SWIFT and Chainlink

[Anonymous No.15415428]

https://twitter.com/LarsJen03259950/status/1166584241829961728?s=19
Be ready. September is coming.

[Anonymous No.15415436]

>>15415428
>literally who?
thanks for the hopium bro

[Anonymous No.15415445]

Holy shit, we made it fellas

[Anonymous No.15415446]

>>15415428
truffle and web3 all over again. let the hype and letdown cycle begin.

[Anonymous No.15415456]

>>15415428

afaik the chainlink team aren’t at SIBOS this year, and this is the demonstration of a different poc

[Anonymous No.15415458]

>>15415456
>>15415446
this

[Anonymous No.15415464]

>>15415428
>Linking SWIFT gpi
>Linking
>Link
Holy shit we made it frens

[Anonymous No.15415477]

>>15415456
Which POC is this

[Anonymous No.15415479]

>>15415456
I'm so torn. On the one hand the Chainlink network is too young to have really proven itself in this context.
But on the other hand, what other technology could possibly connect SWIFT gpi with Corda? It has to be an oracle, and Chainlink is the only team working anywhere near SWIFT. The only other option is some in-house literally who that absolutely nobody sees coming, but why the fuck would SWIFT use that when Chainlink is right there?
Chainlink has to be powering gpi Link, it just has to be.

[Anonymous No.15415486]

[Anonymous No.15415487]

Chainlink is part of gpi link at least faggots

[Anonymous No.15415490]

>>15415479

[Anonymous No.15415495]

>>15415428

[Anonymous No.15415500]

>you mean gpi link?
>gpi chainlink?
Sounded sweet in my ears

[Anonymous No.15415503]

>>15415490
and this

[Anonymous No.15415516]

So my guess that there would not be any reputation implements because the team haven’t implemented Service Agreements yet

[Anonymous No.15415522]

https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/swift-to-bring-benefits-of-gpi-to-dlt-and-trade-ecosystems
>>15415477>>15415479
It's this, gpi Link. It's just Corda as far as I can tell, Corda built a centralized oracle on their own platform

[Anonymous No.15415527]

>>15415522
Corda settler uses chainlink you absolute fucking brainlet>>15415487

[Anonymous No.15415529]

>>15415490
THEIR OWN THEIR OWN THEIR OWN THEIR OWN THEIR OWN THEIR OWN THEIR OWN THEIR OWN
The shadowfork is real gents

[Anonymous No.15415536]

>>15415428

Why would sergey sell if he knew it would pump soom obviously having this information? Hes dumping 700k links regularly for dev costs but clearly could be doing it later for a better price.

Makes no sense

[Anonymous No.15415541]

September isn't being hyped by discord trannies but by morons. Neither SIBOS nor PDS2 are going to have immediate impact for link.

[Anonymous No.15415543]

>>15415527
I'll believe it when it happens

[Anonymous No.15415544]

>>15415529

WORKING WITH WORKING WITH WORKING WITH WORKING WITH WORKING WITH WORKING WITH WORKING WITH WORKING WITH

[Anonymous No.15415546]

>>15415428
Who cares, it's just another network user, a fish in the ocean, the network is growing well and the network/compound effect will take it exponential

[Anonymous No.15415549]

>>15415536
You need to spend money to make money, fren

[Anonymous No.15415550]

>>15415428
>swift
literally who?

[Anonymous No.15415557]

>>15415536
exactly this,

once sergey started selling i started selling


no fucking regret.

all i have left is a 10k stack of link i dont care what happens about it i already took out my initial investment and more

[Anonymous No.15415569]

>>15415557

Literally no one has been able to prove unequivocally that those tokens have been sold. Feel free, we're all waiting.

[Anonymous No.15415580]

>>15415549
>You need to dump in order to pump

[Anonymous No.15415589]

>>15415428
However Quant is the only crypto team invited to SIBOS 2019

[Anonymous No.15415594]

>>15415522
>It's this, gpi Link. It's just Corda as far as I can tell, Corda built a centralized oracle on their own platform

correct

>>15415527
>Corda settler uses chainlink you absolute fucking brainlet

no it doesn't. it uses a shit tier ripple oracle. check the github.

https://github.com/corda/corda-settler/tree/master/oracle

[Anonymous No.15415622]

>>15415589
This.
The CL team isn't even invited.

[Anonymous No.15415626]

>>15415446
I just wish this time there will be a hype cycle, not just a dump like web3.

[Anonymous No.15415640]

>>15415589
Quant is the gonna be top 5 for sure

[Anonymous No.15415669]

>>15415544
Yeah in advisory capacity goober

[Anonymous No.15415671]

>>15415589
>>15415622
>>15415640

shoo pajeets

[Anonymous No.15415676]

>>15415594
>no it doesn't. it uses a shit tier ripple oracle. check the github.

JUST

[Anonymous No.15415677]

>>15415594
Fuck you're actually right:
>https://github.com/corda/corda-settler/blob/master/oracle/src/main/kotlin/com/r3/corda/finance/obligation/oracle/services/XrpOracleService.kt

[Anonymous No.15415690]

>>15415677
Just fuck my shit up

[Anonymous No.15415692]

these millenial high hopers with their news & announcements are getting old... Price aint moving nowhere but down... Let go... You can still have Instagram followers even if you failed to be a crypto millionaire

[Anonymous No.15415710]

>>15415622
Just like Chainlink was only having the one speech at Web3...

[Anonymous No.15415730]

>>15415710
Adlyn is in charge of marketing and conferences so anything is possible. Spelling mistakes are guaranteed

[Anonymous No.15415735]

>>15415692
Why the fuck do you care so much what I do with my money? I will literally never sell faggot

[Anonymous No.15415748]

errr... its your mommys money, i feel bad for her

[Anonymous No.15415758]

>>15415594
>>15415677
>>15415676
Corda Settler is a project that aims to process ALL types of settlements, meaning legacy transactions (fiat, financial instruments, ...) as well as crypto.
They picked Ripple as their first example of crypto because of two reasons:

1) Corda have an ancient agreement (with a lot of troubled history btw) with Ripple, meaning they have a ton of XRP on their hands.

2) Ripple made that oracle for XRP way back in 2014, and literally all it can do is relay the price of XRP (i.e. a single-use, centralized oracle from the dark ages of oracles). So it was convenient.

This latter point tells us one huge thing: Corda will rely on external oracles for its crypto functionality, going for the most convenient solution.
And as soon as they want to add more cryptos to their Settler product, they will once again choose the most convenient oracle solution, which will be the universal standard in oracles.
Two guesses whom that will be.

[Anonymous No.15415761]

JUST

[Anonymous No.15415771]

>>15415677

i posted it in a previous thread and retards said i was fudding. this board has really gone to shit recently and it feels like all the OG linkies have left...

anyway to summarise from all the available information we have:

>we do not know for sure if SWIFT is still working with the CL team
>we know for sure there were talks to take the CL POC to the next stage
>r3's corda settler does not use CL as an oracle
>corda settler is a POC to be demonstrated at SIBOS 2019
>this does not necessarily mean that SWIFT is not working with CL anymore

[Anonymous No.15415772]

>>15415544
As in Smart Contract the company (working with) not using ChainLink (the product).

Possible scenario..

[Anonymous No.15415773]

>>15415771
See >>15415758

[Anonymous No.15415782]

>>15415748
What a reply, please kys redditcuck

[Anonymous No.15415788]

og linkies probably already died... got tired of waiting something that will never happened and inserted a fork into power socket.

[Anonymous No.15415792]

>>15415772
>hurrr Swift is "working with" SmartContract, not Chainlink!!
Pic is the main slide from Sergey's Sibos 2017 presentation.

Count how many times it says "Chainlink".
Protip: it's 6.
6 times.

[Anonymous No.15415804]

The only thing that comings, is the coming end of the ALGORAND Staking Program. If you wanna earn some solid passive income, stake Algorand.

[Anonymous No.15415806]

>>15415788
No, we just sit around and laugh about the pathetic FUD

[Anonymous No.15415811]

have sex incels

[Anonymous No.15415825]

>>15415758
>>15415792
Now THIS is good info.
The quality of pro-Link posts is ramping up.

[Anonymous No.15415836]

>>15415825
This is from 2017 nulinky

[Anonymous No.15415838]

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY! HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

[Anonymous No.15415857]

>>15415758
Thanks for clarifying, anon. It seemed so obvious that Chainlink would be the default oracle that the xrp documentation threw me for a second.

[Anonymous No.15415866]

>>15415804
Coming to this now.
#allin

[Anonymous No.15415867]

>>15415836
Sure shut the fudders up, don’t be salty.

Also, that Corda Settler info isn’t from 2017. Keep trying.

[Anonymous No.15415881]

>>15415836
>corda/ripple court case fucking ripple for any future projects and corda financially
Idiot, that is from late 2018, stupid tranny

[Anonymous No.15415886]

>>15415857
If that threw you for a second you are a literal NPC that can't think for himself, literally kys

[Anonymous No.15415900]

>>15415881
And late 2018 isn’t 2017, like I said.
And don’t pretend you knew about the XRP oracle being from 2014.

Stay salty.

[Anonymous No.15415927]

>>15415758
>literally all it can do is relay the price of XRP

wow surprise, that’s sounds so familiar. Because that’s exactly the only thing Chainlink does, checking the eth price.

[Anonymous No.15415932]

>>15415927
Read Sergey's mainnet blog post.
And the white paper.

[Anonymous No.15415945]

>>15415900
>salty
could you be more defensive?
Go back to where you came from

[Anonymous No.15415962]

>>15415945
Because the most inane fud and retarded larps get all kinds of recognition, while actually legit info gets none because of dismissive idiots like you.

[Anonymous No.15415966]

>>15415932
For god sake I’ve read those dozens of times, you linktards have always the same answer? I repeat, the only thing Chainlink can do right now is checking the fucking eth price.

[Anonymous No.15415980]

>>15415966
>For god sake I’ve read those dozens of times
Then you would know exactly what Chainlink aims to become, why Chainlink is the way it is right now, and exactly when that will change.

Following this "now now now" logic, Bitcoin doesn't process any payments at all because they're not instant.

[Anonymous No.15415990]

>>15415962
Again attention whore fuck off to where you came from. Alone that you replied to me pointing out the late 2018 ripple/r3 court case with
>hurdur 2018 isn't 2017
shows that you don't belong here
shoo shoo, be an upboat farming attention whore somewhere else

[Anonymous No.15416004]

it's all so tiresome

[Anonymous No.15416008]

>>15415927
wrong, you can also check halo 5 scores

[Anonymous No.15416012]

>>15415428
more breadcrum
ducks are aligned

[Anonymous No.15416025]

>>15415990
2018 isn't 2017, stop trying to salvage your ego.

[Anonymous No.15416032]

>>15415990
Imagine being this salty.

[Anonymous No.15416040]

>>15416025
>>15416032
do you idiots know what Ids are?

[Anonymous No.15416043]

>>15416040
Sure, why?

[Anonymous No.15416047]

I hate PoC's

[Anonymous No.15416056]

>>15416043
Because I'm not >>15415836
retarded color blind pajeet

[Anonymous No.15416060]

did you hear the latest news ... said every moonboi every year :D:D:D:D

[Anonymous No.15416061]

>>15415541
This. It won’t matter though, smoothbrains will hype September and we will dump.

[Anonymous No.15416067]

>>15416056
Do you have dementia?
Did you forget you posted this just minutes ago: >>15415990
?

[Anonymous No.15416091]

>>15416056
I just noticed what happened. You could’ve just pointed out the simple mistake instead of getting defensive.

[Anonymous No.15416115]

>>15415771
It does feel like the level of understanding about chainlink has plummeted. There’s not even the level of assumed knowledge anymore, it’s just nulinkers.

[Anonymous No.15416117]

>>15416047
based

[Anonymous No.15416136]

>>15415886
Cheer up

[Anonymous No.15416162]

>>15415825
This is old. This is why nulinkers have no idea. Lucky for you buying the google/coinbase pump isn't bad, unlike the same thing happening for any other shitcoin ever.

[Anonymous No.15416170]

>>15416008
>wrong, you can also check halo 5 scores
kek

[Anonymous No.15416205]

>>15415966
> claims that he has read these documents
> still asks questions which the documents answer
So you're a confirmed brainlet with 0 reading comprehension skills. Thanks for clarifying, anon.

[Anonymous No.15416296]

>>15416115
>It does feel like the level of understanding about chainlink has plummeted. There’s not even the level of assumed knowledge anymore, it’s just nulinkers.

yeah. just nulinkers posting 'tl;dr not selling', 'have sex', 'dilate' etc. it's fucking frustrating and makes me wonder why i even come on here anymore, and they'll be the first ones to post threads asking why the price is dumping after SIBOS after hyping it up for no reason.

[Anonymous No.15416423]

>>15415446
>>15415456

Correct

[Anonymous No.15416485]

>>15415671
Shoo me all you want sirs, but your not gonna get many riches. I've been dumped on sibos once, not gonna let it happen twice

[Anonymous No.15416492]

>>15416162
>This is old.
t. didn’t know half the shit in that post.

[Anonymous No.15416497]

>>15415569
You don't need proof, they already admitted it and put in the small print (a third will be dumped on the market). It's normal practice in cryptospace now, they learned from XRP.

[Anonymous No.15416531]

>>15415838
You are a maniac

[Anonymous No.15416552]

>>15415536
He isn't dumping fren, he is building out the network that will drive it's future success. Bullish not negative unless you are short sighted and can't see the Forrest for the trees. Very comfy with my stack, and truly blessed. Remember to do good with your blessings and give back Marines.

[Anonymous No.15416562]

Chainlink wasn’t even invited to sibos? Which is weird because all swift connected enterprises are.

[Anonymous No.15416587]

I’ll say this once for people who are putting their lives into a chainlink announcement:


There are less than 50 nodes currently. 100 after oracle startups. The network is not ready at all. There is no way GPI link uses link. Link is not ready, and GPI link is a fully functioning product and has been for a year.

TLDR? Chainlink is not going to be part of SWIFT this year. We have no reason to believe they are an integral part or even remotely part of the 2019 release. This is not to say link may not be a integral component come 2021-2024 with network maturity.

[Anonymous No.15416615]

>people of colour are involved in chainlink
wtf
just sold 100k

[Anonymous No.15416618]

>>15416492
>t. didn’t know half the shit in that post.
Yes well now you do. The price is dumping because all the people who bought into the coinbase/goolge pump do not know this and bought because durr hurr google. Imagine buying in then being confronted with all the fud that has been on here for two years (that has valiantly been debunked) plus the new fud (700k, etc) and then deciding to get the fuck out because this is going to be exactly the same as every other shit coin. Except its not. Except they will never know.

Well they will, but too late then. Weak hands.

[Anonymous No.15416648]

>>15416552
Why is he sending to binance then?

[Anonymous No.15416650]

The only interoperability solution at sibos this year is Quant, who is there with Oracle.

[Anonymous No.15416652]

>>15416296
>just nulinkers posting 'tl;dr not selling', 'have sex', 'dilate' etc.
This is not new link holders. This is old link holders who have given up trying to fight the fud due to the influx of nulinkers that are believing it.
>SIBOS after hyping it up for no reason.
SIBOS has been a key point for where something may happen with link for a long time, however I do agree that nulinkers will likely expect a bit too much. I'm undecided if you are low key fud or just dumb.

[Anonymous No.15416663]

>>15415692
>Instagram followers
Maybe if I was not an ugly manlet I could have instagram followers. That's only for the genetically blessed or rich.

[Anonymous No.15416664]

>>15416652
Is Chainlink even at sibos this year?

[Anonymous No.15416698]

>>15416652
>I'm undecided if you are low key fud or just dumb.

neither. simply, i'm not one to get my hopes up for something when the information available to me says that i shouldn't, and i prepare for the worst at all times.

[Anonymous No.15416732]

>>15415428
Reminder these threads are made by Ripple Jews and he just put Swift and Chainlink in the top to distract from that.
Reminder Ripple knows its dead and a coin thats in every ATM next to Bitcoin while being 10x better than Bitcoin isnt going anywhere.
Reminder youre going to kill yourelf for missing out on this and halvening rallies happen a year afterwards.

[DetectiveAnon !!xywCWEmZbu8 No.15416796]

>>15415428
>this is it guys!!! He said we’re going to make it this month!!! He’s speaking to us in codes!
>this is it guys!! TRUFFLECON is going to be huge the Microsoft alliance is literally confirmed!!!!!
>this is it guys COME ON guys this is definitely it!!! Web3 IS WHERRe Sergey will announce he’s been working with Microsoft to roll Chainlink INTO WINDOWS 10 and with google too!!!

Don’t you get bored of crying wolf? Why would you think SWIFT is going to have any business dealings with your 2-year-old ERC coin team made up of literallywho millennials that haven’t actually produced anything? Nobody is doing business with Chainlink. This is why Chainlink needs to sell its funding token (LINK) to unaccountable NEETs like you. A business gets paid, nobody is paying Chainlink to do anything for them. Nobody is buying LINK to use because the decentralized oracles literally do not exist.

We here do not hold centralized non-PoW shitcoins, you need to take this vapourware scam back to Rebbit.

[Anonymous No.15416803]

>>15416047
baste

[Anonymous No.15416824]

>>15416552
How many have your got bro?

[Anonymous No.15416868]

"breakcrumbs" is qanon for /biz/tards

[Anonymous No.15416885]

>>15415428
they'll use mobius sir

[Anonymous No.15417097]

[Anonymous No.15417184]

>>15416796

you can count the blockchain projects with a token that have actual paying customers on one hand. coinmarketcap is an advertisement board for scams.

[Anonymous No.15417200]

>>15416796
>We here do not hold
there is no "we" when you're a tripfag, faggot

[Anonymous No.15417255]

>>15415536
>why would he dump right after Coinbase pump
>exit scam!
>why would he dump right before XYZ event knowing the price will be higher later?
There is no scenario where they could sell these dev tokens and you fudders wouldn't talk shit about the timing

[Anonymous No.15417275]

>>15415788
nah cunt. still here. just immune to your Jew tactics

[Anonymous No.15417281]

imagine still holding this piece of shit lmao how fucking retarded do you have to be

[Anonymous No.15417290]

>>15415428
>PoC

fucking sjw shit, fuck this I just sold

[DetectiveAnon !!xywCWEmZbu8 No.15417304]

>>15417200
Trips are temporary, like your stay on this board. They’re for a purpose. This one is for triggering linkie funding token bagholders like you into leaving our board.

>>15417255
>sell dev tokens

Why didn’t Chainlink get any venture capital funding for their world-changing idea? Not a single linkie has ever been able to answer that without fucking themselves. Why no VC capital, why did they have to do a scam ICO?

[Anonymous No.15417394]

I NEED HOPIUM AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.15417406]

Be ready.

$1.xx is coming.

[Anonymous No.15417488]

>>15417304
>a blockchain project doing an ICO = scam
Jesus Christ you trannies are really grasping at straws these days

[Anonymous No.15417511]

>>15417304
Here's your (You) u/DetectiveAnon, keep up the good fight!

[Anonymous No.15417515]

>>15415446
pinning your hopes on something called 'TruffleCon'
>con
>mfw

[Anonymous No.15417568]

>>15415867
You shared the slide from the swift bond poc smartcontract did for them.
>>15415881
See above retard
>>15416056
Discord trannies cannot do anything right

[Anonymous No.15417964]

Accepting The fact CL does not have any current relationship with swift will make you less depressed and irritable.
So why release mainnet with only google, specific instances, testing your shit ? We are still too early. 2dollars/link was a big fuck up for the tokenomics of Link- hence the 700k dumps. Stop overthinking it.

[Anonymous No.15418246]

>>15415428
STOP HYPING UP NOTHING

[Anonymous No.15418277]

>>15415446
This.

[Anonymous No.15418339]

>>15417964
Go on the chainlink or smart contact website and scroll down.

[DetectiveAnon !!xywCWEmZbu8 No.15418377]

>>15417488
>still cannot answer why Chainlink didn’t secure VC funding
>still trying to reply anyway

Low energy bagholderism.
Can any one linkie explain how Chainlink’s revolutionary system didn’t get $1 of venture capital funding?

[Anonymous No.15418405]

>>15418377
Why would Chainlink need VC funding?
They secured their own funding with the ICO.

Also, Swift paid them 100k just for the PoC.

[Anonymous No.15418452]

>>15418339
>psyops

[Anonymous No.15418478]

[Anonymous No.15418517]

>>15418377
BC we’re to smart for the VC pump n dumpers

[Anonymous No.15418739]

>>15418478
This.

[Anonymous No.15418793]

>>15415428
Based retards who still don't realize gpi is unrelated to link, will hype sibos like Twitter normie mongoloid and then will cry when nothing happens and the price dumps

Never change

[Anonymous No.15419067]

>>15416004
Indeed. Indeed.

[Anonymous No.15419106]

>>15415536
Could be possibly classed as insider trading i guess

[Anonymous No.15419238]

>>15416008
Banks waited for that feature for decades

[Anonymous No.15419295]

>>15418377
>Can any one linkie explain how Chainlink’s revolutionary system didn’t get $1 of venture capital funding?

Data Collective Venture Capital invested in SmartContract's seed round in 2014, 3 years before the Chainlink ICO. This only took 3 minutes to find and you should've actually attempted to do detective work before calling yourself 'detective anon'.

https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/smartcontract#section-investors

[Anonymous No.15419487]

>>15419295
based

[Anonymous No.15419495]

>>15415428
t. the boy who cried ‘moon’