contract does not compute it correctly. And there is no way to fix this because oracles and smart contracts.

Welcome to the fourth industrial revolution.

[Anonymous No.15489790]

where the fuck are the millions i was promised sergey you stupid fat russian mother fucker

[Anonymous No.15489813]

>>15489755
Yes, I fucked your mom. whats new.

[Anonymous No.15489839]

>>15489813
That is nasty anon. She weights roughly 140kg and is 75. You must have a stomach like a mexican trashcan

[Anonymous No.15489852]

>>15489839

How did you know. yeah. stomach of steel.

[Anonymous No.15489853]

Nice! Just sold 750k!

[Anonymous No.15489875]

>>15489777
>y2k will kill all computers because the date won't roll over correctly
>cars will kill you because unlike a horse they cannot see danger
>steel weapons are bad because they rust, copper will never be replaced

Welcome to the mind of the stagnant boomer.

[Anonymous No.15490086]

this thread gave me AIDS

[Anonymous No.15490156]

>>15490086
>implying you haven't been HIV positive for years bug chaser

[Anonymous No.15490472]

Hello, oldfag here
I didn't follow ChainLink like you everyday fudding like retards...well the FUD meme are retard and there is a kind of fetish reading into all the retarded FUD surronfing ChainLink, /ourcoin/.... seen it going to 4$+ and didn't sold, but my question now is:
What is this privacy smart contracts feature? Enigma and dero GTFO?
Does this mean that corporations are not afraid cause their transactions are private on the blockchain?

[Anonymous No.15490556]

>>15490472
>old fag
Cringe larp

[Anonymous No.15490566]

>>15490472
Yes. Enigma and dero were literal jokes anyway, link is literally the industry standart.

[Anonymous No.15490605]

>>15489369
Because they can conduct business with little friction between borders. If your data is in the EU, it is a nightmare to sell it across the border, which is a total loss for AI researchers for example. If you can provide guarantees then this friction goes away. It's all about getting around regulations in the easiest way possible, which shouldn't be a surprise considering we're talking about mega-corps like Google here.

[Anonymous No.15490675]

>>15489875
Kek

[Anonymous No.15490688]

>>15485783
>run a bigquery chainlink node
>not using chainlink
Wew

[Anonymous No.15490697]

>>15489777

This, just like in notaries, they still use typewritters from 1917

[Anonymous No.15490735]

>>15485940
>run chainlink node
>set up chainlink jobs
>write chainlink adapters for your cloud platform components
>manage chainlink oracle contract
>create chainlink test consumer contracts
>write chainlink documentation

Hey google, u using chainlink?
-Whats that larry? Never heard of it

[Anonymous No.15490774]

Mixicles are like pic related from normanbook

[Anonymous No.15490916]

>>15490688
>>15490735
they're not using it. One guy made a blog post explaining that he tried it. That's it. They're not using it anymore.

That's very obvious to anyone who has used big query or even understands what it does. You certainly do not. Learn some programming before investing in software projects. You're like an ape playing chess.

You're smug about your "technical knowledge" but you're actually incorrect. It's really pathetically hilarious. See you at 0.2

[Anonymous No.15490926]

>>15490916
>they're not using it.
Google Cloud have been running a testnet node for months now you brainlet.

[Anonymous No.15490933]

>>15490916
Is what you do for fun or are you paid to FUD LINK?

I've been debating about joining in the shitpost fun

[Anonymous No.15490962]

Hold on. Let me give this a try..

Hey stinky linkies, did you know that NEO has its own Oracles? Bet you drumpf supporters didn't know that. Why would anyone use an ECR20 token when they can use their own coin in the blockspace?

Checkmate atheists.

[Anonymous No.15491087]

Why people here do they fud like retards? Do they believe that biz drives the price?
I think at every pump is reasonable to expect a circa -50% of profit taking
4$--> 1,60$
10$ --> 4$
40$ --> 100$
100$ (hype) --> 40$
40$ ---> 200$...and so on

[Anonymous No.15491109]

>>15483438
so what?

[Anonymous No.15491111]

>>15490926
>Google Cloud have been running a testnet node for months
proof of this?

[Anonymous No.15491125]

>>15491111
Go to: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/building-hybrid-blockchain-cloud-applications-with-ethereum-and-google-cloud

ctrl+f "our documentation for requesting data from BigQuery via Chainlink"
This phrase is a hyperlink, click it.

Post your findings.

[Anonymous No.15491126]

>>15491111
Do you really think Google would entrust some NEET project?

Not gonna lie, former Chainlink node operator here. This is fucking hilarious watching Sergey crash and burn. But in all seriousness we can't let this guy get the big mac secret sauce.

[Anonymous No.15491129]

Digital real-estate.

[Anonymous No.15491215]

>>15490472
id say that ENG and DERO BTFO for sure. Who else is in the privacy game?

i think also scalling projects will be next on the list.

LINK is constantly evolving and can integrate with or update into whatever Ethereum needs. Its an update-able layer and Chainlink will make a lot of projects obsolete. ENG is just one of the many to come.

[Anonymous No.15491259]

>>15483690
>>15483665
i'll vouch, somewhat. it is not what you think, but it is bullish for other reasons. this is not a 'partnership', but a blog post explaining to chainlink users how to use a google service.

It's like a restaurant that leaves a flyer on your door and tells you how you can have a yummy dinner. it's bullish because anytime somebody tries to lookup 'how to use bigquery api on smart contract', the chainlink example will pop up and they'll be likely to use it.

baka i can't believe im spoonfeeding newfags

[Anonymous No.15491285]

>>15491259
i'll expand a bit to be clearer.
> It's like a restaurant that leaves a flyer on your door and tells you how you can have a yummy dinner.
** it is not a partnership between you and the restaurant. And no, a jpeg of how a chainlink node on a blog post doesn't mean that google is running a node...

> it's bullish because anytime somebody tries to lookup 'how to use bigquery api on smart contract' .... etc.

[Anonymous No.15491294]

>>15491125
it's a testnet...so nothing important?

[Anonymous No.15491309]

>>15483438
yeah they are gonna, I don't know why we are even supporting this?? the main reason we went for coins so that this doesn't happen.. thank god I invested in Telecoin and TELEX as well

[Anonymous No.15491313]

>>15489875
chekt and boomers get rekt

[Anonymous No.15491321]

>>15491215
>i think also scalling projects will be next on the list.
how? Theresold signature it's a good beginning... but scaling it's not a problem, LINK is blockchain agnostic

[Anonymous No.15491380]

>>15491294
lmao, read the rest of that article. It's all about using the mainnet.